+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

YouTube thought this purring cat video was a copyright violation

Feb 12, 2015, 15:45 IST

YouTube has claimed a calming cat video was a copyright infringement, TorrentFreak reports. The footage in question is an hour-long video of a cat called Phantom purring softly. YouTube said that the footage was flagged up by its Content ID system, which scans uploads against a database of files submitted by content owners.

Advertisement

YouTube issued something called a "Content ID claim" against the cat footage. The video was uploaded by YouTube user Digihaven last year. Although it has only amassed around 2,594 views - very low in cat video terms. But TorrentFreak reported on Thursday that EMI Publishing and PRS claimed to own the rights to a 12-second loop of Phantom purring.

YouTube's automated take-down tool, which is said to have now paid out more than $1 billion to rights holders, detected the alleged copyright infringement and informed Digihaven that his video was now pirate purring.

YouTube told Digihaven that part of the Phantom cat film is now featured in a musical composition called "Focus," which is copyrighted by EMI and PRS.

But TorrentFreak writes that the claim is false and is a YouTube error. As it stands now, the video hasn't been fully removed, but Digihaven has been unable to earn money through the footage as a result. The user told the site that he's sure "EMI/PRS made Phantom a sad kitty" and added that it seems that the companies involved are "pirating ads on people's legit videos."

Advertisement

Digihaven filed a dispute with YouTube. It proved successful and EMI lifted its claim soon. However, he still wants to flag up the ongoing issue of YouTube's automated copyright detection - which has proved problematic before.

Way back in 2008, soon after the content identification system was first installed, media execs told CNET that it wasn't working out. YouTube at the time said it had seen "terrific results" early on. Yet, seven years later, people are still finding their videos flagged up, seemingly in error.

NOW WATCH: A 13-Year-Old Made A Revolutionary Invention Out Of Legos And Now Intel Is Investing In His Company

Please enable Javascript to watch this video
You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article