+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Why Dallas Won't Kill The Dog Of The Texas Nurse With Ebola

Oct 13, 2014, 23:08 IST

Advertisement

Dallas officials have decided against killing the dog belonging to the nurse diagnosed with Ebola this weekend.

Excalibur, the dog of the Spanish nurse hospitalized with Ebola last week, was euthanized over fears that it could transmit the virus to people or other animals. But this dog will be spared.

There's a tiny snag, however: Neither animal was tested for the virus - we don't have a test for Ebola in dogs.

Excalibur's death was terrible news for the owner and dog lovers worldwide, many of whom took to Twitter or signed an online petition protesting Spain's decision to put down the animal. Yet the science suggests his life was not taken for no reason: There is very limited evidence, but there does seem to be some risk that dogs could become infected with Ebola and transmit the virus to humans. "Human infection could occur through licking, biting, or grooming," a 2005 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states.

Advertisement

So why was this dog spared? Unlike in Spain, where the Madrid Department of Health issued an executive order to euthanize Excalibur, in the US, all it took was a statement from Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings to spare the animal. The Dallas pet is instead being sent to a new location to await the recovery of its owner.

"The dog's very important to the patient and we want it to be safe," Rawlings told USA Today.

The dog will be "monitored," said David Lakey, the commissioner of the Texas Department of State Health Services on Monday. But he did not provide additional details about what that monitoring would entail.

Without a test to ensure the dog isn't carrying the virus, its safety will be difficult to determine. We don't really know how to monitor its symptoms - would a dog with Ebola even develop symptoms we recognize, like a fever? - or ask if it is sick.

If we quarantine the dog, we still wouldn't know how long to keep it under watch. Scientists know, for example, that the virus can develop in a human without showing any symptoms for 21 days. But they have no idea how long it could incubate inside a dog.

Advertisement

After reporting a fever on Friday night, the Dallas nurse with Ebola drove herself to the emergency room of Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital where she worked. But before she came to the ER, the nurse missed two days of work, The New York Times reports. During this time, the nurse could have been home with her pet.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article