Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

It’s less than three months for his prison term to end; however, former <keyword id="6361649" type="CITY" weightage="100" keywordseo="Goldman-Sachs">Goldman Sachs</keyword> director <keyword id="139676" type="PERSON" weightage="100" keywordseo="Rajat-Gupta">Rajat Gupta</keyword> has lost yet another chance for overturning his conviction on insider trading charges. His latest challenge was rejected by the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday. 
 In his appeal, Gupta (67) had argued that there was insufficient evidence at trial to prove that he received personal benefits from hedge fund founder <keyword id="60455" type="PERSON" weightage="100" keywordseo="Raj-Rajaratnam">Raj Rajaratnam</keyword> in exchange for confidential Goldman Sachs information. Rajaratnam too is in jail presently. 
 "Appellant has not shown that 'jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling' ...as to whether Appellant's claim was procedurally defaulted," said the ruling of Circuit Judges <keyword id="595084" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="100" keywordseo="Susan-Carney">Susan Carney</keyword> and <keyword id="3189089" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="100" keywordseo="Christopher-Droney">Christopher Droney</keyword>. 
 
Gupta was sentenced to two years prison term, which would be ending in March 2016. He has filed several appeals since his conviction in June 2012, one even to the US Supreme Court, so that his conviction and prison term can be overturned, but to no avail. 
 
Gupta, an IIT and Harvard alumnus, is presently serving his prison term in a federal prison in Ayer, Massachusetts. 
 
<a href="http://www.krzbb.de/krz_22_110162605-1-60918_Wall-Street-Groesse-muss-wegen-Insiderhandels-ins-Gefaengnis.html">Image source</a>

Court rejects Rajat Gupta’s appeal, yet again

Former <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=goldman+sachs">Goldman Sachs</a> director <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=rajat+gupta">Rajat Gupta</a>, who was convicted for <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=insider+trading">insider trading</a>, walked out of jail after two years. 
 
India-born Gupta's, 67, prison term ended after a US court agreed to rehear his appeal to throw out his 2012 insider-trading conviction. 
 
Gupta was released on March 11 and had completed the last two months of his prison term at his home in Manhattan, after being released on January 5 from the Devens correctional facility in Massachusetts. 
 
He was confined to his apartment and was required to wear an ankle bracelet that monitored his movements. 
 The Harvard-educated Gupta was convicted in 2012 for passing confidential boardroom information to his one- time friend and business associate <keyword id="60455" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Raj-Rajaratnam">Raj Rajaratnam</keyword>, founder of <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=galleon+hedge+fund">Galleon Hedge Fund</a>. 
 Apart from the two-year prison term, he was fined $5 million and the Securities and Exchange Commission also slapped a $13.9-million penalty against him. Rajaratnam is serving an 11-year sentence for <keyword id="6360088" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="insider-trading">insider trading</keyword> in the main prison adjacent to where Gupta was assigned. 
 
Gupta's attorneys did not immediately respond to emails on whether he would make a statement following his official release. A January report in the New York Times had said that Gupta "appears to be eager to get back to the world he once inhabited". 
 
(Image: Indiatimes)

Insider-trading convict Rajat Gupta walks out of prison as a free man

<div class="KonaFilter image-container display-table"><div><div class="image on-image">Lucas Jackson/ReutersFormer McKinsey CEO Rajat Gupta leaves his trial with his lawyer</div></div></div><ul class="summary-list"><li>Former McKinsey leader Rajat Gupta was one of the biggest names facing criminal prosecution following the global financial crisis, as he was tied to billionaire hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam's insider trading case.</li><li>In a book released earlier this year, Gupta still proclaims his innocence, blaming his conviction on the political environment in the country following the housing crisis; an aggressive federal prosecutor; and his "biggest regret of his life": not testifying at his own trial. </li><li>The book, called "Mind Without Fear", details Gupta's life, from his childhood in India, to Harvard Business School, McKinsey, the United Nations, and eventually, a federal prison in Massachusetts. </li><li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/prime">Click here for more BI Prime stories</a>.</li></ul>Even before a jury's decision in the summer of 2012, Rajat Gupta had lived a life that was worth writing about.The former leader of consulting giant McKinsey had advised billionaires like Bill Gates and Swedish heir Sam Wallenberg, knew presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, served on the boards of Goldman Sachs and P&amp;G, and addressed the United Nations General Assembly.But his book, "Mind Without Fear", does not begin with a story about any of these people or even his childhood in India, where he was raised by a Bengali freedom fighter, or his time at Harvard Business School, when he was one of the few people of color at the school. It instead begins with him inside a federal prison in Massachusetts, on his way to serve the first of his two stints in solitary confinement for what he called a minor breach of rules (tardiness to a roll-call count). Gupta was found guilty of insider trading, with prosecutors saying he tipped off disgraced hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam with news of non-public information about Goldman, including Warren Buffett's $5 billion investment into the bank during the financial crisis. In the book, which was released earlier this year, Gupta is still adamantly denying he did anything wrong. Instead, he blames a host of factors for why he ended up spending two years in prison: former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's aggressiveness; the political climate against executives following the financial crisis; Goldman Sachs' former CEO Lloyd Blankfein; and his decision not to testify in his defense. In interviews with media outlets around the release of the book earlier this year, Gupta strikes the same tone, pushing back on any inkling that he helped Rajaratnam gain access to inside information."Bharara couldn't do what he was put in the job to do," Gupta said <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/bb5fb31c-4cb0-11e9-8b7f-d49067e0f50d">in an interview with the Financial Times</a> in March. "How can you have the perpetrators of the financial crisis, which is all the banks and the housing finance companies, and he couldn't bring one person to justice?"I can tell you that basically the incentives are misaligned. Most prosecutors have political ambitions. They want to win at any cost ... if an innocent person is proven not guilty or the jury say not guilty, it's a win for the prosecutor. They shouldn't take it as a loss. What they did [was] to spin a story which they knew was wrong."The book however details much more than just his side of the trial. It dives into the executive's life in prison, the people who stuck by him, and his feelings toward his old employer and Goldman.

Rajat Gupta is out of jail but still has some high-profile grudges. The ex-McKinsey head's book reveals his beefs with Lloyd Blankfein and Preet Bharara and celebrates his former life among the global elite.

When you begin to think greed is god, it is better to remember the case of <keyword id="139676" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Rajat-Gupta">Rajat Gupta</keyword> – an American <keyword id="6356391" type="POSITION" weightage="20" keywordseo="businessman">businessman</keyword> with Indian roots who was known for his smart business moves, as much as his jail sentence has left a lesson for those involved in trading. After having been a stupendous success story, Rajat Gupta is currently serving two year sentence in American Federal Prison for ‘<keyword id="6360088" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="insider-trading">insider trading</keyword>’. 
 <keyword id="44734" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="Indian-Government">Indian government</keyword>, after a long haul of nearly 23 years, has decided to take a relook at the norms for insider trading and make them more stringent so as to encourage fair play for all those involved in the stock market. 
 The new insider trading norms that come into effect from today, with far stricter provisions in many areas where there was a fair amount of ambiguity. The good news is, the revised and revisited provisions are on par with those in the US or UK. Really, India has finally woken up to the concept that ambiguity and unrevised laws since long, can harm the Indian markets in these days of <keyword id="47890" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="global-economy">global economy</keyword> and improved reach. 
 Capital Markets Regulator, the <keyword id="6355630" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India">Securities and Exchange Board of India</keyword> (<keyword id="35210" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="sebi">SEBI</keyword>) has created space to use the ‘prearranged trading plans’ that’s ubiquitously used in the US. However, any person who has remote knowledge of this through being an ‘insider’ or ‘connected person’ to this, certainly cannot revoke it or have numerous trading plans, whether over-lapping or not. 
 India’s approach to evolving this modified frame work can be termed rather ‘conservative-innovative’ with least space for errors. According to <keyword id="288165" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Somasekhar-Sundaresan">Somasekhar Sundaresan</keyword>, who was among the 18-member high-level committee that was set up to review and draft new regulations for India, the new framework is an evolution that will leave blood stains out of the markets. Partner at J Sagar Associates Law Firm, Sudaresan is a prominent name in the field of Financial Law and Financial Sector regulatory practice in India. 
 
“Yes, SEBI has opted for this approach. In the US, you can write and later cancel the plan. But, we have made it a bit water-tight in India. This is an innovation and we would like to view it that way. You can opt for a trading plan, alright. That’s optional and voluntary. But, what is mandatory is to follow it up without any alterations. What do you get in return? The satisfaction of having indulged in legitimate trading; no risks as far as law or legal aspects are concerned. In other words, there’s no blood on your hands. You are as clean as you got into it in the first place,” says Sundaresan. 
 The new framework has come into existence, exclusively to control the insider trading menace. The new set of norms make way for strict penal actions for transactions that are illicit, illegal or seem to have escaped the purview of law. Will this make market a difficult place? <keyword id="51958" type="ENTERTAINMENT" weightage="20" keywordseo="YES">Yes</keyword> and no. 
Insiders who are liable to possess UPSI (Unpublished Price Sensitive Information) have to formulate prescheduled trading plans and proceed accordingly. 
 
With the new set of norms, will provide protection to genuine trades and leave them aside. There is better clarity on concepts and definitions under the new set of norms that was much needed. They can be found under the name ‘Prohibition of Insider Trading Regulations 2015’. This would make matters better and easier even for those who are beginning to trade in the markets. 
 What prompted SEBI was the fact that insider trading was happening at much larger scale than stray individuals making money out of the loopholes in the 1992 framework. Just as India enters the phase of turning into a <keyword id="2853493" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="20" keywordseo="global-economy-leader">global economy leader</keyword>, and being in the ‘sweet spot’ <keyword id="219113" type="POSITION" weightage="20" keywordseo="looking-forward">looking forward</keyword> to sound economic future assuming a lead role, markets were the first place where the norms had to be made more stringent in order to keep the space clean for all the players and keep those away who were here for some mischief. Because a threat to <keyword id="34412" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="economy">economy</keyword> of a country is best managed through markets and India had to reduce chances of this happening at whatever level through individuals or companies.

New ‘Insider Trading’ norms kick in; revamp after 23 years!

Former <keyword id="6361649" type="CITY" weightage="100" keywordseo="Goldman-Sachs">Goldman Sachs</keyword> Group director, <keyword id="139676" type="PERSON" weightage="100" keywordseo="Rajat-Gupta">Rajat Gupta</keyword>, lost his appeal against a $13.9 million civil penalty and a permanent ban on acting as an officer for a public company. The second US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Gupta’s claim that ‘the penalty and the ban were excessive.’ 
 
In June 2012, a federal jury had found the 65-year-old guilty of passing confidential information to Raj Rajaratnam, the former billionaire and founder of the Galleon Group hedge fund. Rajaratnam, too, is in jail, serving an 11-year prison sentence. 
 
Gupta was sentenced to a two-year prison term while $6 million would have to be paid to Goldman as compensation, as well as a $5 million fine. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also filed a parallel civil action against Gupta, leading to a $13.9 million penalty and a lifetime ban from acting as a public company’s officer. Gupta had appealed against the civil sanctions and called it ‘unwarranted.’ 
 
Seth Waxman, Gupta’s attorney, had argued that the federal judge’s positions were ‘inconsistent.’ But the court said the standard in a criminal context was different from that in a civil case.

Former Goldman Sachs Director Rajat Gupta Loses
Appeal, Heads To Prison

<div class="image-container float_right" style="width:480px"><div class="image"><a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/celebrity/business/rajat-gupta">Mugshot via The Smoking Gun</a></div></div>A federal judge Wednesday ordered former <keyword id="6361649" type="CITY" weightage="60" keywordseo="Goldman-Sachs">Goldman Sachs</keyword> board member <keyword id="139676" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="Rajat-Gupta">Rajat Gupta</keyword> to pay a $13.9 million penalty related to insider trading, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced.
Under the order, signed by US Judge Jed Rakoff, Gupta is also barred from acting as an officer or director of a public company and from associating with any broker, dealer or investment advisor, the SEC said.
The SEC's case against Gupta concerns alleged civil violations stemming from his communications with former Galleon hedge fund tycoon Raj Rajaratnam.
The communications allegedly discussed Berkshire Hathaway's $5 billion investment in Goldman Sachs and nonpublic details about Goldman's financial results in 2008.
In a parallel criminal case, a New York jury in June 2012 convicted Gupta of spilling boardroom secrets to Rajaratnam. Rakoff sentenced Gupta to two years in jail last October and ordered a $5 million criminal fine.
Gupta is free on bail pending a decision to his appeal. A US Court of Appeals panel heard arguments in May.
In addition to his spot on the Goldman Sachs board, Gupta had been head of the renowned consultancy McKinsey &amp; Co and a director of Procter &amp; Gamble, making him one of the most successful Indian immigrants in the United States.
<div class="nc_footer">
Copyright (2013) <keyword id="68053" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="60" keywordseo="AFP">AFP</keyword>. All rights reserved.
</div>

Ex-Goldman Director Rajat Gupta Fined $13.9 Million For Insider Trading

<ul><li><keyword id="19912128" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="chandra" source="keywords">Chandra</keyword> hit upon the idea to launch a TV channel after he saw big hotels showing CNN via satellite dishes during the Gulf War.</li><li><keyword id="19976119" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="zee" source="keywords">Zee</keyword> was India’s first private TV channel and had pioneered many superhit TV shows, reality shows and kickstarted the careers of many media barons.</li><li>Chandra entered the infrastructure business and planned a hostile takeover of IVRCL which failed.</li><li>By the mid-2010s, his new ventures had piled up a huge debt which pushed him to sell stake in crown jewel, Zee.</li></ul>Remember Hum Paanch? <keyword id="20328693" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="zee-antakshari" source="keywords">Zee Antakshari</keyword>? Phillips Top 10? These shows, now shared around social media by nostalgia lovers, were the first taste of Hindi TV programmes for many millennials. The generation saw the country move away from one or two channels with very limited entertainment programming; with the entry of private companies into satellite programming, forcing Indians to buy TVs that needed remotes. The man who made this revolution possible was Subhash Chandra, a bright young man from Hisar. Born into an Agrawal Bania family, Chandra entered into business early in his life, and in the 70s before TV wasn’t around in India. After his family business fell into debt, he had to abruptly leave college, go back to Haryana and work on repaying debts. He started off running a pulse polishing mill with moderate success, but his fortunes improved as he supplied grains to Food Corporation of India (FCI). By late 80s and early 90s, he was exporting rice and soybeans to Russia, and had also started a packaging company. It was all running smoothly, until one election season he saw that politicians were renting out vans with projectors and screens for their roadshows. He later learnt that Five-Star Hotels owned satellite dishes and were telecasting CNN during the Gulf War. That’s when the idea of broadcasting content with ads in between came to him, he told Outlook Business in <a href="https://www.outlookbusiness.com/specials-34/secret-diary-of-an-entrepreneur_2018/live-in-the-present-dont-recount-and-regret-the-past-4353">Secret Diary of Subhash Chandra</a>. <div type="image" title="hum paanch twitter" msid="107136147" hostid="261" caption="&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Source: Twitter (Now X) &amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;"></div> The realm of reality TV As he went about it, he was laughed off by DD executives, who coolly told him that they employ hundreds of people and equipment worth thousands of crores. He then intended to lease a transponder in Hong Kong and broadcast from there. STAR’s Li Ka-shing was not so receptive to the idea of broadcasting business in India. After many twists and turns, he rented a transponder; and India’s got its first Hindi channel in the Star bouquet in 1992. Initially there was only three hours of programming, with reruns of old DD serials. But it soon branched<a href="https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/JV7xB6PWkkl5q2Glq8tT8K/The-zee-story-turns-20.html"> out with chat shows </a>like Chakravyuha. Many media barons like Ronnie Screwala who produced the chat show started their careers at Zee. Pritish Nandy also had a show on it called Fiscal Fitness. The hugely popular Aap Ki Adalat, which now airs on India TV, also debuted on Zee. Rajat Sharma, its popular interviewer, also expanded the group’s political vista. The Union Minister Smriti Irani was briefly a stringer for Zee News which was launched later by the group. She, however, also became the star of Star Plus’ super hit TV show Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi in early 2000s. In addition to comedy shows, Zee diversified into drama shows like Neena Gupta starring Parampara in addition to <keyword id="20328692" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="zee-horror-show" source="keywords">Zee Horror Show</keyword>. Its hugely popular Antakshari show was hosted by stars like Renuka Shahane, Pallavi Joshi and Annu Kapoor. <div type="image" title="annu kapoor" msid="107136187" hostid="261" caption="&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Source: Twitter (Now X)&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;"></div> Bags of fan mail In spite of growing success, Chandra had to convince advertisers to shift from print and outdoor ads to TV advertising. He did it by lugging along bags of fan mail sent by viewers of his shows. By the time other players saw how valuable reaching all over India with Hindi shows was, he was miles ahead. He added more channels across movies, music in addition to news, across languages to his bouquet. By the time the world entered the new millennium, he had captured a large chunk of India’s eyeballs, not to mention hearts. The deal with Richard Li, son of Li Ka-shing also included an option to buy 25% stake in the venture within a year. By the time he realised it was good business, the option had long expired. Chandra refused to sell him the stake, took his company public, and the issue was subscribed 60 times over. The goatee-sporting man had become one of India’s first media barons and a billionaire. A failed hostile takeover By 2004, his media conglomerate was running steady, but Chandra, true to himself, was already hunting for the next big bet. The sector he chose was infrastructure. Back then, India was building roads, adding power generation as well as distribution assets, and setting-up ports and airports with a renewed fervour. Many small regional players like GMR and GVK became national companies after they won large-scale airport projects. It seemed like a good business. However, by the time Chandra entered it in 2008, the sector was showing signs of fatigue, due to credit crunch and more. Players were seeing the effects of adding heavy debt onto books. One such company was Hyderabad-based IVRCL which had a good set of projects, sizeable orderbook but was crushing under debt, in 2012. It was borrowing money for working capital purposes, and projects were moving ahead slower. Chandra believed that a hostile takeover of the company would catalyse its infra business which was executing a few highway projects. He went in and acquired a tad over 12% stake in the company when IVRCL too changed track. It stopped bidding for new projects, started monetising its projects and paring down its debt. Eventually Chandra had to sell off his stock at a loss. Takeovers are a high stakes game. Though the financials were never disclosed, the assumption, based on the company’s market cap at that time, he might have spent ₹200 crore on it. On the other hand, its own infrastructure business never scaled up later on, and continued to report deep losses for the next few years. It was a strategy gone wrong, as he later admitted in his open letter. Politics to pledging In 2016, Chandra made his political debut to become a Rajya Sabha MP representing BJP in Haryana. The close contest between him and the Congress candidate R K Anand was also interesting in other ways too. Chandra was declared winner after 14 votes were made invalid as they used the wrong pens. In 2022, Chandra changed his ‘native home <a href="https://www.newslaundry.com/2022/06/08/why-subhash-chandras-rajya-sabha-dreams-are-now-congresss-nightmares">town’ to Rajasthan</a> and filed his nomination as an independent candidate backed by BJP. He however accepted defeat after he fell short of over 40 votes. On the other end, his business was branching out into many businesses, with varying successes, soaking in capital. It entered financial services, acquired Peerless Mutual Fund, investment banking, private equity and much more. It went into education with a chain of K-12 schools, gold refineries in addition to related media businesses like Fun Cinemas and Dish TV. He also had plans for a wellness company. These expansions came at a cost, and a huge debt. The group soon had 87 operating companies which had straddled debt to the tune of ₹17,000 crore, as per estimates. How was so much money raised? The promoters had to pledge their shares in listed entities like Zee Entertainment, Dish TV, Zee Media Corporation, SITI Networks, <keyword id="19960022" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="zee-learn" source="keywords">Zee Learn</keyword> and Shirpur Gold refinery. Reports suggest that <a href="https://www.thequint.com/amp/story/news%2Fbusiness%2Fdoes-zee-news-need-a-commercial-bank-subhash-chandra#read-more">anywhere between 60-90% of their </a>shares in these companies were pledged with lenders in the mid-2010s. The chickens however came to roost in 2018 when the<a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/ilfs-crisis-spilling-beyond-finance-chandras-zee-feeling-the-heat/articleshow/67734787.cms?from=mdr"> NBFC IL&amp;FS bankruptcy spooke</a>d the markets, making it tough for him to rollover debt. The loss of crown jewel Soon, the promoters were forced to sell the stake that they had pledged. Zee’s promoter shareholding fell from 42% to a dismal 4% in its crown jewel, Zee Entertainment. In the meanwhile, its flagship Zee’s earnings also started dwindling, worrying analysts and investors; that led the market regulator to look into it. Between 2021 and 2023, its profits slid by 48%. In 2021, for the second time in two years, Chandra admitted to his mistakes that led to default. He announced <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/media/entertainment/media/subhash-chandra-claims-91-debt-with-43-lenders-settled/articleshow/85007881.cms?from=mdr">that he had settled</a> 91% of his debts with 43 lenders. “I have no regrets for parting with a substantial ownership in the business and specially in the jewels of the crown,” he said in an open letter. Apart from the promoter crisis, the businesses were moving at a slow pace too. Satellite pay TV has become less attractive to viewers now used to streaming. Dish TV, owned by his brother, has been losing steam as well. Edtech is facing its own existential crisis. His digital ventures of Zee5 progressed but at a slow rate due to heavy competition. There are no updates on his plans for its metaverse venture, oddly named Maayaverse. On top of it, Zee’s plans to merge with Sony fell through, after two years of negotiations. Sony is also seeking a $90 million termination fee, which Zee intends to contest. That means more legal troubles, barely a year after it settled a dispute with J C Flowers, an asset reconstruction company. Chandra and his son Puneet Goenka are now part of a <a href="https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/sebi-subhash-chandra-punit-goenka-sebis-flowcharts-explain-how-zee-bosses-allegedly-faked-loan-recovery-4119857">probe by market regulator SEBI</a>, to see if money was siphoned off from the listed entities. That would be a tough spot to any businessman, let alone one who is devoid of crown jewels and without a seat in the parliament. SEE ALSO <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/thelife/personalities/webstories/subrata-roys-journey-from-lucknows-sahara-shahar-to-londons-grosvenor-house-to-tihar-jail/slidelist/105234003.cms">Subrata Roy’s journey from Lucknow’s Sahara Shahar to London’s Grosvenor House to Tihar Jail</a>

You Searched For "rajat gupta jail" and got 7 results

Court rejects Rajat Gupta’s appeal, yet again

BI India Bureau

Insider-trading convict Rajat Gupta walks out of prison as a free man

BI India Bureau

Rajat Gupta is out of jail but still has some high-profile grudges. The ex-McKinsey head's book reveals his beefs with Lloyd Blankfein and Preet Bharara and celebrates his former life among the global elite.

Bradley Saacks

New ‘Insider Trading’ norms kick in; revamp after 23 years!

Preetam Kaushik

Former Goldman Sachs Director Rajat Gupta Loses Appeal, Heads To Prison

BI India Bureau

Ex-Goldman Director Rajat Gupta Fined $13.9 Million For Insider Trading

Agence France Presse

From A to Zee: Subhash Chandra’s spectacular rise and fall

Katya Naidu

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides