Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

Expressing "serious concern" over <keyword id="19902052" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="pendency" source="keywords">pendency</keyword> of a large number of <keyword id="22472776" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="cheque-bounce-cases" source="keywords">cheque bounce cases</keyword>, the <keyword id="19895345" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Supreme-Court" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="Supreme Court" meta.hostid="261" meta.entityid="Supreme Court">Supreme Court</keyword> has said courts should encourage <keyword id="20151747" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="compounding" source="keywords">compounding</keyword> of offences under the <keyword id="20905075" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Negotiable-Instruments-Act" source="keywords">Negotiable Instruments Act</keyword> if parties are willing to reach a compromise. A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ahsanuddin Amanullah set aside the conviction of a man named P Kumarasamy in a cheque bounce case, after noting that the parties have entered into a <keyword id="21163406" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="settlement-agreement" source="keywords">settlement agreement</keyword> and Rs 5.25 lakh has been paid to the complainant. "A large number of cases involving dishonour of cheques are pending before courts which is a serious concern for our judicial system. Keeping in mind that the 'compensatory aspect' of remedy shall have priority over the 'punitive aspect', courts should encourage compounding of offences under the NI Act if parties are willing to do so," the bench said in its July 11 order. The Negotiable Instruments Act governs all negotiable instruments like promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. Compoundable offences are those where a compromise can be reached by the rival parties. The bench said it has to be remembered that dishonour of cheques is a <keyword id="22472777" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="regulatory-offence" source="keywords">regulatory offence</keyword> which was made an offence only in view of public interest so that the reliability of these instruments can be ensured. "Considering the totality of the circumstances and compromise between the parties, we allow this appeal and acquit the appellants by setting aside the impugned order dated April 1, 2019 as well the trial court's order dated October 16, 2012. Appellant no.2 (P Kumarasamy), who was exempted from surrendering by this Court, need not surrender and his sureties are hereby discharged," the bench ordered. The bench noted that in 2006, P Kumarasamy alias Ganesh had borrowed Rs 5,25,000 from respondent A Subramaniam but did not repay the loan. To discharge the debt, the bench said, Kumarasamy gave a cheque for Rs 5.25 lakh in the name of his partnership firm M/s New Win Export. "Since the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds, respondent filed a complaint under Section 138 NI Act against the appellants where the trial court vide order dated October 16, 2012 convicted the appellants and imposed a sentence of one year of simple imprisonment each," it said. It noted Kumarasamy challenged the conviction before the appellate court, which reversed the findings of the trial court and acquitted him and the firm. "Finally, when the matter was taken to the high court at the instance of the respondent/complainant, the high court in its order dated April 1, 2019 set aside the order of the appellate court and restored the order of the trial court, convicting the appellants," the bench noted. It noted the firm and Kumarsamy challenged the high court order before the apex court. The bench added that Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 makes all offences under it compoundable. "In our opinion, this settlement agreement can be treated to be compounding of the offence. All the same, Section 320 (5) of CrPC provides that if compounding has to be done after conviction, then it can only be done with the leave of the court where appeal against such conviction is pending," it said. The bench said in cases where the accused relies upon some document for compounding the offence at the appellate stage, courts shall try to check the veracity of such documents. "For the same, in the present matter, this court vide order dated March 18, 2024 had asked the respondent-complainant to file an affidavit to bring on record whether or not any compromise has been reached between the parties," it said. The bench said an affidavit was filed by the complainant in compliance with the order where it was said that the accused have paid the amount to the satisfaction of the complainant, and that he has no objection if conviction of the appellants is set aside. "Now, when the accused and complainant have reached a settlement permissible by law and this court has also satisfied itself regarding the genuineness of the settlement, we think that the conviction of the appellants would not serve any purpose and thus, it is required to be set aside," it said.

Pendency of large number of cheque bounce cases a serious concern: SC

New Delhi, Mar 7 () With over 35 lakh cheque bounce cases pending in district courts, the Supreme Court has decided to evolve a "concerted" and "coordinated" mechanism for expeditious disposal of such cases.The apex court has registered a suo motu case (on its own) in this regard and sought responses from the Centre and other stakeholders, including the Reserve Bank of India.A bench of Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justice L N Rao, which passed the order while dealing with a plea related to dishonour of two cheques in January 2005, noted that a dispute of this nature has remained pending for 15 years in various courts and taken judicial time."Despite many changes brought through legislative amendments and various decisions of this court mandating speedy trial and disposal of these cases, the trial courts are filled with a large number of pendency of these cases," the bench said in its March 5 order."A recent study of the pending cases, reflects pendency of more than 35 lakh, which constitutes more than 15 percent of the total criminal cases pending in district courts. Further, there is a steady increase in the docket burden," the bench said.The top court has issued notices to the Centre, registrar general of all high courts, director general of police of all states and union territories, member secretary of the National Legal Services Authority, RBI and Indian Bank Association, Mumbai, and asked them to file their response on the issue."These are some indicative aspects in addition to what may come on board after hearing the relevant duty-holders. To work out mechanism for expeditious and just adjudication of cases relating to dishonour of cheques, fulfilling the mandate of law and reduce high pendency, various duty-holders like banks, police and legal services authorities may be required to take measures and prepare schemes," the bench said."Thus, we find it necessary to hear them for evolving a concerted, coordinated mechanism for expeditious adjudication of these cases as per the legal mandate," it said.The bench, which appointed senior lawyer Siddharth Luthra and advocate K Parameshwar as amicus curiae to assist it in the matter, has listed the case for hearing on April 16.The bench noted that dishonour of cheque was criminalised in 1988 and the legislative intent was to "ensure faith in the efficacy of banking operations and credibility in transacting business on cheques.""It was to provide a strong criminal remedy in order to deter the high incidence of dishonour of cheques and ensure compensation to the complainant," the bench said, adding, "Subsequent amendments in the Act (Negotiable Instrument Act) and the pronouncements of this court reflect that it was always perceived that these cases would be disposed speedily so as to preserve the object of criminalisation of the act."The bench noted that as per the legal mandate, endeavour must be made to conclude the trial in cheque bounce case within six months from the date of filing of complaint."One of the major factors for high pendency is delay in ensuring the presence of the accused before the court for trial. As per recent study, more than half of the pending cases, i.e. more than 18 lakh cases, are pending due to absence of accused," the bench said.It said a mechanism may be developed to ensure the presence of the accused even by way of coercive measure, if required, including attachment of property.It observed that banks, being an important stakeholders in cheque bounce cases, have the responsibility of providing requisite details and facilitate an expeditious trial."The Reserve Bank of India, being the regulatory body, may also evolve guidelines for banks to facilitate requisite information for the trial of these cases and such other matters as may be required. A separate software-based mechanism may be developed to track and ensure the service of process on the accused in cases relating to an offence under Section 138 of NI Act," it said."With ensuring the credibility of cheques, it is equally important that cheques are not allowed to be misused giving cause to frivolous litigation. The Reserve Bank of India may consider developing a new proforma of cheques so as to include the purpose of payment, along with other information mentioned above to facilitate adjudication of real issues," it said.The top court also said there is a need of developing a mechanism for pre-litigation settlement in cheque bounce cases and National Legal Services Authority may evolve a scheme for settlement of dispute at pre-litigation stage. ABA SJK ABHABH

SC to evolve mechanism for expeditious disposal of cheque bounce cases

New Delhi, May 6 () Taking note of difficulties faced by lawyers and litigants during nation-wide lockdown due to COVID-19, the Supreme Court on Wednesday extended the period of limitation prescribed under laws for initiating arbitral proceedings and the cheque bounce cases with effect from March 15 till further orders.The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provide fixed time periods to litigants to initiate arbitral proceedings and cheque dishonour cases. They become time-barred if filed after the statutory periods. The top court on March 23 had invoked its plenary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to extend limitation period of appeals from high courts or tribunals on account of coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and on Wednesday extended the same relief to lawyers and litigants for arbitral proceedings and cheque bounce cases."In view of this Court's earlier order dated March 23 passed in Suo Motu Writ Petition …and taking into consideration the effect of the Corona Virus (COVID 19) and resultant difficulties being faced by the lawyers and litigants and with a view to obviate such difficulties and to ensure that lawyers/litigants do not have to come physically to file such proceedings in respective Courts/Tribunal across the country including this court, it is hereby ordered that all periods of limitation prescribed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 shall be extended with effect from March 15, till further orders to be passed by this court in the present proceedings," a bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde said in the order."In case the limitation period has expired after March 15 then the period from March 15, till the date on which the lockdown is lifted in the jurisdictional area where the dispute lies or where the cause of action arises shall be extended for a period of 15 days after the lifting of lockdown," said the bench which also comprised justices Deepak Gupta and Hrishikesh Roy.In the proceedings held through video conferencing, the top court also issued to notice to the Centre, represented by Attorney General K K Venugopal and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, on the plea that such a relief from filing cases within a particular statutory time period be extended to all legal proceedings.The bench said that it would like to give such a reliefs but there cannot a "blanket order" and sought views of the Centre on it.Earlier, the apex court had taken suo-motu (on its own) cognizance of the problems faced by lawyers and litigants due to the pandemic in filing appeals from high courts or tribunals within fixed time and had extended that time by invoking its plenary powers under the Constitution."We are exercising this power under Article 142 read with Article 141 of the Constitution of India and declare that this order is a binding order within the meaning of Article 141 on all Courts/Tribunals and authorities," it had said.The top court had said that its order may be brought to the notice of all high courts for being communicated to all subordinate Courts/Tribunals within their respective jurisdiction. SJK ABA MNL RKS RKSRKS

COVID-19:SC extends time for filing arbitral proceedings, cheque bounce cases from Mar 15

A bill that provides for trial in <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=cheque+bounce">cheque bounce</a> cases at the place where the cheque was submitted and not the place of issue was introduced in the <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=Lok+Sabha">Lok Sabha</a> today. This could help solve the problem of millions suffering from jurisdictional issues. 
 
The Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Bill, 2015 was introduced by the Finance Minister <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=Arun+Jaitley">Arun Jaitley</a> and is looking to replace an older ordinance passed last month. The last ordinance could not be passed in the <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=Rajya+Sabha">Rajya Sabha</a> during the Budget session. 
 
The amendment rules that cases of bouncing of cheques can be filed only in a <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=court">court</a> in whose jurisdiction the bank branch of the payee is placed in. If a complaint against a person issuing a cheque has been filed in the court with the relevant jurisdiction, all subsequent complaints against that person will be filed in the same court. 
 
Image credit: Indiatimes

New
Cheque Bounce Bill introduced in Lok Sabha

Hyderabad-based businessman <keyword id="15211274" type="General" weightage="50" keywordseo="boinpally-abhishek-rao" source="Orion">Boinpally Abhishek Rao</keyword>, who has been arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation (<keyword id="6354572" type="General" weightage="80" keywordseo="cbi" source="Orion">CBI</keyword>) in <keyword id="14762568" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Delhi-excise-policy-scam" source="Orion">Delhi excise policy scam</keyword> allegedly involving the national capital's Deputy Chief Minister <keyword id="6354681" type="General" weightage="50" keywordseo="manish-sisodia" source="Orion">Manish Sisodia</keyword>, is associated with several companies. He is a director of Anoos Electrolysis &amp; Obesity Pvt Ltd, Anoos Health &amp; Wellness Pvt Ltd, Robin Distribution LLP, Agasti Ventures, SS Mines &amp; Minerals, Master Sand LLP, Neoverse Realty Pvt Ltd, Zeus Networking Pvt Ltd and Valuecare Esthetics Pvt Ltd. Considered close to a key leader of the ruling party in Telangana, he is the first person from <keyword id="6354552" type="General" weightage="80" keywordseo="hyderabad" source="Orion">Hyderabad</keyword> to be arrested in the case. Rao was allegedly found to be acting as a south lobby. The investigating agency suspects that he committed irregularities through cartelization. Rao is the second person to be arrested in the excise policy. The CBI had earlier arrested Vijay Nair, former CEO of events company- Only Much Louder. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has also arrested liquor trader Sameer Mahendru of Indo Spirit. He is said to have business links with Arun Ramachandra Pillai, a resident of Hyderabad and one of the persons booked by the CBI in the case. Rao's arrest came after several rounds of raids conducted by the CBI and ED at various places in Hyderabad, including in the office of a media house. He was also reportedly questioned by the CBI a couple of times in the case. According to the CBI investigation, Arun used to collect money from Sameer Mahendru for onward transmission to the accused public servants through Vijay Naidu. The liquor license holders allegedly issued bills to retail vendors to divert funds to public servants involved in irregularities. This is where some companies from Hyderabad are believed to have helped in illegal transactions. Further questioning of the CBI is likely to unearth the role of some other suspects in the case. Six to seven to eight businessmen and a couple of politicians and officials from Telugu states are believed to be involved in the case. The officials hailing from Telugu states are said to be holding key positions in the Delhi government. The Hyderabad-based businessmen were reported having colluded with politicians and officials in the Delhi government to influence the liquor policy of that state to derive monetary benefits from it. SEE ALSO: <a target="_blank" class="c-link c-message_attachment__title_link" href="https://www.businessinsider.in/finance/banks/news/beware-of-bouncing-cheques-harsher-punishments-may-be-afoot/articleshow/94757668.cms">Beware of bouncing cheques, harsher punishments may be afoot</a> <a target="_blank" class="c-link c-message_attachment__title_link" href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/startups/livspace-earmarks-100-mn-to-invest-in-d2c-brands-in-home-segment/articleshow/94755762.cms">Livspace earmarks $100 mn to invest in D2C brands in home segment</a>

Who is Boinpalli Abhishek Rao arrested in Delhi excise policy scam?

New Delhi, Jul 10 () The Supreme Court on Friday decided to use technology more in judicial proceedings keeping in mind the prevailing COVID-19 situation and directed that now court summons and notices can be served on persons through "emails, fax and instant messaging applications" like 'WhatsApp'. The top court had earlier taken suo motu (on its own) cognizance of the difficulties faced by lawyers and litigants during lockdown due to COVID-19 and had decided to extend the period of limitation prescribed under laws for initiating arbitral proceedings and the cheque bounce cases with effect from March 15 till further orders. A bench comprising Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices R Subhash Reddy and A S Bopanna passed the order on the plea filed by Attorney General K K Venugopal in the case. "For services of notices and summons, pleadings it has been seen that it was not possible during lockdown to visits postal offices…we direct that such service (of notices and summons) may be done by email, fax, or through an instant messenger service," the bench said and refrained from using the name of 'WhatsApp' in the order. It referred to the example of 'Xerox' and said that the name of the company has been used to convey the meaning of 'photostate'. The top court allayed the apprehension of Venugopal that he was "not comfortable" with the service of summons and notices through WhatsApp as it has been a "completely encrypted platform". It said that the "blue tick" feature of the messaging application can be used to prove the service of the court's notices under the Evidence Act and if the application is deactivated then it cannot be proven and hence such services can be used. On the extension of limitation period for filing of cheque dishonor cases under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act , the apex court Friday said that it will not intervene into this and the time period can be extended by the RBI only. "Under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, we don't consider it appropriate to interfere in the deadline prescribed by RBI. If RBI considers to extend, then they can do it." The apex court then allowed the modification plea and said the 12 months-time period under the law to complete arbitral proceedings be allowed to remain in force. The bench then dealt with a provision related to the functioning of Commercial Courts and said that the limitation period fixed for mediation will be extended by 45 days after lifting of the lockdown. The apex court took note of the submission of senior advocate Shyam Divan that the lifting of lockdown was a vague term and even after its lifting, certain areas are still declared containment zones having the earlier problems. The apex court said that it was a valuable suggestion and it would like to deal with the term "lifting of lockdown". Earlier, it had extended the period of limitation prescribed under laws for initiating arbitral proceedings and the cheque bounce cases with effect from March 15 till further orders. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provide fixed time periods to litigants to initiate arbitral proceedings and cheque dishonour cases. They become time-barred if filed after the statutory periods. Prior to this, the top court on March 23 had invoked its plenary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to extend limitation period of appeals from high courts or tribunals on account of coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. SJK ABA MNL ABA RKS RKS

SC allows email, fax, instant messaging apps like 'WhatsApp' for service of notices, summons

Bilaspur, Jul 11 () In an effort to settle pending cases by following precautionary measures amid the COVID-19 pandemic, an e-Lok Adalat is being organised in Chhattisgarh on Saturday, where hearings will be conducted virtually, an official said. As per a government release, this is the first time in the country that Lok Adalat is being held through video conferencing. Over 3,000 cases will be taken up for hearing in over 200 benches of various districts, including the high court in Bilaspur on Saturday, said Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, the executive chairman of Chhattisgarh State Legal Services Authority. "The e-Lok Adalat will be inaugurated by Chhattisgarh High Court Chief Justice P R Ramchandra Menon at 10.30 am in the video-conferencing room of the high court and the programme will also be live streamed," Justice Mishra said in the statement. The COVID-19 outbreak has severely hit the functioning of judiciary in the state because of which lawyers and affected parties were also facing financial crisis, he said. The move to hold Lok Adalat on a digital platform will bring relief to lawyers and aggrieved parties, he added. Family disputes, accident claims and cheque bounce cases that can be settled through mutual consent are often resolved by Lok Adalat, he said. All district courts and tehsil courts along with the high court will be part of the e-Lok Adalat, Justice Mishra said. If parties and lawyers have difficulty in connecting through video conferencing, they can also present their case via WhatsApp video calls, he said. "If this experiment is successful, it will be continued further," Justice Mishra added. COR TKP ARU ARU

COVID-19: C'garh to hold e-Lok Adalat via video conferencing

India’s liquor baron <keyword id="14678" type="PERSON" weightage="100" keywordseo="Vijay-Mallya">Vijay Mallya</keyword>, who has <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/Vijay-Mallyas-journey-from-a-businessman-to-a-fraudster/articleshow/51328653.cms">fled the country</a> after being a defaulter of several <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/SBI-wants-Vijay-Mallya-arrested/articleshow/51240258.cms">state-run banks</a>, has been slammed with a non-bailable warrant (NBW) by the Hyderabad court. The warrant was issued after Mallya <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/Vijay-Mallya-has-7-days-to-return-to-India-and-appear-before-the-ED/articleshow/51360074.cms">failed to appear in the court</a> in connection with alleged dishonour of a cheque of Rs 50 lakh to GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd. 
 
Mallya’s counsel has said that he will move the high court seeking quashing of the non-bailable warrant (NBW). 
 
"He (Mallya) and others were supposed to appear before the court on March 10. They did not appear ... Hence, court issued NBW order which has to be executed by April 13," said GMR counsel G Ashok Reddy. He added that there are a total of 11 cases involving Rs 8 crore payment to GMR and the NBWs were issued in connection with a Rs 50 lakh bounced cheque. 
 
Mallya’s advocate H Sudhakar Rao said, "NBWs have been issued in this case. There are other cases going on wherein we have got orders from high court dispensing with his (Mallya's) attendence." 
 
"I will be filing an application in the high court for quashing this order of issuing warrants," Rao told PTI. 
 
When contacted by ET, GMR refused to comment on the issue claiming the matter to be sub judice. 
 
<a href="http://img.newsheads.in/images4web/2016/03/08/31939273-Kingfisher-Vijay-Mallya-Debt_0.jpg">Image source</a>

Another woe for Mallya, Hyderabad court issues non-bailable warrant

Yesterday, we told you how <keyword id="14678" type="PERSON" weightage="100" keywordseo="Vijay-Mallya">Vijay Mallya</keyword> has been slammed with a <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/Another-woe-for-Mallya-Hyderabad-court-issues-non-bailable-warrant/articleshow/51392100.cms">non-bailable warrant</a> in connection with a lawsuit by GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd. 
 
Now, the local court has slammed the former liquor baron with four more non-bailable warrants (NBWs) after he failed to appear in a court for bounced cheques worth Rs 2 crore to GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd. 
 
Also read: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/Vijay-Mallyas-personal-Airbus-jet-to-be-auctioned-to-recover-governments-dues/articleshow/51406790.cms">Vijay Mallya's personal Airbus jet to be auctioned to recover government’s dues</a> 
 
The warrants were issued by 11th Special Magistrate at Erramanjil Courts complex yesterday, and have to be executed by March 29. 
 
GMR counsel G Ashok Reddy had earlier said that a total of 11 cases involving Rs eight crore payment to GMR are pending. 
 
Also read: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/Vijay-Mallyas-journey-from-a-businessman-to-a-fraudster/articleshow/51328653.cms">Vijay Mallya’s journey from a businessman to a fraudster</a> 
 
<a href="http://blogs-images.forbes.com/kenrapoza/files/2014/06/vijay-not-happy.jpg">Image source</a>

Four more NBWs against Mallya in Hyderabad court

As parliament’s Winter Session will convene on November 26, the Prime Minister-led NDA government is confident of passage of crucial bills, including the <keyword id="387846" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="20" keywordseo="GST-Bill">GST bill</keyword>, which is pending in the Rajya Sabha. 
 India’s <keyword id="3148309" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="20" keywordseo="Parliamentary-Affairs-Minister-Venkaiah-Naidu">Parliamentary Affairs Minister Venkaiah Naidu</keyword> expressed confidence about Opposition's support for the GST bill. Naidu said he was in touch with members of some Opposition parties and would consider their suggestions too. 
 
Meanwhile, Modi has also called for BJP's parliamentary party's executive committee to zero on the strategy. 
 
Apart from the crucial GST bill, the Modi government will also take up three ordinance-related bills, including Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Bill, 2015, dealing with cheque bounce cases, and the Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts and Commercial Bill. 
 
(Image: Indiatimes)

The GST will be a reality by January, that’s what the Parliamentary Affairs Minister believes

India got its first banking robot- Lakshmi- in Chennai, which was launched by Kumbakonam-based <keyword id="151071" type="CITY" weightage="20" keywordseo="City-Union-Bank">City Union Bank</keyword>. 
 
Superfast Lakshmi is the first on-site bank helper and can answer on more than 125 subjects. 
 
Lakshmi will answer questions on various questions on loans, bounced cheques, account balance, fixed deposit closure, etc, 
 
"Apart from answering generic questions, we have also programmed it to connect to the core banking solution. If a customer wants to know his bank account details or transaction history, the robot can flash the answer on its display," said N Kamakodi, MD and CEO, City Union Bank. 
 
Lakshmi, who speaks English, will also answer confidential information but not loudly. It will be displayed on her screen. 
 
Interestingly, Lakshmi’s speech is quite relaxed and casual. "Since its artificial intelligence, the robot is constantly learning from customers - the more interactions it has with customers the better it gets," a bank executive told ET. 
 
In case Lakshmi cannot answer your question, she will ask you to contact the bank manager. 
 
“Today she can give real time updates of foreign exchange movement, current interest rates at banks for different asset classes like personal, educational, two-wheeler and home loans, possible charges on withdrawals or deposits. But going forward, she might be able to more than that," said its assembler Vijay V Shah of Coimbatore-based Vishnu Engineering. 
 
Soon, she will also start speaking in Tamil. 
 
Currently, the bank has readied only one version of Lakshmi and has plans for 25-30 robots deployed at key branches by the end of the year if Lakshmi proves a hit with customers. 
 It is worth mentioning <keyword id="6357149" type="CITY" weightage="20" keywordseo="HDFC-bank">HDFC Bank</keyword> is also experimenting with robots to answer customer queries, is testing its humanoid at its innovation lab. 
 
(Image: Indiatimes)

You Searched For "cheque bounce cases" and got 11 results

Pendency of large number of cheque bounce cases a serious concern: SC

PTI

SC to evolve mechanism for expeditious disposal of cheque bounce cases

PTI

COVID-19:SC extends time for filing arbitral proceedings, cheque bounce cases from Mar 15

PTI

New Cheque Bounce Bill introduced in Lok Sabha

BI India Bureau

Who is Boinpalli Abhishek Rao arrested in Delhi excise policy scam?

IANS

SC allows email, fax, instant messaging apps like 'WhatsApp' for service of notices, summons

PTI

COVID-19: C'garh to hold e-Lok Adalat via video conferencing

PTI

Another woe for Mallya, Hyderabad court issues non-bailable warrant

BI India Bureau

Four more NBWs against Mallya in Hyderabad court

BI India Bureau

The GST will be a reality by January, that’s what the Parliamentary Affairs Minister believes

BI India Bureau

Meet India’s first banking robot Lakshmi, which can answer your queries on more than 125 subjects

BI India Bureau

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides