Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

<ol><li><keyword id="6356895" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Cyrus-Mistry" source="Orion">Cyrus Mistry</keyword>, the former chairman of <keyword id="46894" type="General" weightage="50" keywordseo="tata-sons" source="Orion">Tata Sons</keyword>, was born in Mumbai on 4 July 1968. He was an Irish by nationality as his mother was Irish.</li><li>He was the second son of billionaire and construction magnate <keyword id="6689214" type="General" weightage="50" keywordseo="pallonji-mistry" source="Orion">Pallonji Mistry</keyword> and his elder brother is <keyword id="844645" type="General" weightage="50" keywordseo="shapoor-mistry" source="Orion">Shapoor Mistry</keyword>. Both his parents held Irish citizenship.</li><li><keyword id="6391150" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="mistry" source="Orion">Mistry</keyword> went to Cathedral &amp; John Connon School in Mumbai. He went to Imperial College in London and got a Bachelor of Engineering in civil engineering from University College London. </li><li>Pallonji Mistry died earlier this year in June. The Pallonji’s have had business interests in India for over 100 years. In the 1930s Mistry’s grandfather acquired a stake in Tata Sons. He also got a Masters degree in management from University of London. </li><li>The Mistry family has 18.37% in Tata Sons, which is the largest shareholding by a single entity.</li><li>Cyrus Mistry joined the Tata Sons board in 2006 after his father retired from it. He served as director on Tata Elxsi between 1990 and 2009 and was also a director on Tata Power board till 2006.</li><li>In 2013, Mistry was appointed chairman of Tata Sons and was also appointed chairman of several other Tata group companies. </li><li>Cyrus Mistry was married to Rohiqa Chagla, the daughter of lawyer Iqbal Chagla and granddaughter of jurist MC Chagla. It was his father in law that strategized his entire legal battle against Tata Sons. </li><li>Mistry has two sons – Firoz and Zahan Mistry.</li><li>Mistry was known to be a soft spoken and gentleman who believed he had to fight for his honour after he was evicted in an ugly boardroom battle.</li></ol>

10 things you need to know about Cyrus Mistry

<ul><li>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) ruled that Cryus Mistry’s removal as <keyword id="3932388" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Chairman-of-Tata-Sons">chairman of Tata Sons</keyword> was illegal.</li><li><keyword id="46894" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Tata-Sons">Tata Sons</keyword> has four weeks to appeal the decision at Supreme Court.</li><li>The NCLAT order appears to even go beyond the specific reliefs sought by Mistry, the Tata Sons statement said</li></ul>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) ruled that <keyword id="6356895" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="cyrus-mistry">Cyrus Mistry</keyword>’s <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/corporates/news/cyrus-mistry-can-return-as-tata-sons-chairman-three-years-after-he-was-thrown-out-by-ratan-tata/articleshow/72868406.cms">removal as chairman from Tata Sons was illegal</a> and has directed the company to <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/thelife/personalities/news/cyrus-mistry-net-worth-and-full-profile/articleshow/72870160.cms">hand him back his position</a>. However, the court has a left window of four weeks for Tata Sons to appeal at the Supreme Court. As it seems right now, the salt-to-software conglomerate, which also owns companies like the luxury car maker Jaguar Land Rover and the British tea brand Tetley is in no mood to give up. "It is not clear as to how the NCLAT Order seeks to over-rule the decisions taken by shareholders of Tata Sons and listed Tata operating companies at validly constituted shareholder meetings. The NCLAT order appears to even go beyond the specific reliefs sought by the Appellant," the company’s spokesperson told Business Insider. But Mistry sees this as a clear win. "Today's victory is not a personal victory for me, but is a victory for the principles of good governance and minority shareholder rights," he said a statement shared with the press. The Tata vs Mistry battle is far from over Within two months of his dismissal, Mistry’s family-run investment firms approached the NCLT. Mistry’s primary argument was that his removal as chairman of Tata Sons violated the Companies Act by forcing him to leave without ‘due process’ being followed and also accused the Board of ‘oppression and mismanagement’. While the lower court, the NCLT, had turned down Mistry’s appeal, today’s victory at the appellate tribunal gives Mistry a second chance to prove his charges against the Board and Ratan Tata. "The outcome of the appeal is a vindication of my stand taken when the board of Tata Sons, without warning or reason removed me, first as executive chairman, and subsequently as director of Tata Sons," he said. One of India’s biggest corporate disputes may be tested at the country’s highest court soon. 
	

	
 <div type="image" title="image (2)" msid="72872778" hostid="261"></div>




 <div type="image" title="T2" msid="72872774" hostid="261"></div>


 See also: <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/corporates/news/cyrus-mistry-can-return-as-tata-sons-chairman-three-years-after-he-was-thrown-out-by-ratan-tata/articleshow/72868406.cms">Cyrus Mistry can return as Tata Sons Chairman three years after he was thrown out by Ratan Tata</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/corporates/news/cyrus-mistry-still-has-to-prove-the-charges-against-ratan-tata-and-tata-sons-board/articleshow/72868673.cms">First Cut: The legal implications of Mistry's victory in the case against Tata Sons</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/thelife/personalities/news/cyrus-mistry-net-worth-and-full-profile/articleshow/72870160.cms">The volatile fortunes of low-profile Cyrus Mistry who was made the Chairman of Tata Sons only to be ousted soon after — now he’s fighting his way back</a>

Tata Sons says the court gave Cyrus Mistry more than he wanted

<ul><li><keyword id="6356895" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="cyrus-mistry">Cyrus Mistry</keyword> has been reappointed as the <keyword id="3932388" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Chairman-of-Tata-Sons">chairman of Tata Sons</keyword> by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).</li><li>Mistry will return to the helm of the Tata conglomerate after a three-year-long battle in courts.</li><li>He was ousted in October 2016 being chairman for nearly four years.</li></ul>Cyrus Mistry will be back at the helm of <keyword id="46894" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Tata-Sons">Tata Sons</keyword> in another four weeks-- if no other legal hurdles stop him. After over three years spent battling in courts, Mistry’s <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/corporates/news/cyrus-mistry-can-return-as-tata-sons-chairman-three-years-after-he-was-thrown-out-by-ratan-tata/articleshow/72868406.cms">removal as chairman </a>was deemed illegal by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). As Mistry returns to power, the current executive chairman of the company — N Chandra — might have to look for a new job. Mistry served as Tata Sons chairman just shy of four years before the board removed him from the helm in October 2016. His net worth is currently at $10 billion. Here’s a quick look at Mistry’s journey from being the son of a construction tycoon to leading Tata Sons a second time:

The volatile fortunes of low-profile Cyrus Mistry who was made the Chairman of Tata Sons only to be ousted soon after — now he’s fighting his way back

<keyword id="6355725" type="CITY" weightage="20" keywordseo="Tata-Group">Tata Group</keyword> patriarch <keyword id="6360722" type="PERSON" weightage="100" keywordseo="ratan-tata">Ratan Tata</keyword> had personally asked Cyrus P <keyword id="6391150" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Mistry">Mistry</keyword> to resign as chairman of <keyword id="46894" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Tata-Sons">Tata Sons</keyword> as the board had lost faith in him, but his refusal led to the removal via majority vote. In a para¬by ¬para response to the petition filed by investment firms associated with Mistry's family against his removal, Tata Sons — the holding company of the $103 billion salt-¬to-¬steel conglomerate — told the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) that Mistry was removed as Chairman on October 24 last year after "little or no signs of improvement" in his leadership. Seven out of the nine directors of Tata Sons voted for his replacement after <keyword id="2789990" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="20" keywordseo="Farida-Khambata">Farida Khambata</keyword> abstained and Mistry was declared ineligible to vote as he was an interest director. "Before the commencement of the board meeting of Tata Sons on October 24, 2016, Ratan N Tata and (director) Nitin Nohria personally spoke to <keyword id="6356895" type="PERSON" weightage="100" keywordseo="Cyrus-Mistry">Cyrus Mistry</keyword> and offered Cyrus Mistry an opportunity to resign voluntarily as Executive Chairman. However, Cyrus Mistry refused to do so," Tata Sons said in 204¬page affidavit. Stating that the decision was not taken suddenly or in haste, it said the removal "was the result of a chain of events that led to a growing trust and confidence deficit that had to be addressed without delay". During his four years at the helm, "several disturbing facts" emerged about his leadership including insufficient details and discipline on capital allocation decisions, slow execution on problems, strategic Plan and Business Plan lacking specificity and follow ¬through, no meaningful steps to enter new growth businesses and weak top management team. 
 
For 4 years, the directors of Tata Sons supported Mistry and exercised caution, restraint and patience, according to the affidavit. "It was Mistry himself who invited Ratan Tata to be the Chairman Emeritus of Tata Sons and in that capacity, Ratan Tata had the right to participate in the meetings of the Board of Directors of Tata Sons," it said. Prior to October 24, 2016, in his capacity as Chairman Emeritus, Tata never attended any board meeting of Tata Sons and used to render advice only if warranted, as a person interested in the welfare of the Tata Group and in most cases, if not all, only when Mistry reached out to him. "Ratan Tata personally advised and counselled Mistry on several matters, when time and again Mistry reached out to Ratan Tata for guidance on business related matters," it said. It said although the Nominations and Remunerations Committee of Tata Sons, in its meeting held on June 28, 2016, made positive comments on Mistry's performance, it also stressed upon "the need for greater clarity on the functioning of the Board of Tata Sons Ltd in relation to the Tata Trusts, as well as its role vis¬a¬vis Group Companies". Further, the Committee "did not sufficiently factor his ability to lead the Tata Group in the future". "It was felt that Mistry's leadership was lacking on numerous fronts and did not match up to his promises made at the time of his selection. Mistry's leadership was not aligned to the long term goals and targets of Tata Sons as a company and the Tata Group as a whole," it added

Ratan Tata personally asked Cyrus Mistry to step down, his refusal led to the big corporate spar

<ul><li>In his four year tenure as a chairman, <keyword id="6356895" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Cyrus-Mistry" source="Orion">Cyrus Mistry</keyword> was known to maintain a very low profile. </li><li>Cyrus <keyword id="6391150" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="mistry" source="Orion">Mistry</keyword>’s father Pallonji Mistry who passed away th<a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/thelife/personalities/news/pallonji-mistry-the-elusive-but-powerful-phantom-of-bombay-house/articleshow/92511725.cms">is June, was known as the Phantom of Bombay H</a>ouse. </li><li>In 2016, Cyrus Mistry was unceremoniously removed as the chairman without giving reasons and he was no more low profile. </li><li>Mistry called his removal from chairmanship ‘unique in history’.</li></ul>During his four-year tenure as the chairman of <keyword id="46894" type="General" weightage="80" keywordseo="tata-sons" source="Orion">Tata Sons</keyword>, Cyrus Mistry had earned a nickname – ‘the most low profile man with the most high profile job’. After all he came from a family, which is known to zealously protect its privacy. His father Pallonji Mistry who passed away th<a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/thelife/personalities/news/pallonji-mistry-the-elusive-but-powerful-phantom-of-bombay-house/articleshow/92511725.cms">is June, was known as the Phantom of Bombay H</a>ouse for the power he used to wield at the Tata group headquarters and was barely ever seen or heard. If the course ran smooth, Cyrus too would have remained so but in 2016, he was unceremoniously removed as the chairman without giving reasons and he was no more low profile. In a bitter boardroom coup, Mistry was asked to step down and when he refused, he was unceremoniously removed by the board of directors. Subsequently he was forced to step down from boards of other Tata companies too. His removal led to one of the ugliest battles that corporate India had ever seen. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="‘Unique in history’" comment="subhead" text="‘Unique in history’">‘Unique in history’</cmsannotation> Mistry called his removal from chairmanship ‘unique in history’. In addition to questioning many business decisions saying that five companies of Tata group had writedowns that accounted to $18 billion; he also questioned the deal with Air Asia which is known to have made fraudulent transactions. “We managed to raise awareness among stakeholders of the challenges in governance and ethics in the group. These were tough messages that had to be sent for the long term interest of the group,” he told <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/interviews/i-have-a-lifetime-ahead-of-me-but-my-fight-continues-cyrus-mistry/articleshow/56073727.cms?from=mdr">ET in an interview right after he </a>was removed as the chairman. He had accused Ratan Tata of inappropriate intervention and Mistry was pushed to become a ‘lame duck chairman’. The case, as expected, went to court and after a string of shocking twists and turns, the Supreme Court passed an order for the Tata group, after which Mistry filed review petitions and they too were set aside by the country’s highest judicial authority. Mistry, however, never did believe it to be a short-term fight. “I have a lifetime ahead of me and my fight will go on,” he had said. If only, that were true. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="Mistry’s Clementine mirror" comment="subhead" text="Mistry’s Clementine mirror">Mistry’s Clementine mirror</cmsannotation> Cyrus Mistry is survived by wife Rohiqa Mistry and two sons Firoz and Zahan. Rohiqa is the daughter of one of Mumbai’s famous lawyers Iqbal Chagla. The unusually quiet Mistry once spoke in an interview on the Tata website of her role in life. He called her a <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/my-wife-does-not-hesitate-to-disagree-with-me-tata-groupscyrus-mistry/articleshow/54399682.cms?from=mdr">Clementine mirror who never shies</a> away from disagreeing with him. He compared her to Winston Churchill’s wife Clementine who had once famously pointed out the errors in the judgment of the war-time hero and Prime Minister of England during its darkest hours. Mistry’s elder brother Shapoor is the sole owner of the Shapoorji Pallonji group, which is known for its construction business in India and the Middle East. The group had also owned Eureka Forbes which was sold to a private equity fund in 2021. Mistry’s friend and NCP Sharad Pawar’s daughter Supriya Sule who is his friend, calls him an exceptionally hard-working person, who always puts his best foot forward. The golf loving Mistry too had admitted, during his tenure as Tata Sons chairman, that he has done a bad job of work life balance. However, immediately after his exit, the first thing he did even before he took the legal recourse, was to go on a holiday. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="Timeline of events of Mistry-Tata case" comment="subhead" text="Timeline of events of Mistry-Tata case">Timeline of events of Mistry-Tata case</cmsannotation> 2011: Cyrus Mistry is appointed as the deputy chairman of Tata Sons. 2012: Cyrus Mistry takes over as the chairman of Tata Sons, as Ratan Tata becomes the chairman emeritus. 2016: Tata Sons removes Cyrus Mistry as the chairman and reinstates Ratan Tata as the interim chairman. Mistry companies move National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) alleging oppression of minority shareholders and challenge his removal. 2017: Tata Sons names N Chandrasekhar as the chairman of Tata Sons. 2019: NCLT restores Mistry as the chairman of Tata Sons. 2020: Tata Sons challenges NCLT decision in the Supreme Court. SC stays NCLT decision. It also restrains Shapoorji Pallonji group from pledging its shares in Tata Sons. SC sets aside NCLT decision to reinstate Mistry as chairman of Tata Sons. 2022: SC rejects Mistry’s petition to review its earlier decision.

Life and times of Cyrus Mistry – the most low profile man with the most high profile exit

New Delhi, Jan 3 () Ratan Tata on Friday filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking to quash a company law appellate court order directing Tata Sons to rehire the chairman it had fired in 2016, saying the judgment was "wrong, erroneous and contrary to the record of the case".
His petition is separate from the one filed by Tata Sons Ltd, the holding company of the USD 110 billion salt-to-software conglomerate, in the Supreme Court on Thursday that sought a stay on the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's December 18, 2019 order to reinstate Cyrus Mistry as the chairman.
Ratan Tata, who is chairman emeritus and a shareholder of Tata Sons, in the petition said the NCLAT judgment was wrong as it treats Tata Sons as a two-group company.
Mistry, he contended, was made the Executive Chairman of Tata Sons in a purely professional capacity and not as a representative of the Shapoorji Pallonji Group, which holds 18.4 per cent in Tata Sons.
Tata Trusts, of whom Ratan Tata had been a chairman for many years, holds 65.89 per cent of Tata Sons.
The petition said the NCLAT order wrongly suggests that "someone from the SP Group had been a director because of some entrenched right or convention".
"This is untrue and contrary to the records and the articles of association of Tata Sons, which are undisputed and binding on the shareholders including the SP Group," he contended.
He said Mistry's leadership "was lacking" in "his reluctance to timely and meaningfully disassociate himself from his family business after he became the Chairman of Tata Sons and address any conflict in this regard, which was a condition precedent to his appointment as Chairman of Tata Sons".
Mistry, he alleged, "concentrated power and authority in his own hands" and "board members were being alienated on matters relating to Tata Operating Companies where Tata Sons had huge financial exposure and the Board of Tata Sons had to contend with such decisions being cast upon it as fait accompli".
The chairman emeritus targeted Mistry for the handling of the failed partnership with Japan's DoCoMo saying it showed his "complete obstinacy" as he attempted to resist complying with the legal obligations further. "This is not what the Tata Sons brand stands for. Quite to the contrary, honouring its commitments is one of Tata Sons' highest virtues it takes great pride in. Spat with DoCoMo brought ill-repute and reputational losses to Tata Sons."
Ratan Tata said the NCLAT reached a judgment based on "a contrived and self-serving reading of certain correspondence from which it derives erroneous findings which kaleidoscopically portray the larger theme of the judgment on purported oppression and prejudice to the Shapoorji Pallonji Group (SP Group)".
"The Impugned Judgment is also infirm because it blatantly indulges in propagating a selective narrative where relevant facts and records have been glossed over," he said. "The pretense of reasoning and judicial approach is betrayed by omission to consider the record itself."
He said there are no 550 mails between him and Cyrus Mistry as mentioned in the NCLAT judgment. "These mails were between Chairman Emeritus and Chairman Cyrus Mistry and not by entities in Court."
"The whole case of oppression and prejudice is based entirely on words and statements contained in correspondence without there being an iota of evidence to buttress any actual loss/injury being caused to Tata Sons as a result of Cyrus Mistry being forced to act on such interference/interdiction against his wishes," the petition said.
It went on to state that it was "very unfortunate and distressing" that the NCLAT judgment without providing any proper evidence has passed adverse remarks against Ratan Tata who has spent more than half of his life in building the name of the Tata Sons and other Tata operating companies to one of the top global companies.
The judgment creates a wrong legal precedent that is vulnerable to being misused against several companies, including the public sector and government companies, it said. KRH ANZ BAL

You Searched For "tata sons mistry" and got 6 results

10 things you need to know about Cyrus Mistry

BI India Bureau

Tata Sons says the court gave Cyrus Mistry more than he wanted

Prabhjote Gill

The volatile fortunes of low-profile Cyrus Mistry who was made the Chairman of Tata Sons only to be ousted soon after — now he’s fighting his way back

Prabhjote Gill

Ratan Tata personally asked Cyrus Mistry to step down, his refusal led to the big corporate spar

PTI

Life and times of Cyrus Mistry – the most low profile man with the most high profile exit

Katya Naidu

Ratan Tata moves SC against NCLAT order reinstating Mistry as Tata Sons chairman

PTI

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides