REUTERS/ITAR-TASS
"We're not even in the same league as Russia right now," Newsweek quotes Coast Guard Commandant Paul F. Zukunft as saying. "We're not playing in this game at all."
One of the main measures of Arctic capability are icebreakers. While not a direct military tool, these vessels play a mutli-faceted role in any nation's Arctic strategy. The vessels allow a range of other merchant, survey, and military vessels to ply through the Arctic ice safely and in a year round manner.
Currently, the US only has two diesel icebreakers.
In comparison, Russia has six nuclear-powered icebreakers already in service. The Russian also have at least a dozen other diesel icebreakers in service. In 2017, Moscow is expecting the delivery of another new nuclear powered vessel.
Of the US' two icebreakers, only one, the Polar Star, is in functional condition, according to NPR. It's sister vessel, the Polar Sea, has been languishing at port for years following a major breakdown.
US Coast Guard
This forces the US to rely upon a single icebreaker in the Arctic as the region takes on unprecedented levels of economic and geopolitical significance.
Business Insider Australia
Without the needed investment, the US will likely stay leagues behind Russia as the Arctic becomes a pivotal geopolitical region.
In addition the disparity in icebreaker strength, Moscow has undertaken a construction blitz across the Arctic to establish military superiority in the region. Russia is constructing ten Arctic search-and-rescue stations, 16 deepwater ports, 13 airfields, and ten air-defense radar stations across its Arctic coast.
Simultaneously, Moscow has created Joint Strategic Command North (JSCN) from components of the Northern Fleet in order to maintain a permanent military presence in the region. It is likely that this command will become a fifth Russian military district.