+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

This Was The Most Important Line Of Mario Draghi's QE Announcement

Jan 22, 2015, 20:23 IST

Of all the details of the European Central Bank's (ECB's) quantitative easing programme announced today, the commitment to continue asset purchases until inflation moves back towards the central bank's 2% target was one of the most important.

Advertisement

The ECB announced plans to launch an asset purchase programme (QE) across the eurozone amounting to €60 billion a month (although this includes around €10 billion a month as part of its existing asset-backed security programme). Although the scale of the programme itself was impressive, another part of the announcement also exceeded expectations.

Here's the key passage from Draghi's introductory statement:

That is, although the ECB intends to wind-up its programme in September 2016 it is not required to do so unless inflation has moved back towards the central bank's inflation target of "below, but close to, 2%". This means, in effect, that Draghi is providing an open-ended commitment to raising demand in the eurozone sufficiently to start pushing up the rate of price increases.

Advertisement

Prior to the announcement there were concerns that the programme would be time-limited meaning that the ECB would have had to halt purchases at some arbitrary point irrespective of underlying conditions. This would not only have risked it ending prematurely (if inflation was still substantially below target, for example), but would also have imposed a de facto cap on the amount that the central bank was willing to spend.

That risk, at least, has been avoided.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article