+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

The Supreme Court's Roe V. Wade Opinion Wasn't Just About Women

Jan 23, 2013, 03:03 IST

WikipediaFormer Chief Justice Harry BlackmunThe U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Roe v. Wade is widely regarded as a huge victory for women's rights.

Advertisement

But former Justice Harry Blackmun's opinion actually emphasizes the rights of doctors even more than women's freedoms, The New Yorker's Jeffrey Toobin writes.

Blackmun was the top lawyer at Minnesota's famed Mayo Clinic before he became chief justice. In Roe v. Wade, the chief seemed to be tipping his hat to his former colleagues, Toobin says.

The decision mentioned the word "physician" 48 times and "woman" only 44 times.

In Roe v. Wade, the high court ruled that the right to privacy implicitly guaranteed by the Constitution also gives women the right to an abortion in most cases.

Advertisement

It also implied the government shouldn't interfere with a doctor's right to help a woman make that decision. From the opinion, courtesy of Toobin:

"The attending physician, in consultation with his patient, is free to determine, without regulation by the State, that, in his medical judgment, the patient’s pregnancy should be terminated.”

Read Toobin's piece for a full analysis of how the high court's views on abortion have evolved since then >

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article