+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

The Worst Accusations Against Kermit Gosnell Will Be Hard To Prove

Apr 23, 2013, 01:28 IST

AP Photo/Philadelphia Daily News, Yong KimWest Philadelphia abortion doctor Kermit GosnellThe defense for accused infant killer Kermit Gosnell is scheduled to start this week, and the testimony of a prosecution witness could actually help the 72-year-old abortion provider.

Advertisement

Chief Medical Examiner Sam Gulino testified last week that he couldn't say for sure whether any babies in Gosnell's clinic had been born alive, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported. That testimony could help Gosnell, whose main defense is that no babies were ever born alive in his clinic.

Prosecutors say otherwise. He's charged with killing seven live babies and a 41-year-old patient, and a gruesome, 281-page grand jury report says he likely killed many other live babies by "snipping" their spinal cords.

Gosnell is also accused of spreading venereal diseases with dirty instruments, employing a 15-year-old to assist with abortions, and operating a filthy clinic covered in cat feces. The most disturbing parts of the report are disturbing photos of babies whose necks have been "snipped" and jars with severed fetus feet.

There's no apparent medical explanation for cutting off the babies' feet, or for "snipping" the necks of babies that were already dead.

Advertisement

To convict Gosnell of first-degree murder, though, prosecutors would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he killed live babies. Gulino, the chief medical examiner, could have planted some seeds of doubt when he testified that he couldn't say any of the 47 fetuses recovered from Gosnell's clinic were born alive.

Gulino said it was tough to tell whether they were born alive because they'd been frozen.

"We know that the freezing and thawing will destroy tissue, cause fluid to leak from blood vessels into tissue, and that would potentially impede the method that we usually use to determine if fetuses are liveborn or not," Gulino said in court, according to the Inquirer.

Gosnell defense attorney Jack McMahon then asked an incisive follow-up question.

"And am I correct then that based on your total evaluation of these fetuses, 47 of them, we've gone over this at length, you cannot testify that any one of these was born alive, can you?"

Advertisement

The chief medical examiner reportedly responded by saying, "That's correct. I cannot."

The defense was slated to start Monday but has been postponed because McMahon is sick.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article