Why following this professional 'rule' is getting in the way of workplace happiness
You're a professional, the thinking goes - don't do anything to jeopardize that. Especially if you're female.
The fear makes sense: women - particularly women of child-bearing age - are still up against assumptions that they'll ultimately choose their families over their careers. "We'd love to offer her this opportunity, but she probably wants to spend time with her kids, so..." And why offer her a promotion, when she'll probably have a baby and leave?
The tides may be turning - the execution of family-oriented policies may need significant work, but the rise of family-oriented perks, more reasonable parental leave policies, and increasing recognition of the benefits of flexible work schedules, suggest that at least there's an interest in changing things.
But things haven't necessarily changed yet, and they haven't necessarily changed everywhere, and accordingly, it's hardly unreasonable to assume that the best way to keep up professional appearances is to separate work and family as much as possible. If you're going to have the audacity to have family obligations, you can at least have the courtesy to pretend you don't.
That impulse is understandable. But Salli Setta, president of Red Lobster, says it's not benefiting anybody - and it's up to corporate leaders to change it.
To her, there's nothing taboo about discussing family at work.
Employees shouldn't have to hide their non-work relationships, and by maintaining the illusion that people don't have lives and priorities outside the office, we're reinforcing a system that's already broken.
That means that in the office, women - and particularly (though not exclusively) mothers - end up in the awkward position of having their colleagues make assumptions about their priorities. Those assumptions can be well-intentioned, but research has repeatedly shown they hurt women's career prospects.
Those same assumptions are not made of working dads, though. A 2014 study by Citi and LinkedIn reported that 78% of women had never heard of a "successful man talk about the importance of striking a balance between work and family life."
It's not that men don't have partners and children; it's that they're not talking about them. Or more accurately, they're not talking about them in mixed company. Too often, the challenges of navigating work and life are branded a "women's issue," but the same survey suggested that finding "the right balance between work and family life" is a top priority for both men and women.
"If I talk about my children," Setta observes, "other people will talk about their children. I've had men who would never talk about their kids, and when I start talking about mine, they start talking about theirs."
"It allows men to feel a little bit freer," she continues. "It allows them to think, well, maybe I will coach that little league team I wasn't going to coach."
The more that men talk about their extracurricular identities, the more that "work/life" stops being a female problem.
Already, men are slipping out of work to attend to the rest of their lives. According to a recent study from Boston University, they're just better at hiding it - at least in part, presumably, because they have bias on their side. The default expectation isn't that the guy in the well-tailored suit hasn't responded to your VRY IMPT email because he's secretly sitting at his kid's middle school production of "The Music Man."
Slate's Amanda Marcotte has pointed out that family-friendly policies too often end up punishing people who don't have kids. You don't have to go home and feed your six-year-old; why don't you stay late? What's it to you?
"That's not fair, that's people making an assumption," Setta agrees.
Part of getting it is peeling away those assumptions - and the one of the easiest ways to do that is to be open about the reality.
Talking about your kid or your girlfriend or your pottery class is probably not going to close the wage-gap, shatter the glass ceiling, and resolve gender inequality in the American office. Nor is it a particularly safe move for people who aren't yet at the top - as is so often the case, challenging norms is easier when you have power than when you don't.
Obviously, there's a time and a place for everything, and everyone is entitled to boundaries - both in what they choose to reveal, and in what they're required to listen to. But for the cost (nothing), the potential for payoff is huge, and it's up to leaders to nudge progress forward, one casual mention at a time.