Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

<keyword id="11898268" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="mississippi" source="Orion">Mississippi</keyword> is holding congressional primaries on Tuesday. Polls closed at 7 p.m. local time and 8 p.m. ET.<h2>The races and the stakes:</h2>Mississippi has four congressional House districts that are up for election on Tuesday. Of the four seats, three of them are currently held by members of the Republican Party.In the state's 1st Congressional District, GOP Rep. <keyword id="14138901" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="trent-kelly" source="Orion">Trent Kelly</keyword> is running for reelection to a fifth term and is facing off against businessman Mark Strauss in the Republican primary. Strauss, who previously ran for office in Iowa, <a href="https://www.straussforhouse.com/about-3-6">espouses on his website</a> that the COVID-19 pandemic was "planned" and that vaccines were created and distributed for the purpose of "depoputation." Mississippi's 2nd Congressional District features incumbent Rep. <keyword id="11931776" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="bennie-thompson" source="Orion">Bennie Thompson</keyword> running for reelection in the Democratic primary. Thompson, who was first elected to the House in a 1993 special election and serves as chairman of the House committee investigating the January 6 attack, will face off against local business owner Jerry Kerner in the Democratic contest. There's also a crowded GOP primary in the district featuring four candidates: Michael Carson, Ronald Eller, Brian Flowers, and Stanford Johnson.The state's 3rd Congressional District has incumbent GOP Rep. <keyword id="14138900" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="michael-guest" source="Orion">Michael Guest</keyword> running for reelection against challengers Michael Cassidy and Thomas Griffin in the Republican primary. There's only one person running in the Democratic primary, former Homeland Security staffer Shuwaski Young.And lastly, in Mississippi's 4th Congressional District, incumbent Republican Rep. <keyword id="14138902" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="steven-palazzo" source="Orion">Steven Palazzo</keyword> is running against six Republican challengers in the GOP primary — according to DDHQ, the race will go to a runoff. There are two candidates running in the Democratic primary — former Hattiesburg mayor Johnny DuPree and David Sellers, a pastor.According to election experts at Sabato's Crystal Ball at the University of Virginia Center for <keyword id="11893346" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="100" keywordseo="politics" source="Orion">Politics</keyword>, the races in November will likely not be competitive. The organization rates Mississippi's 1st, 3rd, and 4th Congressional Districts as "Safe R" and the state's 2nd Congressional District as "Safe D."

Live results: 2 Mississippi GOP representatives are in tighter than expected primary races, and one is headed to a runoff

<ul class="summary-list"><li>20 House members, mostly Republican, voted against federal funding for their districts.</li><li>It shows the limits of the "earmark" process, which aims to incentivize lawmakers to vote for bills.</li></ul>As Rep. Clay Higgins walked toward the House floor to vote on a <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/house-congress-avert-government-shutdown-votes-2024-3">$1.2 trillion government funding bill</a> on Friday, the Louisiana Republican explained why his "earmarks" couldn't get him to vote yes."Ultimately, I don't control what the final language of the total funding bill will be," said Higgins. "When I cast a vote on a bill, it has to be reflective of my core principles."Higgins voted against the bill, despite securing $2.3 million in federal funding for an emergency operations center at the port in Morgan City, Louisiana.He was one of 20 House members — 15 Republicans and 5 Democrats — who voted against Friday's government funding bill despite securing so-called "earmarks," known officially as congressionally directed spending.Earmarks, which allow lawmakers to funnel spending toward specific projects in their districts, are controversial. Republicans banned them in 2011 amid accusations of fraud and waste, but Democrats brought them back in 2021. One argument in favor of earmarks is that they make high-stakes legislation easier to pass, providing lawmakers a stake in major bills and giving leadership a way to corral votes.But recent votes show that there are limits to that logic.Friday's bill encompassed roughly 70% of federal government funding, including the Pentagon, the State Department, the Department of Homeland Security, and other agencies.The other 30% was contained in a separate funding bill passed roughly two weeks ago, but that bill contained far more earmarks, especially for House members. Nonetheless, 42 House members who secured earmarks voted against it anyway, 40 of whom were Republicans.<div type="image" title="Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal cited a litany of reasons for opposing the bill, even as it contained $1.3 million for the Seattle Public Library." height="1500" width="2000" msid="108718109" hostid="261" sizebytes="136968"></div>The government funding bill, a compromise hashed out between the Democratic-controlled Senate and the Republican-controlled House, barely passed with the required two-thirds majority on Friday. Both progressives and Republicans found reasons to oppose it.Republicans protested that the bill did not include certain hardline immigration-related policy provisions, that culture war "riders" had been stripped from the compromise legislation, and as always, that the federal government is spending too much money.Ultimately, most of the GOP conference voted against the bill, and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia is now <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-motion-to-vacate-threat-republicans-2024-3">threatening to oust</a> Speaker Mike Johnson over it.22 Democrats, the vast majority of whom are members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, voted against the bill in protest of increased military funding, increased funding for border enforcement measures, and a one-year ban on funding for the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/israel-calls-unrwa-chief-resign-hamas-center-under-gaza-hq-2024-2">UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA)</a>, a key provider of aid to Palestinians, particularly in Gaza.That included Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington, the chairwoman of the caucus, who voted against the bill despite securing $1.3 million for seismic structural upgrades at the Seattle Public Library."We are consistently rewarding waste, fraud, and abuse in the Pentagon by providing them with a larger budget year after year," Jayapal said in a statement.Republicans in particular have faced accusations in recent years of "voting no and taking the dough" — not just <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/mike-garcia-earmarks-omnibus-government-spending-2024-1">when it comes to earmarks</a>, but for celebrating funding from bills that <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/tommy-tuberville-federal-broadband-funding-voting-against-bipartisan-infrastructure-2023-6">they wholly opposed.</a>Already, Republicans <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-9-million-earmark-funding-2024-3">including Greene</a> and <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/lauren-boebert-funding-voted-against-ribbon-cuttings-earmarks-2024-3">Rep. Lauren Boebert</a> of Colorado have bragged about earmarks they secured in government funding bills this week, even though they voted against the final product.Here are the 15 Republicans who voted against the bill, despite securing earmarks:<ul><li>Brian Babin of Texas</li><li>Gus Bilirakis of Florida</li><li>John Curtis of Utah</li><li>Mike Ezell of Mississippi</li><li>Garrett Graves of Louisiana</li><li>Michael Guest of Mississippi</li><li>Diana Harshbarger of Tennessee</li><li>Clay Higgins of Louisiana</li><li>Trent Kelly of Mississippi</li><li>Burgess Owens of Utah</li><li>Mike Rogers of Alabama</li><li>Chris Smith of New Jersey</li><li>Greg Steube of Florida</li><li>Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey</li><li>Randy Weber of Texas</li></ul>Here are the 5 Democrats who did the same:<ul><li>Andre Carson of Indiana</li><li>Joaquin Castro of Texas</li><li>Pramila Jayapal of Washington</li><li>Summer Lee of Pennsylvania</li><li>Nydia Velázquez of New York</li></ul>

It happened again: These 20 House members, mostly Republican, voted against millions in funding for their own districts

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Embattled Rep. George Santos grabbed a premier center aisle seat ahead of President Joe Biden's State of the Union Address.</li><li>That seating put him in a prime position to shake some hands.</li></ul>Republican Rep. George Santos of New York grabbed a seat on the center aisle ahead of President Joe Biden's State of the Union address, putting him in a prime position to shake some hands.Seated beside Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Santos soon discovered that not everyone — including some Republicans — was interested in seeing him.As they began to enter the chamber around 8:30 pm, several senators customarily shook hands with the scandal-plagued Long Island congressman, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Whip John Thune, Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville, and even a couple of Democrats: Sens. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Dick Durbin of Illinois.But several senators were visibly uninterested, particularly Republican Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah.Other dignitaries who passed by Santos also passed over him, even as they shook hands with Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, seated on the other side of him. Among them was Vice President Kamala Harris.Santos sat just in front of Republican Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee and behind Rep. Trent Kelly of Mississippi.Aside from reserved places for leadership, seats in the House chamber are <a href="https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R40132.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">not assigned</a> to members of Congress during the State of the Union Address. Seats are reserved for senators as a group in the front of the chamber and House members <a href="https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/national-international/who-sits-where-at-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address/3161545/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">sit behind them</a>. House members can claim preferred spots during the day but they have to camp out there to reserve them for the entirety of the speech.Many Republicans have spent the last month avoiding Santos, who is at the center of a media circus sparked by <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/george-santos-admits-lying-everyone-leaked-audio-recording-2023-2">myriad lies</a> on his resume and investigations of his campaign finances, and who has faced calls to resign from members not just within his own party, but from his home state delegation. Many of those <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/inside-congress-house-republicans-uneasy-reckoning-george-santos-lies-mccarthy-2023-1">who spoke recently with Insider's Bryan Metzger</a> made it clear they wanted nothing to do with Santos.But as Metzger noted, the congressman who initially sat by himself during his first days in office eventually found a "receptive crowd" among the chamber's right-wing lawmakers.Photos of Santos from earlier this session show him sitting between Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and fellow freshman Andy Ogles of Tennessee or with Rep. Pat Fallon of Texas, who told Metzger that Santos seems like a "nice guy." Greene appears to have known Santos <a href="https://twitter.com/Santos4Congress/status/1333475811844829185?s=20&amp;t=8SrbQTrd79sFYQKodKgdXA" target="_blank" rel="noopener">at least since 2020</a>.During the <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/19-hardline-republicans-vote-against-kevin-mccarthy-for-house-speaker-2023-1">House speaker vote fight</a>, Insider spotted Santos hanging out by Kevin McCarthy tormentors Reps. Matt Gaetz of Florida and Lauren Boebert of Colorado. In recent weeks, Insider has watched Santos roam around the chamber during votes. Sometimes that entails standing alone along the back wall as members weigh in on pending bills, while on at least one occasion he spent about 10 minutes chatting up fellow freshman GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida.

George Santos grabbed an aisle seat at the State of the Union. Not everyone was eager to shake his hand.

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Some Republicans conceded that it would be concerning if Trump kept information about nuclear weapons.</li><li>The GOP largely continued to push the DOJ to disclose more about the FBI's Mar-a-Lago raid.</li></ul>Republicans continued on Friday continued to question why the FBI would raid the private home of a former president, despite <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/08/11/garland-trump-mar-a-lago/">new reports</a> that Donald Trump took classified documents related to nuclear weapons from the White House to his Mar-a-Lago residence. But some GOP lawmakers are conceding that this new development is concerning. Rep. Michael McCaul, the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs committee, said that he was still waiting to see more closely held information about the case, including the affidavit that investigators filed to obtain the search warrant. Federal prosecutors typically don't release such information at this stage of an investigation."That's pretty serious, but that is also in a different compartment, you know, we compartmentalize classified information and nuclear is in its own place," the Texas lawmaker told Insider on Friday, alluding to the fact that some information about the US' nuclear arsenal is limited to only a few individuals. "I just don't have all the facts in front of me. It's unfortunate they just didn't work it out where he could send it back. You hate to see a former president have a search warrant" executed against him.Rep. Mike Turner, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said "it depends on what the nuclear information is" during a news conference on Friday."There are things that are highly, highly classified and there are things that are not extremely classified but are nonetheless classified," he said. The Ohio lawmaker said his panel "of course" deals with concerns about the proper handling of classified information. But he stressed that Attorney General Merrick Garland had a "number of options" besides executing a search warrant at Trump's private club at Mar-a-Lago. On Thursday night, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/08/11/garland-trump-mar-a-lago/">The Washington Post reported</a> that "classified documents related to nuclear weapons" were among the things FBI agents were looking for when they executed a search warrant at Trump's Palm Beach resort on Monday. <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-doesnt-deny-taking-classified-nuclear-documents-mar-a-lago-2022-8">Trump himself did not deny The Post's report</a> in a statement on Friday.Other Republicans on the intelligence panel said the onus was on Garland to tell lawmakers more about the raid, including the specifics of why there were national security concerns about the documents that were reportedly stored at Mar-a-Lago."Look at the premise of most of your questions, was it nuclear? Was it, heck, maybe it was aliens? That's the point," Rep. Chris Stewart of Utah said during a news conference. "We don't know, we're asking them to tell us. Until they tell us, we're going to have questions like this and the presumption is gonna be that it is political." Initial news about the raid served as a unifying moment for the GOP as even some of Trump's biggest critics within the party condemned the search. Even Vice President Mike Pence, who has a strained relationship with Trump, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/pence-defends-trump-deep-concern-fbi-mar-a-lago-raid-2022-8">expressed concern.</a>But Trump's more loyal followers within the party went even further. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky followed Trump's example by baselessly speculating that agents may have planted evidence in the material they retrieved from Mar-a-Lago. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene called to "defund the FBI." This torrent of criticism has shifted slightly as some lawmakers clarify that their questions lay mainly with top officials, not agents on the ground."I want to be very clear, the rank and file members of the FBI and our Department of Justice — they are brave men and women who do their job every single day," Rep. Trent Kelly of Mississippi told reporters during a news conference. "However, the 7th floor, the leadership of the FBI and Department of Justice, have been politicized in the eyes of most Americans."Kelly added that "perception is reality" and that the only way DOJ officials can calm the tension sparked by Trump and the broader conservative reaction to the raid is to be more transparent about why investigators took such an aggressive step. Turner, Kelly, and other GOP members of the Intelligence Committee called for Garland to reveal more about why the raid was conducted."Christopher Wray, I would say to you personally you are in a crisis of leadership, you have to assure the American people that you are working for all of us, not just some of us," Stewart said. "If you did what you did this week and there was a necessity for it then tell the American people why."Garland confirmed on Thursday <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/merrick-garland-signed-off-search-warrant-trump-mar-a-lago-2022-8">that he personally signed off on the raid</a> after "less intrusive" means failed. Trump appointed Christopher Wray, the current FBI director, after the president fired FBI Director James Comey. The only opposition to Wray's confirmation came from Senate Democrats. Before returning to DOJ, Wray defended then-New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who would later run for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, during the "Bridgegate" scandal.Garland responded to criticism of the FBI on Thursday, telling reporters that agents and DOJ employees were <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/merrick-garland-defends-doj-fbi-trump-mar-a-lago-raid-2022-8">"patriotic public servants."</a> Wray added his own defense on Friday."Unfounded attacks on the integrity of the FBI erode respect for the rule of law and are a grave disservice to the men and women who sacrifice so much to protect others," <a href="https://twitter.com/PaulHammelNE/status/1558097710456217602">Wray said in a statement.</a>

Some Republicans express concern about Trump reportedly taking documents about nuclear weapons to Mar-a-Lago, even as they bash the FBI

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Roughly 32 GOP mayors are backing Biden's $1.9 trillion <keyword id="8931586" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="covid-19-relief">COVID-19 relief</keyword> bill.</li><li>The support is a stark contrast to the bill's opposition among <keyword id="1101581" type="COMPANY" weightage="60" keywordseo="Congressional-Republicans">congressional Republicans</keyword>.</li><li>The House passed the bill on Saturday and it now heads to the Senate where resistance is anticipated.</li></ul>While President <keyword id="99719" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="Joe-Biden">Joe Biden</keyword> faces firm opposition to his $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief package from congressional Republicans, many elected GOP officials outside of Washington DC are singing a different tune.Roughly 32 GOP mayors, representing cities from Oklahoma City and Arlington, Texas to Carmel, Indiana and Mesa, Arizona, are among 425 mayors who backed the relief bill <a href="https://www.usmayors.org/2021/01/29/more-than-400-bipartisan-mayors-now-signed-on-to-letter-calling-for-action-on-direct-fiscal-assistance-for-cities/">in a letter</a> through the US Conference of Mayors to Congress."American cities and our essential workers have been serving at the front lines of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic for nearly a year," the mayors wrote. "Despite immense fiscal pressure, your local government partners oversaw those efforts, while trying to maintain essential services and increase our internal capacity to provide support for residents and businesses who have been crippled by a tanking economy."Congressional Republicans have blasted the price tag of Biden's bill, deriding the local economic relief as a "blue state bailout" for Democratic cities and states.GOP Rep. Trent Kelly of Mississippi echoed such a sentiment at a House committee meeting this week."What I see is a bailout for poorly-run (cities and states), not money that is earmarked for those who have discovered losses based on COVID," he said.Some Republicans <a href="https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/2021/02/08/sen-rick-scott-misrepresents-covid-19s-toll-on-state-finances-politifact/">have also argued</a> that the economic forecasts for many localities were above expected projections, eliminating the need for increased federal funds.<a href="https://twitter.com/CNNnewsroom/status/1365326548430127104">During a CNN segment</a> yesterday, GOP mayors David Holt of Oklahoma City and John Giles of Mesa defended the need for additional aid."I don't know a city where revenues have gone up," Holt said. "That is news to me and I think that is not true. Whether your mayor is a Republican or a Democrat, revenues are down."He added: "The idea that this is a red state/blue state or red city/blue city thing is really a myth. Everybody is down. Everybody needs some support to get their services back to the level that people expect."When asked if Mesa was a "poorly-run city," Giles rejected such a characterization."I'm very proud of the way that we've administered the COVID relief that we received a year ago," he said. "There are a lot of people in Mesa that received food and utility assistance. Our first responders were funded. We were able to get kids back into school, to help with our school districts to have the remote learning devices they needed."He emphasized: "I would invite any scrutiny that partisans would like to apply to the way that we've administered the funds that we've received thus far."After the relief bill <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/stimulus-house-democrats-approve-19-trillion-biden-rescue-package-2021-2">passed the House</a> in a near party-line 219-212 vote yesterday, the group praised the outcome as it heads to the Senate."The fiscal relief passed today will help close deep budget holes and enable cities to be an engine of our recovery," they wrote. "But the job is not done. Mayors urge the Senate to now act quickly on this package and preserve the desperately needed resources for cities of all sizes."Earlier this month, a group of GOP senators led by Sen. Susan Collins of Maine <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/gop-stimulus-package-compromise-covid-bill-biden-lower-income-payments-2021-1">sought to reduce</a> the size of the relief package to roughly $600 billion, but <keyword id="6534156" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="Democrats">Democrats</keyword> proceeded with their bill through the reconciliation process, which would allow them to pass the bill through party-line votes.If all 50 Democrats back the relief bill on the Senate floor in the face of united GOP opposition, then Vice President Kamala Harris's tie-breaking vote will assure its passage.Holt, for his part, said that he was singularly focused on the well-being of his city."I'm a one-issue voter," he <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/02/25/joe-bidens-covid-19-stimulus-bill-boosted-republican-mayors/4540358001/">told USA Today</a>. "If it's good for cities, and especially for Oklahoma City, I'm going to be supportive. The $350 billion for cities and states is a no-brainer to me, regardless of your political party."

Nearly three dozen GOP mayors back Biden's COVID-19 relief package

Here are all of the Republican elected officials backing Trump's 2024 campaign

Alex Wong/Getty ImagesRep. Ruben Gallego of Arizona.A Democratic lawmaker lashed out at House Republicans on Wednesday, accusing them of pushing a "sneaky gimmick" that could result in military funding being poured into President Donald Trump's wall on the US-Mexico border."This rule is a travesty," said Rep. Ruben Gallego of Arizona. "If we vote to approve it, an amendment unanimously supported by the Armed Services committee ... to prevent President Trump from using our military's money to build his border wall, will suddenly vanish.""It's a legislative magic trick, a sneaky gimmick designed to disguise their actions," Gallego said. "Once again, Speaker Ryan and the House Republicans are doing President Trump's dirty work."The latest amendment, made by Republican Reps. Steven Palazzo and Trent Kelly, was approved by the House Rules Committee Tuesday evening, in the form of a self-executing amendment, according to <a href="http://www.politico.com/tipsheets/morning-defense" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Politico</a>. The amendment would automatically remove Gallego's own amendment from the National Defense Authorization Act's bill, which is being debated by the House.So far, lawmakers have taken advantage of the opportunity to submit their NDAA amendments, over 400 thus far, which is considered to be a crucial piece of legislation due to its $696 billion budget that spans a vast spectrum of US policies.Sandy Huffaker/Getty ImagesA Border Patrol vehicle sits along the US-Mexico border wall on January 25, 2017 in San Ysidro, California."They didn't have the courage to pose my amendment in committee, or even on the House floor," continued Gallego. "They passed this rule late at night with hardly anyone watching, in typical Republican fashion. Republicans are resorting to deceptive legislative tactics to do Trump's bidding, just for his small fragile ego."Gallego, a US Marine Corps veteran, continued to declaim the efficacy and the costs of building a US-Mexico border wall: "Just six months into this administration, it's already abundantly clear that Mexico won't pay for Trump's stupid, dumb border wall. We must not allow precious resources to be robbed from our troops simply to score political points for Trump's ego."Trump's plans to build a wall between the US and Mexico has hit a wave of criticism from both political parties due to its cost and effectiveness. An April report from Senate Democrats estimated that the wall would cost nearly $70 billion and $150 million a year for upkeep. A Homeland Security report; however, estimated the wall would cost $21.6 billion, without maintenance fees, according to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/us/politics/senate-democrats-border-wall-cost-trump.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The New York Times</a>.Gallego continued to explain why he believed channeling funds from the NDAA was an ill-advised maneuver: "It was simply to ensure [Department of Defense] resources aren't siphoned off for a pointless wall that we don't need and can't afford," he said. "We have a ... responsibility to ensure that money meant to address real national security challenges isn't diverted to combat imaginary ones that the president has created."<h2>Watch Rep. Gallego's comments here:</h2> <h3>NOW WATCH: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-irish-reporter-nice-smile-oval-office-prime-minister-taoiseach-leo-varadkar-caitriona-perry-2017-6">Trump tells a female reporter she has a 'nice smile' while on the phone to the Irish PM</a></h3> Please enable Javascript to watch this video

You Searched For "trent kelly" and got 8 results

Live results: 2 Mississippi GOP representatives are in tighter than expected primary races, and one is headed to a runoff

Madison Hall,John L. Dorman

It happened again: These 20 House members, mostly Republican, voted against millions in funding for their own districts

Bryan Metzger

George Santos grabbed an aisle seat at the State of the Union. Not everyone was eager to shake his hand.

Nicole Gaudiano,Bryan Metzger…

Some Republicans express concern about Trump reportedly taking documents about nuclear weapons to Mar-a-Lago, even as they bash the FBI

Brent D. Griffiths

Nearly three dozen GOP mayors back Biden's COVID-19 relief package

John L. Dorman

Here are all of the Republican elected officials backing Trump's 2024 campaign

Bryan Metzger,Oma Seddiq

'Stupid, dumb border wall': Democratic lawmaker unleashes on plans to use military funds for border wall

David Choi

WHIP COUNT: Here's which members of the House voted for and against impeaching Trump

Grace Panetta

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides