+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Wolf Blitzer grills ex-State Department spokeswoman: 'Is it ever justified to lie to the American people?'

Jun 4, 2016, 01:52 IST

Screenshot/YouTube

CNN's Wolf Blitzer grilled White House Communications Director Jen Psaki over reports that footage of a press briefing about the Iran deal was intentionally deleted by someone at the State Department in 2014.

Advertisement

The deleted footage - an eight-minute exchange between Psaki, then the State Department's spokeswoman, and Fox reporter James Rosen - was potentially embarrassing for the State Department.

Psaki had essentially admitted to Rosen that nuclear talks with Iran had taken place as early as 2011, two years before the Obama administration publicly acknowledged that the talks were ongoing.

Psaki's predecessor, Victoria Nuland, had told Rosen months earlier that nuclear negotiations did not begin until 2013. Blitzer called that a "flat-out lie."

"It's one thing to be discreet and not release all the information if it's classified ... but it's another thing to flat-out lie to the news media and to the public, which is what your predecessor [Nuland] did in 2013 when she was asked whether secret bilateral negotiations were going on and she said no," Blitzer told Psaki. "That was a lie, right?"

Advertisement

Psaki responded that Blitzer would have to ask Nuland about that.

"I was supportive of and involved with the press," Psaki said, noting that she "talked through every aspect of the back-channel [negotiations] at the State Department briefings" throughout 2013.

"There's a long history, for decades, of not being able to provide information when it's at a sensitive time when it could have an impact," Psaki said. "And that certainly was the case earlier that year" of 2013.

State Department Jen Psaki.YouTube

Blitzer said Psaki's response to Rosen at the 2013 press conference - when he asked if it was "the State Department's policy to lie to keep negotiations secret" - made it seem like Psaki was defending "that earlier lie" from Nuland.

Advertisement

Psaki's response to Rosen at the time was that "there are times where diplomacy needs privacy in order to progress." Her response was later edited out of the final video at the request of someone within the State Department, current State Department spokesman John Kirby admitted on Wednesday.

Psaki said again that she did not know what information Nuland had in early 2013 about the timeline of the negotiations.

"I do believe that there are times when negotiations and important diplomatic discussions require not briefing the public on what's happening," Psaki repeated. "Not because we don't want to have that conversation with you, Wolf, but because it then becomes a public debate instead of a private negotiation, and that is often what is needed to make progress."

Blitzer wasn't having it.

"It's one thing not to release sensitive information," Blitzer said. "It's another thing to lie to the media and the public. Is it ever justified for a US government spokesperson to lie to the American people?"

Advertisement

"A fundamental value I've always followed is not to," Psaki said.

NOW WATCH: Here's the $5.3 million mansion the Obamas will reportedly live in after the White House

Please enable Javascript to watch this video
You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article