Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

<ul class="summary-list"><li>A Georgia woman faked multiple pregnancies and was granted paid leave, Georgia officials claim. </li><li>Robin Folsom is also alleged to have written an email that claimed to be from the baby's father.</li></ul>A Georgia state employee has been indicted for allegedly faking multiple pregnancies to qualify for <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/mom-got-covid-while-pregnant-says-need-federal-paid-leave-2022-1">paid leave</a>, according to state officials. Robin Folsom, 43, who worked as a communications director for Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency (GVRA), is alleged to have worn a <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/tiktok-video-woman-sneaking-bag-on-flight-pregnant-travel-hack-2021-7">"fake pregnant stomach."</a> She is also alleged to have sent an email claiming to be from the baby's father mandating that she was entitled to rest.Both claims were made in a <a href="https://oig.georgia.gov/press-releases/2022-02-14/former-agency-external-communications-director-indicted-allegedly-faking">statement</a> published by the Georgia Office of the Inspector General, who announced the indictment. Attorney General Chris Carr, <a href="https://law.georgia.gov/press-releases/2022-02-14/carr-former-gvra-employee-indicted-fulton-county-identity-fraud-false">announced</a> on February 10, that Folsom had been indicted by a Fulton County grand jury on three counts of producing False Statements and one count of Identity Fraud, following an investigation. In October 2020, Folsom informed the HR department that she was pregnant, according to the statement. Shortly after she announced the pregnancy in May 2021, her employer received an email claiming to be from the father of her child insisting that she be given time to recover. GVRA approved approximately seven weeks of paid leave — under the Family and Medical Leave Act — "that it otherwise would not have approved," the statement said. When pressed by investigators, Folsom insisted that the baby's father, named in the indictment as Bran Otmembebwe, was a real person. When officials from the Inspector General's office investigated the case, one coworker claimed they saw Folsom's stomach "fall away" from her, leading them to believe that it was fake.Colleagues claimed that she also sent pictures of her new baby but they were "inconsistent" and showed the child with varying skin tones. Folsom had previously announced giving birth to a child in July 2020 but investigators could not find any State Office records of her ever having delivered the child, per the release. She announced she was pregnant again in August 2021. Although the statement doesn't reveal when the Attorney General was made aware of the case, it said Folsom resigned in October 2021, shortly after being interviewed by investigators. Her case is being prosecuted by the Georgia Office of the Attorney General.

A Georgia state employee wore a fake pregnancy belly to get paid maternity leave, according to officials

Busienss Insider/Michael SetoSmosh creators Ian Andrew Hecox, Anthony PadillaThe two founders of <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/smosh/featured">Smosh</a> are breaking up.The YouTube comedy channel was launched nearly 12 years ago by <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/smosh-ian-hecox-anthony-padilla-history-2015-7">buddies Anthony Padilla and Ian Hecox.</a> Now, Padilla is leaving to pursue other projects.Hecox is sticking with Smosh, which has added more channels and cast members over the years.Going forward, Smosh presents and interesting test case for the web video world, and specifically whether a platform like YouTube - which is so often centered on singular personalities - can foster brands that outlive their creators.In other words, is Smosh still Smosh without Padilla?Since launching in 2005, Smosh has amassed over 22.7 million YouTube subscribers while generating upwards of 6 billion views. Defy Media, which manages the Smosh channel and its sister channels, has been <a href="https://blogs.wsj.com/cmo/2015/06/16/smosh-debuts-new-youtube-cast-before-first-movie-even-releases/">preparing for this day for a while,</a> said president Keith Richman.He likened Padilla's departure to cast members leaving "Saturday Night Live.""About four years ago, we came together as a company and said, 'what are steps we need to take to make the brand live way beyond the people that founded it?" Richman said.Besides adding new shows and talent, Padilla and Hecox have increasingly taken on behind the scenes roles on projects, for example."The goal is to be able to have a brand that is permanent and long lasting," said Richman. "Most people haven't' been able to do this."Indeed, there haven't been a ton of examples of YouTube productions outliving their founders. The demands of the video blogging format can lead to burnout. And <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/most-popular-youtuber-stars-salaries-2017">many stars</a> are hard to replace. For instance, when the YouTube star Phil DeFranco decided to leave his channel, <a href="http://www.tubefilter.com/2017/03/20/discovery-group-nine-media-philip-defranco-sourcefed-shutter/">the channel was eventually shut down. </a>In the case of Smosh, the parting appears amicable. "I'm so sad to see this chapter of my life coming to a close, but I will continue to support Ian and wish nothing but the best for him and the brand we created together." said Padilla in a statement. He didn't say what he'll be doing next. <h3>NOW WATCH: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/should-i-take-advil-or-tylenol-2017-5">The main differences between Advil, Tylenol, Aleve, and Aspirin summed up</a></h3> Please enable Javascript to watch this video

One of the founders of the hugely popular YouTube comedy duo Smosh is leaving

<div class="KonaFilter image-container display-table float_right"><div><div class="image on-image">Wikia/Smosh</div></div></div>With 38 million subscribers, the YouTube comedy series Smosh is a phenom.But Smosh's stars didn't always have it easy.When Smosh wanted to expand with more videos, more channels, and more people beyond its famous cofounders Ian Andrew Hecox and Anthony Padilla, it hired Mariko Takahashi (or "Mari" to her fans), and launched Smosh Pit Weekly.It's a weekly show that recapped various images, videos, and articles found on the Smosh Pit blog on the Smosh website.And the reaction was brutally hard on her, her boss Barry Blumberg told attendees at Business Insider's Ignition 2015 conference in New York on Wednesday. Blumberg is chief content officer of Defy Media, the media company that owns Smosh and more than a dozen <a href="http://www.defymedia.com/our-brands/">other entertainment brands.</a>"Every day for a year, she cried when she read the YouTube comments," Blumberg said. "The comments were racist (she's Asian) and sexist (she's a girl)," he said.<div class="KonaFilter image-container display-table float_right"><div><div class="image on-image">Busienss Insider/Michael SetoSmosh creators Ian Andrew Hecox, Anthony Padilla</div></div></div>Hecox and Padilla told her to simply ignore the YouTube comments. To stop reading them. Her bosses liked her and liked the show. "We made like 300 episodes," Blumberg said. She also joined the cast of another show, Smosh Games. "And now she's one of the biggest stars on Smosh Games and one of the people fans get the most excited to see," Blumberg said.Moral of the story: The internet is full of mean people. Don't listen to them and don't let the naysayers chase you away from what you love to do. <div class="margin-top"> <h3>NOW WATCH: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/video-of-a-toddler-remote-controlling-a-truck-2015-12">Watch a gigantic truck remote controlled by a toddler barrel through a construction site</a></h3> <div> <div> <div class="ooyala-video-player" data-video-autoplay="false" data-video-id="I3ZGhleTrU-Ka6yQtxfofYiEIy9-Fi3g" data-player-variable="ooyalapopvideo" id="ooyalaplayer_popvideo" style="width:1280px;height:720px"></div> </div> </div> </div>

When Smosh star Mari Takahashi started out, YouTube comments were so cruel they made her cry

<div class="KonaFilter image-container float_right"><div class="image on-image"></div></div>Supporters of embattled Sweet Briar College <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/sweet-briar-college-will-stay-open-2015-6">seemed to score a massive victory this weekend</a>, as an agreement to keep the college open at least one more year <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/sweet-briar-college-deal-seems-to-confirm-mismanagement-2015-6">thwarted an earlier decision to close the 114-year-old women's college</a> this summer.But the deal most likely won't mean the college will stay open after that year, according to Ronald G. Ehrenberg, who heads Cornell University's Higher <keyword id="6355445" type="COMPANY" weightage="100" keywordseo="Education">Education</keyword> Research Institute."[T]he new president and board face a very hard road because the finances are still very perilous, many of the existing students have already made plans to transfer to other institutions, and it is unlikely that they will be able to attract a large first year class," he told Busienss Insider in an email message.The deal to save the school - reached between the school's leadership, activist alumnae, and Virginia's attorney general - gives Sweet Briar at least $12 million raised by an alumnae group called "Saving Sweet Briar," as well as $16 million that will be unlocked from the college's endowment by Virginia AG Mark Herring.The agreement also stipulates that the majority of the board will step down, as will <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/sweet-briar-college-president-james-f-jones-jr-explains-why-school-is-closing-2015-3">Sweet Briar president James F. Jones</a>.While this may look like an overall win for the various parties who have been fighting to keep Sweet Briar alive, the new leadership still faces significant challenges. Here's more from Ehrenberg, who said he's "very pessimistic" about the long-term future of the college:It is wonderful that the attorney general has given the interested alumni group and a new board that opportunity to keep the school open. It is wonderful that he also has removed the restrictions that were on much of the endowment to allow more of the endowment to be used for general current operations. But the new president and board face a very hard road because the finances are still very perilous, many of the existing students have already made plans to transfer to other institutions, and it is unlikely that they will be able to attract a large first year class. Similarly some faculty have already left and given that it appears from news stories that they will not make commitments to hire faculty back until August, one might expect that they will lose some others also. I wish the institution well but I am very pessimistic about its long-run future.Sweet Briar's new leadership - which will likely be headed up by former Bridgewater College president Philip Stone - has a hard path ahead. The very real problems that faced the college before the decision to close was announced in March may have gotten even worse in the past few months.For example, <a href="https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/06/22/what-case-sweet-briar-means-other-colleges">Inside Higher Ed has a good breakdown</a> of Sweet Briar's troubling enrollment numbers:Sweet Briar had an undergraduate enrollment of about 561 students in the academic year that just ended. Since then, 134 have graduated and another 231 have requested final transcripts, an indicator that they have transferred to another institution, or plan to. The college did not admit students for a new freshman class. The upcoming class is likely to be small.Whatever happens in the college's future, one thing seems clear from this weekend's agreement. <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/sweet-briar-college-deal-seems-to-confirm-mismanagement-2015-6">Sweet Briar's departing leadership did not do enough to save the school</a>. <div class="margin-top"> <h3>NOW WATCH: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/mark-cuban-college-system-trouble-loans-debt-2015-5">Mark Cuban has a brilliant strategy to get the best college degree for less money</a></h3> <div> <div> <div class="ooyala-video-player" data-video-autoplay="false" data-video-id="83b3FhdTqNxb7mgEehPDqKtpf33lmJSW" data-player-variable="ooyalapopvideo" id="ooyalaplayer_popvideo" style="width:1280px;height:720px"></div> </div> </div> </div>

Here's why the embattled 114-year-old college that was just saved may die soon anyway

<div class="KonaFilter image-container display-table float_right"><div><div class="image on-image">REUTERS/Carlos BarriaPresident Donald Trump on Air Force One.</div></div></div>President Donald Trump's <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-muslim-immigrants-2015-12">past comments</a> about a "Muslim ban" and the <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/a-federal-judge-issued-a-stay-on-trumps-executive-order-immigration-ban-2017-1">hasty rollout of his immigration order</a> targeting seven Muslim-majority countries may undermine the government's legal arguments for upholding the order, <keyword id="6355470" type="CITY" weightage="60" keywordseo="Law">law</keyword> experts say.Legal challenges to presidential executive orders are almost always "an automatic win" for the government, William Stock, president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told Business Insider on Wednesday. But the lawsuits against Trump's immigration order seem to be an exception for two major reasons, Stock said. "The first is 12 months worth of statements about a 'Muslim ban.' The second is the president's habitual mistatements of facts and statistics that I really think have caused the court to look upon his claims about the national security imperative for this order with great skepticism."The Trump administration has insisted that the "extreme vetting" order signed by Trump in late January does not amount to a "Muslim ban." Lawyers and civil rights organizations have argued that the ban violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment by "explicitly disapproving of one religion and implicitly preferring others."<div class="KonaFilter image-container display-table"><div><div class="image on-image">Reuters/Laura BuckmanA woman in an American flag hijab chants with other protesters against the travel ban imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order, at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport in Dallas, Texas, U.S. January 28, 2017.</div></div></div>In December 2015, Trump called for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States," and former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, who advised the Trump campaign, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9GKL6i38pI&amp;sns=tw">told Fox</a> last week Trump called him and asked <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/giuliani-trump-asked-me-how-to-do-a-muslim-ban-legally-2017-1">how to do a "Muslim ban" "legally."</a>Those comments could hurt the government's case in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, experts say, where lawyers from the states of Washington and Minnesota are arguing, among other things, that Trump's intention in signing the order was to ban a particular religious group - Muslims - from the US, and is therefore unconstitutional."Those statements are definitely relevant, because there's a longstanding doctrine that there can be laws or executive orders that on their face don't discriminative on the basis of race or religion but that is their motive -- and if that is their motive, they can be struck down," Ilya Somin, a George Mason University law professor,<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/06/politics/trump-muslim-ban-travel-lawsuit/"> told CNN on Tuesday</a>.August Flentje, who argued the government's case for the Department of Justice (DOJ), has not disputed that Trump and Giuliani made made those statements. He argued, however, that "it is extraordinary for a court to enjoin the president's national security decision based on some newspaper articles." <div class="KonaFilter image-container display-table"><div><div class="image on-image">Stephen Lam/GettyDemonstrators hold signs during a rally against a ban on Muslim immigration at San Francisco International Airport on January 28, 2017 in San Francisco, California.</div></div></div>It is unclear whether the comments will be enough to ensure victory for the plaintiffs. Because the ban does not explicitly mention "Islam" or "Muslims," it may be shielded from legal challenges arguing that it violates the Constitution's guarantees of religious freedom and due process.Michael McConnell, the director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School and a former Circuit Judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, said that "evidence of subjective bad motivations" on the part of the executive might not be enough to question an otherwise "neutral" government action. "The general principle is that government action that is neutral and nondiscriminatory cannot be impugned because of evidence of subjective bad motivations on the part of legislators (or in this case, the executive)," McConnell said in an email. "There are some establishment clause cases to the contrary, but the establishment clause does not apply to actions taken abroad in relation to other nations."<h2>Recourse in a hasty rollout</h2>The speed with which the order was drafted and rolled out, largely bypassing the government's national security apparatus, may factor into the court's decision, experts say.Reports emerged in the days after the order was signed that Department of Homeland Security staff members were allowed to see the order only after Trump signed it, and National Security Council lawyers were <a href="https://twitter.com/AriMelber/status/825514236784832512" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">prevented</a> from evaluating it. The State Department and the Department of Defense were also excluded from the process, <a href="https://twitter.com/ericgeller/status/825448574028804096">NBC reported</a>.Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said in <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/dhs-secretary-john-kelly-says-trump-order-not-muslim-ban-2017-1">a press conference late last month</a> that he knew the executive order "was coming" but would not comment on whether he saw the full document before Trump signed it."People on my staff were generally involved" in drafting the order, Kelly said, noting that he thought the order was "fairly clear."According to Stock ,of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, the administration's process has given the court reason enough to wonder if there was an "ulterior motive" at play. <div class="KonaFilter image-container display-table"><div><div class="image on-image">Associated Press/Reed SaxonHundreds of people opposed to President Donald Trump's executive orders barring entry to the U.S. of seven predominantly Muslim countries demonstrate at the Tom Bradley International Terminal at Los Angeles International Airport Saturday, Jan. 28, 2017.</div></div></div>"It's not too difficult to portray the policy as just being flat-out irrational," Temple University law professor Peter Spiro <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/06/politics/trump-muslim-ban-travel-lawsuit/">told CNN</a> on Monday. "There are lots of elements of the story that cast doubt on the efficacy of this law, the way in which it was adopted, whether it would advance any counter-terror objectives, it just all looks bad."Indeed, the courts are more likely to focus on whether there is "an adequate factual basis for singling out these specific countries as distinct sources of risk," Richard Pildes, a professor of Constitutional Law at NYU, told Busienss Insider in an email.Experts have noted that the countries included in the ban - Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen - seem arbitrary, and do not include countries that have posed serious terror threats in the past such as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates. The immigration order cites the September 11, 2001 terror attacks three times as justification for the ban, but the 9/11 hijackers were from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Lebanon - none of which were included on the list of banned countries.So far, the government has had difficulty proving that the seven targeted countries pose an elevated risk over others - and whether, as Stock put it, "something changed on January 20th that justified invalidating 60,000 legally issued visas."Judge Michelle T. Friedland, who was appointed by President Barack Obama and is one of three judges from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals presiding over the immigration ban case, asked Flentje, the DOJ lawyer, whether the government had any evidence connecting the seven nations targeted by the order to terrorism.Flentje replied that the record of the case, so far, does not include any such evidence."The proceedings have been moving very fast," he said. <div class="margin-top"> <h3>NOW WATCH: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/jake-tapper-donald-trump-interview-kellyanne-conway-cnn-murder-rate-terrorism-attack-2017-2">'It's a lie': Jake Tapper calls out Trump during a fiery interview with Kellyanne Conway</a></h3> <div> <div> <div class="ooyala-video-player" data-video-autoplay="false" data-video-id="Bkb29pOTE6DI53bUfdwru76-ARzZGZTg" data-player-variable="ooyalapopvideo" id="ooyalaplayer_popvideo" style="width:1280px;height:720px"></div> </div> </div> </div>

Trump may have undermined the legal case for his immigration ban in 2 major ways

<div class="image-container float_right" style="width:400px"><div class="image"></div><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Boris_Berezovsky.jpg">Wikimedia Commons</a></div>When exiled Russian Oligarch was found dead in his London home this weekend, speculation immediately turned to murder.
Violent death, after all, had followed Berezovsky throughout his adult life.
Berezovksy fell out of favor with the Kremlin shortly after <keyword id="43440" type="PERSON" weightage="60" keywordseo="Vladimir-Putin">Vladimir Putin</keyword> took power. President Boris Yeltsin stepped down in 1999, and Berezovsky, as one of Yeltsin's close advisors known as <a href="http://www.independent.ie/world-news/yeltsin-daughter-helped-plot-cabinet-sacking-26194411.html">the "Family"</a>, helped select Putin to succeed him.
It was an incredibly important decision for all of <keyword id="6358826" type="COUNTRY" weightage="60" keywordseo="Russia">Russia</keyword>'s super rich <keyword id="967282" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="Oligarchs">oligarchs</keyword>. They needed someone who could hold the country for capitalism as, towards the end of the Yeltsin administration, it was unclear whether or not the Communists would come back in to power, repossess all the companies that were privatized, and ruin the party for Russia's new elite (the oligarchs).
Berezovsky thought Putin was the man for the job, but <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/11/roman-abramovich-boris-berezovsky-feud-russia#">Vanity Fair</a> describes how their relationship soured about a year after Putin took office in 2000:
In August, a Russian nuclear submarine, the Kursk, sank off Russia’s Arctic coast; 118 men died, 28 of them likely as a result of bungled rescue efforts that the country watched unfold in real time. The tragedy became a public-relations disaster, in part because Berezovsky’s O.R.T. aired an audio recording of the president’s meeting with victims’ families, during which Putin lost his temper, lashing out at the families and at unnamed enemies. By this time, another oligarch and media magnate, Vladimir Gusinsky, had been jailed briefly and forced to leave the country—but only after signing his media assets over to a state-owned company. The same fate now seemed likely to befall Berezovsky.
In October 2000, the French newspaper Le Figaro published an interview with Putin in which he held forth on the oligarchs: “Generally, I don’t think that the State and the oligarchs are irreconcilable enemies. Rather, I think that the state is holding a big club in its hands, which it will use only once. To deliver a crushing blow on the head. We haven’t yet resorted to that club. We just picked it up—and that was enough to attract public attention. But if we get really angry, we will not hesitate to use it.”
Berezovsky read this interview at his vacation home in Cap d’Antibes, France. He took it as a direct threat—confirmed by a summons to present himself for interrogation—and decided not to return to Moscow. He has lived in exile ever since.
So Berezovsky lived to regret his role as King-maker. He used his estimated $3 billion fortune to bring down the Putin regime from his new home in London. <a href="http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1066222.html">He even admitted that openly to Reuters in 2006, </a>which prompted the British government to ask him to stop meddling in Russian affairs.
It was essentially a request for him to save his own life, as it was around this time that people with connections to Berezovsky started winding up dead.
The most famous of these mysterious deaths is the case of Russian spy, anti-Putin activist, and former KGB agent Alexander Litvinenko. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/9951385/Berezovsky-did-not-kill-himself-Litvinenkos-wife-says.html">In 2006 he was poisoned when radioactive polonium 210 was slipped into his tea.</a> U.S. and British officials had <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20061126112245/http://www.hpa.org.uk/hpa/news/articles/press_releases/2006/241106_litvinenko.htm">never seen anything like it.</a><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/9951385/Berezovsky-did-not-kill-himself-Litvinenkos-wife-says.html"> </a>
Litvinenko's wife, for what it's worth, told the Telegraph she does not believe Berezovsky killed himself, despite his depressed state at the end of his life.
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/9951385/Berezovsky-did-not-kill-himself-Litvinenkos-wife-says.html">From the Telegraph:</a>
"From my point of view it is not likely that he committed suicide," she said. "He had a lot of enemies. He was an outspoken person and never tried to hide what he thought.
"When I talked to him last he was a little recovered and I believed he would be better. He started to take interest and to ask about my son."
Another former KGB officer who met with with Litvinenko the day he was poisoned, Dmitry Kovtun, was also hospitalized after their meeting and had traces of polonium 210 in his system. Kotvun insisted Litvinenko poisoned him.
Then there's Yego Gaidar, a Russian economist that helped carry out the "loans for shares" program that made Berezovsky and other Russian oligarchs so rich. He was a Yeltsin man. The day after Litvinenko was poisoned, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8415441.stm">he collapsed on a book tour</a> and said he was poisoned as well. He died three years later of a blood clot.
Finally, Berezovsky's busienss partner Badri Patarkatsishvili was died in 2008. Patarkatsishvili was part of whatever deal Berezovsky made with Abramovich in 2004. Reports say that he died of a heart attack, but there are doubts.
<a href="http://www.standard.co.uk/news/the-dead-billionaire-and-the-kgb-poison-killer-6623008.html">From The Standard:</a>
Even if a post mortem reveals Patarkatsishvili died from a heart attack, if there is no evidence of long-term heart disease police inquiries are likely to continue. This is because a number of compounds known to be used by the former KGB can induce heart failure, but leave virtually no trace. One is sodium fluoroacetate, a fine white powder derived from pesticide.
It causes irregular heartbeat and breathing difficulties before a fatal heart attack. Patarkatsishvili had difficulty breathing a few hours before he died and left a meeting to go outside for fresh air.
In 2007 Scotland Yard intercepted a plot to kill Berezovsky in London and kicked the suspected hit man out of the UK.
So wouldn't you suspect some foul play here?

You Searched For "busienss" and got 6 results

A Georgia state employee wore a fake pregnancy belly to get paid maternity leave, according to officials

Stephen Jones

One of the founders of the hugely popular YouTube comedy duo Smosh is leaving

Mike Shields

When Smosh star Mari Takahashi started out, YouTube comments were so cruel they made her cry

Julie Bort

Here's why the embattled 114-year-old college that was just saved may die soon anyway

Peter Jacobs

Trump may have undermined the legal case for his immigration ban in 2 major ways

Natasha Bertrand

People All Around Exiled Oligarch Boris Berezovsky Have Wound Up Dead

Linette Lopez

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides