Uber generated almost $500 million from 'safe rides' fees
The number only comes to light after Bloomberg's Joel Rosenblatt spotted the figure in an improperly redacted court filing.
Uber declined to comment.
The ride-hailing company had been sued in December 2014 over the so-called "safe rides" fee after customers claimed it mislead them about their safety. The $1 per ride fee, originally introduced in April 2014, was a way for Uber to recoup the costs of running its background checks and providing 24/7 support to its riders.
Last fall, Uber updated its safe rides fee to as high as $2.50 per ride in some places.
However, plaintiffs in two separate lawsuits argued that the company misled its customers about its safety practices in its consumer advertising when it said it was "safer than a taxi" or had "industry-leading" background checks.
No fingerprints
Uber does perform background checks for all of its drivers, but it does not fingerprint its drivers like other transportation services, including some taxi companies. While the company initially described its background checks as "industry-leading," it's since backed away from that language and endeavors to be more precise as part of the proposal.
In February, Uber agreed to pay $28.5 million to 25 million riders to settle the class-action case surrounding its safety practices advertisements. After expected lawyer's fees, the settlement would have left riders with a whopping 82 cents each.
However, a San Francisco judge ruled Wednesday that the settlement was not enough, given that Uber generated close to half a billion dollars in revenue from the fees - a number no one is supposed to know.
"Under these circumstances, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have not adequately explained why a gross settlement fund amount of $28.5 million is fair, adequate, and reasonable compared to what class members paid Uber for safety," US District Judge Jon Tigar wrote in the court order.
This is the second time in two weeks that a court has squashed Uber's attempts to settle its outstanding court cases. The company's proposed $100 million settlement with drivers was rejected on August 18, citing the tipping policy as one change not nearly as valuable as the settlement had suggested.