Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

<ul><li>The Supreme Court today delivered a verdict on the decades-long Ayodhya dispute — Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid. </li><li>The apex court, in a unanimous judgement, gave the land to a government trust which will aid the construction of a <keyword id="42499" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Ram-Mandir">Ram Mandir</keyword>. The Waqf board was allotted five acres of land at a prominent place in Ayodhya. </li><li><keyword id="46425" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Anand-Mahindra">Anand Mahindra</keyword>, chairman of Mahindra Group took to twitter to applaud the ‘process of justice.’ </li><li>Former CFO of Infosys, Mohandas Pai welcomed the historic judgement calling it a ‘justice to India, Indians, our constitution and Hindus’. </li></ul>The Supreme Court today delivered a verdict on the historic dispute on Ram Mandir, <keyword id="43572" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="Babri-Masjid">Babri Masjid</keyword> and Ayodhya. The apex court, in a unanimous judgement, allotted the land to a government trust which will oversee the construction of a Ram mandir on the disputed land. The Waqf board was allotted five acres of land at a prominent place in Ayodhya. Within the next three months, the centre will appoint board of trustees and the 2.77-acre complex will be handed over to the trust. Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that the <keyword id="399476" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Ayodhya-verdict">Ayodhya verdict</keyword> said that the verdict will reaffirm the independence, transparency and far-sightedness of the judiciary. Political and corporate leaders alike welcomed the decision. Anand Mahindra, Chairman, Mahindra Group took to Twitter to applaud the ‘process of justice’. “What extraordinary courage it required to be on this bench &amp; what incredible application of mind it must have taken to reach a conclusion,” he tweeted. <div type="twitter" handle="anandmahindra" handlename="anand mahindra" image="http://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1053583782584807425/-7IRmY5u_normal.jpg" favoritecount="15679" retweetcount="2352" status="5 men. A decision that 1.3bn people were awaiting. What extraordinary courage it required to be on this bench &amp; wha… https://t.co/hzNJ4npKZu" createdat="1573282376000" id="1193058875370426368"></div>

 Former director of Infosys Mohandas Pai welcomed the historic judgement calling it a “justice to India, Indians, our constitution and Hindus. The sword in the heart of Indian civilization has been removed!” <div type="twitter" handle="TVMohandasPai" handlename="Mohandas Pai" image="http://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/563397282020618240/BsxVmVtk_normal.jpeg" favoritecount="4123" retweetcount="1002" status="SC has done justice to India,Indians, our constitution and Hindus:The sword in heart of Indian civilization has bee… https://t.co/22MM94x8F2" createdat="1573278751000" id="1193043671970504704"></div>

 Indian author Chetan Bhagat thanked the Supreme Court and the Hindu-Muslim communities for their patience. “Thank you SC. Thank you to the entire Muslim community for your grace and generosity. Thank you to the Hindu community for their patience. India remains intact, as does the birthplace of Ram. Jai Shri Ram,” he tweeted. <div type="twitter" handle="chetan_bhagat" handlename="Chetan Bhagat" image="http://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1029242665705992192/nQqnqCUG_normal.jpg" favoritecount="11611" retweetcount="1164" status="Thank you SC. Thank you to the entire Muslim community for your grace and generosity. Thank you to the Hindu commun… https://t.co/duH54UT3uj" createdat="1573282050000" id="1193057507352072193"></div>
 Photographer and producer Atul Kasbekar’s reaction was rhetoric. “I hope that as the very famous AK once famously said, ‘All izz well’” he said. <div type="twitter" handle="atulkasbekar" handlename="atul kasbekar" image="http://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1157383172436430849/pE8z0HR3_normal.jpg" favoritecount="148" retweetcount="6" status="Chalo it’s done Move along now everyone And for my country’s sake, I hope that as the very famous AK once famousl… https://t.co/pqTcYvfp1O" createdat="1573279757000" id="1193047890605879297"></div>

All the celebrities who have welcomed the Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute

<ul><li>Give Muslims another site for a mosque, the Supreme Court ordered quashing the division of land by the Allahabad High Court.</li><li>This is a historic judgement from the Supreme Court in the Ram Mandir (temple) - Babri Masjid (mosque) title dispute being fought in courts at least since 1885.</li><li>The central government has been vested with the disputed land and to come up with a scheme for the construction of a temple in Ayodhya.</li><li>The Muslims should be given a separate 5-acre site for the construction of a mosque, the SC ordered while calling the demolition of the Babri Masjid in 1992 as against the law.</li></ul>In a historic verdict, the Supreme Court of India has ordered that Muslims be given a separate 5-acre site to build a mosque, while holding the demolition of the Babri Masjid in 1992 as against the law. At the same time, Justice Gogoi, while reading out a unanimous verdict, ordered that the Hindus will get to construct a Ram Mandir (temple) at the disputed site in Ayodhya, which the Hindus believe is the birthplace of Lord Rama. The Constitution bench of Supreme Court of India comprising of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde, Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice Ashok Bhushan, and Justice Abdul Nazeer read out a unanimous verdict in the Ram Mandir (temple)- Babri Masjid (mosque) title dispute that has lasted for centuries, and being fought in the courts since 1885. The verdict is expected to settle the issue that has shaped India's politics for nearly 30 years now. <div type="Youtube" id="YB8rCj6W2ks" title="Here are the top highlights from the Ayodhya verdict." thumbUrl="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YB8rCj6W2ks/mqdefault.jpg"></div>

 These are the key highlights of the order being read out: 1. Hindus get the possession of the disputed site in Ayodhya for a Ram temple. Possession of disputed 2.77 acre land will remain with Central government receiver. SC asks centre to frame scheme within 3 months and set up a trust for construction of a temple. 2. Alternate land should be allotted to the Muslims for a mosque. The Allahabad High Court was wrong in dividing the disputed Ayodhya site into three parts. 3. The government has to set up a trust that will enforce the Court's judgement. 4. Ram Janmabhoomi (birthplace of Lord Rama) is not a juristic person and therefore filed by Nirmohi Akhara is barred by limitation. However, the Akhara that has sought the management rights to the temple may get adequate representation going forward, if the government deems fit. 5. The report from the Archeological Survey of India (ASI), which cited the presence of a tenth-century structure beneath the Babri Masjid, has been upheld. But the court highlighted the fact that ASI refrained from recording a finding on whether mosque was built after demolishing a Hindu temple. As it stood at the Supreme Court, there are 50 parties in the case but the broad issue is whether there should be a temple or a mosque in the disputed site or should the land be divided among the sparring parties as ruled by the Allahabad High Court in 2010. Today, the Supreme Court has quashed the Allahabad High Court verdict, which divided the Ayodhya title into three equal parts between the Nirmohi Akhara, Lord Ram-- the deity represented by Triloki Nath Pandey (an RSS volunteer and Vishva Hindu Parishad functionary)-- and the Sunni Waqf Board. All three parties moved the Supreme Court against the order. Reaction of the Muslim side The Muslim side has expressed its displeasure with the Supreme Court verdict. While they agree with the parts of the verdict, they disagree with the handing over of the disputed site to the Hindus. Zafaryab Jilani, a litigant from the Muslim side, representing the Sunni Waqf Board, said that the verdict is "neither justice nor equity". "We are not satisfied with the judgement and the court has reached some wrong conclusions. We will go through the judgement to decide the future course of action... but SC verdict has to be respected. Everyone must remain calm," Jilani said adding that they are yet to decide whether they will move a review petition. SEE ALSO: <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/politics/news/people-prepare-for-supreme-court-verdict-in-the-ayodhya-case-in-pictures/articleshow/71979301.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink" target="_blank">See how India tried to keep calm ahead of the historic Supreme Court verdict in the Ayodhya case</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/politics/news/why-the-supreme-court-verdict-on-the-ayodhya-dispute-is-being-delivered-on-a-saturday/articleshow/71979382.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink" target="_blank">Here's why the Supreme Court verdict on the Ayodhya dispute is being delivered on a Saturday</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/india/news/supreme-court-verdict-on-ayodhya-legal-rights-of-lord-rama-and-other-gods/articleshow/71948927.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink" target="_blank">In India, Gods, rivers, and animals can pay taxes, hold property, sue, and get sued⁠— and that’s an important factor in the Ayodhya case</a>

Hindus get the disputed site in Ayodhya for a Ram Temple-- that and other top highlights from the Supreme Court verdict

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Netflix took down an Indian film after receiving backlash from right-wing Hindu groups.</li><li>The film depicted a Brahmin woman cooking and eating meat and suggested a Hindu deity ate meat.</li></ul>Netflix pulled an Indian film from its platform just days after it began streaming after backlash from right-wing Hindu groups, reports say."Annapoorani: the Goddess of Food," a film made in the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu, follows a young woman from the Brahmin caste as she aspires to become one of India's best chefs. It was released in theaters in December and on Netflix later the same month.As part of her journey, the young woman cooks and eats meat, defying the wishes of her family and the traditions of the Brahmin caste, which <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/r-friction-over-indias-beef-trade-heats-up-after-attacks-2015-2">historically practices vegetarianism</a>.The Vishwa Hindu Parishad, a hardline right-wing Hindu group with ties to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/r-indias-modi-seeks-humble-tolerant-new-image-after-poll-rout-2015-2">Prime Minister Narendra Modi's party</a>, accused the film of being "intentionally released to hurt Hindu sentiments" and promoting "love jihad," <a target="_blank" href="https://www.onmanorama.com/entertainment/entertainment-news/2024/01/11/netflix-removes-nayanthara-annapoorani-right-wing-groups-allege-movie-promote-love-jihad.html">according to</a> a complaint it filed to Mumbai's police. The phrase <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/india-love-jihad-law-results-multiple-arrests-of-muslim-men-2020-12">"love jihad"</a> refers to an Islamaphobic conspiracy theory purporting that Muslim men are seducing Hindu women to convert them to Islam.VHP also condemned the film for implying that the major Hindu deity Lord Rama ate meat while in exile. The group protested outside Netflix offices on Wednesday.Netflix removed the film from international streaming following the controversy, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/nayantharas-annapoorani-removed-from-netflix-after-film-hurts-religious-sentiments-2487296-2024-01-11">India Today reported</a>. The studio behind the film, Zee Studios, issued a statement apologizing "for the inconvenience caused and hurt caused to the sentiments of the respective communities," The Guardian <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/jan/12/netflix-pulls-indian-film-annapoorani-the-goddess-of-food-after-backlash-from-rightwing-hindu-groups">reported</a>.<h2>'Fanaticism won, creativity lost'</h2>It's not the first time Netflix and other streaming platforms have faced pressure from religious Hindu groups.In 2020, Netflix faced <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/23/media/a-suitable-boy-netflix-india-intl-hnk/index.html">boycotts</a> in India after an adaptation of the book "A Suitable Boy" contained a kissing scene between a Muslim man and a Hindu woman, drawing accusations of promoting "love jihad" from some Hindu viewers. And, in 2021, the cast and crew of an Amazon Prime political drama, "Tandav," <a target="_blank" href="https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2021/3/2/amazon-apologises-to-indian-viewers-over-tandav-controversy">apologized</a> after hardline Hindu groups accused it of mocking Hindu gods.Netflix has also pulled other titles from its platform after receiving backlash. The streaming giant <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/netflix-hasan-miinhajs-patriot-act-episode-saudi-arabia-khashoggi-2019-1">took down an episode of Hasan Minhaj's "Patriot Act" in Saudi Arabia</a> after it received a legal complaint from the kingdom in 2019. In 2020, a judge in Brazil <a target="_blank" href="https://news.sky.com/story/netflix-ordered-to-pull-film-depicting-jesus-as-a-gay-man-11904267">ordered</a> Netflix to take down a short film depicting Jesus as a gay man.Some in the film industry have criticized Netflix's decision to pull "Annapoorani" from its platform."Fanaticism won, creativity lost. Shame on @NetflixIndia for giving in to majoritarian bullying," actor Siddharth <a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/DearthOfSid/status/1745364350276374937">wrote</a> on X."A dangerous precedent being set. Censoring left, right, and 'center' until we won't be allowed to breathe," actor Pavarthy Thiruvothu posted on an Instagram story.Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

Netflix removed an Indian film after religious viewers criticized meat-eating characters

You Searched For "ram mandir decision" and got 3 results

All the celebrities who have welcomed the Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute

BI India Bureau

Hindus get the disputed site in Ayodhya for a Ram Temple-- that and other top highlights from the Supreme Court verdict

BI India Bureau

Netflix removed an Indian film after religious viewers criticized meat-eating characters

Yoonji Han

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides