Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

Did you know that your high-speed <keyword id="6357247" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Internet" source="Orion">internet</keyword> might be making you a bit, well… sluggish? According to new research, faster internet connections could actually be helping to drive up <keyword id="6364492" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Obesity" source="Orion">obesity</keyword> rates in Australia. The study examined years of data from the Household, Income, and Labor Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, tracking the expansion of high-speed internet across the country from 2006 to 2019. The result? The faster the internet, the more likely people are to gain weight. <h3 style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:14.0pt;margin-bottom:4.0pt;">Fast internet changing daily habits</h3>According to Dr. Klaus Ackermann from Monash Business School, the connection between fast internet and weight gain has to do with “sedentary behavior.” He explains, “Access to high-speed internet connection decreases the likelihood of individuals meeting the minimum physical activity recommendation proposed by the WHO. That is, individuals become more inactive and exhibit more sedentary behaviour.” Basically, with high-speed internet, we’re more likely to spend hours watching streaming shows or playing online games. And, as Dr. Ackermann says, “Sedentary behavior is induced by the need to stay connected online for longer hours, which leads to lower metabolic rates and contributes to obesity.” And that’s not all — the more we’re sitting around, the more we’re likely to snack. “This problem is elevated by the need to frequently consume snacks during computer usage, which increases the daily intake of calories that contribute to obesity,” Ackermann points out. <h3 style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:14.0pt;margin-bottom:4.0pt;">A growing (and costly) problem</h3>Beyond individual health, Australia’s obesity crisis is also creating a big economic issue. Obesity cost the country $11.8 billion in 2018, and that number is projected to reach an astonishing $87.7 billion by 2032. According to the study, a mere 1% increase in National Broadband Network adoption is linked with a jump in <keyword id="20107050" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Body-Mass-Index" source="keywords">Body Mass Index</keyword> (BMI) of 1.57 kg/m² and a 6.6% increase in the prevalence of obesity. In simple terms, fast internet is allowing people to live slower lives—lives that involve a lot more sitting and a lot less moving. <h3 style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:14.0pt;margin-bottom:4.0pt;">Breaking the cycle</h3>So, what’s the solution? Dr. Ackermann suggests that we might need <keyword id="21876118" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="public-health-campaigns" source="keywords">public health campaigns</keyword> to remind people of the risks that come with endless screen time. “One avenue of suggestion could be creating awareness of the potential increase in <keyword id="23729054" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="sedentary-behavior" source="keywords">sedentary behavior</keyword> with internet access; this could motivate people to take breaks between screen time to reduce sedentary behavior and engage in physical activity to promote a healthier lifestyle,” he says. He adds that encouraging people to take breaks and do more physical activities might be key. “Such public health campaigns could encourage the need to physically engage in errands, if possible, as opposed to strictly accessing goods and services online,” Ackermann advises. High-speed internet may be part of modern life, but maybe it’s worth taking a step back now and then to get off the couch. As Dr. Ackermann puts it, “Public health campaigns that encourage short but vigorous physical activity… could be useful for individuals with busy lifestyles who may only have limited time.” The findings of this research have been published in Economics &amp; Human Biology.

The faster your internet, the more likely you are to be obese, a study has found

The long-standing concern that <keyword id="20016418" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="mobile-phones" source="keywords">mobile phones</keyword> might cause <keyword id="20881867" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="brain-cancer" source="keywords">brain cancer</keyword> has once again been debunked by a comprehensive systematic review commissioned by the <keyword id="19896311" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="World-Health-Organization" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="World Health Organization" meta.hostid="261" meta.entityid="World Health Organization">World Health Organization</keyword> (WHO). Published in the journal Environment International, this review provides the strongest evidence to date that <keyword id="23039585" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="radio-wave-exposure" source="keywords">radio wave exposure</keyword> from mobile phones does not increase the risk of brain cancer or other <keyword id="19924603" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="health-issues" source="keywords">health issues</keyword>. Mobile phones emit <keyword id="21686850" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="radio-waves" source="keywords">radio waves</keyword>, a form of non-ionising radiation, which has raised concerns over the years due to their proximity to the head during use. The idea that these devices could be linked to brain cancer has been a topic of debate, especially since mobile phones have become an integral part of daily life. Despite occasional studies hinting at potential harm, the scientific consensus has consistently found no association between mobile phone use and cancer. The new review strengthens this consensus, analysing data from over 5,000 studies, including 63 key studies published between 1994 and 2022. The review found no evidence that mobile phone use, even over prolonged periods, increases the risk of brain cancer or any other head or neck cancers. <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="111865954" title="9 foods that can boost your brain health — and don&amp;#39;t cost more than $1 per serving" mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div>This latest research is a critical follow-up to the 2011 classification by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a part of WHO, which labeled radio waves as a "possible carcinogen" based on limited evidence. The new review, with its more extensive and updated data set, clarifies that earlier concerns were based on observational studies that had significant biases. One of the major studies cited by the IARC was the <keyword id="23039584" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="interphone" source="keywords">INTERPHONE</keyword> study, which relied on self-reported data from brain cancer patients who may have overestimated their mobile phone use. The new review, however, considers more recent and robust studies that show no correlation between mobile phone use and cancer incidence. Importantly, the findings also reflect the fact that, despite the massive increase in mobile phone use over the past few decades, there has been no corresponding rise in brain cancer cases. This reinforces the idea that national and international safety limits for radio wave exposure are effective in protecting public health. While the results are reassuring, the review emphasizes the need for ongoing research. As technology evolves and the use of radio waves expands, it remains crucial to monitor any potential health impacts. However, for now, the evidence strongly supports the safety of mobile phones, countering persistent misconceptions and misinformation. In summary, this comprehensive review should put to rest fears about mobile phones and brain cancer, confirming that the devices we rely on daily do not pose a risk to our health. <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="112205625" title="Eating processed meats like bacon may age your brain — but you can avoid it with simple food swaps, research suggests" mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div>

Mobile phones are not causing brain cancer, a WHO study confirms

A recent study by <keyword id="19898366" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="harvard" source="keywords">Harvard</keyword> and the <keyword id="23109326" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="european-university-of-rome" source="keywords">European University of Rome</keyword> has uncovered a striking connection between early-life exposure to <keyword id="55910" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="air-pollution" source="Orion">air pollution</keyword> and economic outcomes in adulthood. Published in the Proceedings of the <keyword id="21125238" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="national-academy-of-sciences" source="keywords">National Academy of Sciences</keyword>, the <a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2401882121" data-type="tilCustomLink">research</a> highlights how infants exposed to higher levels of fine particulate air pollution (PM2.5) are likely to earn less as adults, with the most significant impacts observed in the Midwest and South of the United States. “This study takes a big step toward filling the knowledge gap on the crucial link between environmental factors and long-term economic outcomes,” said Francesca Dominici, lead author and professor at Harvard. The findings underscore how environmental pollution, particularly air quality, plays a significant role in shaping not just public health but economic mobility and well-being later in life. <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="112921592" title="Indoor air pollution poses greater health risk than outdoor: Experts" mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div> <h2>Key findings </h2>The study focused on US individuals born between 1978 and 1983, analysing their PM2.5 exposure from 1980 to 2010, and compared it to their earnings in 2014-2015 when they were between 31 and 37 years old. The results were telling: a one-unit increase in PM2.5 exposure was associated with a 1.146% decrease in <keyword id="23109325" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="economic-earnings" source="Orion">economic earnings</keyword>, measured using a statistic called <keyword id="23109327" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Absolute-Upward-Mobility" source="Orion">Absolute Upward Mobility</keyword> (AUM). The data revealed that this impact was not uniform across the country. Midwestern and Southern regions saw the highest negative effects, suggesting regional disparities in both air quality and its long-term economic impacts. <h2>Call for action </h2>The authors argue that these findings should encourage the creation of stringent national air quality standards, as well as targeted interventions to address pollution in highly affected regions. Luca Merlo, co-lead author, emphasised the importance of addressing both environmental and economic inequalities through integrated policies. This research builds on growing evidence of the far-reaching consequences of air pollution, further solidifying the argument that improving air quality is not only vital for public health but also for fostering economic growth and opportunity. <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="112853990" title="India saw 19.3% drop in particulate pollution in 2022, adding 51 days to life expectancy: Report" mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div>

Harvard study links exposure to air pollution in infancy to reduced earnings in adulthood

In a significant move to safeguard <keyword id="19913584" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="public-health" source="keywords">public health</keyword>, the Indian government has banned 156 widely sold fixed-dose combination (FDC) drugs, many of which are used to treat common ailments such as fever, colds, allergies and pain. The banned FDCs include several popular antibacterial and pain-relief medications, which the government has declared "likely to involve risk to human beings." The ban was officially announced through a gazette notification issued by the <keyword id="19897332" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Union-Health-Ministry" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="Union Health Ministry" meta.hostid="261" meta.entityid="Union Health Ministry">Union Health Ministry</keyword> on August 12. <keyword id="22891947" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="FDC-drugs" source="keywords">FDC drugs</keyword>, often referred to as "cocktail" drugs, contain a combination of two or more active pharmaceutical ingredients in a fixed ratio. While such combinations are intended to offer multi-faceted treatment, concerns have been raised about their safety and efficacy. Among the drugs on the banned list is the well-known combination of Aceclofenac 50 mg and <keyword id="20687368" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="paracetamol" source="keywords">Paracetamol</keyword> 125 mg, a popular pain reliever produced by several major pharmaceutical companies. Other banned FDCs include Mefenamic Acid Paracetamol Injection, Cetirizine HCl Paracetamol Phenylephrine HCl, Levocetirizine Phenylephrine HCl Paracetamol, Paracetamol Chlorpheniramine Maleate Phenyl Proanolamine, and Camylofin Dihydrochloride 25 mg Paracetamol 300 mg. A particularly notable ban is on the combination of Paracetamol, Tramadol, Taurine, and Caffeine. Tramadol, an opioid-based painkiller, has drawn attention for its potential for abuse and addiction, adding to the concerns surrounding its inclusion in over-the-counter FDCs. <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="112557689" title="The drugmaker that hopes to legalize MDMA is cutting 75% of its staff after the FDA rejected the drug" mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div>According to the government's notification, the Central government has determined that the use of these FDCs "is likely to involve risk to human beings," and that "safer alternatives to the said drugs are available." The decision follows an in-depth examination by an Expert Committee, which found many of these FDCs to be "irrational." The apex panel Drugs Technical Advisory Board (DTAB) also reviewed the combinations and concluded that there was "no therapeutic justification" for the ingredients in these FDCs. In light of the potential risks, the government deemed it necessary to prohibit the manufacture, sale, and distribution of these drugs under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The notification emphasised that "in the larger public interest, it is necessary to prohibit the manufacture, sale, or distribution of this FDC" as regulation or restriction would not be sufficient to protect patients. This is not the first time the Indian government has intervened to address the sale of FDCs. In 2016, the Centre had announced a ban on 344 FDCs after an expert panel — established at the direction of the Supreme Court — found that many of these combinations were being sold without sufficient scientific evidence supporting their efficacy. Although that decision was contested in court by <keyword id="22603498" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="drug-manufacturers" source="keywords">drug manufacturers</keyword>, it set a precedent for regulatory scrutiny of FDCs in India. In June 2023, 14 FDCs from the original list of 344 were also banned. Many of the drugs included in the recent list of 156 were part of this original 344-drug combination ban, reinforcing the government's continued efforts to remove unsafe and unjustified medications from the market. Several of the banned products had already been discontinued by manufacturers, but the new regulations ensure that these combinations will no longer be available for sale in India, further emphasising the government's commitment to public safety and rational drug use. <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="112374485" title="Govt waives clinical trial requirement for several drugs approved in select countries" mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div>

156 ‘combination medicines’ containing Cetirizine, Paracetamol and other common drugs banned by Centre

Have you been harbouring the misimpression that the worst thing that could happen to you while commuting to work is getting stuck in rush hour traffic? As it turns out, being trapped in your car for the duration is even worse because you could be inadvertently breathing in <keyword id="21593992" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="cancer-causing-air" source="keywords">cancer-causing air</keyword>. This is a real bummer, considering rolling down your windows would mean inhaling polluted air most of the time. New research has found <keyword id="21589825" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="flame-retardants" source="keywords">flame retardants</keyword> in nearly all (99%) of the cars tested in the US. These chemicals, including tris (1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCIPP) and tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP). Why is this a problem? These chemicals are linked to cancer, <keyword id="21593994" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="neurological-problems" source="keywords">neurological problems</keyword>, and even lower IQ in children. In fact, even firefighters seem to have been raising concerns about flame retardants potentially contributing to their high cancer rates. And companies have been adding these potentially carcinogenic flame retardants to car seats and other materials, off-gassing harmful chemicals into the air you breathe. “Considering the average driver spends about an hour in the car every day, this is a significant <keyword id="21593993" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="public-health-issue" source="keywords">public health issue</keyword>. It’s particularly concerning for drivers with longer commutes as well as child passengers, who breathe more air pound for pound than adults,” explains lead author Rebecca Hoehn, a scientist at <keyword id="20075490" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Duke-University" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="Duke University" meta.hostid="261" meta.entityid="Duke University">Duke University</keyword>. Here's the kicker: exposure seems to be worse during hot weather. Car interiors can reach scorching temperatures, causing these flame retardants to break down and pollute the air you breathe. The good news? There's a safer way. California, US, for example, updated its flammability standards for furniture and baby products to eliminate flame retardants without compromising safety. This update actually led to a decrease in flame retardant levels in homes, proving there's a better path forward. While opening windows and parking in the shade can help, the real solution lies in urging <keyword id="19996197" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="car-manufacturers" source="keywords">car manufacturers</keyword> and safety regulators to update outdated standards. We shouldn't have to choose between fire safety and our health. “Commuting to work shouldn’t come with a cancer risk, and children shouldn’t breathe in chemicals that can harm their brains on their way to school,” says the study’s co-author Lydia Jahl, a senior scientist at the Green Science Policy Institute. The findings of this study have been detailed in Environmental Science &amp; Technology and can be accessed <a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c10440">here</a>.

Toxic chemicals in your car seats could be increasing risks of cancer, study warns

<ul class="summary-list"><li>This post originally appeared in the Insider Today newsletter.</li></ul>Good morning! Tired of having to check your email when you're supposed to be off the clock? A growing number of countries are implementing laws that make those <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/ban-after-hours-work-calls-emails-could-bring-trouble-peace-2024-11">late-night emails from your boss illegal</a>.In today's big story, OpenAI's next big AI model <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/openai-orion-model-scaling-law-silicon-valley-chatgpt-2024-11">isn't showing massive improvement over previous versions</a>, and it could be a sign of a new era.What's on deck:<ul><li>Markets: Prediction markets were one of the big winners of the election. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/polymarket-kalshi-trump-victory-future-prediction-markets-2024-11">So now what</a>?</li><li>Tech: The key role YouTube played <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/youtube-donald-trump-podcasts-joe-rogan2024-11">in helping Trump get elected</a>.</li><li>Business: These companies <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/companies-raising-prices-trump-tariffs-inflation-goods-getting-more-expensive-2024-11">have signaled they might increase prices</a> because of Trump's trade plans.</li></ul>But first, not so fast.If this was forwarded to you, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/subscription/newsletter/insider-today">sign up here.</a><h3 id="7fa5f018-5b05-4a37-a8dc-d3f89138bcb3">The big story</h3><h2 id="5fd547b9-ec52-41fc-8e08-4f4b27dd8097">Big leaps to baby steps</h2><div type="image" title="Image of Sam Altman" height="1355" width="1920" msid="115221991" hostid="261" sizebytes="24236"></div>The fastest-growing sector of tech is facing a serious speed bump.OpenAI's next artificial intelligence model, Orion, reportedly isn't showing the massive leap in improvement previous versions have enjoyed. That's leading to bigger questions about how quickly <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/openai-orion-model-scaling-law-silicon-valley-chatgpt-2024-11">we can expect future generative-AI models to keep getting better</a>, writes Business Insider's Hasan Chowdhury and Beatrice Nolan.Some OpenAI employees who have used and tested Orion told The Information its improvements are only moderate and smaller than what users saw going from GPT-3 to GPT-4.It's an astounding revelation when you consider the stakes. OpenAI is considered the leading AI company, and we're learning that its most important new product may not be that much better than something it released about 20 months ago — a lifetime in the AI industry.It also undermines a core assumption about the future of generative AI: If you add more data and computing power, you get smarter and more powerful AI models. This "scaling law" is the consensus view now, yet OpenAI is reportedly struggling with it.Top AI players have eye-popping valuations based on the promise that AI models will keep getting smarter and better with time. If that growth trajectory slows, it could lead to difficult questions, particularly from investors bankrolling the hundreds of billions of dollars companies are pouring into these projects.<div type="image" title="An eye in the center while abstract swirls, numbers and chat bubbles surround it" height="1080" width="2160" msid="115221987" hostid="261" sizebytes="520698"></div>So what's holding AI models back from making another big jump?AI models are already burning through text, with one estimate predicting they'll run out of material by 2028. Companies are trying to circumvent the issue with synthetic data, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-synthetic-data-industry-debate-over-fake-2024-8">but that might not be a viable solution</a>.Using more computing also comes with limitations and has the added hurdle of <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-data-centers-delays-costs-power-labor-shortages-aws-ai-2024-10">needing significant power</a>. The biggest companies in the world are struggling to find cost-efficient energy sources for the massive data centers they're building as part of their AI strategy.There was always an expectation that things might slow down a bit. In July, one OpenAI customer told BI he thought the newest iteration <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/openai-gpt5-gpt4-expectations-ai-2024-7">would be like going from undergrad to a PhD program</a>, as opposed to the jump from GPT-3 to GPT-4, which was like "grade school to undergrad."More resources can help address those issues to a degree, but the improvements still might not mirror what we saw in the early days of generative AI. If that's the case, investors might be unwilling to open their wallets for something they view as having diminishing returns.Even if they shell out the cash, companies will likely price their products accordingly to recoup those investments. That's a tricky proposition, as <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/for-ai-models-good-enough-is-good-enough-2024-5">"good enough" is fine for plenty of users</a>.<h3 id="77f31a4c-8462-4e3d-a71f-838cb79493fb">News brief</h3><h2 id="1fcd294b-3f53-425f-9f20-4093e8623b59">Top headlines</h2><ul><li>New York Times tech workers are <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/the-new-york-times-tech-workers-ending-their-labor-strike-2024-11">ending their strike</a>.</li><li>Anthony Scaramucci tells BI Trump's economic plans could cause a <a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/stock-market-crash-risk-outlook-trump-deportation-tariff-anthony-scaramucci-2024-11">1920s-style stock-market crash</a>.</li><li>Bitcoin hits fresh record near $85,000 as investors keep <a target="_blank" href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/currencies/bitcoin-record-price-outlook-crypto-trump-election-digital-assets-altcoins-2024-11">cheering 'crypto president' Trump</a>.</li><li>The winners of Wall Street bonus season this year: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/wall-street-bonus-season-alan-johnson-associates-report-underwriters-2024-11">the underwriters</a>.</li></ul><h2 id="8120060b-ae66-48dc-b149-f0489a30ffa2">3 things in markets</h2><div type="image" title="Dice with the faces of Trump, Musk, RFK, and Zelensky" height="1500" width="2000" msid="115221989" hostid="261" sizebytes="103426"></div><ol><li>Betting markets are taking their victory lap and already thinking about what's next. Besides Donald Trump — and maybe Elon Musk — betting markets were arguably one of the biggest winners on election night, having predicted a resounding Trump victory. Insiders spoke to BI about how the betting markets' success <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/polymarket-kalshi-trump-victory-future-prediction-markets-2024-11">could impact traditional polls and the media</a>.</li><li>Morgan Stanley teams up with Carta on the eve of an IPO boom. Carta, which helps startups and investors track company ownership, will refer clients looking to go public to Morgan Stanley. Jed Finn, the bank's wealth boss, explained how the partnership will benefit both sides <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/morgan-stanley-partners-with-carta-startup-ipos-wealth-2024-11">in an exclusive interview with BI</a>.</li><li>Putting a number on the impact of Trump's potential tax cuts. Goldman Sachs said the S&amp;P 500 earnings could rise more than 20% over the next two years <a target="_blank" href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/trump-tax-cuts-tariffs-stock-market-sp500-inflation-china-trade-war-2024-11">if Trump cuts corporate taxes like he said he would</a>. The president-elect's blanket tariff proposal could have the opposite effect, but Wharton professor Jeremy Siegel said Trump's so focused on appealing to investors <a target="_blank" href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/trump-policies-tax-cuts-inflation-government-debt-deficit-jeremy-siegel-2024-11">he might soften his economic agenda to suit them better</a>.</li></ol><h2 id="f4b54806-7f81-450c-ba32-92560d4fae9b">3 things in tech</h2><div type="image" title="Distorted Youtube logo with election imagery." height="900" width="1200" msid="115221994" hostid="261" sizebytes="215788"></div><ol><li>This election, social media killed the TV star. Donald Trump spent a lot of time on the campaign trail with podcasters like Joe Rogan, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/youtube-donald-trump-podcasts-joe-rogan2024-11">who have huge YouTube followings</a> and benefit from the platform's content-recommendation algorithm. Now, the Trump administration might turn away from TV and <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-donald-trump-elon-musk-2024-11">embrace new media even further</a>, given the president-elect's bromance with X owner Elon Musk.</li><li>A $3 billion healthcare startup just cut some physical therapists as it turns to AI. Sword Health, which provides virtual care for problems like muscle and joint pain, laid off more than a dozen of its clinical workforce in October, three former employees told BI. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/3-billion-sword-health-cuts-physical-therapists-2024-11">The cuts came as the startup ramps up its AI platform to treat patients</a>.</li><li>Trump's trade plan could make things muy difícil for Elon Musk. Tesla's planned $10 billion gigafactory in Mexico will hit a major roadblock if Trump pursues the massive tax he's discussed putting on vehicles imported from Mexico. Musk isn't alone — analysts warned <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-tariffs-threaten-elon-musk-tesla-mexico-factory-limbo-2024-11">tariffs on imported cars from Mexico would seriously hurt US automakers</a>.</li></ol><h2 id="9260fa45-d397-4b3c-b4f8-4bb193976216">3 things in business</h2><div type="image" title="Photo illustration of a lightbulb with the globe painted on it" height="960" width="1920" msid="115221992" hostid="261" sizebytes="26616"></div><ol><li>Trailblazing for a sustainable future. Solving the climate crisis will take innovation and action across industries like energy, transportation, agriculture, and finance. BI identified <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/climate-action-15-global-leaders-innovating-climate-solutions-2024-11">15 entrepreneurs, policymakers, organizers, and academics</a> around the globe confronting the crisis head-on.</li><li>Expect the price of these goods to go up if Trump enacts his trade plan. Three executives have already warned they plan to raise prices if the president-elect implements the aggressive tariff proposal he campaigned on. "<a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/companies-raising-prices-trump-tariffs-inflation-goods-getting-more-expensive-2024-11">It's going to be very, very difficult to keep products affordable for Americans</a>," one CEO said.</li><li>Key players in Trump administration 2.0. From the wily campaign strategist who will be the first female presidential chief of staff to the ex-ICE director tapped to be "border czar," <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-white-house-staff-cabinet-picks-list-2024-11">these are the people shaping key policies</a> for the next 4 years.</li></ol><h2 id="9f5d80ac-3466-429f-a50a-2ffbb70c65ff">What's happening today</h2><ul><li>New York judge Juan Merchan rules on claims of presidential immunity in Donald Trump's hush-money case. Trump's defense has argued that the prosecution should not have been allowed to use some evidence in the case.</li><li>Jack Teixeira, the national guardsmen who pled guilty to leaking sensitive military documents on Ukraine online, is sentenced in Massachusetts court.</li><li>Home Depot and other companies report earnings.</li></ul>The Insider Today team: Dan DeFrancesco, deputy editor and anchor, in New York. Grace Lett, editor, in Chicago. Ella Hopkins, associate editor, in London. Hallam Bullock, senior editor, in London. Amanda Yen, fellow, in New York. Milan Sehmbi, fellow, in London.

OpenAI reportedly facing issues with its new AI model is a red flag for the entire industry

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Some Americans move to Canada in search of less polarized politics and reduced risk of gun violence.</li><li>Two people who moved said they faced long waiting lists for healthcare and still-high housing costs.</li></ul>Born in the South, Mahlena-Rae Johnson moved to Los Angeles after graduating from high school. She eventually found a partner and a community of people who made California feel like home.Johnson, a 42-year-old Black woman, said she felt a turning point when <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump">Donald Trump</a> beat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. She said she felt it laid bare profound political and ideological divisions within the nation, which resulted in a growing intolerance toward non-cisgendered Americans.In 2018, she and her partner <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/moving-to-canada-from-us-differences-pros-cons-guns-drugs-2023-12">relocated to Canada</a>, seeking what they perceived to be a more politically progressive and secure environment to raise their children."I watched videos of people who moved to Canada, and one man who had moved years ago said that he liked living in a place where he knew his country wasn't constantly at war," Johnson told Business Insider. "It is overall a place where I feel safer with my family."According to Google Trends, searches for "moving to Canada" tend to spike following polarizing events, such as the <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&amp;q=move%20to%20canada&amp;hl=en-US">presidential debate</a> between President Joe Biden and former president Trump on June 27. After that <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/what-happened-biden-trump-debate-takeaways-2024-6">disastrous debate</a>, Biden stepped aside, making way for Vice President <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/kamala-harris">Kamala Harris</a> to eventually become the Democratic nominee.Similar spikes have been observed during <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=2016-11-01%202016-11-30&amp;geo=US&amp;q=move%20to%20canada&amp;hl=en-US">the 2016 presidential election,</a> the bitter <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=2020-09-01%202020-10-31&amp;geo=US&amp;q=move%20to%20canada&amp;hl=en-US">debate between Trump and Biden</a> during the 2020 presidential election, and <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=2022-06-01%202022-07-01&amp;geo=US&amp;q=move%20to%20canada&amp;hl=en-US">the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade</a> in 2022. Searches for "moving to Canada" had already started to <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%201-m&amp;geo=US&amp;q=move%20to%20canada&amp;hl=en-US">increase during the month</a> leading up to Election Day 2024, per Google Trends."Usually when there's an election cycle, or when people don't like who is elected, Americans in particular want to move to Canada," <a target="_blank" href="https://www.visaplace.com/">VisaPlace</a> CEO Michael Niren, an immigration lawyer with more than 25 years of experience in Canadian migration, told BI.A smaller number of Americans actually follow through on their internet dreams and make the move. According to <a target="_blank" href="https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/f7e5498e-0ad8-4417-85c9-9b8aff9b9eda">immigration data from the Canadian government</a>, 93,095 Americans were granted permanent residency between 2015 and the end of the third quarter of 2024. The number of Americans granted permanent residence has increased almost every year. In 2015, 7,655 people got it; in 2023, 10,640 people did. 2021 saw the largest number: 11,955.Two Americans who recently moved to Canada told BI they did so to escape polarized and divisive politics, escape inadequate healthcare, and feel safer in their communities.While they said their overall quality of life had improved, they found the grass wasn't greener in every arena: There can be long waitlists for medical care, and it's very expensive to buy a home.<h2 id="8b3f63f9-a520-43d6-a1bc-b0b4a1463883">One mover said Canada's schools were better, but its free healthcare was still flawed</h2>Johnson, who primarily wanted to escape American politics, said she discovered some advantages of Canada's schooling system once her children enrolled.In LA, she said, "many of the schools are in trailers instead of actual buildings," but in Canada, "children can go to school and not worry about having a place that is safe or not being in an actual building."Johnson said she and her family had also enjoyed Canada's universal, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.commonwealthfund.org/international-health-policy-center/countries/canada">publicly funded healthcare system</a>, under which citizens and permanent residents get most medically necessary care and medications for free or at a very low cost.She added that there were some frustrations, including <a target="_blank" href="https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/waiting-your-turn-wait-times-for-health-care-in-canada-2022">lengthy waiting periods</a> for medical care. "During the pandemic, doctors couldn't see patients as regularly and non-emergency procedures were postponed, so there's a backlog," she said.Niren, who has lived in both the US and Canada, voiced similar concerns. He said his own mother, who needs a hip replacement, was on a waitlist for 18 months."There are people who have to fly to other countries — including the United States — to get cancer treatment because it takes too long," he said. "In the US, you can get a specialist appointment in two days."Niren also said Canadians paid elevated taxes to support such a comprehensive healthcare system."People call it free healthcare — it's not free," he said. "It's very expensive because you're paying through the taxes."<h2 id="8af511bd-4cef-4447-96f8-e2383dcbf3f4">An American found relief from the US's violence and opioid crises in Canada</h2>Chris Ouellet, 40, left Portland, Oregon, for Victoria, British Columbia, in 2020. It wasn't his first-choice destination, he said, but he ended up finding the peace and safety he was looking for.He and his partner had planned to move to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/americans-moving-to-new-zealand-california-nature-quality-of-life-2023-8">Wellington, New Zealand</a>, but were unable to because of pandemic border lockdowns. A lot of the characteristics Ouellet was looking for in New Zealand, he said, he found in British Columbia."We love the Pacific Northwest, and Canada is not far up the road," Ouellet told BI. "It's very similar weather, and they have a lot of the things that we wanted and what we were looking for in New Zealand, which was a lower cost of education, socialized healthcare, and politics that weren't so incredibly polarizing."Ouellet, who works for the provincial government at the Ministry of Health in British Columbia, spoke glowingly of Portland but did point out the "pretty bad" violence and opioid crises he witnessed in the US overall. Before Portland, he and his partner lived in Chicago. The violence they would read about or see on their daily commutes prompted them to move west and eventually out of the country altogether, he said.He hasn't had the same worries in Canada."In British Columbia, the regulations for being able to own a gun are extremely tight," he said. "When you're out in public, and you hear a noise, no one runs, no one checks over their shoulder, no one thinks that it could possibly be gun violence."He added that there was still an opioid crisis in British Columbia, but it wasn't as striking as it is in Portland. Ouellet said that in the three years he'd lived in British Columbia, he'd seen one syringe on the ground, compared with Portland, where he saw dozens a day.Ouellet said he had no regrets about moving to British Columbia, but <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/canada-housing-crisis-bubble-imploding-real-estate-prices-rent-decline-2023-11">Canada's housing crisis</a> have so far sidelined his dreams of homeownership."The house that we had in Portland was three bedrooms, 2 ½ baths. It was about 1,800 square feet, and we bought it for $265,000. You can't find a place for that price here," he said. "Most condos are around $500,000 to $900,000. Single-family homes are almost a million."As Niren said, "Canada is one of the greatest countries in the world, but it's no utopia."This story was originally published on December 5, 2023, and was updated on November 5, 2024.Are you an American who moved to Canada? We want to hear from you. Reach out to the reporters, Alcynna Lloyd at <a target="_blank" href="mailto:alloyd@businessinsider.com">alloyd@businessinsider.com</a> and Jordan Pandy at <a target="_blank" href="mailto:jpandy@businessinsider.com">jpandy@businessinsider.com</a>, with your story.

Some Americans think moving to Canada will solve all their problems. But Canada has its own issues.

The internet insists on calling a spade a spade. The internet will also pompously convince you that they have personally worked with a variety of spades and that they intimately understand how these fantastic tools curve precisely around their working edges for maximum utility. However, any amount or manner of squinting will also reveal that the tool they’re referring to, is in fact, a shovel. Despite the fact that humans today indubitably can access information like before in history, there is still a terrible misinformation pandemic afoot. When it isn’t producing dizzying Mandela Effects to reconcile with, it is mobilising the public with pitchforks, rallying them for a cause they didn’t care about until a week ago. A similar incident transpired during the recent 2024 Paris Olympics, where the identity of Algerian boxer <keyword id="22621786" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="imane-khelif" source="keywords">Imane Khelif</keyword> came under intense scrutiny after her historic gold — with some media outlets and influential personalities also aiding the uproar. Since the initial row dragged in high-profile figures such as <keyword id="19903807" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="elon-musk" source="keywords">Elon Musk</keyword> and Trump, a leaked medical report has claimed to “confirm” Imane’s male-ness. This renewed public discourse on the matter, with various Indian media outlets once again casually labelling the athlete as “a man”. For example, a headline in the Hindustan Times ran, “Imane <keyword id="22633929" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="khelif" source="keywords">Khelif</keyword>, Paris Olympics medalist, confirmed a man in leaked medical report”, and another article by Livemint claimed Khelif was "confirmed as man" following the leak of her medical details. Similar headlines were being carried by a host of mainstream outlets, including The Indian Express and Moneycontrol. Science suggests that there is a great deal of nuance to gender and identity, concepts that are misrepresented due to a lack of gender studies in traditional education. Reporting Khelif to be a man, based solely on reported biological characteristics is highly misleading when discussing both the medical and societal implications of gender identity. To clear the confusion, let’s look at the official definitions of gender, explore Khelif’s reported medical condition, and review the consequences of how media coverage can amplify misunderstandings and bias. <h2>Where the new controversy started</h2>The recent controversy began when a leaked medical report indicated that Khelif has XY chromosomes, internal testes, and lacks a uterus, potentially due to a rare genetic condition called 5-alpha reductase deficiency. <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="112218392" title="Imane Khelif: Is it accurate to label this female-born boxer as ‘biological male’ or ‘transgender’?" mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div>This was nothing new, as a similar report had helped Khelif become the subject of substantial media and public scrutiny in the past as well. During the Olympics, however, statements from high-profile figures like former US President <keyword id="19918985" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="donald-trump" source="keywords">Donald Trump</keyword> and author <keyword id="20260304" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="jk-rowling" source="keywords">JK Rowling</keyword> — who insisted that Khelif was an ineligible man — helped catapult public discourse on gender and sports to astronomical levels. In response, Khelif filed a complaint in France against Trump, Rowling, and Elon Musk, citing cyber harassment and arguing that the comments about her identity amount to public harassment. Despite the reports and the outrage, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has upheld her eligibility to compete in the women’s division, acknowledging her identity as a woman. They based their decision on her lifelong identification as female and her history of competing as such, setting an example of inclusivity while recognising the complexities of gender and biological diversity. <h2>Difference between sex and gender</h2>Understanding Khelif’s case requires better clarity on the terms “sex” and “gender.” While the public may use them interchangeably, there are important differences that are rooted in many fields of science. Sex typically refers to biological differences — chromosomes, hormones, and reproductive anatomy. Gender, however, encompasses the social roles, behaviours, and identities that individuals embody, which may or may not align with their biological sex. A helpful way to think about this distinction is by analogy. Consider how some people have genetically blue eyes while others have brown eyes — these are inherent biological characteristics. However, people might choose to wear contact lenses to change their eye colour, much like how gender identity can vary depending on how individuals view themselves and how they are seen within society. Another popular — albeit somewhat controversial — manner of comparing the two is to think of a person’s sex as their “hardware”, while their gender is the “software” they run on. As such, a person’s biology might suggest certain physical traits, but their gender identity could align differently based on personal and cultural factors. To help them feel more at ease with their bodies, many individuals often undergo hormone therapy and counselling. Some even opt for “gender-affirming” surgeries to modify their physical appearances to match up with the gender they feel the most comfortable in. It is also key to recognise that, for some people, gender identity is flexible and can evolve over time. While biological sex generally remains constant, some people may feel more connected to a specific gender at certain points in their lives, while at other times, they feel aligned with another. This concept, called gender fluidity, shows that gender identity isn't always fixed, and is instead shaped by a blend of inner feelings and external experiences, meaning it can shift naturally over time. Supporting this fluidity helps people feel accepted and understood. <h2>Media language and its implications</h2>Due to these reasons, it is problematic when media outlets refer to Khelif as a "man" or "confirmed as man" in their headlines, which is often the only section of the news most read nowadays. These titles communicate to the general public that biology alone dictates gender identity, a stance inconsistent with widely accepted definitions and understandings of gender today. For instance, even the <keyword id="19896311" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="world-health-organization" source="keywords">World Health Organization</keyword> (WHO) differentiates between sex and gender based on the biological and socially constructed characteristics discussed earlier, insisting that calling someone a man based on sex-linked traits alone oversimplifies their identity and disregards personal self-identification. Not just the WHO, major organisations such as the American Psychological Association (APA) and the United Nations differentiate sex and gender in a similar manner. Science aside, news outlets have a responsibility to handle sensitive issues like gender identity with nuance and respect. While transparency in reporting is essential, invasive coverage of Khelif's private medical details and sensationalised labelling may infringe upon her privacy. Moreover, by framing her gender identity in simplistic terms, the media risks reinforcing stereotypes and marginalising individuals with differences in sex development or gender diversity. <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="112240010" title="Dutee Chand extends support to under-fire boxer Imane Khalif following controversial win in Paris Olympics" mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div>Overall, such rare, unique, and complex cases must be handled by the appropriate and informed authorities and should not be subject to a media trial. Ethically, a more respectful approach would involve using gender-neutral terms when discussing Khelif’s eligibility and refraining from language that disregards her self-identification as a woman. Such reporting would be in line with journalistic guidelines that emphasise minimising harm and respecting the dignity of individuals, especially those in vulnerable or marginalised communities. <h2>What even is 5-Alpha Reductase Deficiency?</h2>The condition reportedly attributed to Khelif, 5-alpha reductase deficiency, is a rare genetic condition. Individuals with this condition have XY chromosomes, but their bodies do not effectively convert testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), an androgen responsible for male genital development. Consequently, people with this condition often appear female or have ambiguous genitalia at birth, although they might undergo masculinising changes at puberty. Notably, people with 5-alpha reductase deficiency are typically assigned female at birth in societies with limited access to advanced genetic testing. Even Imane’s assigned gender was 'female' at birth, as per the official birth certificate shared by her family after the initial controversy during the Paris Olympics. Many of these individuals live as women and some self-identify as female throughout their lives. Thus, it would be misleading to categorically label them as male solely due to their chromosomal makeup, as this does not reflect their lived gender experience. The controversy surrounding Imane Khelif raises essential questions about gender identity and eligibility criteria in competitive sports. Many governing bodies are grappling with these issues, and it is clear that a single set of criteria may not accommodate the complexities of gender. Striking a balance between fair competition and the inclusion of all athletes will require policies informed by medical insights and a compassionate understanding of gender identity. Moving forward, it is essential that media, sports organisations, and the public alike strive to understand gender identity as an intricate intersection of biology, identity, and culture. Disclaimer: This article uses she/her pronouns considering that Imane identifies herself as female and a woman, and we were unable to find any public information on her preferred pronouns. However, this does not imply any form of judgement on the athlete’s gender identity. The decision on whether such athletes should be allowed to participate in competitions must be left to appropriate authorities and should not be made on social or digital media.

You Searched For "public health issue" and got 8 results

The faster your internet, the more likely you are to be obese, a study has found

BI India Bureau

Mobile phones are not causing brain cancer, a WHO study confirms

BI India Bureau

Harvard study links exposure to air pollution in infancy to reduced earnings in adulthood

BI India Bureau

156 ‘combination medicines’ containing Cetirizine, Paracetamol and other common drugs banned by Centre

BI India Bureau

Toxic chemicals in your car seats could be increasing risks of cancer, study warns

Ashmita Gupta

OpenAI reportedly facing issues with its new AI model is a red flag for the entire industry

Dan DeFrancesco

Some Americans think moving to Canada will solve all their problems. But Canada has its own issues.

Alcynna Lloyd,Jordan Pandy

Imane Khelif Olympic gold controversy resurfaces. Is it accurate to term the Algerian boxer a “confirmed man”?

Ankush Banerjee

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides