Whole Foods just offended its most important customers
The company has said the stores will be specifically designed to appeal to millennials with "modern, streamlined design, innovative technology, and a curated selection" of organic and natural foods.
There's two major problems with that approach.
Targeting the stores toward millennials blatantly ignores shoppers over the age of 35, and also suggests that Whole Foods' current stores are in need of major upgrades, writes Robyn Bolton in the Harvard Business Review.
That's probably not what Whole Foods intended to communicate with the launch of its new, yet-unnamed chain of stores.
"But it was what I, and many of my Gen X and Baby Boomer friends and colleagues, heard," Bolton writes.
The company says the new stores will give Whole Foods access to "broader markets and communities, perhaps that we couldn't serve with our flagship brand." This likely means the new stores will be located in lower-income neighborhoods.
But Bolton also questions how Whole Foods can set this new chain apart from all the other grocery companies already succeeding in the low-cost grocery market.
Trader Joe's, Aldi, Target, and Wal-Mart are among Whole Foods' biggest competitors in the space. Online grocery services, such as AmazonFresh and Good Eggs, will also continue to put pressure on Whole Foods.
Organic food sales in the U.S. more than tripled from $11 billion in 2004 to an estimated $35 billion in 2014.
"Consumers are already visiting an average of 2.5 stores or online venues to solve their many grocery jobs, eschewing the supermarket's traditional goal of being the one-stop shop," Bolton writes. "Until it resolves the question of differentiation, the company will likely be forced to answer a far more awkward question, eloquently posed by one millennial: 'Why don't they just call the new chain Trader Joe's?'