Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

<ul><li>Shares of SPAC <keyword id="10788250" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="highcape-capital">HighCape Capital</keyword> Management gained as much as 140% Thursday.</li><li>The SPAC will merge with <keyword id="10788249" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="quantum-si">Quantum-Si</keyword>, a biotech firm that created a semiconductor chip to analyze proteins. </li><li>The transaction was also supported by a $425 PIPE with accounts advised by <keyword id="4513420" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="ark-invest">Ark Invest</keyword>.</li><li><a href="https://newsletter.businessinsider.com/join/4np/10-things-opening-bell?utm_source=markets&amp;utm_medium=ingestgest">Sign up here for our daily newsletter, 10 Things Before the Opening Bell</a>.</li></ul>Shares of special purpose acquisition company HighCape Capital Management LLC exploded as much as 140% on Thursday after the company agreed to buy biotech firm Quantum-Si. Quantum-Si has created the world's first semiconductor chip that can enable protein sequencing and analyze proteins in a digitized format. "DNA sequencing changed medicine and research by revealing what could happen in the body; protein sequencing shows what is happening right now," " said <keyword id="10788248" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="dr-jonathan-rothberg">Dr. Jonathan Rothberg</keyword>, Founder of Quantum-Si in a press release.The transaction was also supported by a $425 PIPE, or private investment in public equity, with participation from Foresite Capital Management, LLC, Eldridge, accounts advised by ARK Invest, Glenview Capital Management, LLC, and Redmile Group, LLC. The expected value of the combined company is $1.46 billion. It will trade on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol "QSI." Quantum Si's end-to-end solution is on track to launch commercially in 2022 for research use, according to the press release. The SPAC merger follows<a href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/spac-boom-record-year-blank-check-company-kaepernick-ackman-2021-2-1030073674"> over 130 other blank-check companies that have gone public in 2021</a> as mania for the funding model continues. For context, in 2020 it took until early October for 130 SPACs to make their debut, according to data from investment firm Accelerate.In a Thursday <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/video/2021/02/18/inventor-dr-rothberg-on-quantum-si-spac-deal.html">CNBC interview</a>, Dr. Rothberg said that it's not just the SPAC format that's propelling more biotech companies to receive funding, it's the "sophistication of investors." "Our PIPE investors understood proteomics. I didn't have to give them a lecture," he said. "And so I'd say it's a combination of the SPAC being there after we worked and spent $200 million to make a semiconductor that sees the molecules of life, and then an educated investor base that normally invests in public companies that knows that this is the future: digitization, artificial intelligence, [and] diagnostics on proteins." Dr. Rothberg is the founder of multiple life science and medical device companies including <a href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/stocks/bfly-stock">Butterfly Network</a>, CuraGen, and AI Therapeutics. He is best known for investing high-speed, DNA sequencing.

SPAC HighCape Capital soars 140% on deal to buy protein-sequencing firm Quantum-Si

Science has a new name for stuff that's super big (and crazy small)What the hell is a hellabyte? That's what Richard Brown wanted to know. Back in 2017, he'd heard the word mentioned on "More or Less," a BBC podcast devoted to exploring the accuracy of numbers and statistics in the public domain. Hellabyte, the host explained, was a new word people were using to refer to a whole hell of a lot of data. Brontobyte was another idea that was starting to gain popular acceptance. Both made Brown hella mad.Not because people were making up words for the amounts of things. All words are made up, after all, and the words for measurements are more made up than most. But these words didn't follow the precepts of the metric system, the official standard for demarcating the universe into manageable, studyable chunks. Metric measurements — also known as the International System of Units, or SI — are managed by a formal international organization. The rulers of the rulers have rules, and "hellabyte" and "brontobyte" don't follow them.The thing is, Richard Brown isn't just some guy. He's the head of metrology — the science of measuring things — at the United Kingdom's National Physical Laboratory. And he serves on the General Conference on Weights and Measures, the supreme authority that names the units of measure and defines the prefixes that tell you how big they are. His opinion, in other words, counts.So Brown, spurred by the podcast, decided to come up with some prefixes of his own. It was time. Researchers across the sciences always push ever further into the realms of the really freaking big and really freaking tiny, but Brown suspected he and the other guardians of the metric system hadn't kept pace. The last time the chief wizards of metrology had added new prefixes was back in 1991, at the behest of analytical chemists who were struggling for words to express scant, molecular amounts of stuff. Since then, volumes of digital data have inflated exponentially, but words for those multiples have been in a drought. Hence the jokey words that ended up on the podcast.Late last year, the General Conference on Weights and Measures met in Paris and approved the new prefixes that Brown came up with. They were not hella or bronto. Like other metric units, the new prefixes represent powers of 10 — just as 1,000 grams of mass, or 10 x 10 x 10, or 103, is a kilogram, and 1/1000 of a meter in length, or 10-3, is a millimeter. The prefixes Brown came up with are ronna and ronto for 1027 and 10-27 and quetta and quecto for 1030 and 10-30. That means scientists now have simpler, easier-to-use names for stuff that is super big or crazy small. No longer do they have to say the visible universe is 1,000 yottameters in diameter. Now it's just 1 ronnameter, give or take a yottameter.Before you allow your shoulders to rise even 1 quectometer's worth of a shrug at this news, let me tell you: This is nothing short of a new way to frame the universe. The way we count things says a lot about how we think about those things, and which things we think are important. The amount of destructive power an atomic bomb delivers was inconceivable until people saw it — and could describe it in kilotons. Then, when the idea of megatons came around, that summed up a whole new level of danger. Terminology gives us the mental armature to grasp such advances in a way that plain old scientific notation can't. How else can any of us be expected to get our brains around infinitesimally small subatomic particles produced in colliders at near the speed of light, new vistas of the edge of the universe unlocked by space telescopes, or amounts of dark matter with enough mass to bend space itself? New scientific prefixes like ronna and quetta aren't just for scientists. They let us recalibrate our imagination to match the scale of the cosmos.The universe would be here even if people weren't, but the system we use to take its measure is a thing made by humans. In fact, SI units used to be based on actual, real-life <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/the-quest-to-perfect-the-universal-language-of-science/">physical artifacts</a>. You could, with the right permission, heft the kilogram, the cylinder of platinum-iridium that was originally used to define mass. Today, after decades of work, each of those units is instead defined by an invariant physical property. A meter, for example, is the distance light travels in a vacuum in 1/299,792,458th of a second, no more or less. The SI is as tightly regulated as the ingredients in a cordon bleu mother sauce, and Brown spends most of his days stewing in it.Scientists, of course, have other ways of expressing very big and very small numbers without adding prefixes. They're fine with scientific notation, saying "2 x 10-9 meters" instead of "2 nanometers." So why bother coming up with words at all? It's partly convenience — the ease of having a shared shorthand that works across disciplines and scales, from astronomical to quantum to digital. "If everyone sticks to SI prefixes," Brown says, "you don't have to go on Wikipedia to find out how long a light-year is or the power in 1 jansky." (A jansky is a measurement of radiation density favored by radio astronomers. And yes, even though I am 1.6 gigaseconds old, I did have to go on Wikipedia.)So how did Brown come up with ronna and quetta? For starters, every SI unit and every SI prefix has an official abbreviation. That's what ticked Brown off about hellabyte and brontobyte. H and B were already taken by other units (the hour, the hectare, the byte, the bel — don't get him started).In fact, just about every letter is already spoken for. "Really, the only two letters left in the English alphabet were R and Q," Brown says. "And then you throw into the mix that big numbers end in A, and small submultiples end in an O. Once you have that, you're halfway there."Starts with R and Q, ends in A and O. Got it. But what to put in between? Brown dived into the history of measurement prefixes. The first ones were <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.01.059">based on the Greek and Latin</a> for the numbers they stand for (well, femto and atto came from Scandinavian, but still). "Then they went through this period where they were based on more abstract concepts, like the Greek for monstrous or the Italian for 'very small,'" Brown says. (That would be tera and pico, respectively.) "They've come out the other side. They're based on numbers again."Here's where Brown got creative. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ac6afd">His new prefixes</a> would be the ninth and the 10th in both directions; Greek for "nine" is ennea; Greek for "10" is deka. Then commenced the neologizing. "You've got to work with them and craft them a little bit," Brown says. "They've got to sound right in English, and run together nicely with units." Starting with R and ennea, he worked his way to ronna and ronto. Starting with Q and deka, he wound up with quecca and quecto.Next up was the horse-trading. Or, as Brown describes it, consulting with stakeholders. That's how he found out that queca, with one C, is an obscenity in Portuguese. Brown changed it to quetta. But that wasn't enough for everyone. A pressure metrologist at the Czech Metrology Institute named Dominik Pražák published <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-021-01491-7">papers arguing</a> that Brown's plan posed "a risk to the future development of the SI," because it continued to use up the alphabet in Unicode, the letters that computers can read and write. Pražák proposed sticking to Greek words and letters.But Greek has problems of its own. Look how confusing it is, Brown argues, that we use the Greek letter µ for the prefix micro. Humans often see it as a U, which is confusing, and it can really fluster a computer's typography. "Machine readability is one of the big challenges in science in general, but in particular in metrology," Brown says. "You have to have ways of unambiguously representing the units."In the end, there wasn't much about the new prefixes that a metrologist could <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ab6cd7">argue with</a>. "The biggest step to overcome is getting the community to accept that new prefixes are needed," Brown says. "Whilst there is a lot of obsession about what the names are, they seem very important at the time when we approve them, but in the fullness of time people will forget any contention and they'll be well used."Then it hits me. "But wait," I say to Brown, pushing up my nerd glasses so hard they enter my brain. "A ronto is a kind of monster in 'Star Wars.'""I realized that," Brown says. "It's some sort of bantha, right?" (Um, I guess so, if you think a giraffe-necked camel that runs around on its hind legs is some sort of shaggy horned elephant.) "You cannot avoid words that mean something else in some other context. Quetta is a city in Pakistan."Ooh. Checkmate! Or whatever the winning move is in holographic chess.When the time came at the Paris meeting for the general assembly to vote, the president asked representatives from each country to hold up cards indicating their approval. They did.The metrologists had <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03747-9">reached a consensus</a>. About prefixes, at least. The conference, it turned out, had a bigger fight on its hands. "At the same meeting we passed a resolution that essentially begins the process of eliminating the leap second," says James Olthoff, the associate director for laboratory programs at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, who served as an American delegate. "There was a lot more hype and energy around that one."Brown was, let's say, not displeased. "One is fairly confident by the time you get there that it will be approved," he says. "But it's still a great moment." His team had a party when he got back to Teddington, a suburb of London. They served "SI cakes," which I fervently hoped meant they were cut into precisely quantifiable sizes, and if you wanted just a half you had to ask for 50 centipieces. Alas, they were just <a href="https://twitter.com/NPL/status/1595101904559755265">cupcakes decorated with a little rainbow wheel</a> showing all the approved SI basic units — from meter and kilogram right on through second, kelvin, ampere, candela, and mole.Granted, Brown's four new nonsensical pairs of syllables sound more like the stage names of half-forgotten vaudeville comedians than scientific, concretized facts. But just as taking the measure of a thing defines its outlines, we assign meaning to things by naming them. In philosophy speak, that's known as a rigid designator. "It points forever at that common object," says Paul Skokowski, a physicist and philosopher who teaches at Stanford. "Naming is important, and it conveys meaning depending on the context." The new words shift our culture just a little. Quantities that would have struck us as comically huge once upon a time — <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-offers-buy-twitter-at-original-deal-price-report-2022-10">$44 billion</a>? With a B? Come on! — become commonplace, conceptually available.And those concepts are coming faster and furiouser. Some of the units that made their way into the SI date back to the French Revolution. But the <a href="https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0026-1394/2/4/006">basic outlines of the modern system</a> got approved only in 1960 — units and prefixes both. Atomic physicists asked for new prefixes for their big numbers in 1964. "It may well be that in the future further extension will be needed," one J. de Boer wrote in the journal Metrologia in 1968, "but for the time being this does not seem necessary."The future was now. The next prefixes came just three years after de Boer's article. Then again in 1991. Given the scales on which technology has operated in the first quarter of the 21st century, from lasers that flash for just <a href="https://opg.optica.org/optica/fulltext.cfm?uri=optica-9-2-145&amp;id=468825">a few attoseconds</a> to the total amount of digital data in the world pushing past 160 zettabytes, it feels as if we may have let things lie for too long. I don't know if the future will have quettabit computer networks or rontometer-scale wormholes, but I'm pretty sure the large and small of it will be hella weird. It'll be comforting to put a name to it all.<a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/author/adam-rogers" rel="">Adam Rogers</a> is a senior correspondent at Insider.

Scientists are discovering stuff that is so freaking big &mdash; and so crazy small &mdash; that they had to come up with 2 new units of measurement.

In India, JBL is one of the most prominent household names when it comes to mid-range audio product brands. It’s been in the audio market for over four decades, and its parent company is Harman - another legacy high-end audio product brand. Besides the name and legacy, consumers prefer JBL for the quality of its products, value-for-money pricing and wide range of product portfolio. Its portfolio ranges from concert speakers to TWS buds. And there are many options in each category. We’ll look at the <keyword id="14814174" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="best-jbl-headphones" source="Orion">best JBL headphones</keyword> available in India. From super cheap earphones to premium over-ear headphones, both wired and wireless, there are different <keyword id="2688146" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="jbl-headphones" source="Orion">JBL headphones</keyword> for everyone, no matter your budget or use. Here’s a list of all JBL headphones available on Amazon with their features, ratings and prices. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="Top JBL headphones that you can buy right now" comment="subhead" text="Top JBL headphones that you can buy right now">Top JBL headphones that you can buy right now</cmsannotation> <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="JBL Tune 760NC - headphones for everyone" comment="subhead" text="JBL Tune 760NC - headphones for everyone">JBL Tune 760NC - headphones for everyone</cmsannotation> <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="B096FYLJ6M" comment="amazoncard" text="B096FYLJ6M">B096FYLJ6M</cmsannotation> Who should buy- gamers, casual users, sports enthusiasts, college students These wireless on-ear headphones from JBL are available for a budget price along with no-cost EMI and offers on selected bank cards. These ANC headphones offer 50 hours of playtime on a single charge. Additionally, it features JBL Pure Bass, Google Fast Pair, dual pairing, and voice assistant. If you are looking for full-featured ANC headphones, then JBL Tune 760NC is just for you. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="JBL C100SI - best budget headphones" comment="subhead" text="JBL C100SI - best budget headphones">JBL C100SI - best budget headphones</cmsannotation> <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="B01DEWVZ2C" comment="amazoncard" text="B01DEWVZ2C">B01DEWVZ2C</cmsannotation> Who should buy- people with low budget, casual users, college students If you are low on budget and yet you want the classic JCL sound signature, then JBL C100SI is worth considering. These wired in-ear headphones feature JBL Pure Bass Sound, one button for multi-function, and angled buds for comfort fit. These wired in-ear headphones have a sleek, glossy and ergonomic design, along with three sizes of ear tips, small, medium and large. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="JBL Tune 510BT - affordable wireless headphones" comment="subhead" text="JBL Tune 510BT - affordable wireless headphones">JBL Tune 510BT - affordable wireless headphones</cmsannotation> <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="B08QTYYNDN" comment="amazoncard" text="B08QTYYNDN">B08QTYYNDN</cmsannotation> Who should buy- gamers, music lovers, college students, everyday users If you are hunting for affordable wireless on-ear headphones, JBL Tune 510BT is a good pick. These headphones are equipped with JBL Pure Bass, Dual Pairing, the latest Bluetooth 5.0 for connectivity and 40- hours of playback time, and quick charging support. These headphones are ideal for everyday use, gaming, entertainment, and much more. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="JBL T460BT by Harman- for bass lovers" comment="subhead" text="JBL T460BT by Harman- for bass lovers">JBL T460BT by Harman- for bass lovers</cmsannotation> <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="B077T4737M" comment="amazoncard" text="B077T4737M">B077T4737M</cmsannotation> Who should buy- music lovers, gamers, fitness lovers, everyday users These wireless on-ear headphones are available in funky colour options, black, white, and blue. It comes with JBL Pure Bass sound technology which is said to deliver true bass. It comes with 11- hours of playback time and integrated control for music and calls on the earcup. Further, 3 hours of charging gives 100% battery. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="JBL Tune 700BT- for music lovers" comment="subhead" text="JBL Tune 700BT- for music lovers">JBL Tune 700BT- for music lovers</cmsannotation> <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="B08145ZW8Y" comment="amazoncard" text="B08145ZW8Y">B08145ZW8Y</cmsannotation> Who should buy- music lovers, college students, wireless headphone lovers It is another pick on our list if you want wireless on-ear headphones with massive battery life. These are available in black, white, and blue colour options. It offers 27 hours of battery life under default audio settings, quick charging, a multi-point connection to switch between two devices, and hands-free calling with a foldable design. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="JBL Free WFH - Oldschool headphones with the latest technology" comment="subhead" text="JBL Free WFH - Oldschool headphones with the latest technology">JBL Free WFH - Oldschool headphones with the latest technology</cmsannotation> <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="B0948TG7H8" comment="amazoncard" text="B0948TG7H8">B0948TG7H8</cmsannotation> Who should buy- gamers, office employees, students, wired headphones lovers If you are looking for wired on-ear headphones from JBL then JBL Free WFH is worth considering. Equipped with a mic, these are ideal for office use, and for students attending online classes and lectures. Equipped with 40mm drivers, these headphones ensure your call and music are crisp and clear. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="JBL Tune 500BT- true wireless headphones" comment="subhead" text="JBL Tune 500BT- true wireless headphones">JBL Tune 500BT- true wireless headphones</cmsannotation> <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="B07HGG85HL" comment="amazoncard" text="B07HGG85HL">B07HGG85HL</cmsannotation> Who should buy- students, gamers, music lovers, travellers The JBL Tune 500BT is available in three attractive colours, black, blue, and white. Equipped with Bluetooth 4.1, JBL pure bass sound, multi-point connection, and foldable design these wireless headphones are worth considering. Besides this, under optimum settings, JBL Tune 500BT can offer a playback time of 16- hours. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="JBL Quantum 100- the basic one" comment="subhead" text="JBL Quantum 100- the basic one">JBL Quantum 100- the basic one</cmsannotation> <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="B083X24CFF" comment="amazoncard" text="B083X24CFF">B083X24CFF</cmsannotation> Who should buy- casual buyers, gamers, office employees This is another great option if you are looking for wired on-ear headphones with a mic. Available in three colours, black, blue and white, these are an ideal pick. Equipped with 40mm dynamic drivers and JBL QuantunSound Signature these headphones offer premium sound quality. The memory foam cushioning gives you a comfortable fit. DISCLAIMER: The Insider Picks team writes about stuff we think you'll like. Business Insider has affiliate partnerships, so we get a share of the revenue from your purchase. SEE ALSO: <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/tech-buying-guides/best-bluetooth-speakers-with-heavy-bass/articleshow/83300956.cms">Best Bluetooth speakers with heavy bass</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/insider-reviews/smart-sleek-all-black-fitness-watches/articleshow/77894047.cms">Best fitness tracker smart watches in India</a>

Best JBL headphones to buy in 2023

<div class="KonaFilter image-container display-table float_right"><div><div class="image on-image"></div></div></div>Humankind is hot on the trail to designing and building the next-generation of super computers, called quantum computers.Capable of easily cracking encryptions that would be impossible with the average classical computer, a quantum computer will not only revolutionize computing speed but also <a href="https://uwaterloo.ca/institute-for-quantum-computing/quantum-computing-101">render most common-day encryption methods</a> obsolete.Now, a team of scientists at the The University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Sydney, Australia and Keio University in Japan have just made a significant breakthrough in the field using a special material: Silicon.By modifying a standard silicon transistor - the backbone of all modern-day electronic devices - the scientists have performed the world's first calculation with what are called quantum bits, instead of classical bits, with a silicon-based material.Quantum bits are the coded language by which quantum computers would speak to one another and transmit and store information. Never before has anyone managed to get two of them to communicate using silicon.This is a tremendous achievement."Our results mean that all of the physical building blocks for a silicon quantum computer have now been successfully constructed," Menno Veldhorst, who is the lead author of the paper where the team reported their results, said in a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=104&amp;v=WXKJ-oUq6F8">UNSW video</a>. The paper was published in <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature15263.html#affil-auth">Nature</a> on Oct. 6.<div class="KonaFilter image-container display-table full"><div><div class="image on-image"></div></div></div>In addition to having everything they need to start the real task of designing a quantum processor, the engineers can proceed with a material that is both ubiquitous and cheap."Because we use essentially the same device technology as existing computer chips, we believe it will be much easier to manufacture a full-scale processor chip than for any of the leading designs, which rely on more exotic technologies,"Andrew Dzurak, who is the team leader and director of the Australian National Fabrication Facility at UNSW, said in a <a href="http://phys.org/news/2015-10-crucial-hurdle-quantum.html">press release</a>.<h2>Next steps</h2>Other researchers have successfully performed calculations between two quantum bits, but they used expensive materials like <a href="http://www.gizmag.com/quantum-computing-diamond-wires/14487/">diamond</a> and <a href="http://www.gizmag.com/optical-transistor-quantum-computing/28203/">cesium</a>. In addition to being pricey, these materials do not play nice when it comes to large-scale manufacturing. The crucial advantage of silicon transistors is that you can, in theory, connect hundreds of them together to work as a quantum computer.<div class="KonaFilter image-container display-table float_right"><div><div class="image on-image"></div></div></div>"The silicon chip in your smartphone or tablet already has around one billion transistors on it, with each transistor less then 100 billionths of a meter in size," Veldhorst said in the press release.Now that the team has successfully managed to get two qubits talking to one another, the next step is to get three qubits communicating, and then tens, hundreds, and eventually billions.Classical computers use what are called <a href="https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs101/bits-bytes.html">bytes, which are comprised of 8 individual bits</a>, so if your computer has an 8 GigaByte hard-drive, that means it has the capacity to store billions of bits of information like important PDF documents and vacation photos. If quantum computers are ever going to compete with what we have today, then they're going to have to run on a lot more than just a few quantum bits.Right now, the most qubits anyone has ever connected is D-Wave System Inc., which <a href="http://www.dwavesys.com/press-releases/d-wave-systems-breaks-1000-qubit-quantum-computing-barrier">broke the 1,000 qubit barrier</a> earlier this year. Though <a href="http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2014/jun/20/is-d-wave-quantum-computer-actually-a-quantum-computer">some question</a> D-Wave's technology as genuine quantum computing.But the UNSW team is taking it one step at a time and has high hopes."I believe that a Si-CMOS qubit prototype containing between tens and hundreds of qubits could be made within five years, provided we have the right level of investment and the right industry partners," Dzurak told <a href="http://www.gizmag.com/silicon-quantum-computer/39711/">Gizmag</a>.Check out Dzurak and Veldhorst explaining their work in the<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=104&amp;v=WXKJ-oUq6F8"> YouTube video</a> below:<div></div>&#xa0; <div class="margin-top"> <h3>NOW WATCH: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/test-mission-nasa-esa-asteroid-impacts-space-science-2015-10">Two world-leading space agencies are teaming up on a mission that could help save the human race</a></h3> <div> <div> <div class="ooyala-video-player" data-video-autoplay="false" data-video-id="phMWp4dzq13JFmuevTtd90LqsPLQbTjY" data-player-variable="ooyalapopvideo" id="ooyalaplayer_popvideo" style="width:1280px;height:720px"></div> </div> </div> </div>

A major breakthrough has given these Australian engineers everything they need to build a new generation of super-fast computers that would jeopardize the way we store personal information

You Searched For "quantum si" and got 4 results

SPAC HighCape Capital soars 140% on deal to buy protein-sequencing firm Quantum-Si

Emily Graffeo

Scientists are discovering stuff that is so freaking big and so crazy small — that they had to come up with 2 new units of measurement.

Adam Rogers

Best JBL headphones to buy in 2023

Rahul Verma

A major breakthrough has given these Australian engineers everything they need to build a new generation of super-fast computers that would jeopardize the way we store personal information

Jessica Orwig

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides

You Searched For "quantum si" and got 4 results

SPAC HighCape Capital soars 140% on deal to buy protein-sequencing firm Quantum-Si

Emily Graffeo

Scientists are discovering stuff that is so freaking big and so crazy small &mdash; that they had to come up with 2 new units of measurement.

Adam Rogers

Best JBL headphones to buy in 2023

Rahul Verma

A major breakthrough has given these Australian engineers everything they need to build a new generation of super-fast computers that would jeopardize the way we store personal information

Jessica Orwig

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides

Scientists are discovering stuff that is so freaking big and so crazy small — that they had to come up with 2 new units of measurement.