Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday issued notice to <keyword id="1996659" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="20" keywordseo="Delhi-chief-minister-Arvind-Kejriwal">Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal</keyword> and five other AAP leaders in a defamation suit filed by <keyword id="6391015" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="20" keywordseo="Finance-Minister-Arun-Jaitley">Finance Minister Arun Jaitley</keyword>. 
 
The court sought replies from Kejriwal, Kumar Vishwas, Raghav Chadha, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai by February 5, 2016. 
 
Jaitley has sought Rs.10 crore in damages following the AAP leaders' statements on alleged Delhi and District Cricket Association irregularities. 
 
Jaitley also filed a criminal defamation complaint in a Patiala House court, saying that the statements of these leaders would cause "irreversible damage" to his reputation. 
 
Jaitley headed the DDCA for 13 years till 2013. 
 
Kejriwal has demanded that Jaitley must resign or be removed as union minister to enable free and fair probe into the DDCA issue. 
 
(Image: Indiatimes)

DDCA row: Delhi HC notice to Kejriwal, others in defamation suit

<ul class="summary-list"><li>A jury on Monday rejected <keyword id="13654822" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="blac-chyna" source="Orion">Blac Chyna</keyword>'s defamation claims against the Kardashian-Jenner family.</li><li>The Los Angeles jury sided with Kris Jenner, Kim Kardashian, Khloé Kardashian, and Kylie Jenner.</li></ul>A Los Angeles jury on Monday rejected defamation and contract-interference-damage claims against members of the Kardashian-Jenner family after nearly two days of deliberation.The decision brought the 11-day trial to a close following testimony from <a href="https://www.insider.com/kris-jenner-gets-weepy-over-guns-while-testifying-in-blac-chyna-trial-2022-4">several members</a> of the <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/international/news/kylie-jenner-and-khloe-kardashian-sent-emails-to-e-executives-expressing-concern-that-blac-chyna-was-hurting-rob-kardashian-and-the-credibility-of-their-brand/articleshow/91087949.cms">famous family</a> and scores of <a href="https://www.insider.com/sensational-moments-from-first-week-kardashian-and-blac-chyna-trial-2022-4">sensational courtroom moments</a>.Chyna, whose legal name is Angela White, <a href="https://www.insider.com/kris-jenner-called-blac-chyna-stupid-ghetto-lawyers-claim-2022-4">was seeking $100 million in damages</a> from Kris Jenner, Kim Kardashian, Khloé Kardashian, and Kylie Jenner, alleging that they unfairly trash-talked her to E! executives five years ago following her split with Rob Kardashian and that it led to the cancellation of their "Keeping Up With The <keyword id="11939470" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="kardashians" source="Orion">Kardashians</keyword>" spin-off series, "Rob &amp; Chyna."While the jury found that none of the Kardashian-Jenners were liable for any damages, jurors also conceded that some of the family members did interfere with Chyna's economic opportunities. The Kardashian-Jenners denied Chyna's allegations, and each woman took the stand along with Rob Kardashian, forming a united front. The reality-TV stars sat in the front row of the courtroom each day dressed in designer suits with a security detail in tow. Blac Chyna was present in the courtroom when the verdict was read. The Kardashian-Jenner family was not present — their attorney Michael G. Rhodes said his clients "<a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=&amp;cad=rja&amp;uact=8&amp;ved=2ahUKEwjC_Obfl8L3AhX1I0QIHX4GBDYQvOMEKAB6BAgPEAE&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.insider.com%2Fkardashian-jenners-ditch-blac-chyna-verdict-for-met-gala-2022-5&amp;usg=AOvVaw1Bf7IyQYGN3HOTyw14Iut_">were all in New York at some gala</a>."The jury was asked 70 detailed questions on a 13-page special verdict form viewed by Insider, and it delivered its verdict at about 3:30 p.m. PT after nearly two full days of deliberations.<h2>Mixed feelings, but clarity on damages</h2>Jurors answered a complex set of questions as part of the verdict. Among their decisions was that Kris Jenner, Kylie Jenner, and Kim Kardashian did not "act reasonably and in good faith" to protect their economic interests in their dealings with Chyna on their TV shows and, in the case of Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner, as executive producers on "Rob &amp; Chyna."When asked whether Kylie Jenner or Khloé Kardashian was "justified with respect to Angela White's contractual relationship with the E! network," jurors agreed that the sisters' actions — which included texting and emailing studio executives about their disapproval of "Rob &amp; Chyna" — weren't justified.Chyna's attorney Lynne Ciani described the no-damages verdict Monday as a "victory" on two fronts, saying the jury had "found that Chyna had not physically abused Rob Kardashian" and that the jury had found the defendants had "intentionally interfered with her contract with the E! network."But ultimately, jurors agreed that the Kardashian-Jenner women had grounds to believe that Chyna physically abused Rob Kardashian, and 11 out of 12 jurors answered that Chyna was not entitled to any damages for her claims in the suit.Chyna didn't answer questions as she left the courtroom.<h2>A 'clear cut' case</h2>Outside the Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Rhodes said his team believed the case was "very clear cut," adding that "the jury got it and the judge did a wonderful job making sure it was a fair trial."Rhodes said the Kardashian defendants, who were attending the Met Gala in New York, were "emphatic in their expression of pleasure. I hope that they're enjoying the gala."Monday afternoon's decision came after a <a href="https://www.insider.com/no-verdict-after-1st-day-of-deliberations-blac-chyna-kardashians-2022-4">full day of deliberations on Friday</a>, which began <a href="https://www.insider.com/judge-dismisses-blac-chynas-defamation-claim-against-kim-kardashian-2022-4">with a tense exchange</a> between Ciani and the presiding judge, Gregory W. Alarcon, over instructions read to the jury on Thursday. Ciani said she wasn't given the opportunity to argue the jury instructions before their presentation while Alarcon fervently rejected her claims.Cianni told reporters that Chyna's team would appeal the decision.The jury instructions included several text messages and emails from the defendants that Chyna's team spent the trial arguing were defamatory. The final instructions, however, didn't include text messages from Kim Kardashian, leading Rhodes to request on Thursday that the judge drop the defamation claim against her.<a href="https://www.insider.com/judge-dismisses-blac-chynas-defamation-claim-against-kim-kardashian-2022-4">Alarcon ultimately issued a direct verdict on the matter</a> Friday morning, arguing in a decision obtained by Insider that Chyna's team failed to establish a defamatory statement made by Kim Kardashian and provided "no basis" to demonstrate that she played a "responsible part" in the publication of any defamatory statement.The jury was still tasked with determining whether the other three women made defamatory comments about Chyna to E! Network executives as well as whether Kris Jenner, Kim Kardashian, Khloé Kardashian, and Kylie Jenner interfered with a second season of "Rob &amp; Chyna," which never materialized. Throughout the trial, several network executives testified that there could be no season two of the reality series because the real-life couple had split so acrimoniously that they could barely stand to be in the same room. In a particularly damning piece of testimony last week, Walter Mosley, Chyna's former attorney who was called as a witness on her behalf, also <a href="https://www.insider.com/blac-chynas-ex-attorney-no-production-notice-s2-rob-chyna-2022-4">testified that the network had never officially picked up the show's second season</a>.A separate case involving <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/rob-kardashian-blac-chyna-instagram-attack-2017-7">nude photos Rob Kardashian posted</a> of Chyna following their breakup in early 2017 is still being litigated.

Jury rules in favor of Kardashian-Jenners after Blac Chyna brought a defamation lawsuit against the family

<a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=nitin+gadkari">Union Transport Minister Nitin Gadkari</a> on Friday slammed Nehru-Gandhi dynasty scion <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=rahul+gandhi">Rahul Gandhi</a> for making an insulting comment against External Affairs Minister <keyword id="6355111" type="PERSON" weightage="100" keywordseo="Sushma-Swaraj">Sushma Swaraj</keyword> and asked him to apologise. 
 
Gadkari also threatened Congress party vice-president, Rahul Gandhi, of defamation suit. 
 
Gandhi, while launching a scathing attack on Swaraj over <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=lalit+modi">Lalit Modi row</a>, accused Swaraj of committing a crime. 
 
“<a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=sushma+swaraj">Sushma</a><a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=sushma+swaraj"> Swaraj</a> is a minister who the whole country knows has done a criminal act. When you do a criminal act, you go to jail. The foreign minister of India going around ... and saying please release this man. The CM of Rajasthan has done that. This is against the law," he said while addressing mediapersons. 
 He also attacked Rajasthan Chief Minister <keyword id="6361795" type="PERSON" weightage="100" keywordseo="Vasundhara-Raje">Vasundhara Raje</keyword> and demanded Swaraj’s and Raje’s resignation. 
 
Both the BJP leaders are accused of assisting former <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=IPL">IPL</a> chief Lalit Modi with travel documents and an immigration application. 
 
"This is a very insensitive and insulting comment against a foreign minister. He should apologise in person and take back his words. Gandhi's charges of corruption had no basis. She has not violated any law, nor has she misused her office,” Gadkari told the media. 
 
Meanwhile, the day 3 of the Monsoon Session was yet again adjourned. 
 
<a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=BJP">BJP</a> moved a privilege notice in Lok Sabha against <a href="http://www.businessinsider.in/searchresult.cms?query=robert+vadra">Robert Vadra</a> for a recent Facebook post that said, "Parliament begins and so do their petty diversionary tactics...People of India are not fool(s). Regret to see India led by such so-called leaders." In response to comments on his post, he added, "We need to win over this kind of dictatorship and intrusion in a democratic India. Have nothing to hide, so will continue to fight till they stop falsely accusing me." 
 
BJP MPs submitted notices of privilege, demanding that Vadra be punished and reprimanded for his post.

Apologise to Sushma Swaraj or face defamation suit, Gadkari warns Rahul Gandhi

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Lindell sold a luxury plane while facing the possibility of losing a billion-dollar defamation suit.</li><li>Federal Aviation Administration records show an aircraft registered to MyPillow was sold on July 26.</li><li>Lindell on August 25 made another attempt to get the <keyword id="11940347" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="dominion" source="Orion">Dominion</keyword> Voting Systems' suit dismissed.</li></ul>MyPillow CEO <keyword id="11916985" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="mike-lindell" source="Orion">Mike Lindell</keyword> sold a 10-seat luxury aircraft this summer while he tangled with a billion-dollar defamation lawsuit filed against him by <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/everyone-dominion-smartmatic-suing-defamation-election-conspiracy-theories-2021-2">Dominion Voting Systems</a>. According to an exclusive report by <a href="https://www.salon.com/2021/09/01/mike-lindells-meltdown-begins-he-recently-sold-a-mypillow-plane-to-fund-dominion-lawsuit/">Salon</a>, MyPillow sold off a 1993 Dassault-Breguet Falcon 50 with tail number N497SP this July. <a href="https://registry.faa.gov/AircraftInquiry/Search/NNumberResult?nNumberTxt=497SP">Federal Aviation Administration records</a> show that Lindell <a href="https://flightaware.com/resources/registration/N497SP">transferred the jet's ownership to an entity called Clyde Air LLC</a> on July 26.The address of Clyde Air LLC at <a href="https://opengovus.com/boston-property/0302961176">10 Rowes Wharf in Boston</a>, points to a potential buyer being the investor <a href="https://www.crunchbase.com/person/frank-selldorff">Frank Selldorff</a>, the CEO and founder of the investing firm <a href="https://www.momentumequity.com/">Momentum Equity Partners</a> and the <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/company/1318635D:US">consulting firm Meteorix</a>. It is not known how much Lindell sold the three-engine plane for, but a <a href="https://globalaeroexport.com/1993-dassault-falcon-50.html">similar plane</a> is on the market for a cool $2.5 million. Selldorff did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Insider. Josh Merritt, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/sidney-powells-secret-source-spider-is-actually-an-it-consultant-2020-12">an IT consultant hired by Lindell</a> to look at what the MyPillow CEO claimed was evidence that the 2020 election was stolen, told Salon the plane was sold to help build Lindell's war chest for the Dominion lawsuit. Lindell sold the plane "because he's needing money," Merritt told Salon. "He just started raising money for the lawsuit by Dominion." Lindell did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Insider on his reason for selling the plane. The MyPillow CEO is facing <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/dominion-sues-mypillow-ceo-mike-lindell-election-fraud-claims-voting-2021-2">a $1.3 billion lawsuit filed against him by Dominion Voting Systems</a>, which alleges that he promoted false conspiracy theories about the voting machine maker's role in the 2020 presidential election. Lindell attempted to have the <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/dominion-voting-systems-machines-mike-lindell-giuliani-election-conspiracy-theory-2021-2">defamation</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/mike-lindell-mypillow-responds-experts-may-lose-dominion-defamation-lawsuit-2021-2">lawsuit</a> dismissed <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/judge-weighs-dismissing-dominion-lawsuits-against-rudy-giuliani-sidney-powell-mike-lindell-mypillow-2021-6">during a hearing in June</a>. But in August, Lindell's request was dismissed by a federal judge, who <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.225699/gov.uscourts.dcd.225699.45.0.pdf">noted</a> that the First Amendment offered "no blanket immunity" to Lindell in the Dominion lawsuit.Lindell was <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/mike-lindell-ran-off-stage-cyber-symposium-dominions-lawsuit-proceed-2021-8">spotted running off the stage</a> during his <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/my-pillow-mike-lindell-offers-5-million-disprove-voter-fraud-2021-7">marathon 72-hour Sioux Falls</a> <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/08/11/cybersecurity-202-my-pillow-cyber-symposium-is-yet-another-font-election-fraud-lies/">cyber symposium</a> at the same time that <keyword id="11893589" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="100" keywordseo="news" source="Orion">news</keyword> broke that the defamation suit against him would proceed in full. MyPillow and Lindell <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/mypillow-tries-to-get-dominion-defamation-lawsuit-dismissed-again-2021-8">made another attempt to get the case dismissed on August 24.</a> They are now asking whether an appellate court will reconsider the legal framework allowing Dominion to go ahead with its lawsuits against Lindell and the pro-Trump lawyers <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/sydney-powell-defense-in-dominion-lawsuit-used-against-her-michigan-2021-4">Sidney Powell</a> and <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/dominion-sues-rudy-giuliani-13-billion-over-election-fraud-claim-2021-1">Rudy Giuliani</a>.

Mike Lindell sold a MyPillow private plane to raise funds for his $1.3 billion Dominion Voting Systems defamation lawsuit: report

<ul class="summary-list"><li>A <keyword id="12087753" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="ucla" source="Orion">UCLA</keyword> <keyword id="11905871" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="professor" source="Orion">professor</keyword> was suspended last year after he refused to grade Black students leniently amid <keyword id="12188731" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="blm" source="Orion">BLM</keyword> protests.</li><li>Klein responded to the request sarcastically, and students petitioned to have him fired.</li></ul>A UCLA professor has filed a lawsuit against the school after he was briefly suspended last year over his <a href="https://www.insider.com/ucla-professor-student-blm-protest-gordon-klein-racist-response-leave-2020-6">refusal to grade black students more leniently</a> amid nationwide Black Lives Matter protests.Gordon Klein, who is an accounting lecturer at the UCLA Anderson School of Management, wrote in a <a href="https://bariweiss.substack.com/p/why-i-am-suing-ucla">blog post </a>that he believed his suspension was a "well-timed publicity stunt" to distract from the school's reputation as "an inhospitable place for persons of color." The UCLA Anderson School of Management is a prestigious graduate business school, which recently <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/best-mba-programs-in-the-world-2020-9?r=US&amp;IR=TIR=T">ranked 15th</a> in a Global MBA Ranking, Insider reported.In the blog post, Klein said that in June of last year a non-Black student wrote to him to ask for him to grade his Black students with a "no harm" policy, meaning the results should only be counted if it boosted a student's grade.The student went on to refer to recent events including the killings of Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and George Floyd and the COVID-19 pandemic, which they said had disproportionately affected the Black community."As we approach finals week, we recognize that these conditions place Black students at an unfair academic disadvantage due to traumatic circumstances out of their control," the student said.Klein said he believed the email was "deeply patronizing and offensive" to Black students, and he penned a sarcastic reply.He said: "Are there any students that may be of mixed parentage, such as half black half-Asian? What do you suggest I do with respect to them? A full concession or just half? Also, do you have any idea if any students are from Minneapolis? I assume that they are probably especially devastated as well. I am thinking that a white student from there might possibly be even more devastated by this, especially because some might think that they're racist even if they are not."Following the email exchange, students condemned his "woefully racist" response and <a href="https://www.change.org/p/ucla-fire-ucla-professor-gordon-klein">started a petition</a> to have him fired, which gained over 20,000 signatures in two days. <h2>"The woke mob runs into a college teacher who's fighting back"</h2>The dean of UCLA's business school launched an investigation into the incident and briefly suspended Klein before reinstating him three weeks later.But Klein was not mollified and On September 27, Klein filed suit against Dean Antonio Bernardo and UCLA in <a href="https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/KleinvBernardo.pdf">Los Angeles Superior Court</a> for breach of contract, defamation, political bias, labor law violations, violation of privacy, and interference with his consulting business. In the blog post, entitled "Why I am Suing UCLA," Klein rejected the accusations of racism and criticized the school's handling of the situation."From the start, my whole point had been that all students, irrespective of skin color, should be treated the same," Klein said.Klein claimed that UCLA capitalized on the incident to distract from the school's reputation of not being very diverse.He said that Anderson <a href="https://www.anderson.ucla.edu/about/our-leadership#chaired-professors">hadn't granted a Black professor tenure</a> in decades and Black students made up about two percent of the student body. In the blog post, Klein said that the incident led to him receiving death threats and anti-Semitic abuse.He added that the incident caused him a $500,000 loss of income from consulting law firms and other corporations, which dropped him in the wake of the saga."No employee should ever cower in fear of his employer's power to silence legitimate points of view, and no society should tolerate government-sponsored autocrats violating constitutional mandates," he said.<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/10/08/woke-mob-runs-into-college-teacher-whos-fighting-back/">An opinion column for the Washington Post</a> on October 8, written by George F. Will, was headlined: "The woke mob runs into a college teacher who's fighting back."A UCLA spokesperson told Insider, "We don't comment on personnel litigation matters, but we are looking forward to having the facts fully addressed through the litigation process."Insider also contacted Klein for comment.

A UCLA professor suspended in a row over grades for Black students claims it was to distract from the business school that's 'inhospitable' to people of color

The unsung warriors of 'The Price Is Right'

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Fox News settled Dominion's defamation suit about election conspiracy theories for $788 million.</li><li>Several Senate Republicans predicted the settlement wouldn't change much at Fox or in journalism.</li></ul>Several Senate Republicans who rallied to Trump's side when he baselessly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him said Fox paying nearly $800 million to avoid explaining its corresponding coverage was a straight-up business decision, and unlikely to hurt the functioning of a free press."I don't know whether this has what I'd call 'landmark qualities' to it," Sen. Mike Braun of Indiana said of the conservative news outlet's <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-settles-dominion-defamation-lawsuit-trial-2023-4">blockbuster defamation suit settlement with Dominion Voting Systems</a>. Braun initially <a href="https://www.braun.senate.gov/tribune-star-braun-joins-gop-group-rejecting-election-results" target="_blank" rel="noopener">planned to reject the 2020 election results</a> but switched sides after MAGA supporters <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/january-6-oral-history-capitol-attack-insurrection-timeline-investigation-2021-10">swarmed the US Capitol in January 2021</a>.Braun told Insider that the price tag, though steep, probably wouldn't have an "earthshaking impact on Fox." The media giant has <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/rupert-murdoch-fox-news-dominion-defamation-lawsuit-defense-stakes-survival-2023-4">dodged potentially ruinous scandals for decades</a>. "I think that it leaves a few things a little murky," Braun said while walking through the Senate subway. He added that other news companies should take note because "if you are taking a certain point of view, you better make sure you got all your facts and ducks in a row."Three GOP senators who voted to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/01/07/us/elections/electoral-college-biden-objectors.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">overturn the 2020 election results</a>, Sens. Josh Hawley of Missouri, Ted Cruz of Texas, and Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, danced around the specifics of the case but weighed in on aspects they felt most comfortable with. Hawley, a Yale Law School graduate who serves on the Senate Judiciary Committee, told Insider he didn't know enough about Fox's arguments to offer any kind of expert opinion. "I will leave Fox's legal strategy to Fox," he said, stressing that he didn't have any inside information or "anything to compare it to." Hawley loosened up a bit when asked if this was an example of lawyers wreaking havoc on freedom of speech. "Lawyers are always running amok. I mean, that's what we do for a living. Especially plaintiff's attorneys," he said with a laugh. Cruz, a Harvard Law School graduate who also serves on Judiciary, said it made sense for Fox to bail out before things got any worse. "The trial was likely to be pretty ugly," Cruz told Insider. "And I understand Fox making the decision not to go through a trial where there's lots of testimony that's harmful to the station." Fox took a beating leading up to the trial as <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/texts-from-the-dominion-lawsuit-reveal-the-real-fox-news-2023-3">private messages</a> from founder Rupert Murdoch and talk show hosts like Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity leaked out, showing Fox bigwigs were more interested in appeasing their Trump-obsessed audience than factual reporting. "I get that it's salacious. And everybody kind of enjoys a chance to see private texts back and forth, particularly of famous people," Cruz said of the media frenzy surrounding the internal communications. But he said he's fairly certain no rational being would invite that level of scrutiny. "I think a lot of people say things in private to their friends that they don't particularly want broadcast to the world," Cruz said. "I would suggest you probably don't want your texts made public. I certainly don't want mine."Tuberville held his tongue when asked about news-gathering practices and legal precedents. But said he fully understood wanting to escape a public drubbing. "I've been in a couple of lawsuits before. And a bad settlement is a lot better than going to court," Tuberville said with a chuckle. Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, who <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-acquitted-senate-impeachment-trial-capitol-siege-2021-2">voted to impeach Trump</a> following the January 6, 2021 attack on Congress, offered the most pointed analysis of Fox's legal challenges. "It's no problem — if you don't lie," Romney told Insider between votes.

Senate Republicans who backed Trump's election fraud claims say Fox News settling Dominion case leaves things 'a little murky'

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Fox News kept its position atop right-wing media and fought off rivals while settling with Dominion.</li><li>It can afford the hefty price tag, and top executives and hosts won't have to testify under oath.</li></ul>WILMINGTON, Delaware — Just a couple of hours after a judge seated a jury for what was supposed to be the defamation trial of the century, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-settles-dominion-defamation-lawsuit-trial-2023-4">Dominion and Fox agreed to settle their case</a>.Fox News said it would shell out $787.5 million to Dominion, an election technology company that was the target of right-wing conspiracy theories falsely claiming it rigged the 2020 presidential election against Donald Trump. By a large margin, it's the biggest publicly known settlement for a defamation case in US history.In the moments after I watched the judge announce the settlement in court, 16 things went through my mind:<h2>1. Fox gets to keep its audience.</h2>Dominion's CEO, lawyers, and corporate owners <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-settles-dominion-defamation-lawsuit-trial-2023-4">blasted Fox News in a press conference</a> outside Delaware Superior Court following news of the settlement.On Fox's end, it's hard to imagine a more tepid statement."We acknowledge the Court's rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false," the company said in an email as its lawyers dodged journalists. "This settlement reflects FOX's continued commitment to the highest journalistic standards. We are hopeful that our decision to resolve this dispute with Dominion amicably, instead of the acrimony of a divisive trial, allows the country to move forward from these issues."Pay attention to the first bit. The company acknowledged <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-loses-part-of-dominions-defamation-lawsuit-2023-3">Judge Eric M. Davis' ruling, made last month, that it broadcasted false claims from Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani</a>.Not "we lied," or "sorry," or "we'll do better next time."A person familiar with the settlement terms told Insider that Fox News' hosts — including Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, Jeanine Pirro, and Maria Bartiromo — would not be required to issue retractions or make any statements about Dominion whatsoever. <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-loses-part-of-dominions-defamation-lawsuit-2023-3">Davis ruled that all of those hosts broadcast falsehoods about Dominion</a>.In other words: Fox doesn't admit to anything, except that the judge is right. Aside from forking over money, they get to do things on their own terms. The network's hosts don't have to tell their audience what they don't want to hear.That audience may not want to hear, for instance, that Trump really lost the 2020 election. <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meetthepressblog/poll-61-republicans-still-believe-biden-didnt-win-fair-square-2020-rcna49630">Recent polls show</a> a majority of Republicans don't believe Biden legitimately won the presidency. As <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/rupert-murdoch-make-trump-non-person-after-january-6-2023-2">Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch himself said in a deposition for the Dominion case</a>, Trump's fans and Fox News' audience have a lot of overlap, and he didn't want to antagonize the then-president in the election's aftermath."He had a very large following, and they were probably mostly viewers of Fox, so it would have been stupid," Murdoch said.<h2>2. $787.5 million was the price to keep it.</h2>Dominion asked for $1.6 billion in damages and got about half of that, not counting legal fees. It's still a massive settlement.You can also say that number was the price Fox paid to keep itself at the top of the right-wing media universe.Fox clearly wanted to make a tepid statement about the case and avoid issuing retractions or denunciations of its own employees. Did that requirement drive up the price Dominion wanted it to pay?One of the main arguments in Dominion's lawsuit, filed back in March 2021, was that Fox was driven to push lies about the 2020 election because it was threatened by the rise of Newsmax and One America News, two further-right media organizations that Dominion says more explicitly embraced election conspiracy theories.Evidence obtained by Dominion in the lawsuit and filed to court ahead of the settlement <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-hosts-knew-election-conspiracy-theories-false-messages-dominion-2023-2">appeared to support that theory</a>. Hannity and Carlson privately fretted that Newsmax's ratings could threaten Fox's dominance."Serious $$ with serious distribution could be a real problem. Imho they need to address but wtf do I know," Hannity wrote in a text message obtained by Dominion, referring to Newsmax."Do the executives understand how much credibility and trust we've lost with our audience? We're playing with fire, for real....an alternative like newsmax could be devastating to us," Carlson told his producer in another message included in filings.Newsmax and OAN are already in dire straits after DirecTV dropped them from its programming listings. Dominion and Smartmatic — a rival election technology company caught up in false 2020 election conspiracy theories — have <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/everyone-dominion-smartmatic-suing-defamation-election-conspiracy-theories-2021-2" rel="">separate pending defamation lawsuits against them as well</a>.<h2>3. Fox avoided a likely reckoning in court.</h2>It's extremely hard to win a defamation case against a media company in the US, given the country's strong First Amendment protections.Unfortunately for Fox, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-dominion-defamation-lawsuit-trial-first-amendment-free-speech-2023-4">First Amendment experts widely agreed Dominion had an extremely strong case</a>. James Goodale, a leading media lawyer and former top attorney for the New York Times, told Insider that Fox put itself in a terrible position by repeatedly hosting Powell and Giuliani on its shows. Most libel cases, he said, are over only a single disputed issue."In an ordinary libel case, that probably would happen once, and you fight over that one instance," Goodale told Insider. "In here — I don't know, what's the number, a hundred? — it happens over and over and over again."<h2>4. Rupert Murdoch and other Fox brass won't have to testify.</h2>A settlement means that 92-year-old Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch gets to stay home and avoid the glare of the courtroom. His son, Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan Murdoch, can kick back on <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11903347/Lachlan-Murdoch-superyacht-150million-ship-ready-News-Corp-media-mogul-five-years.html">his $150 million yacht</a> instead of making the trek to Wilmington, Delaware.It also means that executives like Fox News President Jay Wallace and CEO Suzanne Scott, and hosts like Hannity, Carlson, and the litany of others Dominion said they intended to call as witnesses, avoid the drama of a trial as well.While <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/dominion-fox-news-trial-american-democracy-private-equity-settle-2023-4">Fox News' detractors might love to see them grilled on the witness stand</a>, Dominion got to use the prospect of testifying under oath as leverage to extract the largest settlement possible.<h2>5. Dominion won't have to deal with appeals.</h2>Even if Dominion won at trial, it would still face the prospect of years of appeals. Both Fox and Dominion hired prominent appellate attorneys for the case. In court Tuesday, each side had about two dozen lawyers filling the rows. And Fox Corp.'s top lawyer, Viet Dinh, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/16/business/media/fox-news-dominion-trial.html">reportedly believed Fox had good odds</a> of winning their case if it appealed to the Supreme Court. First Amendment experts Insider spoke to strongly disagreed with Dinh on that point.Now, Dominion doesn't have to deal with any of that. So that's nice for them.<h2>6. Fox, though, has to deal with shareholder lawsuits.</h2>A historically large settlement like this might mean Fox Corp., the parent company of Fox News, will have the headache of shareholders who will claim it overpaid.One shareholder <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/fox-investors-seek-records-possible-step-toward-suing-directors-2023-04-17/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">filed a suit earlier this year in Delaware Chancery Court</a> alleging the company breached its fiduciary duties by allowing the network to broadcast election lies in the first place, exposing it to litigation from Smartmatic and Dominion.<h2>7. Fox can afford it.</h2><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-payout-big-for-company-but-insurance-may-help-2023-4">Fox Corp. has nearly $4.1 billion of cash on hand</a>, Lachlan Murdoch said in February. The company, which also includes Fox Sports and the streaming service Tubi, is valued at more than $17.6 billion.It's not clear if any of the $787.5 million settlement figure will be borne by libel insurance. Representatives and attorneys for Fox Corporation declined to answer Insider's questions about insurance arrangements.<h2>8. Still — wow!</h2>Did I mention that $787.5 million is the biggest known defamation settlement in US history? Feels like that needs its own item on this list.The runner-up is <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/pink-slime-case-177-million-settlement-2017-8">the $177 million Disney paid to settle the infamous "pink slime" lawsuit</a> against its subsidiary ABC News in 2017.The lawyer who represented the plaintiff suing ABC News in that case is J. Erik Connolly.He's now representing Smartmatic in its lawsuit against Fox News.<h2>9. Smartmatic is still suing.</h2>Speaking of which, Smartmatic's separate lawsuit against Fox News is <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/smartmatic-remains-committed-to-fox-news-defamation-case-2023-4">still moving forward</a>."Dominion's litigation exposed some of the misconduct and damage caused by Fox's disinformation campaign. Smartmatic will expose the rest," Connolly said in a statement on Tuesday. "Smartmatic remains committed to clearing its name, recouping the significant damage done to the company, and holding Fox accountable for undermining democracy."Smartmatic's lawsuit, in New York state court, may be an even greater risk for Fox.It's asking for $2.7 billion in damages. The suit also counts Giuliani as a defendant; it has <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/smartmatic-restarts-defamation-lawsuit-against-sidney-powell-dc-court-2022-3">a separate lawsuit against Powell for jurisdictional reasons</a>.And as outlandish as Giuliani's and Powell's claims about Dominion were, Smartmatic's were even more fantastical. The company's technology was used in elections for only two counties in the US 2020 election. Dominion's was used in multiple states. Smartmatic has also been able to bolster its own case by drawing on evidence filed in Dominion's lawsuit.For the same <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/dominion-fox-news-trial-american-democracy-private-equity-settle-2023-4">reasons Fox settled Dominion's suit</a>, it likely wants to settle Smartmatic's suit as well — and before Smartmatic makes public more embarrassing revelations from its discovery process.<h2>10. The settlement is a victory for Delaware courts.</h2>The settlement helps bolster the Delaware court system's reputation as a place to resolve business disputes with minimal fuss, <a href="https://thechancerydaily.substack.com/p/delaware-scores-another-massive-litigation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">as The Chancery Daily noted</a>.Tuesday's events, in some ways, echo last fall, where <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-offers-buy-twitter-at-original-deal-price-report-2022-10">Elon Musk reached a settlement</a> with Twitter where he agreed to purchase the company for $44 million shortly before a case was supposed to go to trial. Twitter had sued him for trying to back out of a deal where he agreed to buy the company for that sum. (<a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-twitter-tesla-crisis-mood-intensity-2023-2">Things haven't been going too well for Musk since</a>.)Smartmatic's lawsuit against Fox, it should be noted, is in New York, where <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/judge-denies-fox-news-motion-to-dismiss-smartmatic-defamation-lawsuit-2022-3">a judge has had little patience with Fox's legal positions</a>.<h2>11. I wouldn't want to be Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, or Mike Lindell right now.</h2>For a lot of reasons. Legally speaking, the three are most directly responsible for the proliferation of false conspiracy theories about Dominion and Smartmatic that, according to a legal process, have caused at least $787.5 million in damages.Fox News broadcast them and at times endorsed the claims, Dominion argued. But no one has hammered away at the falsehoods as prolifically and loudly as those three.Mike Lindell is pretty wealthy, but <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/will-dominion-own-mypillow-if-it-wins-defamation-lawsuit-2021-11">I'd wager he doesn't have that much money</a>.<h2>12. Fox dropped a big hint it would settle the suit earlier this month.</h2>On April 8, Fox arrived at a "confidential agreement" to settle a separate defamation lawsuit from Venezuelan businessman Majed Khalil, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-settles-lawsuit-with-venezuelan-businessman-2020-us-election-2023-4">according to a court filing</a>.After Trump lost the 2020 presidential election, then-Fox Business News host Lou Dobbs said on Twitter that Khalil helped rig votes, an alleged plot the Trump ally amounted to a "cyber Pearl harbor" and "electoral 9-11."<a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/venezuelan-man-sues-fox-news-sidney-powell-for-conspiracy-theories-2021-12?r=US&amp;IR=T">Khalil sued for $250 million</a>.Fox and an attorney for Khalil declined to comment on the settlement, so it's not clear how much he got in the end. But it was a clear signal the right-wing media company was willing to pay to make these cases go away.<h2>13. Abby Grossberg takes the stage.</h2>The weeks before the settlement were beset with twists from Abby Grossberg, a former producer for Carlson and Bartiromo. She filed lawsuits <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/tucker-carlson-fox-news-team-lawsuit-pelosi-swimsuit-photo-lawsuit-2023-3">alleging Fox discriminated against her because of her gender</a>, and that <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-lawyers-coerced-false-deposition-testimony-dominion-lawsuit-allegation-2023-3">Fox lawyers coached her into giving false deposition testimony</a> for Dominion's lawsuit. Fox fired her and denied wrongdoing.Her litigation upped the stakes for the case, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/ex-fox-news-producer-claims-company-withheld-dominion-discovery-2023-4">bringing forth additional evidence</a> suggesting Fox News knew that Giuliani's and Powell's claims about Dominion were false.Her attorneys on Tuesday <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-producer-to-continue-legal-fight-after-dominion-settlement-2023-4">pledged to keep her fight going</a> and lambasted "the network's abhorrent culture of lawlessness." The lawsuits are yet another headache Fox has to deal with.<h2>14. Fox News dodged another legal bullet.</h2>Because of how Fox handled evidence related to Grossberg — as well as other evidence about Murdoch's role in Fox News — the judge appointed a special master on Tuesday morning to investigate whether Fox properly complied with the discovery process.The investigation could have been even more embarrassing for Fox. Davis ruled that the special master could subpoena whoever he wanted and that Fox would have to pay all associated costs.By Tuesday afternoon, the situation was moot. The settlement meant that the special master's investigation was called off, <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/media/judge-appoints-special-master-investigate-fox-news-dominion-defamation-rcna80289">as NBC News reported</a>.<h2>15. Too bad for the media reporters.</h2>For the media reporters covering this trial, this was the story of the century. Even without a full-blown trial, the case was still an incredible story. <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-settles-dominion-defamation-lawsuit-trial-2023-4">So much of Fox News' inner workings have been exposed already</a>. This trial was a great opportunity for more juicy material.Still, I feel a little bad for Brian Stelter, the former CNN host who <a href="https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/brian-stelter-fox-news-book-network-of-lies-1235582429/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced he was working on a book</a> about Fox News partially based on the trial, and who got a part time Vanity Fair gig covering the case. What's he going to do now? Stelter didn't immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.Rupert Murdoch biographer Michael Wolff got a Sky TV commentator job to cover the case and <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/dominion-isnt-the-only-one-looking-to-cash-in-on-fox-news-defamation-woes">was reportedly in talks to write a book about it</a>. Outside court after news of the settlement, he lamented about his "lost weekend in Wilmington."Oh well. There's always the Smartmatic case.<h2>16. This was great for Dominion's private equity owner.</h2>A majority of Dominion is <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/dominion-fox-news-trial-american-democracy-private-equity-settle-2023-4">owned by Staple Street Capital, a private equity firm</a>.In court filings ahead of the settlement, Fox complained about the $1.6 billion price tag Dominion put on the lawsuit. Internal valuations, it argued, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/dominion-worth-80-million-despite-billion-lawsuit-fox-news-says-2023-2">showed it was worth closer to $100 million</a>. Staple Street, Fox said, was just looking for a payday."Would be pretty unreal if you guys like 20x'ed your Dominion investment with these lawsuits," read one text to a Staple Street executive cited in a Fox court filing.Well, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/foxs-7875-million-settlement-is-big-win-buyout-firm-staple-street-2023-04-18/">Staple Street got a return on its investment</a>, alright. And Dominion's lawyers got their fees, too. Moments before the judge announced the settlement Tuesday, one top Dominion attorney in court looked like she could hardly suppress a smile.

16 takeaways from Fox News' historic $787.5 million settlement with Dominion

Inside the wild, drug-fueled world of celebrity keynote speakers

<div class="KonaFilter image-container display-table"><div><div class="image on-image">REUTERS/Shannon StapletonLawyer David Boies arrives with his client Virginia Giuffre for hearing in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein, who died this month in what a New York City medical examiner ruled a suicide, at Federal Court in New York, U.S., August 27, 2019.</div></div></div><ul class="summary-list"><li>More than 20 accusers of Jeffrey Epstein testified in the Southern District of New York on Tuesday in what Judge Richard Berman called both "a matter of <keyword id="6355470" type="UNKNOWN" weightage="60" keywordseo="law">law</keyword>" and "a measure of respect for the victims."</li><li>16 women emotionally recounted their experiences being allegedly sexually abused and, for some, being raped by Epstein when they were underage girls, many over a period of several months or years. An additional seven testimonies were read via statements presented by their lawyers or legal counsel. </li><li>Before the accusers spoke, Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey motioned to dismiss the <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-bail-request-hearing-2019-7">indictment served</a> to the now-deceased Epstein on charges of sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy, and Epstein's lawyers argued that the circumstances surrounding his death should be investigated in court. </li><li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/?hprecirc-bullet">Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.</a></li></ul>NEW YORK, NY - Three and half rows of women filled the left-hand side of the courtroom as assistant US attorney Maurene Comey motioned to dismiss the indictment against the now-deceased wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was charged with the sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy.More than 20 of the women said they were victims of Epstein. One by one, 16 of them took the stand to recount what the convicted sex offender did to them, and how it has affected the rest of their lives. Lawyers read from an additional seven victims' statements, and some of the victims just sat and observed.There were at least 30 more accusers who did not come to the courthouse in the Southern District of New York."I've suffered and he has won," Chauntae Davies, who says Epstein raped her after she was recruited to be his masseuse, said in between cries. "We have all suffered, and he is still winning in death. Please don't rob us of justice again."Read more: <a href="https://www.businessinsider.my/model-escaped-epstein-he-was-in-charge-of-victorias-secret-2019-7/">'I just grabbed the vibrator and threw it at his head': Former model says she escaped Epstein in 2004 after she was told he was 'in charge of Victoria's Secret'</a>Two hours of emotional testimony followed a logistical back-and-forth between District Judge Richard Berman, Comey, and Epstein's legal representation. Berman lamented the loss of a judicial process in the case against Epstein, who died by apparent suicide in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan after being <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-bail-request-hearing-2019-7">refused bail.</a> His death came two days <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-signed-new-will-2-days-before-his-suicide-2019-8">after signing</a> a new will. Berman also sharply criticized <a href="https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2019/08/26/the-judge-in-epsteins-case-should-not-turn-the-dismissal-into-a-drama-for-the-victims/?slreturn=20190727134352">an article</a> published by the New York Law Journal the night before, which he said he understood was written in part by, though not credited to, Alan Dershowitz, a lawyer who had served on Epstein's legal team in Palm Beach, Florida, when he signed a non-prosecution plea deal ruled to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-lawsuit-epstein/prosecutors-violated-victims-rights-act-in-deal-for-florida-financier-judge-idUSKCN1QA30I">have violated</a> the Crime Victims' Rights Act. One of Epstein's most vocal accusers, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who settled a <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/epstein-giuffre-v-maxwell-unsealed-thousands-documents-defamation-2019-8">defamation suit</a> against his accused recruiter and ex-girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, testified in court on Tuesday. She has also <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/alan-dershowitz-was-obsessed-with-men-wrongfully-accused-of-rape">accused Dershowitz</a> of raping her. The article published by the New York Law Journal argues that Epstein's victims should not have been given a speaking role in the hearing to discuss the dismissal of the indictment against the deceased financier. Berman denounced the reasoning, stating that the hearing and the opportunity for victims' testimonies were "being done both as a matter of law and as a measure of respect for the victims."<div class="KonaFilter image-container display-table"><div><div class="image on-image">REUTERS/Jane RosenbergVictims wait to make impact statements during a hearing in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein, who died this month in what a New York City medical examiner ruled a suicide, in a courtroom sketch at Federal Court in New York, U.S., August 27, 2019.</div></div></div>Before the accusers were given the opportunity to stand and testify, Comey emphasized that the investigation into Epstein's co-conspirators was not over, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/sdny-us-attorneys-office-confirms-epstein-investigation-remains-ongoing-conspiracy-2019-8">echoing statements</a> from the Department of Justice since Epstein's death that urged more victims to come forward. She noted that civil forfeiture was ongoing.One of Epstein's lawyers, Martin Weinberg, brought up the circumstances surrounding his client's death and suggested that the broken neck bones <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/epstein-used-his-jail-bedsheet-to-commit-suicide-by-hanging-2019-8">he sustained</a> during what was ruled a suicide were actually more consistent with a homicide and asked for Berman to investigate Epstein's death in court, as well as the <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/epstein-spent-last-days-emptying-vending-machines-with-lawyers-2019-8">poor conditions</a> and mismanagement that has been reported on at the federally controlled MCC.Read more: <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/tech-moguls-jeffrey-epstein-connected-bill-gates-elon-musk-2019-8">All the tech moguls who have been connected to Jeffrey Epstein, the elite wealth manager who died in jail while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges</a>Comey disagreed that such a process would be possible, arguing that "no case, and no investigation" into any crimes meant that the <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/attorney-general-barr-iinvestigating-jeffrey-epstein-suicide-2019-8">independent investigations</a> being conducted by the SDNY, the FBI, and the Office of the Inspector General in the DOJ would be sufficient. Berman then motioned for accusers' lawyers to introduce their clients, and more than 10 women rose to begin the process of recounting their testimonies. <ul class="read-more-links"><li>Read more:</li><li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-connections-videos-flights-2019-8" data-read-more-link="" data-e2e-name="read-more-link">Inside Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein's controversial 20-year friendship</a></li><li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-psychiatrist-weighs-in-risk-of-suicide-in-prison-2019-8" data-read-more-link="" data-e2e-name="read-more-link">A psychiatrist who's worked with inmates where Jeffrey Epstein was held weighs in on his death</a></li><li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-charities-donated-over-800k-to-mit-2019-8" data-read-more-link="" data-e2e-name="read-more-link">MIT took 'approximately $800,000' in donations from Jeffrey Epstein's charities, MIT's president says in apology letter</a></li><li><a href="https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/new-york-times-staffer-reportedly-ousted-over-jeffrey-epstein-donation-2019-8-1028470434" data-read-more-link="" data-e2e-name="read-more-link"> A former New York Times staffer quietly left the paper after revealing he had solicited charitable donations from Jeffrey Epstein</a></li></ul>

More than 20 Jeffrey Epstein accusers gave emotional testimony in court as federal prosecutors motioned to dismiss the sex trafficking indictment against the deceased financier

You Searched For "DDCA row defamation suit" and got 10 results

DDCA row: Delhi HC notice to Kejriwal, others in defamation suit

BI India Bureau

Jury rules in favor of Kardashian-Jenners after Blac Chyna brought a defamation lawsuit against the family

Erin Snodgrass,Azmi Haroun

Apologise to Sushma Swaraj or face defamation suit, Gadkari warns Rahul Gandhi

BI India Bureau

Mike Lindell sold a MyPillow private plane to raise funds for his $1.3 billion Dominion Voting Systems defamation lawsuit: report

Cheryl Teh

A UCLA professor suspended in a row over grades for Black students claims it was to distract from the business school that's 'inhospitable' to people of color

Alia Shoaib

The unsung warriors of 'The Price Is Right'

David Kushner

Senate Republicans who backed Trump's election fraud claims say Fox News settling Dominion case leaves things 'a little murky'

Warren Rojas

16 takeaways from Fox News' historic $787.5 million settlement with Dominion

Jacob Shamsian

Inside the wild, drug-fueled world of celebrity keynote speakers

David Kushner

More than 20 Jeffrey Epstein accusers gave emotional testimony in court as federal prosecutors motioned to dismiss the sex trafficking indictment against the deceased financier

Kat Tenbarge

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides