Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

<ul><li>The <keyword id="8370475" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="20" keywordseo="supreme-court-verdict-on-maharashtra">Supreme Court verdict on Maharashtra</keyword> government formation is out and the judges have ordered the floor test tomorrow.</li><li>A temporary speaker must be appointed to hold the floor test and it should be concluded by 5 pm on Wednesday (November 27). </li><li>"At this interim stage, parties must maintain constitutional morality," Justice Raman said as he read out the order. </li><li>The counsel for <keyword id="6358821" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="shiv-sena">Shiv Sena</keyword> sought the Supreme Court to prevent the Maharashtra government from taking any big policy decisions.</li></ul>Supreme Court Justices Ramana, Ashok Bhushan and Sanjiv Khanna have ordered that the floor test in Maharashtra assembly must be held on Wednesday and that a Pro-tem speaker to be appointed and the only agenda is to conduct the floor test. Pro-tem is a Latin phrase which translates to 'for the time being' in English-- essentially the appointment will be the sole purpose of presiding over the floor test. <keyword id="6355042" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="20" keywordseo="Devendra-Fadnavis">Devendra Fadnavis</keyword> who has been sworn in as the Chief Minister will have to prove that he has the requisite amount of support to lead the government. "At this interim stage, parties must maintain constitutional morality," Justice Raman said as he read out the order. This is how the unprecedented political crisis in Maharashtra played out in recent weeks. October 24: BJP won 102 seats in the recent assembly elections but need a partner to reach the magic number of 145, to form the government. While Sena had won 56 seats, NCP won 54 seats and Congress won 44 seats. As Sena and BJP disagreed on seat sharing, endless discussions and delays led to a President’s rule in the state. November 10: BJP says it will be unable to form the government while Shiv Sena seeks 24 hours to prove its ability. The Uddhav Thackeray-led party was looking to garner support from ideological rivals- the NCP and the Congress. November 12: Governor rejects the Shiv Sena 's claim and the state is brought under President's rule. November 23: Just when a coalition between Sena, Congress and NCP seemed imminent, Ajit Pawar sprung a surprise. In a dramatic turn of events, the leader of NCP's legislative party decides to back the BJP -- against the wishes of the party chief Sharad Pawar. BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis is sworn in as chief minister and Ajit Pawar takes oath as deputy chief minister in a hush-hush ceremony on Saturday. November 24: The aggrieved coalition moves Supreme Court against the governor's decision.Mukul Rogatgi, the advocate on behalf of the Fadnavis asserted to the court that they are ready for a floor test. The BJP government submitted two letters to the Supreme Court, one of them include the letter submitted by Devendra Fadnavis to the governor. The letter had 54 signatures of NCP MLAs, and current deputy CM Ajit Pawar’s assurance that he will support the government for a stable government. SEE ALSO: <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/politics/india/news/shiv-sena-congress-ncp-show-proof-of-strength-with-an-unprecedented-public-parade/articleshow/72229903.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink" target="_blank">Shiv Sena, Congress, NCP show proof of strength with an unprecedented public parade</a>

Supreme Court verdict on Maharashtra: Trust vote on Wednesday

<ul><li>It said that the office of <keyword id="6363345" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="20" keywordseo="cji">CJI</keyword> will come under Right to Information act (<keyword id="6356198" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="20" keywordseo="RTI">RTI</keyword>). </li><li>This means that information can be sought by anybody by filing an application.</li><li>However, Justice Ramana who pronounced the verdict also said that RTI should not be allowed to be used as a tool of surveillance. </li></ul> The <keyword id="6354977" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="Supreme-Court">Supreme Court</keyword> of India has made its <keyword id="42759" type="POSITION" weightage="20" keywordseo="Chief-Justice">chief justice</keyword> accountable to the public. It said that the office of CJI will come under Right to Information (RTI) which means that information can be sought by anybody by filing an application. “RTI office of <keyword id="45053" type="POSITION" weightage="20" keywordseo="Chief-Justice-of-India">Chief Justice of India</keyword> is a public authority under RTI. Judicial independence has to be kept in mind while dealing with transparency,” ruled SC in its order. However, Justice Ramana who pronounced the verdict also said that RTI should not be allowed to be used as a tool of surveillance. "Nobody wants to remain in the state of darkness or keep anybody in the state of darkness. The question is drawing a line. In the name of transparency, you can't destroy the institution," the SC bench said. 2010 or now? This order mirrors the Delhi High Court judgement which said that judicial independence was not the privilege of a judge but a responsibility. The case was filed by an RTI activist S C Agarwal who had engaged prominent lawyer Prashant Bhushan to file the case. The controversial case had triggered a debate between transparency and judicial freedom. Bhushan had famously questioned if judges inhabit a “different universe” and described their reluctance to part information as “disturbing”. This is the second important judgement that Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi has pronounced in the last week, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/politics/news/ayodhya-ram-mandir-case-supreme-court-verdict-top-highlights/articleshow/71979856.cms">after AYodhya case order on Saturday (November 9). </a>

Chief Justice of India will now come under RTI lens, says Supreme Court

<ul><li><keyword id="53964" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Soli-Sorabjee">Soli Sorabjee</keyword>, the <keyword id="2500151" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Former-Attorney-General-of-India">former Attorney General of India</keyword>, passed away on 30 April at the age of 91 due to complications from COVID-19.</li><li>The Padma Vibhushan awardee is most recognised for his work defending people’s freedom of expression as well as human rights. </li><li>Sorabjee is also one of the few well known names in the profession who have openly opposed lawyers that charge big bucks.</li></ul>Former <keyword id="458351" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Attorney-General-of-India">Attorney General of India</keyword>, Soli Sorabjee, passed away on Friday, at the age of 91 due to COVID-19 related issues. “He will be remembered as a legend who added strength to the pillars of democracy. I pay my deep respects to the departed soul. Condolences to the family, friends and fans,” said the Chief Justice of India NV Ramana. Sorabjee had a career that spanned across seven decades during which he served two terms as the Attorney General, once from 1989 to 1990 and again from 1998 to 2004. “Despite possessing a different political persuasion, Soli [Sorabjee] has steadfastly believed in Voltaire [sic] famous dictum that he would disagree violently with anyone but defend to death that person’s right to disagree with him,” said Abhishek Manu Singhvi, a senior Member of Parliament (MP) and senior advocate in the Supreme Court, in a <a href="https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/straight-candid/down-the-memory-lane-reminiscing-soli-sorabjee/?source=app&amp;frmapp=yes">Times of India</a> op-ed. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="Work in the field of human rights and freedom of expression" comment="subhead" text="Work in the field of human rights and freedom of expression">Work in the field of human rights and freedom of expression</cmsannotation> Sorabjee is known for his work in the area of the protection of human rights and freedom of speech — an endeavour that eventually won him the Padma Vibhushan, India’s second-highest civilian honour, in March 2002. “If Soli was forced to choose amongst his many passions, I would guess freedom of speech and press would be his choice. His commitment to it has been unfailing and unflagging, never affected by the vicissitudes of contemporary ambiance or the burdens and exigencies of high office,” noted Singhvi. Sorabjee is also one of the few well known names in the profession who have openly opposed lawyers that charge big bucks. According to him, anyone charging ₹30 to ₹40 lakh is in the business of extortion. "If a man is willing to be robbed, will you be a thief," he <a href="https://www.shiksha.com/law/articles/5-famous-indian-lawyers-and-where-they-studied-blogId-8656">said.</a> The man has many a feather in his cap, including being the chairman of Berlin-based nonprofit organisation Transparency International and the convenor of the Minority Rights Group, in addition to being the <a href="https://www.un.org/press/en/1997/19971020.HRCN814.html">special rapporteur </a>to the United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) since 1997. He also worked on the Citizen’s Justice Committee, which represented pro bono — without any legal fees — the victims of 1984 anti-Sikh riots. The champion for freedom of speech and expression also defended the press in many landmark Supreme Court cases revoking censorship orders and bans on publications. The most recent example of this was lawyer and activist <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/india/news/supreme-court-holds-prashant-bhushan-guilty-of-contempt-of-court-punishment-to-be-announced-on-august-20/articleshow/77539437.cms">Prashant Bhushan’s case</a>. Before the <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/india/news/supreme-court-tests-prashant-bhushans-resolve-with-a-1-fine-for-critical-tweets/articleshow/77846880.cms">₹1 verdict</a> came in, Sorabjee felt the apex institution overreacted over a couple of tweets. “The court may at most give a lecture to Prashant (Bhushan) now. Warn him, but not punish him… It is a rather delicate balance to keep,” he told <a href="https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/soli-sorabjee-interview-supreme-court-overreacted-in-prashant-bhushan-contempt-case/article32420327.ece?homepage=true">The Hindu. </a> Sorabjee was born on 9 March 1930 and after studying at St. Xavier’s College and the Government Law College in Mumbai, he enrolled at the Bar in 1953. Zora Mody, Sorabjee’s daughter, is also a lawyer and a published author. She wrote the book 10 Judgements that Changed India. Sorabjee also has three granddaughters — Anjali, Aarti and Aditi.

Former Attorney General of India Soli Sorabjee passes away at 91

Irked over truckload of bulky documents filed by parties in a batch of petitions arising out of the Amazon-Future Retail case (Reliance Industries acquisition deal with Future Retail), the Supreme Court Tuesday asked whether the purpose was just to drag on or harass the judges and sought a common small compilation of documents. A bench comprising Chief Justice N V Ramana and Justice A S Bopanna and Hima Kohli asked the counsel for parties to file small volume of documents so that the matter can be disposed of, and fixed the case for hearing on December 8. I am sorry to say to all of you. What is the fun in filing 22-23 volumes of records. How many documents both sides have filed repeatedly and is it the purpose of just dragging on or otherwise to harass the judges, said the CJI. It is completely unnecessary, senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for the Future group, said and suggested that both sides can discuss and file a common document along with short written notes. There is a problem in locating the volume, the bench said, adding Give us some time. Do one thing. Can you make a small compilation of these documents which you are relying upon. Truckload of volume has been filed yesterday . Meanwhile, the bench allowed the IDBI trusteeship, which had moved the apex court seeking to de-freeze Future Retail shares pledged to it, withdrew its plea and said that it will go to the Delhi High Court with its plea. The pledged shares have been attached at the orders of the high court, senior advocate N K Kaul said, adding that since the apex court had barred the high court from proceeding with the case, the IDBI trusteeship has failed to access its shares. On November 11, the top court judge Justice Hima Kohli had offered to recuse herself from hearing the pleas, saying she and her family members have shares in Reliance Industries Ltd group firms, one of the interested parties to the litigation. We have no objection, said a battery of lawyers appearing for parties Amazon, Future Retail Limited (FRL) and Future Coupons Private Ltd (FCPL). The top court was hearing a fresh petition of Future Group against the Delhi High Court's recent order declining its plea for stay on an arbitration tribunal decision refusing to interfere with the Singapore International Arbitration Centre's (SIAC) Emergency Award (EA) which restrained it from going ahead with the Rs 24,731 crore merger deal with Reliance Retail. The bench was also hearing a counter plea by Amazon, seeking to restrain the regulators from approving the merger deal. It said the last order was passed with the consent of the parties that the regulatory authorities will not approve the merger deal without prior nod from the top court. The dispute over the merger deal has seen several rounds of litigation after SIAC passed the EA in favour of the US firm on October 25, 2020 staying the merger. On October 21 this year, a duly-constituted panel of arbitrators at SIAC reiterated the decision of the EA. Then on October 29, the Delhi High Court declined Future Group's plea for stay on the arbitration tribunal order refusing to interfere with the EA which restrained it from going ahead with the Rs 24,731 crore merger deal with Reliance Retail. The high court sought response from Amazon which had challenged the merger before the SIAC, and listed the appeals by FCPL and FRL for further hearing on January 4, 2022. FRL and FCPL moved the top court recently against the order with fresh pleas. Kishore Biyani and 15 others including FRL and FCPL have been embroiled in a series of litigations with Amazon, an investor in FCPL, over the deal with Reliance. Following the EA, subsequently, a three-member arbitral tribunal was constituted to decide the issues arising from the deal. On September 9, the apex court had stayed for four weeks all proceedings before the high court in relation to the implementation of the EA and also directed statutory authorities like National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Competition Commission of India (CCI) and Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) not to pass any final order related to the merger deal in the meantime. Subsequently, the arbitration tribunal under the SIAC rejected on October 21 the FRL plea to lift the interim stay granted by its EA on October 25 last year, observing that "the Award was correctly granted". Amazon had dragged Future Group to arbitration at SIAC in October last year, arguing that FRL had violated their contract by entering into the deal with rival Reliance. The FRL and FCPL had moved the top court against the high court order of August 17 which said that it would implement the earlier order by its single-judge restraining FRL from going ahead with the deal in pursuance of the EA's award. The high court had said that in the absence of a stay, it would have to enforce the order passed by its single judge, Justice J R Midha, on March 18. On March 18, besides restraining FRL from going ahead with its deal with Reliance Retail, the court had imposed costs of Rs 20 lakh on the Future Group and others associated with it and ordered attachment of their properties. On August 6, the Supreme Court gave the verdict in favour of Amazon and held that EA award, restraining the Rs 24,731 crore FRL-Reliance Retail merger deal, is valid and enforceable under Indian arbitration laws. The apex court had also set aside the two orders of February 8 and March 22 of the division bench of the Delhi High Court order which had lifted the single-judge's orders staying the FRL-RRL merger. A bench headed by Justice R F Nariman, since retired, had dealt with the larger question and held that an award of an EA of a foreign country is enforceable under the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act. SEE ALSO <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/telecom/news/jio-is-slowing-down-in-the-race-to-500-million-subscribers/articleshow/87862415.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink">Jio is slowing down in the race to 500 million subscribers – a goal set by none other than Mukesh Ambani</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/startups/news/nobroker-is-the-38th-indian-startup-to-be-valued-over-a-1-billion-in-2021/articleshow/87867289.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink">NoBroker is the 38th Indian startup to be valued over a billion dollars this year</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/telecom/news/vodafone-idea-hikes-tariffs-by-up-to-500-for-its-popular-plans/articleshow/87864183.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink">Vodafone Idea hikes tariffs by up to ₹500 for its popular plans</a>

Amazon vs Future — 'Why file voluminous records, to drag the case or harass judges?' asks Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Friday upheld the life imprisonment of P. Rajagopal, the owner of south Indian hotel chain <keyword id="188781" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="Saravana-Bhavan">Saravana Bhavan</keyword>, for murdering an employee in October 2001 so as to marry his wife. A bench headed by Justice N.V. Ramana gave Rajagopal time till July 7 to surrender. The ruling comes on the Madras High Court order upholding his life imprisonment. The High Court had enhanced the 10-year sentence given by a trial court. When contacted, Rajagopal's son P.R. Shivakumar told IANS: "I just got an SMS about the verdict. I have to get more details." The hugely popular hotel chain has outlets within and outside India and is now managed by Shivakumar. The South Indian restaurant chain, Saravana Bhavan has 33 outposts in India and 47 around the world. <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P._Rajagopal_%28businessman%29">P. Rajagopal</a>, was sentenced to life in prison in India in 2009 on charges of murdering his employee, Prince Shantakumar, so as to marry his wife. However, India's highest court had granted him a bail in May 2009, when the lawyer of the accused claimed that Rajagopal needed to go through medical treatment for paralysis, reported One India News. He served just 11 months of that sentence. With IANS

Owner Of A Wildly Popular Restaurant Chain Gets Life Term In Murder Case

The people of Andhra Pradesh have routed the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) as YSR Congress won 21 states in the Lok Sabha polls. They are also leading in one more. TDP on the other hand had won three seats only However, it is to noted that TDP had a vote share of 40% which is very high for a party which barely won any seats. <table style="width:0in;border-collapse:collapse;mso-yfti-tbllook:1184;mso-padding-alt: 0in 0in 0in 0in"> <tbody><tr> <td style="border:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;border-top:solid black 1.0pt; mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid black .5pt; background:white;padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> Andhra Pradesh </td> <td style="border-top:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none; border-bottom:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;border-right:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; mso-border-top-alt:solid black .5pt;background:white;padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt; height:10.65pt"> Won/25 </td> <td style="border:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;border-left:none; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> Leading </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="border-top:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt; border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt: solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid black .5pt;background:white;padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height: 10.65pt"> YSR Congress </td> <td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt; border-right:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid black .5pt;background:white;padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt; height:10.65pt"> 21 </td> <td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt; border-right:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> 1 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="border:solid black 1.0pt;border-top:none;mso-border-top-alt: solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid black .5pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; background:white;padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> TDP </td> <td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt; border-right:solid black 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-top-alt:#CCCCCC;mso-border-left-alt: #CCCCCC;mso-border-bottom-alt:black;mso-border-right-alt:black;mso-border-style-alt: solid;mso-border-width-alt:.5pt;background:white;padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt; height:10.65pt"> 3 </td> <td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt; border-right:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> 0 </td> </tr> </tbody></table> Assembly elections brought more bad tidings for TDP head Chandrababu Naidu as he lost his Chief Minister's seat as well. Even while counting was underway, Naidu tendered his resignation to the governor late evening yesterday. YSR Congress led by Jagan Reddy is all set to finish the line with 151 seats in its kitty, having won 150 already. TDP has won 21 and debutante Pawan Kalyan's Jana Sena Party has won only a single seat. <table style="width:0in;border-collapse:collapse;mso-yfti-tbllook:1184;mso-padding-alt: 0in 0in 0in 0in"> <tbody><tr> <td style="border:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"></td> <td style="border:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;border-left:none; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> Won/175 </td> <td style="border:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;border-left:none; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> Leading </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="border:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;border-top:none; mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> YSR Congress </td> <td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt; border-right:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> 150 </td> <td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt; border-right:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> 1 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="border:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;border-top:none; mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> TDP </td> <td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt; border-right:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> 21 </td> <td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt; border-right:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> 2 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="border:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;border-top:none; mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> Jana Sena </td> <td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt; border-right:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> 1 </td> <td style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt; border-right:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; mso-border-left-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid #CCCCCC .5pt; padding:1.0pt 1.5pt 1.0pt 1.5pt;height:10.65pt"> 0 </td> </tr> </tbody></table> As per exit polls At least three exit polls had predicted that Jagan Reddy and his party YSR Congress will overtake the Telugu Desam Party (TDP). While India Today predicted a clear win for YSR-C, a few others believed they will remain head to head. Some even foretold a fractured verdict in the state, as Reddy banked on his late father Y S Rajasekhar Reddy’s legacy to win votes this election. BJP, fielded its own candidates this time, with no partner; was expected to get only one or two seats in this state. Andhra Pradesh went for polling for all its 25 Lok Sabha seats during 2019 general elections and the results are hotly pursued now. The major contenders in the state are the four parties including TDP, YSR Congress, INC and BJP. All these four major political players in the state have adopted their best winning strategies to bag as many seats as possible to send maximum number of representatives to the Lok Sabha. Who the 2019 election results will favor is a question triggering curiosities all over. Kambhampati Hari Babu of Bharatiya Janata Party won from the Visakhapatnam constituency during 2014 general elections. In this constituency, the BJP has now fielded D Purandeshwari. She has waged a tough war with the candidates of other major parties including Ramana Kumari Pedada of Congress, MVV Satyanarayana of YSR Congress and MV Sribharat of the TDP. Again a tough game is seen in the Vijayawada constituency where the BJP has fielded Dilip Kumar Kilaru, Congress has nominated Naraharasetti Narsimha Rao, TDP has nominated Kesineni Srinivas alias Nani and the YSR Congress had sent Potluri Vara Prasad to fight with them. All over the state, the results could bring surprising turns and twists.

You Searched For "ramana verdicts" and got 6 results

Supreme Court verdict on Maharashtra: Trust vote on Wednesday

Sriram Iyer

Chief Justice of India will now come under RTI lens, says Supreme Court

Preeti

Katya

Former Attorney General of India Soli Sorabjee passes away at 91

BI India Bureau

Amazon vs Future — 'Why file voluminous records, to drag the case or harass judges?' asks Supreme Court

PTI

Owner Of A Wildly Popular Restaurant Chain Gets Life Term In Murder Case

BI India Bureau

Total Recall: YSR is back in Andhra wins 21 seats, routs Naidu

BI India Bureau

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides