The EU just took a massive step in giving regulators the power to break up the banks
The deal is said to cover 30 of Europe's biggest banks.
The Financial Times reported that EU officials hashed out a deal with European legislators late last night that will see regulators given the ability to not only force a lender to be chopped up and sold off but to also ban them from conducting a number of activities.
One of those is banning the banks from making financial bets using their own money - also known as proprietary or prop trading. Other measures agreed in the preliminary deal include the banks having to prove to regulators that their investment banking activities do not threaten the financial stability of the country's financial system.
In other words, regulators and lawmakers want to prevent the cataclysmic events of the credit crisis which stemmed from highly risky investment banking products - mortgage-backed securities. The new plans are designed to prevent banks derailing the global financial system again by making trading activities a lot more supervised and less risky.
The proposals were initially tabled by the member of the European Commission responsible for financial services policy between 2010 and 2014 - Michel Barnier.
In 2013, Barnier laid out in a speech exactly why and what he planned to do in making sure Europe's financial system would never be as vulnerable to a systemic collapse again:
However, after he left the European Commission, Brussels have still tried to forge ahead with the proposals in giving regulators greater power to decide the fates of banks.
Naturally, the financial industry has greatly opposed the proposals and this month, the president of the European Banking Federation and chief executive of Société Générale, Frédéric Oudéa wrote to the FT to explain how "if we are not careful, then these proposals would have the potential to damage banks' ability to undertake market-making and provide other services in support of their corporate clients."
Basically, the regulators could inadvertently kill off the banks anyway because the amount of restrictions proposed on them regarding "risky" investments means that the lenders wouldn't make as much money and therefore lose their clients and shareholders.