Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.
But H&M is struggling, seeing operating profit drop a whopping 62% in the first quarter of 2018. In June, it reported flat sales growth for the second straight quarter.
During recent visits, we found that both stores seemed to have similar issues, from varying quality to unfashionable clothes, but one store had a clear advantage over the other.
Old Navy and H&M have become go-to stores for inexpensive basics like t-shirts and sundresses.
H&M, a competitor of Old Navy, has had its fair share of struggles lately. In the first quarter of 2018, operating profit at H&M decreased 62%. In June, it reported flat sales growth for the second straight quarter. Business Insider's Mary Hanbury reported that analysts believe H&M has a brand issue because it's not the cheapest store, and its clothes are not the best quality nor the most fashionable.
When we visited both Old Navy and H&M, we found this statement to hold true for both stores - while both had a lot of great deals, they both still had a few overpriced outliers. The quality varied from product to product, and the styles were hit or miss.
Advertisement
However, we found that one store was a much nicer environment to shop in and had a bigger selection of everything from clothes to accessories. See what it was like shopping at each:
First I went to H&M in New York City's Financial District.
The fluorescent lights and huge windows created a bright and airy atmosphere to shop in. Sundresses, blazers, and t-shirts were displayed in the front of the store.
This was one of the nicest H&M stores I've visited. Almost everything was spotlessly clean and nicely displayed, and most products cost less than $50.
Some products were insanely cheap, like these $6 tops. That being said, the quality varied from one product to another. Even though some of the products were very high-quality, others felt like they were ready to fall apart.
Sale racks were scattered around the store, with items ranging from $7 to $25 or more. Though this sale sign read $7, there were only a few items on the sales rack at that price point.
Even though the store was in better shape than many other H&M locations, it was still pretty disorganized. Parts of the store seemed to be organized by color, but the actual products were pretty random.
Jeans, hoodies, and floral dresses were next to each other. It would be hard to shop for a specific product, like jeans, considering they were spread out all over the store.
Although there were pairs of jeans spread out across the two floors, were was also a designated denim section in the back of the top floor. The prices were generally below $20.
A huge part of the store was dedicated to accessories, with purses, hats, jewelry, and other small products on display in the areas surrounding the register.
The jewelry was simple and inexpensive.
I found that the styles were pretty hit or miss, but the store was generally very trendy.
There was a designated men's section on the second level ...
... but a lot of the clothing on display was wrinkled or stretched out.
The store, overall, had a lot of trendy clothes at low prices, but the quality varied, and it was confusing to navigate. Even though it was maze-like, it was a bright and generally upbeat place to shop.
The second store I visited was Old Navy in the Flatiron District.
In the doorway was a big red "clearance" sign advertising up to 75% off.
The marquee hanging in the entryway advertised free shipping on products if you can't find the size you need in-store. Similar advertisements were posted around the store. Denim was stacked up at the front and had its own designated section. I noticed right away how much darker the store was than H&M.
Massive sale signs were all over the place. The styles in the front of the store were okay, but definitely not as trendy as H&M. Plus, a lot of the clothes on display were wrinkled and messy.
The prices in the store were similar to H&M, with most products costing under $50.
Most of the clothes that Old Navy sold were simple sundresses, t-shirts, and jeans. There wasn't a ton of a variety in the styles, so it got repetitive going through the store.
Even though the store didn't have anything that was really trendy or unique, it had a lot of inexpensive basics that were pretty high-quality. Like at H&M, the quality varied.
Old Navy had an entire wall of $2 flop flops for the summer ...
... but didn't have nearly as many accessories as H&M. There were a few shelves of inexpensive jewelry, a handful of scarves ...
... and an e.l.f makeup display. While everything was inexpensive, there just wasn't a lot to choose from.
Upstairs there was a children's shop, and downstairs was the men's section. The men's section was a lot bigger and more well-kept than the one at H&M, and a lot of the styles were similar. It was very dark downstairs.
There was also a massive clearance section that took up a quarter of the floor, on top of all the sales upstairs. It wasn't organized in any way.
Even though the register was on the ground floor, you could check out anywhere in the store, so there weren't any lines anywhere.
The prices and quality were about the same at H&M and Old Navy, but H&M had a much bigger selection in terms of the styles it offered, and the clothes were generally more trendy. H&M also won in terms of atmosphere, creating a much brighter and more upbeat store.
