Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

<ul class="summary-list"><li>House Democrats are set to vote on an article of <keyword id="84041" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="Impeachment">impeachment</keyword> for <keyword id="3828720" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="President-Donald-Trump">President Donald Trump</keyword> for inciting an insurrection on the US Capitol.</li><li>As House members began to debate on Tuesday evening, Democrats on the <keyword id="161345" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="60" keywordseo="House-Judiciary-Committee">House Judiciary Committee</keyword> released a 50-page report outlining the imminent need for Trump to be impeached and removed from office.</li><li>Trump's term as president is set to end on January 20, but House Democrats contend that his behavior before and after the riot is an "imminent threat to the United States."</li><li>Read the full report below. </li></ul>Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee <a href="https://judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/house_judiciary_committee_report_-_materials_in_support_of_h._res._24.pdf?utm_campaign=4640-519">released a scathing 50-page report</a> on Tuesday evening laying out supporting evidence for why they say the House should impeach President Donald Trump on a charge of inciting the January 6 insurrection on Capitol Hill. Three House Republicans - Reps. Liz Cheney of Wisconsin, Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, and John Katko of New York - <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-voting-to-impeach-trump-capitol-insurrection-2021-1">have come out in favor of impeaching Trump</a> for inciting the riot, with more expected to follow.Even though Trump is set to leave office on January 20, Democrats contend that he poses an "imminent threat" to the nation's safety. "The timeline of events demonstrates that President Trump encouraged and incited the violent and seditious acts that occurred. Moreover, the lawlessness that resulted from President Trump's conduct was entirely foreseeable by the President," the report says. <h3>Read the full text of the report below: </h3>Expanded Coverage Module: capitol-siege-updates

READ: House Democrats release a scathing 50-page report in favor of impeaching Trump for inciting deadly Capitol riots

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Rep. <keyword id="3736227" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="john-katko">John Katko</keyword> of New York on Tuesday became the first House Republican to announce that he would vote to impeach President <keyword id="6354484" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="Donald-Trump">Donald Trump</keyword> for inciting the US Capitol riots, <a href="https://www.syracuse.com/politics/2021/01/rep-john-katko-becomes-first-house-republican-to-back-trump-impeachment.html">according to the Syracuse Post-Standard</a>.</li><li>Katko said that he would support at least 218 House Democrats who have signed on to an <keyword id="84041" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="Impeachment">impeachment</keyword> resolution.</li><li>"To allow the president of the United States to incite this attack without consequence is a direct threat to the future of our democracy," Katko said in a statement. "For that reason, I cannot sit by without taking action. I will vote to impeach this president."</li><li>Katko, a former federal prosecutor, was first elected to the House in 2014.</li></ul>Rep. John Katko on Tuesday became the first House Republican to announce that he would vote to impeach President Donald Trump for inciting the US Capitol riots, <a href="https://www.syracuse.com/politics/2021/01/rep-john-katko-becomes-first-house-republican-to-back-trump-impeachment.html">according to the Syracuse Post-Standard</a>.Katko, who represents New York's Syracuse-anchored 24th Congressional district, said that he would support a move from at least 218 House Democrats who are backing an <a href="https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hres34/BILLS-117hres34ih.pdf">impeachment resolution</a>. The impeachment vote is expected to be held on Wednesday.In expressing his support for impeachment, Katko, a former federal prosecutor who was first elected to the House in 2014, held firm to his commitment to the Constitution."To allow the president of the United States to incite this attack without consequence is a direct threat to the future of our democracy," Katko said in a <a href="https://katko.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/statement-rep-katko-articles-impeachment-0">statement</a>. "For that reason, I cannot sit by without taking action. I will vote to impeach this president."He added: "It cannot be ignored that President Trump encouraged this insurrection - both on social media ahead of January 6th, and in his speech that day. By deliberately promoting baseless theories suggesting the election was somehow stolen, the president created a combustible environment of misinformation, disenfranchisement, and division. When this manifested in violent acts on January 6th, he refused to promptly and forcefully call it off, putting countless lives in danger."<a href="https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hres34/BILLS-117hres34ih.pdf">The Democratic-led resolution</a> accuses the president of "inciting violence against the government of the United States" and argues that he "threatened the integrity of the democratic system, interfered with the peaceful transition of power, and imperiled a coequal branch of government" by imploring a mob of pro-Trump protesters to challenge the certification of President-elect Joe Biden's 2020 presidential victory.The resolution is likely to pass on Tuesday when it is brought to the House floor with a roll call vote. After the vote, Vice President Mike Pence will be given 24 hours to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office or the House will vote on <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/house-democrats-article-of-impeachment-trump-incitement-of-insurrection-2021-1">impeaching</a> the president.Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, the third-ranking House Republican, announced on Tuesday that <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/mitch-mcconnell-pleased-at-prospect-of-trump-being-impeached-nyt-2021-1">she would also vote</a> to impeach Trump, saying that "there has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution."

Rep. John Katko becomes the first House Republican to back Trump impeachment in wake of deadly Capitol siege

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Rep. <keyword id="302868" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="Ro-Khanna">Ro Khanna</keyword> of California is a third-term Democrat who wants to end America's "forever wars," help bridge the country's cultural and political divides, and fight for progressive causes. </li><li>Khanna also wants to hold Trump and Sen. <keyword id="4723758" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="josh-hawley">Josh Hawley</keyword> accountable for their roles in inciting the deadly insurrection at the Capitol. </li><li>The congressman spoke with Insider columnist <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/author/anthony-l-fisher">Anthony Fisher</a> by phone on Friday, less than 48 hours after the deadly insurrection by Trump supporters on the Capitol during the Electoral College certification proceedings.</li><li>This is an <keyword id="6356002" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="100" keywordseo="opinion">opinion</keyword> column. The thoughts expressed are those of the author.</li></ul><a href="https://twitter.com/RoKhanna">Rep. Ro Khanna of California</a> is a third-term progressive Democrat in the House who has made a name for himself as a strident opponent of the US government's interminable support for the "forever wars" - the numerous military actions that have gone on for years without congressional approval. Khanna spoke with Insider columnist <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/author/anthony-l-fisher">Anthony Fisher</a> by phone on Friday, less than 48 hours after the deadly insurrection by Trump supporters on the Capitol during the Electoral College certification proceedings.The following interview has been edited for style, length, and clarity. What were you doing when the doors of the Capitol were busted in? I was in the Cannon office building. We were evacuating Cannon because there was a lead pipe bomb threat. I was actually headed towards the Capitol and then I got a frantic text saying head back, the Capitol is being overrun. We went back to the Cannon building and there were conflicting reports. We got one report saying "bomb threat cleared," then another report saying it was not cleared. But finally we just decided that it was probably cleared and better to be in our office. So I went to my Cannon office and locked the door and stayed there. I stayed in my office till about eleven o'clock and then and then went to the floor for the proceedings and the votes until about three in the morning. Can you describe the feeling on the floor of the House that late at night after such an unprecedented day? I think it was one of determination that we were going to stay until we certified the results, one of anger about what happened, one of shock. As you walk to the floor of the chamber, you see the damage. The elevator I usually take was cordoned off as a crime scene because that was a place where a woman had died. [I was] going into a majestic building which had been badly damaged. What do you think about your Republican colleagues who even after the insurrection insisted on trying to stop the certification? It's bewildering. It's baffling. A total lack of respect for the democratic process. There have been calls to expel <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/john-danforth-josh-hawley-presidential-election-challenge-electoral-college-2021-1">Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri</a>, what do you think about that? I think there has to be an ethics investigation. Hawley was actually out there <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/capitol-riots-trump-cruz-hawley-republican-leaders-violence-maga-congress-2021-1">fist pumping with the crowd</a>, and so there could be actual incitement to violence. And I think there should be an investigation for any sitting member of Congress or senator who actually incited violence, who went and supported a crowd that was engaged in violence. Do you consider Hawley's behavior an incitement to violence? On its face? It looks like it from the pictures I've seen of his activity next to the protesters. But that's where I think there should be a formal ethics investigation into his role in inciting violence. Do you think that the president directly incited violence? I think it was a case of incitement. Again, I think there has to be an investigation into what laws may have been broken. Do you support impeaching the president again? I do. I think we need to do it right away. Why's that?Well, first you have a President of the United States who incited violence, then supported the people who were engaged in storming the Capitol - literally supported them on Twitter - and then refused to do his duty, which is to safeguard American democracy. He refused to call the national guard. I don't see how you do those things in you. How can you do those things and still be President of the United States. He should have been out the day after. So I am not just for impeachment, I'm for impeaching him now. What do you think the chances are of more unrest? I'm fearful of it. I think a lot depends on what the Republican leadership does. If Pence is president, I think there's less of a chance of riots and violence. And hopefully this time you aren't going to have Republican lawmakers invoking conspiracy theories and inciting violence. To pivot a bit, you took a lot of heat from <a href="https://twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1334317356043149315">people on the left</a> for going on Laura Ingraham's Fox <keyword id="6355005" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="news">News</keyword> show and discussing your support for ending the <a href="https://khanna.house.gov/media/in-the-news/transpartisan-revolt-against-america-s-endless-wars">forever wars</a>. Some thought you were "validating" Ingraham just by appearing on her show. Why do you think it's valuable to go on shows like that? I believe in the First Amendment, and I believe that you have to reach as many audiences as possible, and you have to engage in wide debate. Laura Ingraham has millions of followers. She's going to have millions of followers whether I go on her show or not. So the idea that I'm "validating" it doesn't measure up with the facts. It's one thing if I went on some show that had a small audience and was giving them a credibility boost, but Ingraham's show doesn't need that. I don't think <keyword id="1467230" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="progressives">progressives</keyword> should be afraid to go into forums and articulate our ideas and build a growing coalition. Otherwise, how are we ever going to get our policies through? Now, if someone is on those programs, I think that they have an obligation to speak out for their values and you shouldn't be going on a show and, and agreeing with the host if they're saying things that are offensive or saying things that are contrary to what you believe. President-elect Joe Biden's got a history of being a hawkish Democrat, and his administration is shaping up to be a lot of familiar faces, probably not people that are terribly divergent from his foreign policy views. What are you hoping for from the Biden administration when it comes to national security and foreign policy?I'm hoping we end the war in Yemen and I've been encouraged by preliminary conversations with people in Biden's team. I think they understand the moral urgency of the situation. I believe [Biden's nominee for secretary of state] Tony Blinken is going to make it a priority to stop our support for the Saudis and stop the bombing in Yemen. That has to be a priority. I'm working with Sen. Bernie Sanders on a war powers resolution to make sure that Congress has to be consulted before we get into any other wars.What do you think Biden should do about the remaining US troops in Afghanistan?He should pull them out. There needs to be a peace negotiation, and then we ought to leave. That's what's in the interest of humanitarian considerations, that women and children are dying there every day as we speak. And that's in the United States' interest. We're still spending $50 billion a year there. That would pay for almost-free college for every American. That would alternately pay for high-speed internet for every American. The costs have been staggering and the cost to human life is staggering. So we need to leave. We should make it clear that if there's ever emerging threats or terrorist threats to our homeland from [Afghanistan], we reserve the right to conduct and we reserve the right to go in again. But, there's no point in having a permanent presence there. For the past five years, Republicans have been terrified of offending Trump and in some cases abandoned their long-held principles for free market economics to appease Trump and his base.After the Capitol insurrection, will Republicans still express that kind of fealty to Trump because they're afraid he'll support a primary challenge?It's the first time I've seen a break. Not just by lawmakers, but also by [Trump's] Republican friends.I think the images of the Capitol being stormed, it really shifted people's mindsets. There's something about the sacredness of the Capitol, about a belief in stability for American democracy. Conservatives are the last ones who want to see some revolution in this country. And I think those images scared people of what we've become. So I used to think that Trump would run again and now I think that seems very unlikely. I think events of January 6th were a game changer.Trump has stoked conspiracy theories and those conspiracy theories were obviously a huge factor in the minds of the people who got violent at the Capitol. A repeated mantra from this hardcore Trump supporters is that - even though Trump's lawyers were laughed out of court - there was enough voter fraud that the election was effectively stolen and that they now no longer trust democracy. Moving forward, what do you think about the state of American democracy in the sense that a great many millions of people have lost faith in it because of blatant lies? It's a big challenge for us. I think on the one hand you've had parts of democracy working, you had Republican state legislatures vote for certification. You had Republican secretaries of state stand up to this president. You had a Republican appointed judges rule against the president. You had a Republican senate majority leader and a Republican vice president stand up to the president. But how do you overcome the spread of conspiracy theories and alternative reality, is one of the challenges for our time. Obviously we need to rethink the role that social media has had in encouraging diversion realities and how we try to structure and design social media so that there are common sources of information. We have to look at education across the country in terms of giving people the ability to sort out facts from conspiracy theory. And then we have to look at the communities that have been left out and why and why some of the anger may be there and the anxiousness may be there with the changes the country is going through, and how to respect the dignity of these places that have been left behind. And if we can do that, you're not going to get to everyone, but maybe you'll get to some, and that builds a coalition of people going forward.I think there's two challenges for the country. The challenge of economically-left behind places and people where you don't have economic wealth generation, without basic healthcare, without basic housing. And then you have the deeper question, and that is the cultural challenge. I mean, one of the reasons that this country has produced Obama, Trump, and AOC within a few election cycles is because we're searching with great difficulty in how we've become a multi-racial multi-ethnic democracy. And when you look at the immigration post-'65 from non-European countries - I mean we're the most diverse we've ever been in our nation's history - it's easy to conceive of a nation on philosophical principles if there is also a cultural similarity. To conceive of a nation on philosophical principles, of a commitment to our constitution, when you have such incredible racial diversity, such incredible religious diversity and the racial history we do, is a very, very difficult project. And I think a large part of our challenges - how do we begin to improve the communication between Americans who come perhaps from very different perspectives - I think that just the awareness of said difficulty of that project, that having greater respect and humility in how we talk to each other, trying to lower the temperature of accusations, is something that leaders should aspire for. I guess the point is we need a bold economic vision, but we need to couple that with leadership that looks for finding commonalities of Americans with great differences. And it's a difficult project, but there's never been a multiracial, multiethnic democracy in the history of the world. And so what we're trying to do is very hard as well. In the Congress, we need to begin a dialogue with each other in ways that lowers the volume of the screaming on cable news and looks for ways to respect Americans and understand their anxieties, understand their perspectives, and find some common fabric for this country.Are there any Republican colleagues who you're hopeful can help you in that effort to lower the temperature? I have a very good relationship with Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin. We've done things together with Jodey Arrington in Texas. I went to Hal Rogers' district in Kentucky to have conversations.One of the things I think we need in America is sister cities. We have sister cities with countries overseas, but what about the sister cities with Palo Alto, California and Jefferson, Iowa?I think we have to stand firm on our values, but figure out how do we understand and appreciate the misconceptions, the anger, and common ground. I guess it comes down to your fundamental belief of a fundamental decency of the American people. I think there is, of course, we're all a product of her upbringing. Now, my family hasn't faced some of the piercing hate and segregation that certainly African-Americans have faced in this country. So I don't want to minimize the problems around race and the changes in the face of leadership and the reactions that caused. But I think the way to solve that is to have more exchanges between members of Congress going to each other's districts, learning and recognizing, and talking to communities with an openness and not having a moral judgment in doing so. It's a little bit abstract because there's not a concrete three-point program that is going to suddenly find a common culture in America. But, I think ultimately it's the responsibility of leaders.Take Lincoln's famous speech on July 4th, the question was, how could you be a German and be American, or be French and be American, or be a Norwegian and be American - ironic given that Trump said he wanted Norwegians in this country - but back in Lincoln's time, Norwegians weren't considered American because you had to trace your heritage back to the founders to be a true American. And Lincoln said famously in that speech that there's a mistake chord that extends from any American who believes in freedom and liberty. Of course, Lincoln was half-poet, half-political leader, but the question is how do we have that kind of leadership in communities across America that allow us to have difficult conversations and yet search for some common identity? I actually think you could probably split politicians into two buckets. To me, the highest obligation of those who are serving - more than the programs they're offering - are they contributing to finding a common American narrative and vision, or are they further dividing it? <ul class="read-more-links"><li>Read more:</li><li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/right-wing-conspiracy-theories-qanon-fueled-capitol-siege-instigate-violence-2021-1">The right-wing conspiracy theories that fueled the Capitol siege are going to instigate more violence</a></li><li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/arrest-trump-directly-incited-deadly-violence-free-speech-first-amendment-2021-1">Arrest Trump. He directly incited violence.</a></li><li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-violent-capitol-siege-maga-mob-republican-party-disband-gop-2021-1">Trump's violent MAGA mob shows the Republican Party isn't worth saving. Disband it and start over.</a></li><li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/capitol-coup-trump-led-country-america-towards-this-5-years-2021-1">This was a coup. Trump's been leading the country toward this for 5 years.</a></li></ul>

Progressive Rep. Ro Khanna on holding Trump accountable for the Capitol siege, ending the 'forever wars,' and working with conservatives to bridge America's cultural divide

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Top conservative lawyer <keyword id="1616407" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="Charles-Cooper">Charles Cooper</keyword> has dismissed Republican arguments against Trump's impeachment.</li><li>Many Republican senators argued Trump's upcoming impeachment trial was unconstitutional because he is no longer president.</li><li>"It defies logic to suggest that the Senate is prohibited from trying and convicting former officeholders," Cooper wrote.</li></ul>Charles J. Cooper, a leading conservative lawyer in Washington, broke ranks with Republicans on Sunday to argue that former President Donald Trump can be impeached.In <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-constitution-doesnt-bar-trumps-impeachment-trial-11612724124">an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal</a>, Cooper - who has <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/07/us/politics/charles-cooper-trump-impeachment.html">reportedly advised multiple Republicans</a> including Ted Cruz - said that the Constitution allows the Senate to try a former federal official, in a significant blow to the argument favoured by many Republican senators against Trump's impeachment.Forty-five Republican senators <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/senate-republicans-back-trump-on-eve-of-impeachment-trial-2021-2">on January 27 voted in favour of GOP Sen. Rand Paul's</a> motion to declare Trump's impeachment trial - which begins on February 9 - unconstitutional, on the grounds that the Senate was not legally allowed to try a former president.Cooper said that Paul's argument was flawed because it misinterpreted part of the Constitution which describes the consequences of impeachment. He said the constitution gave the Senate authority to bar officials from holding office, a punishment which could logically only apply to former officials."It defies logic to suggest that the Senate is prohibited from trying and convicting former officeholders," he wrote.The House of Representatives in January <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-impeached-second-time-house-of-representatives-capitol-riots-2021-1">impeached Trump for the second time in his presidency</a> for inciting the deadly Capitol insurrection on January 6, when a mob of pro-Trump supporters stormed the building and forced members of Congress to hide or flee for their safety.Only five Republican senators dissented against Sen. Paul's motion to throw out the trial, making the prospect of Trump ultimately being convicted appear very unlikely.Some legal scholars including constitutional law professor Johnathan Turley, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-democrats-clash-over-trump-impeachment-constitutional-senate-trial-2021-1">who briefed the GOP caucus</a> ahead of the January 27 vote, have supported Paul's argument.But other legal experts have contested that viewpoint, and said that refusing to hold impeachment proceedings against former officials would mean they were able to act unaccountably at the end of their time in office."You want to give someone a get-out-of-jail free card at the end of the administration so they can do anything they like and be immune from the high court of impeachment?" <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-democrats-clash-over-trump-impeachment-constitutional-senate-trial-2021-1">Yale Law School professor Akhil Reed Amar told NPR in January</a>.

A top conservative lawyer has dismissed Republican claims that Trump can't be impeached

<ul class="summary-list"><li>The controversial evangelist, <keyword id="827070" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="Franklin-Graham">Franklin Graham</keyword>, has compared Republicans who voted for Trump's impeachment to Judas.</li><li>In a <a href="https://www.facebook.com/FranklinGraham/posts/4048702435185907">Facebook post</a>, Graham compared the <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-voting-to-impeach-trump-capitol-insurrection-2021-1?r=US&amp;IR=TIR=T">10 Republicans</a> who voted for Trump's impeachment to Judas Iscariot, the notorious apostle who betrayed Jesus after being paid 30 pieces of silver. </li><li>It came the day after the House of Representatives voted 232-197 to <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-impeached-second-time-house-of-representatives-capitol-riots-2021-1?r=US&amp;IR=TIR=T">impeach</a> Trump for his role in inciting the <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/photos-show-the-aftermath-of-a-siege-on-capitol-building-2021-1?r=US&amp;IR=TIR=T">Capitol riot</a> last week, making him the first President in history to be impeached twice. </li></ul>The controversial evangelist, Franklin Graham, has compared Republicans who voted for Trump's impeachment to Judas.In a <a href="https://www.facebook.com/FranklinGraham/posts/4048702435185907">Facebook post</a>, Graham compared the <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-voting-to-impeach-trump-capitol-insurrection-2021-1?r=US&amp;IR=TIR=T">10 Republicans</a> who voted for Trump's impeachment to Judas Iscariot, the notorious apostle who betrayed Jesus after being paid 30 pieces of silver. He began: "Shame, shame on the ten Republicans who joined with Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats in impeaching President Trump yesterday. After all that he has done for our country, you would turn your back and betray him so quickly?"And these ten, from his own party, joined in the feeding frenzy. It makes you wonder what the thirty pieces of silver were that Speaker Pelosi promised for this betrayal," he continued later in the post. It came the day after the House of Representatives voted 232-197 to <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-impeached-second-time-house-of-representatives-capitol-riots-2021-1?r=US&amp;IR=TIR=T">impeach</a> Trump for his role in inciting the <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/photos-show-the-aftermath-of-a-siege-on-capitol-building-2021-1?r=US&amp;IR=TIR=T">Capitol riot</a> last week, making him the first President in history to be impeached twice. Read also: <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/capitol-riot-custodial-staff-cleanup-janitors-maga-trump-white-supremacists-2021-1?r=oo-pol">'It was degrading': Black Capitol custodial staff talk about what it felt like to clean up the mess left by violent pro-Trump white supremacists</a>Those who voted for his impeachment included <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/gop-congresswoman-liz-cheney-will-vote-to-impeach-trump-2021-1?r=US&amp;IR=TIR=T">Liz Cheney</a>, the US Representative for Wyoming and third-ranking House Republican. Graham, who is the leader of the North Carolina based charity, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/samaritans-purse-douglas-dc-8-humanitarian-aid-covid-19-photos-2020-4?r=US&amp;IR=TIR=T">Samaritan's Purse</a> and son of the late evangelist <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/ap-evangelist-billy-graham-dies-at-age-99-reached-millions-2018-2?r=US&amp;IR=TIR=T">Billy Graham</a>, has been a staunch supporter the outgoing President. In the run-up to Trump's first impeachment in December 2019, he promoted T-shirts that said "Pray for 45" on them on <a href="https://twitter.com/Franklin_Graham/status/1190341870997688320?s=20">Twitter</a> using a photo of his daughter and added the caption: "The Bible instructs us to pray for our leaders &amp; Donald Trump needs our prayers."In January 2020, Trump created the 'Evangelicals for Trump' group but his support from the community has declined, with a <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/exit-polls-president.html">New York Times exit poll</a> showing a drop from 81% in 2016 to 76% in 2020.

You Searched For "trump impeachmemt" and got 5 results

READ: House Democrats release a scathing 50-page report in favor of impeaching Trump for inciting deadly Capitol riots

Grace Panetta

Rep. John Katko becomes the first House Republican to back Trump impeachment in wake of deadly Capitol siege

John L. Dorman

Progressive Rep. Ro Khanna on holding Trump accountable for the Capitol siege, ending the 'forever wars,' and working with conservatives to bridge America's cultural divide

Anthony L. Fisher

A top conservative lawyer has dismissed Republican claims that Trump can't be impeached

Thomas Colson

Christian evangelist, Franklin Graham, slams Republicans for taking '30 pieces of silver' from Nancy Pelosi in Trump impeachment 'betrayal'

Naina Bhardwaj

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides