Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

The <keyword id="19946148" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Karnataka-High-Court" source="keywords">Karnataka High Court</keyword> recently dismissed an appeal filed by a woman seeking Rs 6 lakhs in monthly <keyword id="20538992" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="alimony" source="keywords">alimony</keyword>, citing the lack of reasonable justification for the requested amount. <keyword id="22894144" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Justice-Lalitha-Kanneganti" source="keywords">Justice Lalitha Kanneganti</keyword>, presiding over the case, found the petitioner's claim to be excessive and asked for more concrete figures regarding her actual expenses. The appeal, presented by Advocate Akarsh Kanade on behalf of the petitioner, sought the large sum to cover what was described as her “basic needs,” which included items such as bangles, chains, sandals, and watches. The court questioned whether such expenses constituted "basic needs" and noted that the petitioner did not have any dependents or children. <div type="twitter" handle="DeepikaBhardwaj" handlename="DeepikaBhardwaj" favoritecount="0" retweetcount="0" id="1826237815962907135"></div>According to the Bar and Bench, the court said that she has no responsibility for any other family member or children, “Does anybody spend this much? A single lady for herself?” During the hearing, the petitioner referenced her ex-husband’s preference for branded clothing, such as Calvin Klein t-shirts costing around Rs 10,000, arguing that she should be entitled to similar living standards. Additionally, she cited health concerns, including knee joint pain and fever, which she attributed to negligence during the marriage. Further, Judge Lalitha Kanneganti also refused to entertain the request, saying, “If she wants to spend, let her earn,” TOI reported. <h2>But how much alimony is considered fair in India?</h2>In India, alimony, also referred to as <keyword id="20027249" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="maintenance" source="keywords">maintenance</keyword>, is a key aspect of <keyword id="19911325" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="divorce" source="keywords">divorce</keyword> proceedings. This <keyword id="19972877" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="financial-support" source="keywords">financial support</keyword> is provided by one spouse to another, irrespective of the divorce grounds. The determination of alimony involves complex legal and financial assessments, taking into account factors such as the earning capacity of both spouses, their financial needs, the length of the marriage, and the lifestyle maintained during the marriage. The <keyword id="19900742" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="supreme-court-of-india" source="keywords">Supreme Court of India</keyword> has set a general benchmark for monthly alimony, where the husband may be required to pay 25% of his net salary to his estranged wife. While this guideline applies to monthly payouts, no specific rule exists for lump-sum settlements, though they typically range from one-fifth to one-third of the spouse's net worth. The calculation of alimony depends on various factors, such as: <ul><li>Monthly incomes of both spouses</li><li>Educational background and employment prospects</li><li>Duration of the marriage</li><li>Number of children and child custody arrangements</li><li>Husband's income, liabilities, and lifestyle</li><li>Reasonable needs and financial independence of the wife</li></ul>In case of the Karnataka woman, the court expressed its expectation that more reasonable figures be provided to support her request. "If you want an order from the court, I want actual figures, not these lakhs of figures," said Justice Kanneganti. The judge also stated that the court is not a place for bargaining and advised the petitioner to be realistic in her demands. While the petitioner’s counsel attempted to lower the alimony request, the court maintained that without a rational basis for the amount, the application could not be entertained. Justice Kanneganti emphasised that the appeal would be dismissed if a more reasonable claim was not presented. In its final remarks, the court suggested that the appeal could be denied solely on the grounds of being unreasonable, stressing the importance of presenting justified and fact-based requests in legal proceedings. <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="112689204" title="Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck reportedly didn&amp;#39;t sign a prenup. Here are the assets they may have to split 50/50 in their divorce settlement." mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div>

A Karnataka woman is being ridiculed for demanding an alimony of Rs 6 lakh monthly from her ex. Is this fair?

<ul class="summary-list"><li><a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk">Elon Musk</a> has been feuding with a Brazilian justice for months over <keyword id="20363452" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="content-moderation" source="keywords">content moderation</keyword> on <keyword id="19959117" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="X" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="X" meta.hostid="261" meta.entityid="X">X</keyword>.</li><li>The disagreement has resulted in over $3 million in fines on X and restrictions on <keyword id="20034452" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Starlink" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="Starlink" meta.hostid="261" meta.entityid="Starlink">Starlink</keyword>.</li></ul><keyword id="19903807" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Elon-Musk" source="keywords">Elon Musk</keyword> hasn't shied away from fights since he bought Twitter and renamed it X <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/did-elon-musk-buy-twitter-acquisition-details">in 2022.</a> Musk's approach to content moderation — which he insists is due to his advocacy for free speech — has been challenged in countries like Australia, Nigeria, Turkey, and India. But now it's led him into a <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-fightingwars-alot-of-fronts-2024-8#:~:text=Elon%20Musk's%20conflicts%20include,is%20also%20juggling%20four%20companies.">high-stakes conflict</a> with Brazilian Supreme Court <keyword id="21241885" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Justice-Alexandre-de-Moraes" source="keywords">Justice Alexandre de Moraes</keyword>. <keyword id="19935367" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Brazil" source="keywords">Brazil</keyword>'s judiciary branch has dueled tech companies like Whatsapp and Telegram in the past. But the disagreement over moderation on X has blown up, leading to threats of arresting X employees and restrictions on other companies owned by Musk. As of Tuesday, Musk's <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-starlink-satellites-internet">satellite provider Starlink</a> agreed to follow court orders to block access to X in Brazil, which serves as the platform's fifth largest population of users. It's not clear what will happen next, but professor at FGV Law School in Rio de Janeiro Luca Belli told Business Insider he thinks the situation will be solved in a few days once investors start calling Musk. "I think at some point it will be a little bit difficult to explain that his commitment to absolute freedom of expression is losing millions to investors," Musk said. Here's a timeline of the international feud: <h2>Brazilian officials crack down on social media censorship</h2>Moraes started to tighten restrictions on free speech a few years ago, when he opened an investigation into "fake news" during former President Jair Bolsonaro's term. X initially <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://x.com/GlobalAffairs/status/1776729732970594483">agreed</a> to remove over 100 accounts flagged for hate speech, misinformation, and attacks on democracy while vowing to "challenge the orders legally when possible." Musk remained vocal about disagreeing with Justice De Moraes's stance, frequently publicizing his concerns about the leader and calling the justice a dictator, and <a target="_blank" href="https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1776989005848207503">calling</a> for him to "resign or be impeached." <h2>X ignores Moraes' orders</h2>While X first agreed to adhere to the orders, Musk announced in April that he was reversing the restrictions, saying in a post on X that "principles matter more than profit." De Moreas responded that Musk would be investigated for obstruction of justice after refusing to remove the accounts. He also said Musk would face a fine of about $20,000 every time an account was reactivated on X, <a target="_blank" class="" href=" https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20240408-brazil-supreme-court-judge-orders-probe-on-elon-musk-for-censorship">according</a> to a report from French publication AFP. <h2>Justice de Moreas ups the stakes</h2>Musk closed X offices in Brazil on August 17 after de Moreas threatened to arrest an X legal representative, <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://x.com/GlobalAffairs/status/1824819053061669244">according</a> to a statement from X's Global Affairs team. X was then banned from Brazil on August 31 after failing to follow orders to name a legal representative for X. Moraes said the ban would remain in effect until over $3 million in fines were paid and a legal representative was named. De Moraes also <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/vpn-demand-surges-brazil-x-banned-legal-threats-fines-2024-9" target="_blank">threatened a nearly $9,000 daily fine</a> on any person in the country who attempted to access X with a VPN, which Musk had <a href="https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1777089879295631409" target="_blank">recommended</a> for users. <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/brazil-starlink-sanctions-amid-feud-elon-musk-x-2024-9">Starlink's bank accounts were also frozen in the country</a> on August 29 to help cover X's fines since the companies were linked by Musk's ownership, <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://apnews.com/article/brazil-starlink-x-block-compliance-musk-supreme-court-moraes-d09dfe4c6fbfacf303968fe44bcd0ab1">according to an Associated Press report</a>. The company provides satellite internet to over 200,000 customers in Brazil. "This order is based on an unfounded determination that Starlink should be responsible for the fines levied — unconstitutionally —against X," Starlink <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://x.com/Starlink/status/1829253626839380424">said</a> in a post on X, adding that it planned to take legal action. Musk <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1829307275309093121">noted</a> in a post on X that SpaceX and X are separate companies with different shareholders and the move "improperly punishes other shareholders and the people of Brazil." <h2>Starlink agrees to enforce the X ban</h2>After initially refusing to block X until its accounts were frozen, Starlink <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://x.com/Starlink/status/1831053118265843722">changed</a> course on Tuesday and said it would comply with the order to block X access in the country. "Regardless of the illegal treatment of Starlink in freezing of our assets, we are complying with the order to block access to X in Brazil," Starlink <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://x.com/Starlink/status/1831053118265843722">said</a> in a post on X. But Starlink vowed to "pursue all legal avenues" to fight the order. Starlink's parent company SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment from BI. Correction: September 20, 2024 — This story has been updated with new information about the fine levied against X in Brazil. It also corrected the last name of the judge. His last name is de Moraes, not Moreas.

How Elon Musk and X got into a messy situation in one of its biggest markets

After the Supreme Court ruled on June 10 that a <keyword id="20100511" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Muslim-woman" source="keywords">Muslim woman</keyword> is entitled to claim <keyword id="22407616" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="maintenance-after-divorce" source="keywords">maintenance after divorce</keyword>, <keyword id="20066703" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="National-Commission-for-Women" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="National Commission for Women" meta.hostid="261" meta.entityid="National Commission for Women">National Commission for Women</keyword> (NCW) Chairperson Rekha Sharma welcomed the decision and stated that all <keyword id="20013419" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="personal-laws" source="keywords">personal laws</keyword> related to women should be equal across all religions. Speaking to ANI, Rekha Sharma said, "I always say that <keyword id="19927138" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="womens-rights" source="keywords">women's rights</keyword> should be universal and not determined based on <keyword id="19969367" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="religion" source="keywords">religion</keyword>. All personal laws related to women should be equal across all religions. Under the Hindu Marriage Act, you get alimony after divorce, so why should a Muslim woman not get it? I welcome what the Supreme Court has said." The Supreme Court on June 10 ruled that a divorced Muslim woman is entitled to seek maintenance from her husband under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), asserting that any discrimination against Muslim women in matters of alimony under the secular laws of the country would be regressive and against <keyword id="20809677" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="gender-justice" source="keywords">gender justice</keyword> and equality. Earlier, the <keyword id="20066702" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="NCW-chief" source="keywords">NCW chief</keyword> wholeheartedly welcomed the Supreme Court's landmark ruling, stating that the decision is a significant step towards ensuring <keyword id="20250318" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="gender-equality" source="keywords">gender equality</keyword> and justice for all women, regardless of their religion. The NCW Chairperson emphasised that the decision reinforces the principle that no woman should be left without support and protection under the law. The NCW remains committed to advocating for women's rights and ensuring that justice prevails for every woman in India, she emphasised. Rekha Sharma also addressed the "lewd" comment incident that occurred earlier regarding a picture of the widow of Kirti Chakra recipient Captain Anshuman Singh. NCW chief Rekha Sharma said, "It was a very derogatory comment that we saw on social media, and we immediately took suo motu cognizance of it. The police have filed an FIR against this person. However, the individual is most likely from Pakistan." "Many such comments are being made, and we are taking those comments very seriously and urging the police to file FIRs in those cases as well," she added. Delhi Police acknowledged the National Commission for Women's (NCW) letter to the Delhi Commissioner of Police, demanding the arrest of the man and submission of a detailed report to the panel within three days. The police said a complaint was received from the National Commission for Women, alleging that a social media user had made an extremely lewd and derogatory comment on a picture of the widow of a late soldier. Taking cognizance of the complaint and after a preliminary examination of its contents, a case FIR under Sections 79, BNS-2023, and Section 67 of the IT Act 2000 has been registered at the Police Station Special Cell, and an investigation is underway. Captain Anshuman Singh, a doctor, was posted with the 26 Punjab as a medical officer in the Siachen Glacier area. On the night of July 19, 2023, there was a fire incident at an Indian Army ammunition dump at the camp where he was posted. Captain Singh saw a fibreglass hut engulfed in fire and immediately acted to rescue four to five individuals trapped inside. He went inside the medical investigation room, which was also on fire, to retrieve the critical medical aid box but could not make it out due to heavy fire amid strong winds. He was awarded the Kirti Chakra posthumously. Captain Singh's wife, Smriti, and his mother received the award from President Droupadi Murmu.

All personal laws related to women should be equal across all religions: NCW chief Rekha Sharma

In a bid to expand its viewership data transparency, <keyword id="19897536" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Netflix" source="keywords">Netflix</keyword> released its first biennial report covering six months of streaming habits on the platform late last year. Now, the second edition, titled "What We Watched: A <keyword id="19811142" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="netflix-engagement-report" source="Orion">Netflix Engagement Report</keyword>," offers valuable insights into global streaming habits from July to December 2023. And it sheds light on the content resonating most with viewers in India, a crucial market for the streaming giant. The report unveils a significant surge in viewership for Indian series and films, accumulating over 1 billion views in 2023. Leading the pack is Sujoy Ghosh's suspenseful thriller <keyword id="20075862" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Jaane-Jaan" source="keywords">Jaane Jaan</keyword>, captivating audiences with 20.2 million views and securing the 83rd position on the global Top 400 list. In case you missed it, this multi-starrer mystery/thriller has <keyword id="19901583" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Kareena-Kapoor" source="keywords">Kareena Kapoor</keyword> Khan, <keyword id="1109461" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Jaideep-Ahlawat" source="Orion">Jaideep Ahlawat</keyword> and <keyword id="196455" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="vijay-varma" source="Orion">Vijay Varma</keyword> playing a single mother, a maths teacher and a cop, respectively. When single mother Maya D’Souza is caught in a crime investigation, her neighbour Naren Vyas, a gifted maths teacher, offers to help. But as Inspector Karan digs into the case, he manages to catch up to them. Jaane Jaan is an adaptation of the 2005 Japanese novel The Devotion of Suspect X by Keigo Higashino. While critics and the audience did complain about the somewhat patchy writing and rather disappointing ending, the characters do justice to the plot and the movie does make for an enjoyable watch. Ahlawat, in particular, stands out with his impeccable performance. And Kareena, with her days of “overacting” behind her, does justice to her role, too. Following Jaane Jaan is Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan's action-packed Jawan, directed by Atlee, with 16.2 million views. Beyond these top contenders, the report highlights the continued popularity of diverse Indian content genres. Viewers enjoyed comedic offerings like OMG 2 and Lust Stories 2, while the true-crime documentary Curry &amp; Cyanide boasts 8.2 million views. The report also explores the performance of web series within the Indian market. <keyword id="19987742" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Yash-Raj-Films" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="Yash Raj Films" meta.hostid="261" meta.entityid="Yash Raj Films">Yash Raj Films</keyword>' debut series, The Railway Men, captured viewers' attention, securing the top spot with 10.6 million views. Kohraa emerged as the second most-watched Indian web show, garnering 6.4 million views. While Indian content dominated viewership in the region, the report acknowledges the enduring appeal of international shows and movies. Most notably, Julia Roberts-Ethan Hawke starrer Leave the World Behind generated 121 million views in just over three weeks after premiering December 8, 2023. The first three parts of the captivating French series Lupin amassed nearly 100 million views in the latter half of 2023, demonstrating the global reach of captivating storytelling. And One Piece, with nearly 72 million views, more than doubled viewing across Netflix’s anime film and series.

Netflix released its list of most viewed Indian content and Kareena Kapoor’s Jaane Jaan was the most-watched film

Tech giant <keyword id="6355629" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="google" source="Orion">Google</keyword> has quietly limited the number of files that users can create and save in Google <keyword id="6364103" type="General" weightage="50" keywordseo="drive" source="Orion">Drive</keyword>. Now, users can create a maximum of five million files in Drive, reports The Verge, citing sources. According to Google spokesperson <keyword id="11973603" type="General" weightage="50" keywordseo="ross-richendrfer" source="Orion">Ross Richendrfer</keyword>, this change aims to "maintain strong performance and reliability" and will help prevent "misuse" of the company's systems. Richendrfer further mentioned that when the users reach the limit, they will receive a notification and also that users can contact Google support to address the issue. Although five million files might seem absurd for one person to upload, some users have actually exceeded that number. As reported by many users, it seems that the tech giant did not alert the affected users about the newly implemented limit before it took place, the report said. Meanwhile, last week, the tech giant had introduced a "search chips" feature in Drive, which will allow users to filter by criteria like file type, owner, and last modified date anywhere in the web app. SEE ALSO: <a target="_blank" class="c-link c-message_attachment__title_link" href="https://www.businessinsider.in/science/health/news/remain-alert-says-union-health-minister-as-india-records-3038-fresh-covid-19-cases/articleshow/99238578.cms">Remain alert says Union Health Minister as India records 3,038 fresh Covid-19 cases</a> <a target="_blank" class="c-link c-message_attachment__title_link" href="https://www.businessinsider.in/india/news/77-inmates-in-prisons-undertrials-says-india-justice-report/articleshow/99238746.cms">77% inmates in prisons undertrials, says India Justice Report</a>

Google quietly limits the number of files users can create and save in Drive

In a landmark judgement, the <keyword id="19900742" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Supreme-Court-of-India" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="Supreme Court of India" meta.hostid="261" meta.entityid="Supreme Court of India">Supreme Court of India</keyword> has broadened the definition of crimes under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The court ruled that simply viewing <keyword id="20456028" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="child-pornography" source="keywords">child pornography</keyword> on the internet, without physically possessing or storing the material, is now a criminal offence under Section 15 of the <keyword id="19920672" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="POCSO-Act" source="keywords">POCSO Act</keyword> and provisions of the <keyword id="19930099" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="information-technology" source="keywords">Information Technology</keyword> (IT) Act. This ruling significantly expands the scope of the law to address the evolving challenges posed by digital platforms. <h2>A wider net</h2>In its ruling, a bench comprising Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice J.B. Pardiwala stated, "Any act of viewing, distributing, or displaying child pornographic material by a person over the internet without any actual or physical possession or storage of such material in any device or in any form or manner would also amount to 'possession' in terms of Section 15 of POCSO Act." This interpretation effectively settled conflicting verdicts from various high courts, notably overturning a Madras High Court decision that had quashed a POCSO case against an individual who had viewed child pornography but had not circulated it. The Supreme Court, in agreeing with senior advocate H.S. Phoolka's arguments, deemed the earlier judgement "egregiously erroneous." <h2>Crimes categorised</h2>In a further clarification, the Supreme Court divided crimes related to child pornography under Section 15 of the POCSO Act into three distinct categories. The decision emphasised that law enforcement and courts must carefully assess each case to determine the specific category under which an offence falls. One critical insight from the judgement is that an offender cannot escape prosecution by simply deleting illegal content before an FIR is registered. The bench declared, "We clarify that there is no requirement under Section 15 of POCSO Act that ‘storage’ or ‘possession’ must continue to exist at the time of initiation of the criminal proceeding, and no such requirement can be read into the said provision." <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="113417654" title="“Learned no lessons from Nirbhaya case”: Madhya Pradesh High Court criticises lenient treatment of crime-accused juvies in India" mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div>This means that even if an individual deletes the material before the authorities take action, they may still face <keyword id="20554971" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="legal-consequences" source="keywords">legal consequences</keyword> based on the mere act of viewing or temporary possession. <h2><keyword id="23293250" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="automatic-downloads" source="keywords">Automatic downloads</keyword></h2>Acknowledging the complexities of <keyword id="20573374" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="digital-media" source="keywords">digital media</keyword>, the Supreme Court recognised that certain child pornographic content might be automatically downloaded onto devices without the user’s knowledge. To address this, the court created a safeguard for those unaware of the offensive material stored on their devices. If a person discovers such material on their device through automatic downloads, they will not be prosecuted if they take immediate steps to delete it and report it to the authorities. However, the onus is on the device owner to act swiftly. Failure to delete or report the offensive material after becoming aware of it would constitute an offence under the law. To avoid the automatic downloading of problematic material, there are several proactive measures you can take. First, adjust your browser settings to disable automatic downloads and pop-ups, ensuring you have to approve any file before it is downloaded to your device. Regularly update your web browser and security software to benefit from the latest protections against malicious websites. <div type="Article" hostid="261" msid="113146443" title="Karnataka HC rejects school teacher&amp;#39;s plea to quash POCSO case over filming of girl students" mstype="2" mssubtype="0"></div>Additionally, be cautious about the sites you visit, particularly those that seem suspicious or unfamiliar; stick to well-known, reputable sources. Additionally, consider using ad blockers or content filters that can prevent potentially harmful content from loading. Always be mindful of any unsolicited links in emails or messages, as these can lead to automatic downloads of unwanted material. Lastly, routinely monitor your device for any unfamiliar files and promptly delete anything that looks suspicious to minimise your risk of unknowingly storing problematic content. <h2>What this means for the future</h2>This judgement sends a clear message: India is taking a zero-tolerance approach toward child pornography in all its forms, whether stored, distributed, or merely viewed. The ruling adapts the legal framework to modern challenges, ensuring that perpetrators can no longer hide behind technicalities such as the absence of physical possession. The Supreme Court’s interpretation also places a burden on individuals to exercise responsibility in the digital world. Anyone who stumbles upon child pornography, whether intentionally or accidentally, must take swift action to avoid legal consequences. (With inputs from agencies)

You can now be prosecuted for unknowingly “auto-downloading” child porn. Here’re some safe browsing habits

INDIA bloc leaders gathered at <keyword id="19895812" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Jantar-Mantar" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="Jantar Mantar" meta.hostid="153" meta.entityid="Jantar Mantar">Jantar Mantar</keyword> here on Tuesday to demand the release of Delhi Chief Minister <keyword id="19901384" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="Arvind-Kejriwal" source="keywords">Arvind Kejriwal</keyword> amid his declining health and hit out at the BJP-led Centre for "suppressing" the voice of <keyword id="19895395" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="opposition" source="keywords">opposition</keyword>. They also blamed the Centre for obstructing the work of the Delhi government, therefore leading to the recent incident in Rajinder Nagar where three students died after getting trapped in a flooded basement of a coaching centre. Slogans of "Bharat Mata Ki Jai" and "End dictatorship" were raised during the <keyword id="19895811" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="protest" source="keywords">protest</keyword> rally called by the <keyword id="19914482" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="AAP" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="AAP" meta.hostid="153" meta.entityid="AAP">AAP</keyword>. CPI(ML) Liberation leader Dipankar Bhattacharya said three senior AAP leaders -- Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and Satyendar Jain were put in jail as "part of a conspiracy". He also accused the Centre of obstructing the work of the Delhi government, and held them responsible for the situation in the national capital, including the Rajinder Nagar coaching centre deaths. "The Modi government is responsible for the anarchy in Delhi. This anarchy took the lives of the three <keyword id="20217536" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="UPSC-aspirants" source="keywords">UPSC aspirants</keyword> in Rajinder Nagar. <keyword id="19894848" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="BJP" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="BJP" meta.hostid="153" meta.entityid="BJP">BJP</keyword> took the lives of three UPSC aspirants," Bhattacharya said during the rally. "They tried to end AAP, weaken Delhi government as part of a conspiracy. The elected chief minister is in jail. Umar Khalid and many activists are in jail in false charges in Delhi riots. Bhima Koregaon fake case, father Stan Swamy was in jail and he even died while in custody. There is a huge conspiracy against leaders, activists," he said. The BJP-led Centre is "trying to suppress the voice of those who oppose them", he said. "Six months ago when Arvind ji, Hemant ji were arrested, we knew it was a conspiracy because Lok Sabha elections were there," he said. "Hemant ji came out, there was an appeal to stop his bail but it was dismissed. Kejriwal ji was released for less than a month. Now though he has been given a bail there is a conspiracy to keep him in jail," he said. "It is a conspiracy to finish a democratically elected government and a political party," Bhattacharya said, urging the people to give their reply to the BJP in upcoming assembly polls in Haryana, Maharashtra and Jharkhand by defeating the BJP. "The recent mandate has proved that people won't tolerate tyranny. We will ensure justice,"he added. Communist Party of India general secretary D Raja also demanded the immediate release of the Delhi chief minister, and expressed concerns about his health. "After BJP's coming to power, democracy is no longer 'for' the people, democracy is 'far' from people, democracy is not 'of' the people, it is 'off' the people, and it is not 'by' the people, it is 'buy' the people," Raja said. "Kejriwal is one of the victims of the central agencies used by the Modi government. Can we allow this? How much longer can we tolerate this situation in the country. Kejriwal is not well and his health has deteriorated," he said. AAP Delhi convener Gopal Rai said Kejriwal's sugar levels are going down in custody. "He was granted bail by trial court and Supreme Court but a conspiracy was hatched to keep him in jail. Why does BJP want to put opposition leaders in jail? Who is responsible for the deaths of the three UPSC aspirants?" Rai said. "When LG is being asked about the incident, he is quiet. The BJP, which is demanding Kejriwal's resignation, snatched away the powers of the Delhi government. They want rights but run away when they are held accountable," he charged. has been accusing the BJP of "conspiring to kill" Kejriwal in jail and cited his medical report to show that his sugar levels have fallen 34 times between June 3 and July 7. Nationalist <keyword id="19895371" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Congress" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="Congress" meta.hostid="153" meta.entityid="Congress">Congress</keyword> Party - Sharadchandra Pawar (NCP-SP) chief Sharad Pawar and Deputy Leader of Congress in Lok Sabha Gaurav Gogoi are also present in the INDIA bloc rally. Congress Rajya Sabha MP Pramod Tiwari referred to Kejriwal's wife Sunita as a "symbol of resistance" as he began his address. "We have come to give complete moral support to AAP and Kejriwal on behalf of Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, and party leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi in the struggle against illegal arrest of Arvind Kejriwal. The arrest of Kejriwal in an illegal and unconstitutional manner indicate nothing but the bad intentions of the BJP," he alleged. Tiwari said it was "height" of inhumanity to keep Kejriwal in jail despite his medical reports showing dip in his blood sugar to a dangerous level. The Congress and AAP had fought the recent Lok Sabha elections in Delhi in alliance. AAP had fielded candidates on four seats and Congress on three seats. However, the alliance drew a blank. Gogoi warned the BJP and its leaders saying they cannot scare the opposition whether it is AAP, Congress or any other party. "Their illusion lies shattered with this rally. If fair Lok Sabha elections had been held in 2024, the BJP would have been in opposition and we would have been in power. The BJP-led government is not going to complete its five-year term," he stressed. Kejriwal was arrested on March 21 by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in a money laundering case linked to the alleged excise policy scam and has been granted bail by the Supreme Court. However, he is currently lodged in Tihar in a connected CBI case.

INDIA bloc leaders gather at Jantar Mantar, demand release of Delhi CM Kejriwal

<keyword id="19913553" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="tech" source="keywords">Tech</keyword> giant <keyword id="19894961" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="apple" source="keywords">Apple</keyword> has reportedly shelved plans to develop display screens for its smartwatch. According to a <keyword id="19897999" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="bloomberg" source="keywords">Bloomberg</keyword> report, the tech giant has pulled the plug on an in-house project to build screens with microLED technology. The iPhone maker is now reportedly "reorganising the teams that handle display engineering," and also "eliminating dozens of roles in the US and Asia". Apple did not immediately comment on the report. The display project was reportedly part of a "broader push by Apple to design more of its technology in-house". Apple is also likely to launch new iPad Pro models with OLED displays from <keyword id="19897758" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="samsung" source="keywords">Samsung</keyword> and LG. Meanwhile, the US Justice Department and 16 states have accused tech giant Apple of using exclusionary business practices to sustain the monopoly of its flagship product, the iPhone. The lawsuit alleged that the tech giant uses this monopoly to keep the cot of its product high for consumers. Apple's iPhone dominates the US market with a 65 per cent share. And it has made the company immensely rich, along with its other products. SEE ALSO:<a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/mobile/news/motorola-edge-50-pro-to-launch-in-india-on-april-3-everything-we-know-so-far/articleshow/108667275.cms" target="_blank"></a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/mobile/news/motorola-edge-50-pro-to-launch-in-india-on-april-3-everything-we-know-so-far/articleshow/108667275.cms" target="_blank">Motorola Edge 50 Pro to launch in India on April 3 – Everything we know so far</a><a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/auto/news/jsw-group-and-saic-motors-jv-jsw-mg-motor-india-set-to-up-production-to-3-lakh-vehicles-a-year-with-a-new-car-every-3-6-months/articleshow/108647799.cms" target="_blank"></a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/auto/news/jsw-group-and-saic-motors-jv-jsw-mg-motor-india-set-to-up-production-to-3-lakh-vehicles-a-year-with-a-new-car-every-3-6-months/articleshow/108647799.cms" target="_blank">JSW Group and SAIC Motor’s JV ‘JSW MG Motor India’ set to up production to 3 lakh vehicles a year with a new car every 3-6 months</a><a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/telecom/news/mobile-number-portability-revamped-to-reduce-sim-swap-frauds-here-are-the-new-rules/articleshow/108613683.cms" target="_blank"></a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/telecom/news/mobile-number-portability-revamped-to-reduce-sim-swap-frauds-here-are-the-new-rules/articleshow/108613683.cms" target="_blank">Mobile Number Portability revamped to reduce SIM swap frauds – Here are the new rules</a>

You Searched For "india justice report" and got 8 results

A Karnataka woman is being ridiculed for demanding an alimony of Rs 6 lakh monthly from her ex. Is this fair?

BI India Bureau

How Elon Musk and X got into a messy situation in one of its biggest markets

Ana Altchek

All personal laws related to women should be equal across all religions: NCW chief Rekha Sharma

ANI

Netflix released its list of most viewed Indian content and Kareena Kapoor’s Jaane Jaan was the most-watched film

Ashmita Gupta

Google quietly limits the number of files users can create and save in Drive

IANS

You can now be prosecuted for unknowingly “auto-downloading” child porn. Here’re some safe browsing habits

BI India Bureau

INDIA bloc leaders gather at Jantar Mantar, demand release of Delhi CM Kejriwal

PTI

Apple shelves plans to develop displays for smartwatch: Report

IANS

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides