Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

<keyword id="6082395" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="The-Shapoorji-Pallonji-group">The Shapoorji Pallonji Group</keyword> on Thursday said it has submitted a plan to Supreme Court to end its seven decades-old association with the Tata Group. The Mistrys have valued their holding in the <keyword id="6360721" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="tatas">Tatas</keyword> at Rs 1.75 lakh crore, it informed the apex court, which is hearing the long-drawn legal battle between the two groups that began after the Tatas in a boardroom coup on October 28, 2016 sacked <keyword id="6356895" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="cyrus-mistry">Cyrus Mistry</keyword> as the Chairman. "Tata Sons is effectively a two-group company, with the Tata Group comprising Tata Trusts, Tata family members and Tata companies holding 81.6 per cent of the equity share capital, and the Mistry family owning the balance 18.37 per cent," the <keyword id="261354" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="Shapoorji-Pallonji-Group">Shapoorji Pallonji Group</keyword> said in a statement quoting from its submission to the apex court. The group has submitted a plan for separation from Tatas to the Supreme Court. Tata Sons is the core investment company and is the holding company for the Tata Group and its value arises from its stake in listed equities, non-listed equities, the brand, cash balances and immovable assets. The value of 18.37 per cent stake of <keyword id="9314615" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="the-sp-group">the SP Group</keyword> in Tata Sons is over Rs 1,75,000 crore, it said. In their scheme of separation, the SP Group said disputes over valuation can be eliminated by doing a pro-rata split of listed assets (share price value is known) and pro-rata share of the brand (brand valuation already done by Tata and published). A neutral third-party valuation can be done for the unlisted assets adjusted for net debt. As a non-cash settlement, the SP Group sought pro-rata shares in listed Tata entities where Tata Sons currently owns stake. For example, while Tatas own 72 per cent of TCS, the SP Group's ownership of 18.37 per cent in Tata Sons translates to 13.22 per cent shareholding of TCS, which is worth Rs 1,35,000 crore at present market capitalisation, as per the statement. Pro-rata share of brand value adjusted for net debt can be settled in cash and/ or in listed securities, the statement said. For the unlisted companies, an expedited valuation can be done with a valuer selected by both sides. This can be settled in cash and/or in listed securities, it added. SEE ALSO: <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/startups/news/byjus-backer-lightspeed-india-invests-in-a-live-tutoring-platform-teachmint/articleshow/78924152.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink">BYJU'S backer Lightspeed India invests in a live tutoring platform Teachmint</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/india/news/covid-19-vaccine-updates-pfizer-moderna-to-roll-out-covid-19-vaccine-by-december/articleshow/78924143.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink">COVID-19 vaccine updates: Pfizer, Moderna to roll out COVID-19 vaccine by December</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/stock-market/news/dow-craters-943-points-in-worst-day-since-june-as-virus-spike-spurs-new-lockdowns/articleshow/78921995.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink">Dow craters 943 points in worst day since June as virus spike spurs new lockdowns</a>

Shapoorji Pallonji Group proposes plan for separation from Tata Sons

The Supreme Court Tuesday restrained till October 28 the Shapoorji Pallonji (SP) group and Cyrus Mistry from pledging or transferring their shares in <keyword id="5004980" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="tata-sons-pvt-ltd">Tata Sons Pvt Ltd</keyword> (TSPL). A bench comprising Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian also directed <keyword id="3788830" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="the-tata-sons">the Tata Sons</keyword> and <keyword id="9314615" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="the-sp-group">the SP Group</keyword> not to take any further action on the shares which have already been pledged till October 28, the next date of hearing. The SP group, which owns 18.37 per cent in Tata Sons, had said TSPL moved the top court to block its plan to pledge shares for raising funds and that reeked of vindictiveness and oppression of minority shareholder rights. On September 5, Tata Sons had moved the top court seeking to restrain the Mistry group from raising capital against their shares. Through the plea, the Tatas had sought to prevent the SP Group from creating any direct or indirect pledge of shares. The SP Group was planning to raise Rs 11,000 crore from various funds and had signed a deal with a marquee Canadian investor for Rs 3,750 crore in the first tranche against a portion of its 18.37 per cent stake in Tata Sons. The SP Group share holding in the country's largest business house is valued at over Rs 1 lakh crore. In a hearing conducted through video conferencing, the top court said that it would hear the plea after four weeks and "in the meantime, parties shall maintain status quo regarding pledging/transfer of shares". "We will say status quo on transferring/pledging and any further action with regard to transfer/pledge already made," the bench said. Senior advocate C A Sundaram, appearing for the SP group, said they were being stopped from pledging the shares and "it is creating havoc for me". On the other hand, senior advocate Harish Salve, representing TSPL, said that the point was "something else" as the TSPL has a right to buy the share at market price, but the SP group was pledging them. "We are of the view tentatively that pledging is a limited transfer," the bench observed while saying that it will "conduct final hearing in four weeks". Earlier, the TSPL had told the top court that it was not a 'two-group company' and there was no 'quasi-partnership' between it and <keyword id="9553407" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="cyrus-investments-pvt-ltd-">Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd.</keyword> TSPL had said this in an affidavit filed in the apex court while responding to the cross-appeal filed by Cyrus Investments seeking removal of alleged anomalies in NCLAT order for getting representation on the TSPL's board in proportion to the stakes held by his family. The apex court had on January 10 granted relief to <keyword id="6355725" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="tata-group">Tata group</keyword> by staying <keyword id="4170404" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="the-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal">the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal</keyword> (NCLAT) order of December 18 last year, by which Cyrus Mistry was restored as the executive chairman of the salt-to-software conglomerate. Then, the top court had on May 29 issued notice to TSPL and others on a cross-appeal filed by Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd. Cyrus Mistry had also filed an affidavit to the apex court saying the Tata Group had an adjusted net loss of Rs 13,000 crore in 2019 -- the worst losses in three decades. In his reply to the Tatas' petition challenging his reinstatement by the NCLAT last December, Mistry had also demanded that group chairman emeritus Ratan Tata should reimburse all the expenses to Tata Sons since his departure in December 2012 in keeping with best global governance standards. Mistry, the ousted chairman of Tata Sons, is seeking representation in the company in proportion to the 18.37 per cent stake held by his family, the cross-appeal has said. In its affidavit filed in the top court, Tata Sons has alleged that the thrust of Cyrus Investments' focus "has now shifted to propagating the quasi-partnership theory to secure the relief of 'proportionate representation'." In the petition, the appellant (Mistry group firm) has described the group's relationship with Tatas as "a quasi-partnership relationship of a vintage of over 60 years, holding 18.37 per cent in the equity share capital of Tata Sons and whose stake is now worth over Rs 1.5 lakh crore". According to the petition, the Mistry group firm has sought remedies for many anomalies in the NCLAT order, including not looking at alleged oppression of minority shareholders as well as converting Tata Sons into a private limited company as a post-facto move. As per the petition, the tribunal order clearly and unequivocally found the prejudicial conduct by Tata Sons, but failed to provide certain important reliefs that would have put an end to the oppressive conduct of the majority shareholder. Reinstating Mistry as the chairman, NCLAT had also termed the action of the Registrar of Companies to allow conversion of Tata Sons into a private limited company illegal. Mistry had succeeded Ratan Tata as chairman of Tata Sons in 2012 but was ousted four years later. While taking note of appeal of Tata group on January 10, the apex court had stayed the NCLAT order restoring Mistry as executive chairman of the Tata Group, observing that there were "lacunae" in the orders passed by the tribunal. SEE ALSO: <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/finance/banks/news/yes-bank-ceo-prashant-kumar-clarifies-that-the-forensic-investigation-isnt-restricted-to-the-top-10-defaulters/articleshow/78255868.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink">EXCLUSIVE: YES Bank CEO Prashant Kumar clarifies that the forensic investigation isn't restricted to the top 10 defaulters</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/stock-market/news/sharekhan-new-discount-broking-platform-espresso-will-take-no-fees-for-a-loss-making-trade/articleshow/78255651.cms" data-type="tilCustomLink">INTERVIEW: Sharekhan’s new discount broking platform will take no fees for a loss-making trade</a>

Supreme Court restrains Shapoorji Group, Cyrus Mistry from raising capital on Tata Sons shares

<keyword id="46894" type="PERSON" weightage="20" keywordseo="Tata-Sons">Tata Sons</keyword> Chairman <keyword id="97017" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="N-Chandrasekaran">N Chandrasekaran</keyword> on Wednesday asked all group employees to stay focussed on their businesses and welfare of stakeholders in wake of the NCLAT order that raised issue of his appointment as Executive Chairman of the company. In a message to the employees of the group, Chandrasekaran said Wednesday's "NCLAT ruling, which apart from other things, raises issues on my appointment as Executive Chairman of Tata Sons". He further said, "Tata Sons firmly believes in the strength of our case and will pursue the appropriate legal recourse".
 Going forward, he further said, "I assure you that we have set ourselves on a course that will make the <keyword id="6355725" type="COMPANY" weightage="20" keywordseo="tata-group">Tata Group</keyword> stronger and more vibrant than it has ever been before. I urge all employees to stay focussed on their businesses and the welfare of our stakeholders". Chandrasekaran said ever since he was asked to take on the role and responsibilities of Executive Chairman in February 2017, "our efforts have been primarily focused on: restoring stability and moving decisively towards a healthier financial position; conducting our businesses with the highest ethical standards, which the group has been known for over 150 years".
 He further said "honoring our commitments to all stakeholders and resolving outstanding issues; driving growth and transforming our businesses for the future" were also equally important issues. 
 "We will continue to work towards deepening the legacy of this unique institution," Chandrasekaran said.
 The NCLAT on Wednesday ordered reinstatement of ousted Chairman <keyword id="6356895" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="cyrus-mistry">Cyrus Mistry</keyword>, while ruling appointment of Chandrasekaran as illegal. See also: <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/news/tata-sons-says-the-court-gave-cyrus-mistry-more-than-he-wanted/articleshow/72872657.cms">Tata Sons says the court gave Cyrus Mistry more than he wanted</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/news/tata-group-stocks-fall-after-nclat-allows-cyrus-mistry-to-return-as-its-chairman/articleshow/72869261.cms">Tata Group stocks tumble after Mistry's legal win casts a shadow on the conglomerate's hallowed reputation</a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/corporates/news/cyrus-mistry-warning-to-ratan-tata-on-jlr-tata-motors-airasia-and-telecom/articleshow/72873129.cms">Cyrus Mistry was proven right on at least four of his warnings to the Tata Sons Board even before the latest court ruling</a>

Chandasekaran writes to Tata employees; asks them to focus on biz, stakeholders' welfare

<ul><li>Tata Sons filed a suit in Supreme Court challenging an order which asks them to bring Mistry back as its chairman. </li><li>Tata Sons sought an urgent hearing on January 6 after the SC’s winter break, says a TV report. </li><li>Tatas and Mistry family have been locked in a legal battle for four years ever since the former removed Cyrus Mistry as its executive chairman. </li></ul>Cyrus Mistry has a long path to clear before he takes over his mantle as the chairman of Tata Sons yet again. In spite of the company law tribunal saying that he is the rightful chairman, the old guard at Tata Sons is in no mood to relent. Today, they filed a lawsuit in Supreme Court challenging the judgment by National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). Tata Sons sought an urgent hearing on January 6 after the SC’s winter break, says a report by CNBCTV 18. This move comes weeks after NCLAT passed its judgment on the four year old dispute between Tata Sons and Mistry family, one of its largest shareholders. NCLAT ruled that Mistry’s removal as chairman from Tata Sons was illegal and has directed it to bring him back his position. However, the court had then left a window of four weeks for Tata Sons to appeal at the Supreme Court. Mistry was removed as the chairman of Tata Sons four years after he held the position, succeeding its charismatic leader Ratan Tata. However, Mistry had brought in many changes into the system, which were not accepted readily by many board members, and was removed from his position in 2016. While Ratan Tata did take over as the interim chairman for a while, the former head of TCS, N Chandrasekharan was brought in as the chairman in early 2017. The Mistry family which owns 18.4% stake in Tata Sons moved <keyword id="6354457" type="ORGANIZATION" weightage="20" keywordseo="National-Company-Law-Tribunal">National Company Law Tribunal</keyword> (NCLT) after Cyrus was removed as a director from all Tata companies. But, NCLT dismissed the case. They appealed again in NCLAT which had said that Mistry’s removal is illegal and gave four weeks time to reinstate him. But Tata Sons chose to challenge the order. Here is a timeline of the 4-year-old dispute: October 2016: Mistry removed as Executive Chairman after four years in the hot seat and Ratan Tata takes interim charge Mistry alleges Tata trustees of interference, oppression, and mismanagement. Mistry also warns that the group could end up with $18 billion writedowns December 2016: Mistry resigns from all Tata group companies. Mistry family files a case in NCLT accusing Tata Sons of “mismanagement and shareholder oppression’ January 2017: Tata Sons names N Chandrasekaran, the then CEO of TCS, as Tata Sons chairman February 2017: Mistry removed as director of Tata Sons April 2017: NCLT dismissed Mistry firms’ case against Tata Sons. Mistry firms move the appellate tribunal against NCLT order August 2018: Tata Sons converts into a ‘private limited company’ blocking the sale of shares by the Mistry family, who appeal against the decision by NCLT. December 2019: Mistry wins the case. NCLAT orders his reinstatement as Chairman and that Tata Sons should become a ‘public limited company’ again. SEE ALSO <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/corporates/news/cyrus-mistry-warning-to-ratan-tata-on-jlr-tata-motors-airasia-and-telecom/articleshow/72873129.cms">Cyrus Mistry was proven right on at least four of his warnings to the Tata Sons Board even before the latest court ruling</a>

Tata Sons hurries to challenge NCLAT order that reinstates Cyrus Mistry as deadline looms large

January 3 marks the birth anniversary of one of the world's greatest teachers, <keyword id="1011723" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="savitribai-phule" source="Orion">Savitribai Phule</keyword>. Reeta Ramamurthy Gupta is set to release <keyword id="166738" type="General" weightage="80" keywordseo="savitri" source="Orion">Savitri</keyword>bai's first biography, titled 'Savitri and <keyword id="132665" type="General" weightage="80" keywordseo="fatima" source="Orion">Fatima</keyword>', with a focus on her friendship with Fatima Shaikh. The announcement was made by Harper Collins in November 2022. The question that remains is why is the first book about <keyword id="341578" type="General" weightage="80" keywordseo="savitribai" source="Orion">Savitribai</keyword> Phule coming 125 years after her death? Here's an interview with the author who also wrote the bestselling biography of Sanjeev Kumar in 2022. Q: Why is the first biography on Savitribai Phule coming so late? A: As a matter of fact, there are many books about Savitribai in Marathi. I have seen some compilations in English as well, but nothing that qualifies as a biography. I do wonder why there haven't been attempts to write her story in English before or whether I might have missed them. Savitribai Phule is a part of every listicle of the world's greatest teachers. She's one of the greatest revolutionaries and guiding lights to have been born in India. Q: Which again brings us to why there's no book about her. A: Destiny maybe. Also, remember that there is an awakening of sorts in our country at present. India's writers, filmmakers and business leaders are reclaiming India's history in a decisive manner. I also see India taking pride in its own stories and artists like never before. This unapologetic pride is possible because, on the one hand, we haven't been acquisitive or predatory towards other lands. On the other hand, from Gandhi to Buddha, Narendra Modi to Rishi Sunak, Mukesh Ambani to Gautam Adani, and Mother Teresa to Priyanka Chopra, some of the world's most inspirational icons across different fields are from India. India has come into her own. Q: Why did you pick this subject? A: Every Indian woman, anywhere in the world, who can read and write, owes a debt of gratitude to Savitribai Phule. I wanted to bring her to the front and centre of public consciousness because the preservation of our democracy lies in being cognisant of our hard-won freedom and how precious and tenuous this freedom is! Savitribai Phule was an embodiment of the word 'feminism'. Her convictions and her actions were set in the 19th century, at a time when even basic rights were not available to women. She fought for their basic dignity and education. Her activism and her duty required real gumption. She not only rescripted her own life, she made it possible for untouchables and women to re-script theirs too. Q: Is it possible to 'Rescript Your Life', as per your first book? A: Yes, 'Rescript Your Life' is my first book, on which every other book is based. You become what you believe in, not what you want, is the message of the book. If you read 'Stranger in the Mirror', Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra's biography, he is someone who came from humble origins to become one of our greatest filmmakers. If you read 'Sanjeev Kumar: The Actor We All Loved', the man lost his father at 12 and fell prey to heavy depression, before he rose to become one of India's finest actors. So both of them re-scripted their lives. Q: Your book is titled Savitri and Fatima. A: Yes, this is a story of a friendship between the two women. When Savitribai and her husband Jyotirao Phule founded the first school for girls (by a non-missionary or by someone who was not British), they were thrown out of their house. It was Fatima Shaikh who gave them shelter. Fatima had taken her teacher training lessons along with Savitribai Phule and they developed a deep friendship. Fatima functioned as a dependable deputy to Savitri Phule's efforts. She offered to run all the schools and this gave Savitribai Phule the opportunity to confront other social issues such as widow remarriage and the oppressive caste system. Yet, this friendship between Savitri and Fatima and their work together remains unsung and unknown. They had a dream, 'education for all', irrespective of caste, creed or religion. The spark lit by Savitri and Fatima had far-reaching consequences. As more and more they got educated, their minds opened up to the ideas of freedom, justice and liberty. Q: When will this book be launched? A: Later this year. But I do believe that after this book, Fatima Shaikh will be mentioned with the same reverence that we accord to former President and freedom fighter <keyword id="8925" type="General" weightage="50" keywordseo="zakir-hussain" source="Orion">Zakir Hussain</keyword> or former President and acclaimed scientist A.P.J. Abdul Kalam. Q: What next? A: Another exciting story from the annals of Indian history. Another forgotten hero perhaps? SEE ALSO: <a target="_blank" class="c-link c-message_attachment__title_link" href="https://www.businessinsider.in/thelife/personalities/pel-vivienne-westwood-cyrus-mistry-pope-benedict-xvi-and-more-luminaries-who-passed-away-in-2022/slidelist/96678840.cms">Pelé, Vivienne Westwood, Cyrus Mistry, Pope Benedict XVI and more: Luminaries who passed away in 2022</a> <a target="_blank" class="c-link c-message_attachment__title_link" href="https://www.businessinsider.in/india/news/naga-peace-accord-a-tale-of-so-near-yet-so-far/articleshow/96678962.cms">Naga peace accord: A tale of so near, yet so far</a>

Savitribai Phule, one of the world's greatest teachers, to get 1st biography 125 yrs after death

A US-based economist won the <keyword id="449074" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Nobel-prize-for-Economics" source="Orion">Nobel prize for economics</keyword> Monday for pioneering research that showed an increase in minimum wage does not lead to less hiring and immigrants do not lower pay for native-born workers, challenging commonly held ideas. Two others shared the award for creating a way to study these types of societal issues. Canadian-born <keyword id="3003018" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="David-Card" source="Orion">David Card</keyword> of the University of California, Berkeley, was awarded one half of the prize for his research on how minimum wage, immigration and education affect the labour market, while the other half was shared by <keyword id="12289093" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Joshua-Angrist" source="Orion">Joshua Angrist</keyword> from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Dutch-born <keyword id="12289359" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Guido-Imbens" source="Orion">Guido Imbens</keyword> from Stanford University for their framework for studying issues that can't rely on traditional scientific methods. The <keyword id="1284472" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Royal-Swedish-Academy" source="Orion">Royal Swedish Academy</keyword> of Sciences said the three have completely reshaped empirical work in the economic sciences. Card's studies of core questions for society and Angrist and Imbens' methodological contributions have shown that natural experiments are a rich source of knowledge, said Peter Fredriksson, chair of the Economic Sciences Committee. Their research has substantially improved our ability to answer key causal questions, which has been of great benefit for society. Card looked at what happened when New Jersey raised its minimum wage from 4.25 to 5.05, using restaurants in bordering eastern Pennsylvania as a comparison group. Contrary to previous studies, he and his late research partner Alan Krueger found that an increase in the minimum wage had no effect on the number of employees. Card later did further work on the issue. Overall, the research concluded that the negative effects of increasing the minimum wage are small and significantly smaller than believed 30 years ago, the Nobel committee said. Card also found that incomes of those who are native born to a country can benefit from new immigrants, while immigrants who arrived earlier are the ones at risk of being negatively affected. Angrist and Imbens won their half of the award for working out the methodological issues that allow economists to draw solid conclusions about cause and effect even where they cannot carry out studies according to strict scientific methods. Speaking by phone from his home in Massachusetts, Imbens told reporters that he had been asleep after a busy weekend when the call came. I was just absolutely stunned then to get a telephone call," he said. And then I was just absolutely thrilled to hear the news ... that I got to share this with Josh Angrist and and David Card," whom he called "both very good friends of mine. Imbens said Angrist was best man at his wedding. Krueger, who worked with Card on some of the research that won the Nobel, died in 2019 at age 58. He taught at Princeton for three decades and was chief US Labour Department economist under then-President Bill Clinton. He served in the US Treasury Department under then-President Barack Obama, then as Obama's chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. Nobel prizes are not awarded posthumously. The award comes with a gold medal and 10 million Swedish kronor (over 1.14 million). Unlike the other Nobel prizes, the economics award wasn't established in the will of Alfred Nobel but by the Swedish central bank in his memory in 1968, with the first winner selected a year later. It is the last prize announced each year. Last week, the 2021 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to journalists Maria Ressa of the Philippines and Dmitry Muratov of Russia for their fight for freedom of expression in countries where reporters have faced persistent attacks, harassment and even murder. Ressa was the only woman honoured this year in any category. The Nobel Prize for literature was awarded to UK-based Tanzanian writer Abdulrazak Gurnah, who was recognized for his uncompromising and compassionate penetration of the effects of colonialism and the fate of the refugee. The prize for physiology or medicine went to Americans David Julius and Ardem Patapoutian for their discoveries into how the human body perceives temperature and touch. Three scientists won the physics prize for work that found order in seeming disorder, helping to explain and predict complex forces of nature, including expanding our understanding of climate change. Benjamin List and David W.C. MacMillan won the chemistry prize for finding an easier and environmentally cleaner way to build molecules that can be used to make compounds, including medicines and pesticides. SEE ALSO: <a target="_blank" class="c-link c-message_attachment__title_link" href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/corporates/news/cyrus-mistrys-sterling-wilson-was-at-the-right-place-at-the-right-time-for-mukesh-ambanis-green-energy-ambitions/articleshow/86952399.cms">Cyrus Mistry's Sterling &amp; Wilson was at the right place at the right time for Mukesh Ambani's green energy ambitions</a> <a target="_blank" class="c-link c-message_attachment__title_link" href="https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/enterprise/news/infosys-may-beat-tcs-earnings-even-with-lower-deal-wins-in-september-quarter/articleshow/86952606.cms">Infosys may beat TCS earnings even with lower deal wins in September quarter</a>

You Searched For "Cyrus Mistry writer" and got 6 results

Shapoorji Pallonji Group proposes plan for separation from Tata Sons

PTI

Supreme Court restrains Shapoorji Group, Cyrus Mistry from raising capital on Tata Sons shares

PTI

Chandasekaran writes to Tata employees; asks them to focus on biz, stakeholders' welfare

PTI

Tata Sons hurries to challenge NCLAT order that reinstates Cyrus Mistry as deadline looms large

Katya Naidu

Savitribai Phule, one of the world's greatest teachers, to get 1st biography 125 yrs after death

IANS

Three US-based economists win Nobel prize for Economics

PTI

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides