Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Christina Farr, who invests in healthcare tech startups, has ditched most of her Zoom meetings.</li><li>Farr, 36, said she's "happier" and "healthier" after switching 90% of her meetings to the phone.</li></ul>If anyone is ready to kick <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/inside-the-never-ending-zoom-thats-like-a-virtual-office-2021-11">Zoom</a> to the curb, it's Christina Farr.The 36-year-old healthcare tech investor said <a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/chrissyfarr/status/1786376488490561913">on X,</a> formerly Twitter, earlier this month that 90 percent of her meetings are phone calls, while 10 percent are <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/largest-zoom-conversation-database-science-interact-video-chat-2023-4">on Zoom</a>."I'm healthier, happier, and the benefits derived from taking meetings on a walk far outpace my enjoyment of seeing someone's face over a screen," wrote Farr, who also writes a Substack newsletter on healthcare technology called <a target="_blank" href="https://secondopinionmedia.substack.com/">"Second Opinion"</a> for 20,000 subscribers.Other desk workers have moved away from video calls, a decision that is also backed up by recent research on Zoom fatigue.<h2 id="50402997-50bd-411c-b9f8-f029735545ce">Switching video meetings to phone calls</h2>Speaking to Business Insider — over the phone, of course — Farr said the choice to switch to mostly phone meetings with her network of startup founders, investors, and operators happened after she developed <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/guides/health/treatments/lower-right-back-pain">sciatica</a>, or nerve pain, while working remotely for a venture-capital fund in 2021."Suddenly, I was six months pregnant, sitting at home during a pandemic, and on these back-to-back Zoom calls," said Farr, who now mostly works a hybrid schedule. "I was just sitting all the time."She said her condition "got so bad" that she struggled to move toward the end of her pregnancy. Though sciatica can have various causes, Farr said she firmly suspects the hours on Zoom sans physical activity was one of the main culprits.Farr started moving her video meetings to phone calls so that she could take walks during them. She recalled some people she asked to switch formats reacted with surprise, "You feel like you're that annoying person that's like, 'Hey, do you actually mind if we don't do video?'"<div type="image" title="Christina Farr spoke to Business Insider the same way she does 90 percent of her meetings —&#xa0;over the phone." height="2316" width="3088" msid="110184133" hostid="261" sizebytes="819486"></div>But the more she asked, the more Farr — who said she has up to seven hours of meetings each weekday — realized how many other people also hated Zoom."People almost want to talk to me because it's the one break in the day when they don't have to be sitting," she said. "I have been getting responses like, 'Oh my God, thank you so much. I really don't want to do that either.'"Farr knows phone calls don't work for every type of meeting, especially when visuals are crucial — like when a slide deck is being presented. However, she said, it's usually a viable option.<h2 id="036bc226-ea2d-4caa-b816-76a0ddde88f7">There's a perception that being off camera is rude</h2>Alyssa Jaffee, a friend of Farr's who is also a healthcare-tech investor, also prefers to use the phone for most of her meetings — which can take up to 10 hours during her workday, depending on the day.Jaffee, a partner at Chicago-based VC fund 7wireVentures, believes the pandemic propped up the idea that it's "rude" to be off-camera because "you're not present if you're not on video.""There is a challenge around the perception that is hard to break free from," Jaffee, 37, said.But she said it's a false narrative."When I am on audio only, I am often moving, I'm often walking in my neighborhood, I'm walking on the treadmill in my basement, and I'm only focused on the conversation I'm doing now," she said, adding that being on the phone mitigates the chance of being distracted by incoming notifications, emails, or other browser tabs. "There's no universe that just sitting in front of a screen looking at your own face is better for you."Jaffee also said that some meetings that people think need to be on video because they involve presentations could actually be conducted audio-only."We did this long before Zoom existed for pitch calls," she said. "People used to be good storytellers."<h2 id="dd767928-2e14-40f4-b7b3-bbcb0ef07387">Zoom haters have research to justify their stance</h2>Farr's and Jaffee's criticisms of video conference calls are backed up by a recent academic journal article by Stanford professor Jeremy Bailensonon why <a target="_blank" href="https://tmb.apaopen.org/pub/nonverbal-overload/release/2">people typically find video meetings exhausting</a>.Bailenson's report, which expands on his <a target="_blank" href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-zoom-meetings-can-exhaust-us-11585953336">Wall Street Journal opinion piece</a> from 2020, argues that the primary cause of "Zoom fatigue" is "nonverbal overload," because people work harder to communicate with body language.In his newer report, Bailenson said the overload may be caused by aspects of video calls including unnatural and "intense" prolonged eye contact, constantly being able to see yourself, reduced mobility, and unconsciously having to work harder to execute "nonverbal communication."Bailenson concluded the report with a simple suggestion: "Make 'audio only' Zoom meetings the default, or better yet, insist on taking some calls via telephone."For Zoom haters like Farr, reports like Bailenson's are vindicating."I don't want to see my face. I don't particularly need to see anyone else's face," Farr said. "I certainly don't want to see your face at the expense of my own health and well-being."

A millennial investor feels happier and healthier after taking most of her meetings off Zoom

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Eric Zhu raised $1 million for Aviato from his high school bathroom aged 15 for his startup Aviato.</li><li>Aviato is a data analysis platform for private markets and has raised $2.3 million to date.</li></ul>This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Eric Zhu, now 17 years old. He cofounded the startup Aviato and raised $1 million while still at high school aged 15. The following has been edited for length and clarity. Business Insider has verified his identity and the funds raised.I started raising money from my high school bathroom for a startup I cofounded at the age of 14 called <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.aviato.co/">Aviato</a>, a data analysis platform for private markets, and launched an investment fund.My journey as an entrepreneur started during the pandemic after I joined a community on <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/discord-ceo-blames-tech-layoffs-company-growth-2024-1">Discord</a> called "Gen Z Mafia." I was lucky to meet some really smart people at the right time and thought "How can I be like them?" I started networking and worked with a few startups in 2021 to help build landing pages for their websites.I then joined Stanford's Online High School community and met some impressive people. At the age of 14, I cofounded a nonprofit that taught kids to code for free, and I also learned to code myself in the process.In 2021, I started raising money from my high school bathroom in Carmel, Indiana for a startup I cofounded called Aviato, and I also launched an investment fund called Bachmanity Capital.Aviato is like a Bloomberg terminal for private markets, and we provide insights such as the name of a top engineer at an organization, and how many shares an employee has.<h2 id="cb350857-f68e-449b-a548-354509c1aaa2">Bathroom meetings </h2>When it came to raising money, I didn't know many people in San Francisco. But I realized that the investors I saw on X had usernames that correlated to their <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/wednesday-most-popular-day-work-meetings-avoid-overload-2023-12">Calendly</a> links, a platform that helps schedule meetings. So I wrote a scraper tool that would pull their usernames and find their Calendly link, and I'd use that to book meetings with many different people.I would attend those cold Zoom meetings from my high school bathroom and pitch to investors. I even bought a green screen and ring light for serious meetings. A lot of people were like "fuck you," but some ended up working out.I got my first check of $50,000 from <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/tom-preston-werner-resigns-from-github-after-harassment-accusations-2014-4">Tom Preston-Werner</a>, a <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/github-the-full-inside-story-2016-2">cofounder of GitHub</a>. When I got that check, I was like, "holy shit, they're actually giving me money." I would buy hall passes from other students to get out of class. At one point, I was spending about five hours a day in the bathroom taking meetings. But I ended up getting banned from going to the bathroom without an escort.<h2 id="1e0cfca8-7219-4790-bde4-26aa33236bca">Trial and error</h2>But it was worth it, as I raised $1 million in 2022. We've raised a total of $2.3 million and we're about to launch Aviato. Now, we're a team of nine people.I learned to navigate meetings with potential investors through trial and error. The first few calls were absolutely horrible, but they improved over time. I figured a lot of it out along the way.My age could be seen as both a negative and a positive factor. Some of the negative feedback was that I was still in school and not working on the startup full-time, so I'd often get asked why they should bet on me.On the flip side, my willingness to take a risk and hold meetings in my high school bathroom showed that I'm willing to go out of my way to build a company, so I think that was a big factor in winning over some investors.<h2 id="7dfd71f5-ad6d-488e-b852-14156773acf9">Going viral</h2>I took a photo of myself taking a meeting in the bathroom and posted it on X, which ended up blowing up and going viral. I learned there are <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-promote-business-on-social-media-go-viral-influencers-2022-4">three things that go viral</a>: controversial, funny, and out-of-context.So we built our startup story around that and shared it through meme accounts, which can be a powerful form way to reach a wide audience. Going viral also helped me to meet new people.I haven't graduated from high school yet and I started taking online classes instead a few months ago after I got suspended for taking meetings in the bathroom. I then moved to San Francisco to work on building the company full-time. My parents are pretty chill about it, but for the first two months, they thought it was a little surprising for me to take a risk like this.I've learned a ton and experienced some highs and lows. It's opened up my world, but it hasn't come without difficulty.There are a lot of times when it's like, "I don't know what to do," but I've figured it out along the way. Surrounding myself with experienced people like my cofounders and investors has been really helpful. Got a tech career story to share? Contact this reporter at <a target="_blank" href="mailto:jmann@businessinsider.com">jmann@businessinsider.com</a>

I raised $1 million for my tech startup by taking Zoom meetings in my high-school bathroom

<ul class="summary-list"><li><a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/meta">Meta's</a> second-quarter revenue hit $39 billion, surpassing Wall Street expectations.</li><li>The company says it's going to keep spending big this year to support AI research and development.</li></ul>Investors seem to be backing <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerberg-ai-flex-meta-nvidia-gpus-2024-1">Meta's continued heavy spending on AI</a>.The social media giant <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/meta-stock-quarterly-earnings-call-report-live-updates-2024-7">surpassed analyst expectations in its second-quarter</a> earnings report released Wednesday. Its revenue hit $39 billion, a 22% increase over the same period last year. Wall Street analysts had expected just over $38 billion.Meanwhile, the company said it expects infrastructure costs — such as the money it's plowing into building its artificial intelligence capabilities — to be a "significant driver of expense growth." It's expecting to spend at least $35 billion to $37 billion this year — an increase from its last estimate. It kept its maximum spend estimate at $40 billion for the year.And it is planning to keep spending in 2025, too."While we continue to refine our plans for next year, we currently expect significant capital expenditures growth in 2025 as we invest to support our artificial intelligence research and product development efforts," the company said in its earnings report.Even after saying it would spend more, investors apparently liked what they heard: Meta's stock zoomed ahead nearly 7% in after-hours trade. It's up nearly 40% so far this year.Meta CEO <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerberg">Mark Zuckerberg</a> said on the investor call that the big focus is "figuring out the right amount" of infrastructure for the AI future. Meta is planning the computing clusters and data centers for the next several years, he said, but it's "hard to predict" how that'll pan out."I'd rather risk building capacity before it's needed rather than too late," Zuckerberg said.<a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-big-tech-spending-on-ai-investments-2024-7">Meta's bullish attitude toward AI spending</a> isn't new.Zuckerberg has shared plans to purchase 350,000 Nvidia GPUs by the end of 2024, bringing Meta's GPU collection to roughly 600,000. Analysts have estimated Meta could spend about $18 billion by the end of 2024. A JPMorgan analyst said the company's costs could hit $50 billion by 2025, <a target="_blank" rel=" nofollow" class="" href="https://qz.com/meta-second-quarter-earnings-ai-spending-llama-1851607702">according</a> to a report from Quartz.Still, the reaction from investors was a sharp contrast from Microsoft's earnings on Tuesday. While Microsoft reported an overall positive quarter in terms of revenue, <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-investors-freaked-out-about-ai-spending-azure-growth-2024-7">Microsoft Azure spending slightly missed estimates</a> and shares dropped in post-market trading by more than 6%. They lost another 1% on Wednesday.Unlike Microsoft, Meta seemed to persuade investors it was moving in the right direction with its AI investments with growth in key areas of investment."We've released the first frontier-level open-source AI model," Zuckerberg said. "We continue to see good traction with our <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/meta-ray-ban-smart-glasses-gen-z-friends-review-photos-2023-11">Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses</a> and we're driving good growth across our apps."Still, similar to Microsoft, Meta executives said that over the long-term, they expect their stepped-up investments in AI to pay off.

Meta's going to spend like crazy on AI in the next year — and investors don't hate it 

Investors and execs eye Trump's potential return to the White House

<ul><li><keyword id="46002" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="gold-prices" source="Orion">Gold prices</keyword> hit a fresh all-time high in the last two trading sessions.</li><li><keyword id="85550" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="silver-prices" source="Orion">Silver prices</keyword> also zoomed Rs 1,000 to hit record Rs 81,700 per kg.</li><li>In the international markets, spot gold at COMEX was trading at USD 2,297 per ounce.</li></ul>New Delhi, Gold prices surged by Rs 850 to reach a new peak of Rs 70,050 per 10 grams on Thursday on strong global cues, according to HDFC Securities. This is the second straight session that precious metal prices have hit all-time high levels. In the previous trade, the precious metal had settled at Rs 69,200 per 10 grams. Silver prices also zoomed Rs 1,000 to hit record Rs 81,700 per kg. In the previous session, it had finished at Rs 80,700 per kg. "Spot gold prices (24 carats) in the Delhi markets are trading at Rs 70,050 per 10 grams, up by Rs 850, amid a bullish trend in the overseas markets," Saumil Gandhi, Senior Analyst of Commodities at HDFC Securities, said. In the international markets, spot gold at COMEX was trading at USD 2,297 per ounce, up by USD 22 from the previous close. Gold touched yet another record after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell confirmed that an interest rate cut would likely be appropriate "at some point this year". Traders focus on rate cuts rather than the timing of the first rate cut, Gandhi said. Silver was also trading higher at USD 27.05 per ounce. It had closed at USD 26.25 per ounce in the previous session. "Gold continues to hover around its all-time high levels on the back of weakness in the dollar amid uncertainty over US interest rate cuts, while increased safe-haven demand also aided prices. "Additionally, silver prices too marked an all-time high on the domestic front, amidst a sharp rally in industrial metals," Navneet Damani, Senior VP of Commodity Research at Motilal Oswal Financial Services, said. Persistent geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and between Russia and Ukraine, coupled with a devastating earthquake in Taiwan, spurred safe haven plays into bullion and other precious metals, Damani added. According to Praveen Singh - Associate VP, Fundamental Currencies and Commodities at Sharekhan by BNP Paribas, "Major US economic data, including weekly jobless claims to be released on Thursday, will provide more insights on the US Federal Reserve's monetary policy outlook". Investors will also look forward to services and composite PMIs out of the UK and the Eurozone, Singh added.

Two sessions, two new peaks: Gold hits fresh all-time high of ₹70,000/10 gm

<ul class="summary-list"><li><a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/who-got-rich-reddit-ipo-2024-3">Reddit</a>, which loses money, is currently worth about $8.15 billion. </li><li>The New York Times, which makes money, is worth about $7.2 billion.</li></ul>Pop quiz!Which media company is more valuable? One that generated $800 million in revenue last year and lost $90 million?Or one that brought in $2.4 billion and made a $232 million profit?Pencils down: For now, the winner is the money loser. That would be <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/reddits-ipo-set-to-take-front-page-of-internet-public-2024-3">Reddit, the message board that went public last week</a> and has a market cap of $8.15 billion.Meanwhile, the media company that actually makes money is The New York Times. As I'm typing this, it's worth $7.2 billion.The obvious caveat here is that Reddit's stock is subject to all kinds of price swings. On Thursday, when the company went public, its <a target="_blank" href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/reddit-stock-price-investors-ipo-social-platform-finance-markets-outlook-2024-3">shares soared by nearly 50%</a>; on Friday, they sank by 9%. On Monday, they zoomed up again, gaining 17%. It's going to take some time for the market to reach a consensus about what Reddit is really worth.This is also not the first time some dimwit has compared the value of the Times to a tech-driven upstart competing for readers' time and advertisers' money: Back in 2009, I noted that the content farm <a target="_blank" href="https://allthingsd.com/20091020/rise-of-the-machines-why-demand-media-is-worth-more-than-the-new-york-times/">Demand Media was supposedly worth at least $1.5 billion when the Times was worth $1.3 billion</a>.Turns out that the Times, whose future seemed <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/01/end-times/307220/">very much in doubt back then</a>, ended up thriving. <a target="_blank" href="https://searchengineland.com/google-panda-update-costly-112062">Demand, whose business model was crushed by changes in Google's algorithm</a>, went in the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/06/10/2245496/0/en/Leaf-Group-Announces-Shareholder-Approval-of-Merger-Agreement-with-Graham-Holdings.html">opposite direction</a>.But if you're running a media business, you understand precisely why investors are more excited about Reddit than the Times: The Times spends lots of money to make the content that readers and advertisers pay for. Reddit gets all of it for free, from its users.That shows up in the companies' financials when you compare their cost of revenue: Last year, the Times spent $1.25 billion — 51% of its total revenue — producing and distributing all the stuff you can find via its website, apps, and print edition. By the end of last year, Reddit's cost of revenue was just 12% — mostly money it paid other people for hosting its site and app.And while the Times has done an admirable job of transforming its business model — <a target="_blank" href="https://www.vox.com/2017/5/4/15550052/new-york-times-subscription-advertising-revenue-chart">it now relies on paying readers instead of fickle advertisers</a> and has diversified beyond news to products like <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/inside-ny-times-big-plans-for-nyt-cooking-app-2024-2">recipes</a> and games — it's always going to have to spend more to make more stuff.But Reddit's pitch is that its flow of free content will always be there and that <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/reddit-ipo-hinges-on-improving-performance-for-advertisers-2024-3">it will get better at selling ads</a>. And that, for the moment, is a pitch investors want to hear.

Why investors think Reddit is worth $1 billion more than The New York Times

<ul class="summary-list"><li>US property investors snapped up 26.1% of low-priced homes in the fourth quarter, a record share.</li><li>Affordably priced homes are scarce in the US, as inventory remains low in much of the country. </li></ul>A lot of people want a cheaper home, but they're hard to come by in this market. Homebuyers looking for an affordable house or a so-called starter home might be crowded out a bit by investors who are also on the hunt. <a href="https://www.redfin.com/news/investor-home-purchases-q4-2023/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Redfin reported on Wednesday</a> that property investors snapped up 26.1% of low-priced homes that were for sale in the fourth quarter, hitting a record share. Zooming in, low-priced homes accounted for 46.5% of investor purchases, with mid-priced homes at 24.6% and high-priced homes at 28.8%."I get tons of emails every day from investors looking for properties, but of course, they only want homes that are under market value, which are hard to come by. When they find those properties, they pile in," said Carrie Caruthers, a Redfin Premier real estate agent in California, adding that she has also observed an increase in foreclosures, which also draw big demand from investors as they tend to be cheaper than other homes on the market. Like everyone else looking to buy a house in 2024, investors want to buy cheap if they can, but affordable homes are scarce. Inventory is still low across the country as sellers cling to lower mortgage rates they locked in years ago. Investors' overall home buying dropped 10.5% in the fourth quarter to 46,419, the lowest fourth-quarter volume since 2016. "If the Fed cuts interest rates later this year as expected, we may see more investors wade into the housing market," said Redfin Senior Economist Sheharyar Bokhari. The research also found that single-family homes accounted for more than two-thirds of investors' purchases, at 68.6%, followed by condos or co-ops at 19.2%, and multifamily properties were the least popular, at only 5.1%.Escalating mortgage rates have posed significant hurdles for prospective homebuyers, while prices also remain elevated in most market. The 30-year fixed mortgage rate surged climbed in the last week to <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/30-year-mortgage-rates-rate-cuts-housing-january-inflation-data-2024-2">6.87%</a>, representing the highest level since early December 2023. At the end of 2023, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/housing-market-affordability-investors-hedge-funds-wall-street-democrats-bill-2023-12">Democrats in Congress proposed bills</a> aimed at limiting big investors' participation in the housing market in order to help affordability. It's worth noting though that big institutions make up a small percentage of investors in the market buying homes.According to data from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, institutions accounted for just 3% of all home purchases in 2021, and the major investor money behind the US homebuying spree in recent years has been so-called mom-and-pop buyers.

Investors bought a record 26% of the affordable houses in the US last quarter

<ul><li>Investors are ramping up outflows from Cathie Wood's ARK funds after a three-year decline.</li><li>The suite of ARK ETFs has seen net outflows of $2.2 billion so far this year, triple the outflows in 2023.</li><li>A string of bad bets and missed opportunities have led to a 72% decline in ARK's flagship fund.</li></ul>Investors in Cathie Wood's ARK ETFs are starting to increase the pace of outflows after a string of bad bets and a painful three-year decline.The family of ARK ETFs has seen a net outflow of $2.2 billion this year, which is about triple the $760 million in outflows seen in all of 2023.The ARK ETFs' combined assets under management stand at $11.1 billion, down 81% from its peak AUM of $59 billion in 2021.The sharp decline in assets under management coincides with a painful three-year period for Wood's disruptive innovation investment strategy. The flagship ARK Innovation ETF is down 72% from its February 2021 peak, and some of its top bets are still floundering.ARK has long counted <a href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/stocks/tsla-stock">Tesla</a> among its top holdings, but the carmaker's more than 40% stock decline year-to-date has weighed heavily on the performance of the ARK Innovation ETF, which is down 16% year-to-date despite a positive return for the broader stock market.This dynamic — the sharp decline in ARK funds while the broader stock market hits record highs — was highlighted by Morningstar earlier this year. The investment firm highlighted that the <a href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/funds/cathie-wood-ark-invest-wealth-destroyed-tech-stocks-morningstar-arkk-2024-2">ARK ETFs have destroyed $14 billion in wealth over the past decade</a> as investors piled into the fund right near its peak."These funds managed to lose value for shareholders even during a generally bullish market," Morningstar analyst Amy Arnott said. Another source of pain for ARK investors is the fact that the funds have missed out on the hottest artificial intelligence trade in the market, with <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/cathie-wood-says-nvidia-has-become-check-the-box-stock-2024-2">Wood selling most of her funds' Nvidia holdings</a> right before the stock started to surge in late 2022.Other top holdings of the ARK funds include <a href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/stocks/roku-stock">Roku</a> and <a href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/stocks/u-stock">Unity Software</a>, which are both down more than 30% year-to-date, and <a href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/stocks/zm-stock">Zoom Video</a>, which is down 16% year-to-date.Despite the sharp underperformance, Wood has largely defended her portfolio, recently arguing that Tesla could <a href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/exclusive-cathie-wood-breaks-down-2-000-tesla-price-target-with-benzinga-1032606181">trade to $2,000 per share in the next five years.</a>

You Searched For "zoom investor" and got 8 results

A millennial investor feels happier and healthier after taking most of her meetings off Zoom

Maria Noyen

I raised $1 million for my tech startup by taking Zoom meetings in my high-school bathroom

Jyoti Mann

Meta's going to spend like crazy on AI in the next year — and investors don't hate it

Ana Altchek

Investors and execs eye Trump's potential return to the White House

Dan DeFrancesco

Two sessions, two new peaks: Gold hits fresh all-time high of ₹70,000/10 gm

PTI

Why investors think Reddit is worth $1 billion more than The New York Times

Peter Kafka

Investors bought a record 26% of the affordable houses in the US last quarter

Yuheng Zhan

Investors are ramping up their exits from Cathie Wood's ARK after an epic 72% decline in her flagship fund

Matthew Fox

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides