+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Warriors president Rick Welts says cities should help pay for sports arenas

Mar 29, 2019, 22:34 IST

Advertisement
Jeff Chiu/AP

  • Golden State Warriors president Rick Welts says he believes cities should help pay for sports arenas.
  • The Warriors self-financed the $1.4 billion Chase Center, their new arena in San Francisco because San Francisco does not allocate public money for sports buildings.
  • The debate over whether sports arenas should receive public funding has been a heated one for years, but Welts called arenas "amazing culture institutions" that he believes improve the quality of life in cities.

After the Golden State Warriors self-financed the $1.4 billion Chase Center, their new home in San Francisco starting next season, team president Rick Welts says he believes sports arenas should receive public funding.

"Personal opinion: I actually think these are amazing cultural institutions that allow the city to have a better quality of life and a certainly more varied cultural offering by having this," Welts told Business Insider.

"I think there's every justification for cities investing or states or counties or whatever entity investing in these facilities because I think they actually enhance the quality of life."

San Francisco does not allow sports teams to use public money to fund arenas, according to Welts. He said the Warriors were aware of this before their move.

Advertisement

Read more: Take a look at the Warriors' new $1.4 billion San Francisco arena - what's said to be the nicest arena in sports

The debate over public funding for sports arenas and stadiums has been a heated one for years. Supporters often argue that pro sports teams and arenas can be good for cities, creating jobs, encouraging spending from locals and tourists alike, and creating an intangible sense of community. 

Opponents argue that the economic benefits are over-stated - the jobs created are part-time, seasonal, and low-paying. Previous studies found that arenas didn't really add much to local economies.

Could that change with more teams building arenas in city centers? The Milwaukee Bucks built their new, $500 million arena Fiserv Forum - which received $250 million in public funds - in downtown Milwaukee, with their president Peter Feigin saying it became a "catalyst" in reviving the area.

Chase Center is situated in the neighborhood of Mission Bay, an industrial, growing area. Welts said he believes arenas belong in urban centers and can increase the quality of life in those places.

Advertisement

"These are meant to be urban things," Welts said of arenas. "That's where they add most to the quality of life to the city. I think the most successful ones are located in really dense urban areas. We love that ... I think they're part of the fabric of a city."

via Chase Center

Like Fiserv Forum, Chase Center features an outdoor complex with retail stores and restaurants and a public park the Warriors hope will attract visitors year-round, not just for games.

Opponents of using public money to fund arenas also point to the rising value of sports franchises. Forbes found the average NBA franchise to be worth $1.9 billion, up 13% from last year, and three times as valuable as they were five years ago.

Despite this, Welts said it would be unwise for other teams to self-finance their arenas, arguing the Warriors had a confluence of events that made it possible.

Advertisement

"We really have such a unique intersection of circumstances on this project that you could never, as a business planner, with a straight face, replicate," Welts said.

Eric Risberg/AP

Welts said between the Warriors competing for championships and the booming tech economy and wealth in the Bay Area, the Warriors were able to afford a $1.4 billion project, knowing the cost was worth it, and they could make the money back.

"We have like a perfect storm. We have this roaring economy, we have the companies that are changing the world are part of our backyard, we have a championship-caliber team, and we have a great city, great global city that never in its history has had one of these [arenas].

"So, I wouldn't recommend anybody else trying to recreate that formula because I think it'd be impossible."

Read moreWarriors President Rick Welts explains why their new $1.4 billion self-financed stadium was a one-of-a-kind situation other teams can't replicate

Advertisement

Several other teams are eyeing new stadiums or stadium renovations. The Phoenix Suns are renovating their stadium - after team owner Robert Sarver threatened to move the team - with a reported $150 million in public funds.

The Los Angeles Clippers, who currently share Staples Center with the Los Angeles Lakers, are looking to move into a new arena with 2024 as a target date. It's unclear how it will be funded.

NOW WATCH: Meet the stylist who turned LeBron James into a fashion icon

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article