+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Why one of the wealthiest airlines in the world refuses to invest its money in other airlines

May 15, 2018, 23:17 IST

REUTERS/Fabian Bimmer

Advertisement
  • Emirates has refrained from making equity investments in other airlines in recent years.
  • Emirates Airline president Sir Tim Clark explains that the time and money required to make the investment work isn't worth the returns.
  • Clark also believes it may take focus and attention of the management team away from Emirates.

With fuel prices down and demand for air travel up, major airlines have gone on a binge of equity investments.

Delta holds significant stakes in Air France/KLM, Virgin Atlantic, China Eastern, AeroMexico, and Gol. American spent $200 million on a piece of China Southern while United spent $100 million on equity in Brazil's Azul.

Etihad purchased large chunks of Alitalia, Air Serbia, Jet Airways, Virgin Australia, and Air Seychelles. Qatar Airways hold major stakes in LATAM, Cathay Pacific, and IAG, the parent company of British Airways.

Emirates is one of the most well funded and profitable airlines in the world. Over the last fiscal year, the Dubai, United Arab Emirates-based carrier reported a profit of $762 million, up 124% over the previous period.

Advertisement

And yet, it has decided to stay on the sidelines as its rivals from Europe and North America buy up stakes in airlines around the world.

REUTERS/Satish Kumar

According to Emirates Airline president Sir Tim Clark, the strain these mergers and acquisitions can put on a company along with their relatively low success rate has been a turn-off.

"We are an organic animal and we're very focused on what we do, how we do it, and where we do it. We're focused on results," Clark said in an interview with Business Insider earlier this year. "It's a small, lean management team that run this business and the notion that we'll be sidetracked by M&A activity, taking on or getting involved with another carrier would be not without its difficulties."

Clark pointed to its neighbors in Abu Dhabi as an example of the perils that are associated with such a business strategy.

Last July, Etihad reported that it had lost $1.87 billion from 2016-2017. About $808 million of that loss was due to its investment in Alitalia, which is in administration, and Air Berlin, which has been liquidated.

Advertisement

AP

According to Clark, Emirates has been approached by "hundreds" to get involved in their airlines. Whether that be by their owners, the governments that own them, or their parent companies.

But Clark has turned them all down apart from one. And the lessons learned from Emirates' only foray into equity ownership would go on to inform its decision making for years to come.

In 1998, Emirates spent $70 million to acquire 43.6% of Sri Lankan Airlines, a money-losing government-owned carrier. Clark was tasked with transforming the airline's business and products.

To do so, Emirates stipulated that it must have total control of the airline in spite of local laws limited foreign equity ownership. Local politics proved to be difficult to navigate and hampered the turnaround.

"I was down there between six and eight times a year," he told us. "Sri Lankan politics was volatile. There was a war going on and we had a lot of problems to deal with."

Advertisement

By the time the partnership ended in 2008, Emirates had managed to turn Sri Lankan around through great difficulty.

Flickr/Amila Tennakoon

The experience left a lasting impression on Emirates and its president. In short, he doesn't think it's worth it.

"What it taught us, in the end, was that the management time being soaked up in the M&A activity and the subsequent on-going management of these airlines to protect your investment was disproportionate to the return," Clark said.

Sir Tim went on to explain that Emirates has grown organically to a scale where equity acquisition would no longer make strategic sense for the airline.

NOW WATCH: A Nobel Prize-winning economist explains what Milton Friedman got wrong

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article