Wall Street Will Not Be Kind To Brazil Tomorrow

The election results aren't official yet, but President Rousseff has nearly 51% of the vote with 95% of all ballots counted.

Despite allegations of corruption at the highest levels of her administration - especially regarding the massive state oil firm Petrobras - after a close campaign against center-right candidate Aecio Neves, the incumbent will have another four years to right Brazil's ship.

It will not be easy, and Wall Street knows that. As a result the markets may punish Brazil's markets in the morning.

Over the last four years the country has taken a turn for the worse. Low commodity prices have hurt Brazilian exports, and so has a Chinese slow down. Inflation is high, and corporate profits are thin.

Either way, however, says Societe Generale analyst Dev Ashish, monetary policy and foreign investments have their limits. They're far less powerful tools without increased domestic output and demand.

He wrote: "...the success of monetary policy depends on finding some alternative domestic source sof growth in the absence of greater demand (and prices) for commodities and other Brazilian exports. A lot will depend on how quickly the new government can work to restore investors' confidence after the 26 October election, which would help not only growth but also to resolve the currency and inflation issues."

That is why some on the Street have been skeptical that a Neves victory would make a huge difference either way.

Last Monday, short-seller Jim Chanos of Kynikos Investments gave a presentation on Petrobras, Brazil's quasi-state oil firm, at the Robin Hood Investor conference. His dark thesis on the health of the massive company, sent the stock, Brazil's ETF, and the country's market falling.

He said he gave the presentation to warn investors not to buy into what Cantor Fitzgerald once called the Brazil "farce."

"... I thought it was timely this week that if that's what happens and if investors knee jerk run into the Bovespa and buy Petrobras because Neves wins, I think it's a great entry point on the short side in this story because it doesn't change the economies of the situation," Chanos told Bloomberg TV.

Rousseff's win changes the economics even less.

Note: An earlier version of this article prematurely said Rousseff had won the election