However, the two oil powerhouses didn't announce any concrete action plan, which had some analysts wondering whether this latest development would actually lead to anything - especially given that Khalid al-Falih, Saudi Arabia's oil minister, dismissed the need for a production freeze.
Moreover, the team at Capital Economics pointed out that most OPEC members and Russia are already pumping oil at record levels, which suggests that they have little spare capacity. "The upshot is that there was nothing in Monday's announcement to change our view that oil prices will finish the year a little lower than they are now," wrote Tom Pugh, the firm's commodities economist, in a note to clients.
And big oil players remain at odds in various geopolitical situations, including in Syria and Yemen, which adds another dimension to all potential decisions.
Prices for Brent crude oil, the international benchmark, surged by as much as 6% to $49.90 per barrel in the immediate aftermath before giving back most of their gains later in the day.
Capital Economics
However, other analysts have argued that there's more to the latest overture than meets the eye.
Monday's announcement, "while short on details and immaterial for actual supply and demand balances, is another indicator of the extreme economic duress that producers are enduring, and in our view, increases the likelihood of some type of collective action if prices remain under significant pressure," Helima Croft, the global head of commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, wrote in a note to clients.
"We take the view that potential joint action discussion is a symbolic attempt to shore up sentiment since there is little else to lose given that most countries are already producing flat out," she added.
RBC Capital Markets
Although Saudi Arabia and Russia are nowhere near the chaos engulfing OPEC's so-called "Fragile Five" - Nigeria, Venezuela, Libya, Iraq, and Algeria - they, too, have seen their fortunes shrink over the past two years.
Russia's economy shrank by 3.7% in 2015. And, although things have started to somewhat stabilize, the IMF forecasts it will contract by 1.2% in 2016. Plus, an estimated 13.4% of the population is currently living in poverty (about 19.2 million people), according to data from March 2016, and there have been several protests regarding economic concerns this year.
Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia, which has managed to weather the lower-for-longer environment far better than most of its OPEC colleagues, is not without problems. FX reserves are down almost $190 billion since oil prices started falling; Bloomberg reports that the country is aiming to cancel over $20 billion of projects and to slash ministry budgets by a quarter; there have been several ugly economic data points; and the public hasn't been happy with some austerity measures, such as the sharp rise in electricity bills.
As such, "while geopolitical tensions between key producers continue to run high because of ongoing conflicts in Syria and Yemen, their leaders may yet opt for pragmatism and seek some financial relief that will allow them to keep their increasingly restive citizens content and off the streets," Croft argued.
It's worth nothing that previous attempts to re-instate production quotas have not always yielded desired results. However, the fact that even the better-off producers are increasingly feeling the strain of the lower-for-longer environment somewhat raises the stakes.
Also notably, a coordinated decision could underscore the oil cartel's legitimacy.
"Although co-operative action taken by the cartel and other key producers may prove to be more of an optics play than physically actionable, at a minimum, it alters sentiment, puts a floor into the market, and reminds the market of OPEC's capacity to co-operate," wrote Croft.
"It would also prove that the prolific pronouncements of the cartel's demise are premature."
Brent crude prices are down 2.3% at $46.55 per barrel as of 10:14 a.m. ET.