Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

Succeeding <keyword id="2501349" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="80" keywordseo="Justice-HL-Dattu">Justice HL Dattu</keyword>, Justice T S Thakur will become the next <keyword id="45053" type="POSITION" weightage="80" keywordseo="Chief-Justice-of-India">Chief Justice of India</keyword>. 
 
Justice Thakur, the senior-most judge of the apex court, will take over as the CJI after Justice Dattu retires on December 2. 
His name was recommended to the government by Justice Dattu on Monday, official sources said. 
 
After the law ministry clears the file of Justice Thakur's appointment, it would be sent to the Prime Minister's Office. His Warrant of Appointment will be issued when the President clears it. 
 
Justice Thakur, who would be the 43rd CJI, was born on January 4, 1952 and enrolled as a Pleader in October 1972. He began practising in the Jammu and Kashmir High Court and dealt with all types of matters, including civil, criminal, tax and Constitutional and service cases. 
He then joined the chamber of his father D D Thakur, an eminent advocate who became a judge of Jammu and Kashmir High Court and later a union minister. 
 
Justice Thakur, who was elevated as a judge of the <a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Supreme-Court" target="_blank">Supreme Court</a> and assumed charge on November 17, 2009, would have a tenure of little over one year. He would retire as CJ on January 4, 2017. 
 
63-year-old Justice Thakur headed the bench which had delivered the verdict in the IPL spot-fixing and betting scandal in January this year. 
Justice Thakur was designated as a senior advocate in 1990. On February 16, 1994, he was appointed as an additional judge of the J&amp;K High Court and transferred as a judge of the Karnataka High Court in March, 1994. 
 
He was appointed as a permanent judge in September 1995 and transferred to Delhi High Court in July 2004. 
 
Justice Thakur was appointed as acting Chief Justice of Delhi High Court on April 9, 2008 and on August 11, 2008, he took over as Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. 
 
Image credit: Indiatimes

Justice TS Thakur to become the next Chief Justice of India

The honourable Supreme Court has hinted that it could disallow <keyword id="102342" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="100" keywordseo="Public-Interest-Litigations">public interest litigations</keyword> (PILs) that involve commercial interests so that proxy corporate wars from can be prevented in the court. 
 
In the past, PILs have resulted in historic court orders that left considerable business impacts, for example group cancellation of telecom spectrum and coal block allocations. 
 After it disallows commercial interest PILs, the court might restrict its dealing to selective PILs, which would be selected after a rigorous scrutiny process. The decision was hinted at by a three-judge bench, including Chief Justice TS Thakur and Justices AK Sikri and R Banumathi. The bench was hearing a petition on the acquisition of <keyword id="2285630" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="100" keywordseo="Infotel-Telecom">Infotel Telecom</keyword> by Reliance Industries. 
 
"In the next phase of development (in PILs), we must ensure that that the process is not abused, only used in the fittest of cases. It must be an institutional mechanism," Justice Thakur told ET. 
 
He further suggested that a credible interface between the judicial process and the civil society is needed. 
 "How do we prevent misuse of the judicial process to settle scores, commercial rivalries," the CJI asked <keyword id="6368850" type="PERSON" weightage="100" keywordseo="Prashant-Bhushan">Prashant Bhushan</keyword>, the advocate for the petitioner, NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL). 
 
"You must satisfy us that the information, that your process of verifying information which comes to you, must be credible. We won't allow the process to be taken for a ride," Justice Thakur told Bhushan after he told the court that the NGO had so far filed 50 cases. 
 
"We must be convinced that your petition is genuine. Otherwise (Harish) Salve (who appeared for Reliance) will say you are settlings scores," the CJI said. The case has been reserved by the court for the final order. 
 
Bhushan, on the other hand, said that public interest is a hige factor in deciding whether or not to file a case in court, and that commercial interest might be incidental. 
 
To this, the CJI rejected the view and said, "When so much time is spent on them (such cases) and litigation costs are so high, we must devise ways to keep out commercial fights and business rivalries. We may end up spending precious time to only draw a blank." 
 
<a href="http://legaltrigger.com/images/5052261194.jpg">Image source</a>

PILs with commercial interest might be disallowed, hints the Supreme Court

As the New Year arrives, millions of Delhi residents are warming up to the radical changes they have to bring in their daily commuting in the world's most polluted capital. 
 
However, the Delhi High Court today has asked <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=Arvind+Kejriwal+">Arvind Kejriwal </a>to offer an explanation why women and two-wheelers are exempt from the policy. 
 
Since 1st January, the Delhi government will only allow cars with odd-numbered licence plates to drive on odd-numbered dates. The rule would be in place from 8am to 8pm every day except Sunday. The trail will run for an initial two-week period. However, the government has said that it will consider longer-term implementation as well. 
 
Some have dismissed the idea. "They will only be cheating themselves with 'jugaad'. There is no magic button that will make the pollution disappear. We must act now," said <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=Delhi+Transport">Delhi Transport</a> Minister Gopal Rai to news agency AFP. 
 
Chief Justice Of India <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=TS+Thakur">TS Thakur</a> will willingly follow the policy despite being exempted. 
 
Image credit: Indiatimes

Court
asks Delhi CM why women and two-wheelers exempt From Odd-Even policy

The <keyword id="6354977" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="100" keywordseo="Supreme-Court">Supreme Court</keyword> has lifted the ban it had imposed on the registration of large diesel-powered vehicles in Delhi and NCR, after automakers offered to pay a 1% environment protection charge on every car that gets registered in the region. 
 
The ban was imposed on the registration of passenger vehicles having engines with 2 litres and more capacity in last December, so that the rising air pollution could be controlled. 
 
"Let (the environment protection charge of) 1% come. Pollution is now under control," said an SC bench comprising Chief Justice TS Thakur and Justices AK Sikri and R Banumathi. 
 
The companies will be paying 1% charge on the vehicle's ex-showroom price, excluding local levies and insurance cost. The rate can be modified or removed later, and could also be imposed on vehicles having less than 2-litre engines. 
 
<a href="http://quintype-01.imgix.net/thequint/2016-01/7433c2f5-333d-44bc-a591-62dacc9f919f/delhi-traffic-reuters.jpg">Image source</a>

Supreme Court lifts ban on large diesel vehicles’ registration in Delhi, NCR

<keyword id="6354756" type="CITY" weightage="100" keywordseo="BCCI">BCCI</keyword>, the Board of Control for Cricket in India, had claimed to act as an association, but the claim has been rejected by the <keyword id="75952" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="100" keywordseo="Supreme-Court-of-India">Supreme Court of India</keyword>. It added that the board, which is a monopoly holding full sway over the game of cricket, can’t at the same time claim the right to be a free private association under Article 19 (1) of the Constitution with no concomitant obligations. 
 
A special bench comprising Chief Justice of India TS Thakur and Justice FMI Kalifullah said that the BCCI and its member associations should fall in line with the recommendations made by Justice Lodha committee. 
 
However, on behalf of member associations of the BCCI, advocates Kapil Sibal and Arvind P Datar have opposed the idea of one association, one vote, as was proposed by the Lodha panel. 
 
"You are discharging a public duty. In doing so, can you discriminate? You have full sway over cricket in the country. You also seem to have some kind of state patronage, otherwise the state would have regulated you," Justice Thakur said. 
 
The CJI had said this after Datar had argued for the Tamil Nadu Cricket Association's right to conduct its own affairs, acting as a free association. 
 
"No one can play cricket without being on the BCCI's right hand side. You have a monopoly. You also have a full sway over membership," Justice Thakur said. 
 
He said, "You are not giving up this right to control cricket. You are insisting that you can select team India, the Ranji teams. In that case can you say I will only associate with one body and not the other? Can you say I will take in one association and not the other? You have to let everyone in and give them equal opportunities." 
 
The CJI also added that the Lodha panel measures don’t suggest any restriction of the rights of the BCCI or its member associations, but in fact, they were only proposals to open up membership to more regions and people. 
 
"Cricket is a game of glamour. Every other youngster is aspiring to become Dhonis and Kohlis. The associations must also fall in line and accept these reforms," he said. 
 
Moreover, the CJI added that even the International Cricket Council had a one nation, one vote policy. "Sri Lanka is just the half of Delhi. Don't you think in ICC regardless of population, different countries have one vote? If it can work with the international body can't it work for BCCI?" he said. 
 
<a href="http://www.clipper28.com/images/Sep_2015/24-09-2015/sc-or-bcci.jpg">Image source</a>

BCCI can’t claim to act as an association, says the Supreme Court of India

<keyword id="4637" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="100" keywordseo="Sahara">Sahara</keyword> chief <keyword id="31933" type="PERSON" weightage="100" keywordseo="Subrata-Roy">Subrata Roy</keyword>'s lawyers have moved the <keyword id="6354977" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="100" keywordseo="Supreme-Court">Supreme Court</keyword>, seeking a deal room in <keyword id="56350" type="PERSON" weightage="100" keywordseo="Tihar-jail">Tihar jail</keyword> to help Roy raise the amount of Rs 10,000 set by the court as a condition for his bail. The room would be used negotiate business deals. 
 
An application regarding this request was moved by senior advocate KTS Tulsi before a bench headed by Justice TS Thakur. 
 
"He has to deal with people in five different time zones. Some of the potential buyers and lenders want to meet before submitting their financials," Tulsi said. "These would be facilities outside the jail but within the complex." 
 
According to the application by Sahara, the "applicants... appeal to shift them from barrack no. 3 of Tihar jail to an out-house in the Tihar jail premises so that they can enter into effective and fruitful negotiations with prospective buyers, lenders for the sale, encumbrance of domestic and three overseas properties of the group companies."

Subrata Roy Demands Deal Room At Tihar

<keyword id="31906" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="Sahara-group">Sahara Group</keyword>'s corporate group head <keyword id="31933" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Subrata-Roy">Subrata Roy</keyword>, who has been lodge in Tihar Jail since March 24, has moved the <keyword id="6354977" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="Supreme-Court">Supreme Court</keyword> on Tuesday to seek urgent medical help to arrest his deteriorating health condition. 
 
The 66-year-old has been jailed for not complying with the apex court's August 31, 2012 directions to return an amount of Rs 24,000 crore to its 3 crore investors with interest through market regulator SEBI. 
 Mentioning the matter before a bench led by Justice TS Thakur, senior advocate Sidharth Luthra informed the court that Subrata Roy was suffering from <keyword id="24294" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="20" keywordseo="high-blood-pressure">high blood pressure</keyword> (BP), which could further lead to a stroke. 
 
It is important to note, the income tax department had seized Rs 137 crore in cash from Sahara offices in Delhi and Noida during raids on Monday. 
 
Earlier, the court had granted bail to Roy on the condition that he deposits Rs 10,000 crore as part payment of the total amount due from Sahara Housing and Sahara Real Estate. The two Sahara firms were found to have illegally raised the money from three crore small investors through one-time fully convertible debentures (OFCDs). 
 
Notably, the bench told Luthra that it would hear the application on Wednesday, and pass appropriate directions to the Tihar jail authorities provided the plea was filed in the registry in proper form. 
 
The Sahara group is planning to file fresh application seeking Roy's release on medical grounds, as per media reports.

You Searched For "Justice TS Thakur" and got 7 results

Justice TS Thakur to become the next Chief Justice of India

BI India Bureau

PILs with commercial interest might be disallowed, hints the Supreme Court

BI India Bureau

Court asks Delhi CM why women and two-wheelers exempt From Odd-Even policy

BI India Bureau

Supreme Court lifts ban on large diesel vehicles’ registration in Delhi, NCR

BI India Bureau

BCCI can’t claim to act as an association, says the Supreme Court of India

BI India Bureau

Subrata Roy Demands Deal Room At Tihar

BI India Bureau

Sahara Chief Subrata Roy Moves Supreme Court To Seek Urgent Medical Help

BI India Bureau

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides