scorecard
  1. Home
  2. tech
  3. Walmart Is At War Against Apple Over The New iPhone Payments System - And Apple Is Losing

Walmart Is At War Against Apple Over The New iPhone Payments System - And Apple Is Losing

Jim Edwards   

Walmart Is At War Against Apple Over The New iPhone Payments System - And Apple Is Losing
Tech2 min read

walmart ferguson police

REUTERS/Jim Young

Do not mess with Walmart.

American retailers appear to have gone to war against Apple's new mobile payments system, Apple Pay, and Apple is losing.

Walmart, Best Buy, Rite Aid and CVS have all said they want nothing to do with the system (or Google Wallet, for that matter). The latter pair tried it and then disabled it over the weekend.

Apple is hanging on to a tiny gaggle of corporate partners. As described by the Verge, it sounds bleak:

A quick look at Apple's website explaining the service highlights just 34 retail partners that support the system. Eight of those are different flavors of Foot Locker. One is Apple itself.

So that's basically just 25 companies, not including Apple.

It's an early battle, so it is premature to say who will win in the long run. Apple appears to have created an ingenious and obviously superior mobile payments system. But retailers control their own checkouts - they get to say who pays with what, not Apple. And Walmart, the world's largest retailer, is backing the retailers' system via a company they're partnering with called MCX.

The retailers don't want Apple to monopolize a system that will produce a lot of valuable customer data. Their system, "CurrentC," will let them keep that data.

Apple Pay is an elegant, universal, simple-to-use system that can be used by any retailer. You just touch your finger on the iPhone Touch ID fingerprint scanner, wave your phone near the NFC checkout device at the store, and approve the payment.

CurrentC, by contrast, is kinda clunky, the early reviews say. Here's John Gruber, the respected tech writer:

What Apple gets and what no one else in the industry does is that using your mobile device for payments will only work if it's far easier and better than using a credit card. With CurrentC, you'll have to unlock your phone, launch their app, point your camera at a QR code, and wait. With Apple Pay, you just take out your phone and put your thumb on the Touch ID sensor.

tim cook apple pay

REUTERS/Robert Galbraith

"No card information shared with merchant": Which pretty much explains why merchants don't want it.

Apple's system works with any credit card you want to punch into the system. Apple Pay basically partners with, and sits on top of, the existing credit card system and makes credit cards super-easy to use by funneling payments securely through your phone. It shields data from retailers, too - which is why Walmart et al. don't like it.

The retailers' CurrentC system does something similar, but without the fingerprint and without the one-step approval. You have to scan things and punch in codes to make the payment. The advantage of CurrentC is that it automatically applies discounts and coupons to your purchase, so consumers are heavily incentivized to use it. It also funnels a ton of data to retailers. And they have about 60 companies on board.

So in the long run, the fight will be between Apple's system, which is simple and works universally like any credit card, and Walmart's system, which is complicated and only works when a store agrees to adopt it.

That's why, even though it looks like the Apple Pay launch is in tatters, you shouldn't assume that Apple has lost the war.

READ MORE ARTICLES ON


Advertisement

Advertisement