Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

The government has officially announced October 1, 2024, as the starting date for <keyword id="23245808" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="Vivad-Se-Vishwas-2-0" source="keywords">Vivad Se Vishwas 2.0</keyword>, the direct tax dispute resolution scheme. If you're involved in a tax dispute, this scheme might be your chance to resolve it efficiently. Originally introduced during the 2024-25 Union Budget, the scheme is designed to handle <keyword id="22518437" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="income-tax-disputes" source="keywords">income tax disputes</keyword> that are currently tied up in appeals. Confirming the news, the <keyword id="19900485" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Finance-Ministry" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="Finance Ministry" meta.hostid="261" meta.entityid="Finance Ministry">finance ministry</keyword> said in its notification: "The central government hereby appoints the 1st day of October, 2024 as the date on which the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 shall come into force." <h2>The scope of the disputes</h2>To give you an idea of the scale, about 2.7 crore direct tax demands are currently being contested, amounting to a staggering Rs 35 lakh crore. These disputes are scattered across various legal forums, and Vivad Se Vishwas 2.0 aims to help clear this backlog. <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="113444994" title="In the long run, rate cut by Fed will be favourable for most US banks: Moody&amp;#39;s" mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div>In her Budget speech, <keyword id="19912360" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Finance-Minister-Nirmala-Sitharaman" source="keywords">Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman</keyword> highlighted the government’s dedication to simplifying taxes and minimising litigation. She said, "The government will continue its efforts to simplify taxes, improve <keyword id="20404572" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="taxpayer-services" source="keywords">taxpayer services</keyword>, provide tax certainty and reduce litigation while enhancing revenues." <h2>Who can avail the scheme?</h2>If you have any pending disputes or appeals, including writs and special leave petitions, whether filed by you or the tax authorities, as of July 22, 2024, you are eligible to take advantage of this scheme. The list of eligible cases includes those pending before the Supreme Court, high courts, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, and Commissioner/Joint Commissioner (Appeals). It also covers cases before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) and revision petitions awaiting a decision from the Commissioner of Income Tax. <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="113417255" title="Individuals earning over Rs 10 cr rise by 63% in India; financial assets of high net worth individuals to nearly double by 2028" mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div>However, the window to decide whether or not to participate in the scheme is limited. As Karishma R. Phatarphekar, Partner at <keyword id="20006170" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Deloitte-India" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="Deloitte India" meta.hostid="261" meta.entityid="Deloitte India">Deloitte India</keyword>, said: "Given the limited time window, an informed decision on opting for the scheme should be made promptly." The rules and forms for the scheme are expected to be published "imminently in the coming week." <h2>Success of the original Vivad Se Vishwas</h2>For those who are wondering about the potential impact, the first Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, introduced in 2020, resolved a significant number of cases. More than 1 lakh taxpayers participated, and the government collected about Rs 75,000 crore in taxes. With this track record, the expectations from Vivad Se Vishwas 2.0 are high. With October 1 just around the corner, now is the time to prepare if you are considering resolving your tax dispute through Vivad Se Vishwas 2.0. As the rules and forms are expected shortly, it’s wise to consult your <keyword id="23245810" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="tax-advisor" source="keywords">tax advisor</keyword> and make a decision soon. This scheme could provide the relief you’ve been waiting for while contributing to a more efficient tax system for all. (With inputs from PTI)

New Vivad Se Vishwas 2.0 tax resolution scheme to start on Oct 1 — what you need to know

The deadline to file your <keyword id="19948101" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="income-tax-returns" source="keywords">income tax returns</keyword> is approaching fast, and Sana is perplexed. All of 23, she's just started earning and working at an MNC, earning Rs 7,00,000 per annum, and can't figure out which <keyword id="20301439" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="tax-regime" source="keywords">tax regime</keyword> would work best for her. If you're having the same concerns and can't seem to wrap your head around the <keyword id="19935168" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="new-tax-regime" source="keywords">new tax regime</keyword>, here's a ready reckoner for you: When should I choose new tax regime? Think of choosing a tax regime as having to choose a friend in office. The <keyword id="8706677" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="old-tax-regime" source="Orion">old tax regime</keyword> is that aged, wise senior who has answers and hacks for everything. Want to get over with a boring project quickly? They will certainly have a trick up their sleeve! On the other hand, the new regime is far more chilled out, lax and is a no-nonsense person who wants nothing to do with long documents and longer meetings. The new regime was introduced in budget 2020 to simplify taxation, and offer lower rate of taxes as compared to the old regime. However, there's a catch. You cannot claim the 70+ exemptions and deductions that help bring down your taxable income and hence, reduce your tax liability. This option is exclusively available under the old tax regime. The main USP of this tax regime? Lower tax rates, and fuss of deductions! Consider this. If your income is within the range of Rs 5,00,000-Rs 12,00,000, and you have no investments, <keyword id="99916" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="house-rent-allowance" source="Orion">house rent allowance</keyword> (<keyword id="19944588" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="hra" source="keywords">HRA</keyword>), health/life insurance premiums or other such deductions to claim, the new tax regime would obviously make more sense to you, given the significant difference in tax liabilities (just 5% under new regime, and a whopping 20% in old regime for those in the Rs 5-6 lakh bracket!) <div type="image" title="Tax rates under old and new regime" msid="111685908" hostid="261"></div> So, if you're someone who hates complex tax calculations, wants minimal tax deductions, the new regime might just be for you! But remember, there are two conditions under which this new regime will be automatically chosen for calculating your taxes: <ul><li>If you keep procrastinating and don't file your <keyword id="6374875" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="ITR" source="Orion">ITR</keyword> till July 31, 2024</li><li>If you do not specifically opt for the old tax regime on your employer's HR portal</li></ul>Also, if you earn less than Rs 3,00,000 per annum, you are completely exempted from paying any tax at all. In the old regime, this basic limit is slightly lower at Rs 2,50,000. Also read: <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/personal-finance/income-tax/all-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-tax-regime/articleshow/111578840.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink">All you need to know about the new tax regime</a> So, what do I get under this regime? Thanks to a rebate under Section 87A, if you earn up to Rs 7 lakh per annum, your tax liability (and Sana's as well) will effectively be zero. This is limited to Rs 5 lakh under the old regime. While a <keyword id="20429578" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="standard-deduction" source="keywords">standard deduction</keyword> of Rs 50,000 is available under both of them (so you can directly deduct Rs 50,000 from your total income before even beginning to calculate your tax liability), there are a lot more deductions and exemptions that this regime DOES NOT allow you to avail: <ul><li>Leave Travel Allowance (LTA)</li><li>House Rent Allowance (HRA) (Comes in handy if you're paying hefty rents in metros)</li><li>Interest on housing loan (on self-occupied property or vacant property)</li><li>Own contribution to NPS (If there's any)</li><li>Interest earned on savings bank A/Cs </li><li>Investments made in ELSS, PPF</li><li>Premiums paid towards life, health insurance policies</li></ul>As for the deductions that are allowed, that makes for a pretty small list: <ul><li>Transport allowances (only if you are specially abled)</li><li>Gifts of up to Rs 50,000</li><li>Employer’s contribution to your NPS account</li><li>Interest paid on home loan only on let-out property</li></ul>But that's the trade-off. You get to pay taxes at low rates, yes, but you also don't get to claim a whole lot other deductions. Notes CA Nitesh Buddhadev, "Which regime is beneficial for you depends upon the allowances and deduction available to you during a relevant financial year. So, if your total income from salary is Rs 10.5 lakh and if the aggregate of any of the deductions / allowances you can claim is less than Rs. 3.15 lakh, you should opt for the new tax regime. If you have not invested in multiple tax-savings scheme, the new regime will work better. So, don't make this decision in any haste. You can choose your tax regime only once in a financial year. And if your income from business or other professions, be even more careful, because this will then become a once in a lifetime choice for you (quite literally!). So, take a good hard look at your finances, and then decide what works best for you!

Confused about the new tax regime? Here's when you should opt for it

My grandparents' vacation cabin in Lake Tahoe is the stuff of legend.In the '90s, when my parents were just friends, my dad "accidentally" invited himself on a ski trip with my mom and her parents. It was an epic winter when the blizzards created berms as tall as the houses. By the time spring came, my parents were dating.My grandparents' little house in South Lake Tahoe, which they bought for $113,000 in 1984, quickly became a haven for my family.I dreamed of getting married there and taking my own kids to the cabin someday. But in May, my mom called to tell me this could be the last year we have the home.A tax on vacation home-owners might make our place in Tahoe too costly to keep.A measure on the ballot today proposes an annual tax on every property occupied less than 51% of the year. If it passes, second-home owners would owe $3,000 in 2026 and $6,000 every year after.In ski towns and cities across the US, home prices have skyrocketed, and young people struggle to pay rent or buy a house. Meanwhile, the wealthy have flocked to mountain retreats where they can vacation and work from home. One of the measure's architects told BI that it will combat this trend by incentivizing second-home owners to rent to local residents, bringing down the cost of housing by increasing the available supply.Supporters project city revenue gains of $4 million to $8 million in the first year and $10 to $20 million every year after that. The money would go toward rebuilding roads, creating more public transit, and paying the administrative costs of implementation.Framers of the Tahoe tax measure took inspiration from Berkeley, California, which adopted a vacancy tax this year. The Hawaiian island of Oahu and the Colorado ski towns of Aspen, Vail, and Breckenridge are also considering vacancy taxes.But some say it's unclear whether the tax will actually lower housing prices for locals.<div type="image" title="View of the mountains around South Lake Tahoe" height="3279" width="4896" msid="114990171" hostid="261" sizebytes="935262"></div>The opposition in South Lake Tahoe is made up of some of its institutionalized powers, including the local Chamber of Commerce, the South Tahoe Association of Realtors, and the restaurant and lodging associations. In interviews, they told BI that a tax would drive second-home owners away, depriving local businesses of their spending while having no impact on housing affordability for locals. The city's report on the economic outcomes of the tax said it may not actually incentivize homeowners to rent or sell to locals.Some long-timers feel squeezed: How do they afford to live in these places, and what measures would actually fix the problem? Is it a tax — or is it, say, zoning changes that allow more homes to be built?Similar battles over housing affordability are happening across the country. I just happen to have a front-row seat to this one.Since the city of South Lake Tahoe was incorporated in 1965, it's been populated by a healthy mix of year-round and seasonal residents.Middle- and upper-middle-class mountain enthusiasts from the Bay Area flocked to the city, which, with 21,000 residents per the most recent census data, is more densely populated than any other town around the lake.This part of Tahoe has long been a relatively more affordable alternative to the ski havens of Colorado and Utah. As of October 2024, the median sales price for homes in South Lake Tahoe was $750,000, according to Realtor.com. By comparison, it was $958,000 in Park City, Utah, $1.4 million in Aspen, and $1.6 million in Vail."It's one of these places where you have folks from really different socioeconomic backgrounds," said Amelia Richmond, who favors the tax and leads a group of other supporters called Locals For Affordable Housing. "It's one of the reasons I think mountain towns are so cool."But that environment doesn't exist without both year-round and seasonal residents in town. Fifty-six percent of Tahoe's 9,125 housing units are filled by renters, while 44% are owner-occupied, according to the US Census' American Community Survey.Because Measure N will appear on the local ballot, most second-home owners directly affected by the tax can't vote. Nearly half of the property-owning population — my family included — is left watching debates over the tax play out among local residents, who are split on where they stand.<h2 id="90a60f06-f278-4362-9ebf-345a4dac61c6">Locals are divided on the tax</h2>Steve Teshara, who has held several roles, including CEO, at the Tahoe Chamber of Commerce, said the tax would hurt the local economy by driving out second-home owners.He pointed to evidence from a previous measure, which banned Airbnbs and other short-term rentals in certain parts of town. That measure was also intended to stabilize area home prices and rents."It has an immediate effect when visitors are not able to spend as much money or when visitors just aren't here anymore," Teshara said.The previous measure effectively reduced the supply of Airbnbs from 3,350 units in January 2018 to 2,635 units in July 2024, according to the short-term rental data company AirDNA. However, it didn't make the expected dent in housing costs, data from the Realtors' Association shows. Median sale prices continued to increase overall, from $440,000 in 2018 to $750,000 in 2024.<div type="image" title="View of Highway 50 in South Lake Tahoe with a light dusting of snow" height="4153" width="5538" msid="114990167" hostid="261" sizebytes="1763634"></div>Teshara believes the housing crisis must be solved in the long term, pointing to the local government's <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.cityofslt.us/2332/Affordable-Housing-Properties-Other-Deve">affordable housing construction projects</a>. He is a fan of indirect measures currently in place, like vanpooling, which shuttles people who live further away — where prices are lower — through the mountains to work.Richmond, the pro-tax organizer, said that business from year-round residents is more important to many shops and restaurants than purchases from occasional visitors."How many beers do you have to buy to make up that difference when you're up just once a quarter?" she said. "Local economies are actually robust when you have a healthy middle class that can spend small amounts of money on a regular basis."<h2 id="139d1f43-575b-4368-9419-52d99a68446e">Taxing second home-owners may not make them rent to locals</h2>The city of South Lake Tahoe conducted an independent study on the tax's economic outcomes if it were to go into effect.The findings supported Richmond's assertion that the measure could modestly boost sales tax revenue if second homes vacated by owners were converted into permanent residences or long-term leases.But the report also cautioned that the measure's impact on housing availability will depend largely on how second-home owners react if the tax is adopted — behavior that's nearly impossible to predict.Second-home owners could sell their properties, like my family is considering. But because of current home prices, buyers would likely be people who don't see an additional $6,000-a-year expense as a deterrent. While the city could collect additional tax revenue from a wealthier population of second-home owners, that wouldn't make it any easier for locals to buy.Homeowners could also decide to rent and become landlords instead of selling, as Richmond hopes. But that may be a longer shot, the city report found.Based on the previous leasing programs in the area, "it appears that financial incentives are not particularly effective to motivate owners of vacant property in South Lake Tahoe to rent out their homes for longer terms," the report said.<div type="image" title="A view of South Lake Tahoe in 1974" height="3458" width="5142" msid="114990163" hostid="261" sizebytes="1062714"></div>Some second-home owners told Business Insider they would refuse to rent to tenants.Sherri Maslyar, who has owned a home in South Lake Tahoe with her husband since 2013 and visits monthly, said she heard a horror story about a neighbor's long-term tenant who defied the landlord's no-pets rule and ruined parts of the house. She said she would rather pay the tax than risk renting her home to someone untrustworthy."That's not what we bought the house for," she said.<h2 id="534b0195-f639-4a7b-8fb1-9c677eca426d">Tahoe's character — and prices — have changed over the years</h2>The median income in South Lake Tahoe grew 65% from $40,972 to $67,686 between 2000 and 2022, according to census data. In the same period, median home prices in the area ballooned by 288%, from $189,000 to $732,500.Zillow's rent data, which only goes back to 2020, shows that typical rents in South Lake Tahoe grew from $2,101.52 in October 2020 to $2,653.05 in October 2023. The typical rent as of September 30 was $2,682.50.The neighborhood where our family's cabin sits was once populated by eclectic A-frames and modest one-story structures, whose kitschy exteriors tended to match the eccentricities of their owners. Now, vaguely chic rustic McMansions with smooth angles and wood finishing are common.<div type="image" title="Line of wooden bears carrying &quot;howdy&quot; and &quot;welcome&quot; signs" height="3435" width="5617" msid="114990174" hostid="261" sizebytes="1760630"></div>Part of why building more houses or apartments — which might stabilize prices — has been so difficult is due to strict development laws. In Lake Tahoe, all development projects must be approved by the Tahoe Regional Planning Association (TRPA), whose primary objective is conservation, not housing construction.Jeff Cowen, TRPA's public information officer, told BI the agency's main goals were environmental, adding that "we have to consider community impacts of our regulations." It doesn't have a stance on the tax.One thing opponents and proponents of Measure N agree on: TRPA's mandate has made it difficult to build new housing in Tahoe to address the housing shortage. But they disagree on whether radical and rapid changes should be made to make Tahoe affordable right now.<h2 id="7b8ad7f8-c9b9-4a00-b5a4-14745b01c7cc">It might be the end of Tahoe as we know it</h2>A place that was once accessible as a seasonal destination for a middle-class family risks becoming a playground for the very rich if changes in the Tahoe market continue to make buying a home there relatively unaffordable.I am benefiting from generational wealth stemming from my grandparents' choices, and I will always be grateful for the investment they made.My family isn't sure what we'd do if the tax passes. One option is to rent to a long-term tenant, but we'd likely lose the freedom to come and go seasonally. Another is to sell the house.<div type="image" title="A middle-aged Asian American couple and their 10-year-old daughter standing in front of an old car in a ski resort parking lot." height="537" width="800" msid="114990172" hostid="261" sizebytes="23164"></div>Either way, we'd be saying goodbye to the home as we've known it for the past four decades.It's hard to imagine giving up my ties to a place that has such emotional value — that is very much the second home my grandparents intended it to be. And if the tax doesn't do what proponents hope it will, I'd be losing Lake Tahoe for nothing.All I can do now is wait and see.

My family bought a vacation home in Lake Tahoe for $113,000. A new tax could push us out. 

As expected and in relief for the citizens, the central government neither tweaked nor put any additional tax burden on citizens, in the interim Budget for 2024-25 tabled by Union Finance Minister <keyword id="19916618" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="nirmala-sitharaman" source="keywords">Nirmala Sitharaman</keyword>. "Keeping with the convention, I do not propose to make any changes relating to taxation and propose to retain the same tax rates for direct taxes and indirect taxes including import duties," Sitharaman said in her Budget speech on Thursday. However, certain tax benefits to start-ups and investments made by sovereign wealth or pension funds as well as tax exemption on certain income of some IFSC units are expiring in March 2024. To provide continuity in taxation, she proposed to extend the date by another year. Moreover, in line with the government's vision to improve ease of living and ease of doing business, she announced to improve tax-payer services. "There are a large number of petty, non-verified, non-reconciled or disputed direct tax demands, many of them dating as far back as the year 1962, which continue to remain on the books, causing anxiety to honest tax-payers and hindering refunds of subsequent years," she said. She proposed to withdraw such outstanding direct tax demands up to Rs 25,000 for the period up to financial year 2009-10 and up to Rs 10,000 for financial years 2010-11 to 2014-15. "This is expected to benefit about a crore tax-payers," she added. Presenting the Union Budget 2023, Sitharaman on Thursday pegged the fiscal deficit target for 2024-25 at 5.1% of gross domestic product (GDP). In 2023-24, the government pegged the fiscal deficit target for 2023-24 at 5.9% of gross domestic product (GDP). Today, Sitharaman said that the fiscal deficit of 2023-24 was downwardly revised to 5.8%. The difference between total revenue and total expenditure of the government is termed as fiscal deficit. It is an indication of the total borrowings that may be needed by the government. The government intends to bring the fiscal deficit below 4.5% of GDP by the financial year 2025-26. The government intends to bring the fiscal deficit below 4.5% of GDP by the financial year 2025-26. A capital expenditure, or capex, is used to set up long-term physical or fixed assets. Last year, which was the last full Budget under the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government's second term, the government proposed to increase capital expenditure outlay by 33% to Rs 10 lakh crore in 2023-24, which was estimated to be 3.3% of the GDP. With the substantial increase in capex, it is central to the government's efforts to enhance growth potential and job creation, crowd in private investments and provide a cushion against global headwinds. The interim budget, tabled today, will take care of the financial needs of the intervening period until a government is formed after the Lok Sabha polls after which a full budget will be presented by the new government in July. With this Budget Presentation, Sitharaman equalled the record set by former Prime Minister Morarji Desai, who as finance minister, presented five annual budgets and one interim budget between 1959 and 1964. The Budget Session of Parliament commenced on Wednesday with President Droupadi Murmu addressing a joint sitting of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. The Indian economy is projected to grow close to 7% in the financial year 2024-25 which starts this April, said the Ministry of Finance in a review report. India's economy grew 7.2% in 2022-23 and 8.7% in 2021-22. The Indian economy is expected to grow 7.3% in the current financial year 2023-24, remaining the fastest-growing major economy.

FM Nirmala Sithraman keeps tax slabs unchanged

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Kamala Harris is aiming for 25 million new business applications in her first term.</li><li>To get there, she's proposing an increased tax deduction and reduced red tape.</li></ul>Vice President Kamala Harris wants you to start a small business.Harris is set to roll out another economic policy, focused on a new goal: boosting small business creation. Harris's goal — which she'll announce on Wednesday — is 25 million new business applications in her first term if elected.That would outpace the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sba.gov/article/2024/04/11/new-small-business-applications-soar-over-17-million-under-biden-harris-administration">over 18 million new business applications</a> filed so far during the Biden-Harris administration, which comes amid a post-2020 <a target="_blank" href="https://www.uschamber.com/small-business/new-business-applications-a-state-by-state-view">business application boom</a>. Harris aims to hack away at some of the red tape and startup costs new businesses face when they're setting up shop.According to a Harris campaign official, Harris wants to bolster the tax deduction that small businesses can claim for initial startup costs. Some small business owners have to turn to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/alternative-business-funding-options-small-companies-2023-9">creative funding measures</a> to get their businesses off the ground, which can come with their own risks.Harris's proposal would increase that startup deduction tenfold, upping it from $5,000 to $50,000; businesses would also be able to defer claiming it until they turn a profit — which is when they'd also likely encounter a larger tax burden.The other aspect of Harris's plan hinges on easing the logistical burden on new entrepreneurs. It's no secret that many small businesses must wade through <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/jpmorgan-jamie-dimon-says-bureaucracy-is-crippling-us-hindering-progress-2021-4">administrative red tape</a> to finally <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/something-about-her-sandwich-shop-opening-day-vanderpump-rules-2024-5">get to their opening days</a>.Harris's proposals include incentives for local governments to reduce their own red tape, creating a standard deduction for small businesses to ease the time spent on taxes, and chipping away at barriers in obtaining occupational licenses that can inhibit businesses or workers from crossing state lines.Harris also wants to pour cash into small businesses: She wants to guarantee that a third of federal contract dollars will go to smaller businesses and set up a fund to help community banks cover the cost of interest for small businesses.Harris previously called for a <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/child-tax-credit-new-parents-cut-taxes-harris-economic-policy-2024-8">restoration of the expanded child tax credit</a> — bringing it back up to $3,600 — and giving middle and lower-income parents a $6,000 credit in their child's first year of life.How far a hypothetical future President Harris could get with major economic proposals will depend on the makeup of Congress. Attempts by President Biden to restore the child tax credit were stymied in the Senate; a gridlocked legislature might mean even more roadblocks for potential President Harris.

New business owners could get a $50,000 tax deduction under Kamala Harris's plan

July's here, and as we inch closer to the budget, which is set to be presented around the latter half of July, there is much talk about how it will affect our pockets. Reports suggest the government is considering raising the <keyword id="20429578" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="standard-deduction" source="keywords">standard deduction</keyword> threshold from existing Rs 50,000 to Rs 1,00,000, amidst other things. The most common wish for a salaried employee is to reduce the income tax rates across all slabs, but at the moment, this seems unlikely. That aside, we decode the common man's wish list and what they look forward to in terms of <keyword id="22225988" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="income-taxes" source="keywords">income taxes</keyword> as the Finance Minister <keyword id="19916618" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="nirmala-sitharaman" source="keywords">Nirmala Sitharaman</keyword> drafts the budget. <h2>Wish 1: Raise the standard deduction to Rs 1 lakh</h2>A standard deduction is a fixed amount that you can deduct from your taxable income right away, to reduce your overall tax liability. You do not need to furnish any proofs for this amount. Currently, this stands at Rs 50,000, under both old and new tax regimes. Raising this threshold to Rs 1,00,000 will mean more disposable income in your hands. And as per the policy experts, this is the most likely change that we can expect under the new budget. <h2>Wish 2: Increase the <keyword id="20228341" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="basic-exemption-limit" source="keywords">basic exemption limit</keyword> in new tax regime</h2>As per EY's pre-budget expectation report, an increase in the basic exemption limit from the present Rs 3,00,000 to Rs 5,00,000 would immensely benefit the common man. Earlier, this limit was set at Rs 2,50,000. Note that unless you specifically opt for the old regime, the new tax regime is considered as your default choice starting 2023. If your annual income is equal to, or falls below this basic exemption limit, you do not have to pay any income tax. <h2>Wish 3: Increase tax-free limit of LTCG gains </h2>At present, if you sell any equity mutual fund unit or share after more than 12 months of holding it, you'll have to pay a 10% long-term capital gains (LTCG) tax. However, within one financial year, long-term capital gains below Rs 1,00,000 are tax-exempt. As EY's report notes, raising this extant tax-free limit to Rs 2 lakh would be beneficial, especially in boosting long-term investing sentiment in the country. But will this come true? Only Nirmala Sitharaman knows! <h2>Wish 4: Consider some tier-2 cities as metros for HRA exemption </h2>Residents of Gurugram, Noida, Bengaluru, listen up! HRA, or House rent allowance is a crucial component of our salary, and hence, our tax planning as well. You can get HRA exemption on the lowest amount amidst these 3: 1. Actual HRA received 2. 50% of salary for metro cities (Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai) 3. 40% of salary for non-metro cities 4. Rent paid- 10% of salary But its no secret that residents of nearby cities like Noida, Gurugram, Faridabad, or rapidly developing urban hubs like Pune, Ahmedabad, Ghaziabad, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Thane bear the brunt of sky-high residential rents that takes a huge toll on their monthly income. Yet, they cannot claim 50% of their salary for HRA exemption. Since these cities has been classified as a non-metro, residents can claim a maximum of 40% of their salary as exemption. In case rent exceeds Rs 1,00,000 annually, you are also required to furnish the PAN details of landlord, along with a formal rental agreement. Consider this. You live in Delhi, and have an annual income of Rs 10,00,000. For HRA purposes, you can claim exemption of up to Rs 5,00,000, since Delhi is considered a metro. But, if you live in Ghaziabad, or Noida, the limit available to you sharply falls down to Rs 4,00,000. This budget, as reports note, considering these cities as metros for tax purposes would provide some relief to the common man's pocket. Per a recent report by ANAROCK research, the top 7 cities in the country (Mumbai metropolitan region, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Pune, Delhi NCR, Chennai and Kolkata) saw an average price rise between 13-39% on a yearly basis. In fact, it was Hyderabad recorded the highest yearly price rise in residential property last quarter, jumping by as much as 39%. <h2>Wish 5 : Enhance exemption limits under the old regime</h2>The list is endless, but so are our wishes! Experts are also suggesting an enhancement in the existing limit for deduction towards interest on housing loan for self-occupied house. From its present limit of Rs 2 lakh, it should be taken to Rs 3 lakh. Also, the Rs 2-lakh cap on set off of house property loss against other heads in the same year should be done away with. For senior citizens, there should also be greater clarity on how funds received from <keyword id="19919089" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="nps" source="keywords">NPS</keyword> (National Pension System) via the systematic lumpsum withdrawal plan should be taxed. Well, we can only hope some, if not all of these wishes come true when finance minister presents the union budget in the parliament this month.

Budget 2024: Increase standard deduction, exemptions and more, an aam aadmi's wishlist

Finance Minister <keyword id="19916618" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Nirmala-Sitharaman" source="keywords">Nirmala Sitharaman</keyword> on Tuesday announced <keyword id="20404375" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="income-tax-relief" source="keywords">income tax relief</keyword> for the <keyword id="20071167" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="middle-class" source="keywords">middle class</keyword>, a Rs 2 lakh crore outlay for <keyword id="22517841" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="job-creation-schemes" source="keywords">job creation schemes</keyword> over the next five years and a spending splurge for states run by her party's new coalition partners as she unveiled <keyword id="20509939" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Modi-3-0" source="keywords">Modi 3.0</keyword> government's first budget after the general elections. With rural distress and unemployment being blamed for BJP losing its majority, Sitharaman in her seventh straight budget provided Rs 2.66 lakh crore for <keyword id="20027688" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="rural-development" source="keywords">rural development</keyword> and maintained spending on long-term infrastructure projects at Rs 11.11 lakh crore to boost <keyword id="19900794" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="economic-growth" source="keywords">economic growth</keyword>. She abolished 'angel tax' for all classes of investors in startups, cut customs duty on mobile phones and gold and simplified capital gains tax. She, however, raised the securities transaction tax (STT) on futures and options of securities, which led to tanking of stock markets. "India's economic growth continues to be the shining exception (in a world that is gripped by policy uncertainties) and will remain so in the years ahead," she said. "In this budget, we particularly focus on <keyword id="19898684" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="employment" source="keywords">employment</keyword>, <keyword id="20374219" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="skilling" source="keywords">skilling</keyword>, MSMEs, and the middle class." Besides Rs 2 lakh crore provided over a five year period for schemes and initiatives to facilitate employment, skilling and other opportunities for 4.1 crore youth, "I have made a provision of Rs 1.48 lakh crore for education, employment and skilling," she said. For Bihar, where assembly elections are due next year, the finance minister announced spending of Rs 60,000 crore on infrastructure projects like expressways, power plant, heritage corridors and new airports. The support to Bihar, whose ruling party and BJP's partner JD-U has been demanding an economic package and special category status for the state, is in the form of capital projects but not subsidy or cash dole. Similarly, for Andhra Pradesh, whose ruling TDP recently joined BJP-led NDA, she allocated Rs 15,000 crore in financial aid through multilateral agencies. A similar request for support to Bihar will be expedited, she said. For the middle class, she raised standard deduction -- a flat deduction from total salary earned by an employee in a year before calculating applicable income tax rate -- by 50 per cent to Rs 75,000 and tweaked tax slabs for taxpayers opting for the new income tax regime. This will lead to taxpayers under the new tax regime -- which offers lower rates of taxes but permits limited deductions and exemptions -- saving up to Rs 17,500 in tax annually, she said. To spur employment, the Budget provided for incentives for companies, including paying for one-month salary for first-time employees, incentive at specified sale to both employee and empower with respect to their retirement fund contribution in the first four years of employment and reimbursing employers up to Rs 3,000 per month for 2 years towards EPFO contribution of each additional employee. Also, a programme to improve skills as well internship for students and subsidised loans for higher education will be provided, she said. India's official unemployment rate in urban areas is pegged at 6.7 per cent but private agencies put it at much higher levels. Buoyed by robust tax collections and a higher-than-expected dividend receipt from the Reserve Bank, Sitharaman said the government's fiscal deficit -- the difference between the total revenue earned and total expenditure -- will be trimmed to 4.9 per cent of the GDP in 2024-25, below the 5.1 per cent figure estimated in the interim budget she presented in February. She reduced gross market borrowing marginally to Rs 14.01 lakh crore. The Budget for 2024-25 fiscal (April 2024 to March 2025) allocated Rs 1.52 lakh crore for agriculture and allied sectors, aid for building 3 crore affordable housing units in urban and rural areas, provided credit support to small and medium businesses, raised small loans to Rs 20 lakh for small business, proposed setting up 12 industrial parks, and provided for setting up a Rs 1,000 crore venture capital fund for space sector.

You Searched For "new tax slabs 2020" and got 7 results

New Vivad Se Vishwas 2.0 tax resolution scheme to start on Oct 1 — what you need to know

BI India Bureau

Confused about the new tax regime? Here's when you should opt for it

Ira Alok Puranik

My family bought a vacation home in Lake Tahoe for $113,000. A new tax could push us out.

Amanda Yen

FM Nirmala Sithraman keeps tax slabs unchanged

ANI

New business owners could get a $50,000 tax deduction under Kamala Harris's plan

Juliana Kaplan

Budget 2024: Increase standard deduction, exemptions and more, an aam aadmi's wishlist

Ira Alok Puranik

Modi 3.0 1st Budget: Tax relief for middle class, Rs 2 lakh cr job scheme

PTI

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides