- John Rogers - the CEO, chief investment officer, and lead portfolio manager at $12 billion Ariel Investments - spoke with Business Insider to break down his top fund's outsized success since the financial crisis.
- The $1.8 billion flagship Ariel Fund was No. 1 in Lipper's mid-cap core universe of funds in the period from the stock market's bottom on March 9, 2009 through Dec. 31, 2018.
- Rogers also discussed what Ariel does differently than other firms, his views on the stock market's future, and whether he thinks an economic recession is imminent.
John Rogers - the CEO, chief investment officer, and lead portfolio manager at $12 billion Ariel Investments - spoke with Business Insider senior investing editor Joe Ciolli.
They chatted about his fund's market-beating performance since the financial crisis, what Ariel does differently than others, the stock market's future, and the possibility of a recession.
Following is a transcript of the video.
Joe Ciolli: John, your fund has really outperformed peers over the last decade, and I wanted to see if you could maybe distill that success down to one specific strategy or behavior that you guys do better than anyone else.
John Rogers: I think what was really, really important is that we are long-term investors, so we are always looking out over the horizon and making sure that we're not getting caught up in the short-term noise, short-term emotions of the market. We're able to say, 'Hey, three to five years from now, what will these companies look like?'
So during that financial crisis, we were able to look out over the horizon, take a long-term perspective, and try not to let all the fear stymie us during that tough, tough time.
Ciolli: So I wanted to see what your best call might be over the last 10 years. Is there any sector call or specific allocation that you made that you think really contributed to your success more than other things?
Rogers: There are a couple sectors that we worked on, but the one that really comes to mind is the real estate services companies. Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) and CB Richard Ellis (CBRE). They are both real estate services companies known for leasing. They have businesses that do the capital markets business. They have outsourcing real estate services.
They really are worldwide companies in terms of real estate servicing, and those stocks got crushed during the financial crisis. CBRE got under $5 a share, and got to be extraordinarily cheap, everyone hated it, and now it's bumping up toward $50 a share. So that was a sector that was really great for us.
Another one was the leisure-oriented companies. Companies like Royal Caribbean that do a wonderful job of creating cruises for American consumers primarily. But they're also global, they're all over the world. That stock got under $10, and now it's well over $100. People were very fearful during the crisis that people wouldn't cruise again.
In both cases, we looked out over that horizon and took that long-term perspective that we believe that real estate will be here forever and that people would love being able to get away on a cruise down the road.
Ciolli: Is there anything in particular that you think you do differently that kind of sets you apart? I know that you're traditional value investors, but value has not done so well over the last decade, but you have. What wrinkle have you added to the value investing playbook that's allowed you to continue to succeed where others have failed?
Rogers: I think, on the one hand, the thing that we do that has worked well for us is to follow Warren Buffett's playbook. He always says, 'You wanna be greedy when others are fearful.' And so during the financial crisis when there was maximum pessimism, we were buying our favored names.
Same thing happened this last December. Stocks got crushed as we moved up toward Christmas. We were in there buying our favored stocks like Mattel and US Silica right before Christmas Day, and those stocks are up now over 50%, just through this period, through the end of February and early March. So being able to truly buy when there's that kind of fear in the marketplace is something that distinguishes us from our peers.
And then finally, we worked hard to improve our debt analysis. We think often value-oriented firms - and we learned this during the financial crisis - we didn't spend enough time doing our own independent work on making sure that our balance sheets were exceedingly strong, and that's something that I think we've worked really hard on improving, and it's helped our performance these last 10 years.
Ciolli: So does that help you avoid these so-called value traps, where a company's cheap just because it's not that great of a company and maybe it's saddled with debt? Does that sort of allow you to avoid that minefield somewhat and pick the cream of the crop?
Rogers: Well, I think it helps us that if you make a mistake, if you don't have an overleveraged balance sheet, you can live through mistakes, and you can build a business for the long run. If you don't have the right type of balance sheet, when things get tough, that business can go away. You can have a permanent loss of capital, which we're trying to really protect our customers from.
We think that waiting to make sure we have these bulletproof balance sheets has helped to protect capital for us during the ups and downs that are inevitable in the market, and the volatility that's gotten greater and greater than I've ever seen in my career. There's been so much volatility.
Ciolli: You mentioned the big uptick in volatility in recent months. Is there anything strategy-wise that you're doing to sort of take advantage of that, or to avoid the downside of that?
Rogers: Well, we're trying to make volatility our friend. And when we see stocks that are gapping down maybe where there's no fundamental change in the long-term economic outlook of that business, well, that creates an opportunity, and I think that's an important thing. So volatility should be something that helps you. On the other hand, when stocks spike higher and maybe get overpriced, that can be an opportunity for us to trim, take some profits, and move into cheaper companies.
So volatility doesn't scare us, and we think that in this environment where everyone's been in this flight to safety, more and more investment communities have gotten more and more conservative. So they're moving money to the safe parts of the marketplace. That means the stocks that are left out can be truly orphaned and be really cheap. So we're trying to find those cheap orphans in this type of environment.
Ciolli: So you mentioned that you're looking more at company credit profiles. Is there anything else that you're doing on a stock-selection basis to sort of insulate yourself from the next downturn? Any other types of strategies that you're using to protect yourself?
Rogers: One of the things that Charlie Bobrinskoy - the head of our investment group - has helped us work on is that we are big believers in behavioral finance, and we're in Chicago, and the University of Chicago's there. I'm actually vice chairman of the board. Professor Dick Thaler just won the Nobel Prize in behavioral finance. They've had some other great behavioral finance professors there. So we've been trying to use that to help us.
One of the things that we think that helps protect you against behavioral biases is to have a devil's advocate. Someone in your investment group who challenges the perspectives and points of view of our various reports that we put together on the companies and industries we follow. So I think the devil's advocate's been a big improvement. It's created better dialog, better discussion for us to challenge each other in our weekly portfolio management meetings.
Ciolli: I know that you like to look way beyond the short term, so perhaps this is too nearsighted of a question, but I'm gonna ask it anyway. What do you think the future holds for the bull market, how much longer can it go?
It sounds like the way your portfolio is built that you're insulated from any downturn. But it's still helpful to get an idea from an expert like yourself how long we have to go in the current cycle.
Rogers: As you know, you never know quite where we are in the cycle. I always tell people we invest for the long run so that in case there is a downturn that's inevitable, we know that downturn will end, and that stocks will march back up. We think that if you get too caught up in the short-term emotions and try to predict the short term, it's really, really hard to do and often doesn't lead to good decision-making.
But overall, our perspective is right now is things are steady as she goes. Market multiples are reasonable, the S&P at 17 times next year's earnings is reasonable. If you look at the kind of interest-rate environment we're in, we have historically low rates. So you put reasonable valuations with low rates, we think that means stocks are not overpriced. I think that's really a big deal.
Also, there's so much money in private equity, so much cash sloshing around out there. If stocks get beaten up and get cheap, private equity can come in and bid those companies up and take advantage of those opportunities. So we're still quite optimistic. As we talk to our management teams these days, people are telling us cash flows are strong, the economy's reasonably strong, and it gives us confidence that things are gonna chug along here. It's a good environment to invest in common stocks.
Ciolli: One last one. A recession, people seem to be thinking that there could be one coming by the end of this year, or end of next year. Opinions really vary, but it's on the radar. What's your take on it?
Rogers: No one knows when the next recession's going to come. And we just believe you've got to look out over the horizon. Warren Buffett always talks about the fact that last century the Dow started at around 66, and ended at over 11,000. We had two world wars. We had a Great Depression. We had all kinds of challenges that faced our country.
Our capitalist democracy is the best system ever invented. So if we do have a recession, which is inevitable, we'll recover from it, and it'll bounce right back. So I think investors shouldn't try to time the market to move in and out on a short-term basis. I don't think that's a successful formula.