+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

The VP debate proves viewers don't care about policy - they want a reality TV show

Oct 6, 2016, 01:38 IST

Advertisement
Republican vice presidential nominee Mike Pence (L) and Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine (R) debate as moderator Elaine Quijano (C) listens during the Vice Presidential Debate at Longwood University on October 4, 2016 in Farmville, Virginia. This is the second of four debates during the presidential election season and the only debate between the vice presidential candidates.Joe Raedle/Getty Images

In theory, this was the debate America apparently desired. In reality, all the available evidence suggests they didn't.

For months, the personal, reality-TV driven element woven into the fabric of the 2016 presidential race had been decried.

Americans deserve better, the talking heads said. The race for the most important office in the world should be debated on measures of important policy and substance, not tabloid-level gossip. Less talk about Donald Trump's fights with Miss Universe, and more about the candidates' distinct foreign-policy differences, for instance.

Well, that's exactly what Tuesday's vice presidential face-off between Gov. Mike Pence and Sen. Tim Kaine delivered - and instead of being praised, it was largely panned as boring.

Advertisement

In real-time, viewers weren't impressed. Take a look at some of the reaction on Twitter:

Advertisement

They didn't look thrilled in the crowd, either.

Here's a Reuters photo of the Longwood University audience. Attendees were not as engrossed as the pundits may have led you to predict:

Members of the audience watch as Democratic U.S. vice presidential nominee Senator Tim Kaine and Republican U.S. vice presidential nominee Governor Mike Pence participate in their vice presidential debate at Longwood University in Farmville, Virginia, U.S., October 4, 2016. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

And the evidence afterward confirmed the lackluster real-time sentiment. The event amassed less than half the audience that tuned into last week's record-breaking presidential debate, and it garnered the lowest vice presidential debate ratings since 2000:

Advertisement

As it turns out, the broader electorate - and even those in the political world - is not very intrigued by lengthy discussions on criminal-justice reform, America's posture in Eastern Europe, or taxes.

What people actually want is a fight.

Voters may not openly admit it, but they crave the kind of gutter campaign Trump has run this election cycle. It's in fact precisely this kind of politics people most want to consume - politics spliced with plenty of drama.

And perhaps there is nothing wrong with that. It's human nature to gravitate toward conflict.

In-depth discussions on public policy are certainly not everyone's cup of tea. Watching a presidential candidate lob personal insults at another onstage for 90 minutes, on the other hand, is entertaining and an easy concept to grasp.

Advertisement

But it does seem jarring for the very people who complain about the election being a circus to yawn when it isn't one.

If reaction to last night's debate proved one thing, it's this: America doesn't want a civil debate. It wants a fight, but still isn't ready to admit it.

NOW WATCH: Golf legend Greg Norman reveals the truth behind President Bill Clinton's late-night 1997 injury

Please enable Javascript to watch this video
You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article