We now know exactly what Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg think about before they acquire a startup
Hello everyone! Welcome to this weekly roundup of Business Insider stories from executive editor Matt Turner. Please subscribe to Business Insider here to get this newsletter in your inbox every Sunday.
Hello!
It's been a dizzying week for Big Tech, with Jeff Bezos et al appearing in front of Congress, then earnings, before the week wrapped up with an unexpected twist involving Tik Tok, President Trump, and Microsoft.
For smart commentary on the Congressional hearing on tech antitrust, I'd recommend these opinion pieces:
- Linette Lopez wrote that unlike other tech hearings, the politicians came prepared. The tech titans did not seem ready for that at all, and they admitted to doing a lot of offensive things.
- Big Tech's CEOs wrapped themselves in the flag and warned about China, Troy Wolverton noted. He argued that their patriotic appeal was meaningless, misleading, and should be ignored.
Personally, I often find some of the most illuminating takeaways to be buried in the documents that are released as part of the hearing. These can offer a window into how top executives think and communicate. The picture they paint is often less than flattering. For example:
- Mark Zuckerberg wrote to his top lieutenants about the benefits of 'cloning' competitors after meeting with Chinese entrepreneurs in 2012 — read the full memo
- Emails show how Amazon's $1 billion Ring acquisition was driven by Jeff Bezos' interest in its 'market position – not technology'
- Emails show Amazon coordinated an 'aggressive' plan to 'undercut' Diapers.com before acquiring its parent company in 2010
- Newly-released emails reveal how Google hoped to pay $50 million for YouTube in 2006, and why it ended up paying $1.65 billion
As Becky Peterson reported:
Market position, "land grabs," and winning were all top considerations for the CEOs at Amazon, Facebook and Google ahead of major acquisitions, according to emails and instant messages made public on Wednesday as part of Congressional hearing over possible anticompetitive practices in tech.
The documents give unique insight into the thought processes of these powerful (and often rash) men on the eve of big purchases, which over time have proven to completely rewrite the technology landscape. Ultimately, the messages show, none of these companies made their most high-profile acquisitions because of the quality of the technology.
You can read her story in full:
What were your takeaways from the hearing?
And what do you make of Microsoft's interest in buying TikTok's US operation? The outcome is difficult to predict now that President Trump has said he's against a deal, but the very fact that Microsoft had been keen is fascinating.
Email me at mturner@businessinsider.com. I'd love to hear from you.
Exxon's stealthy job cuts
From Benji Jones:
Like many of her colleagues, Katie considered herself a hard worker. Her manager told her as much, often throwing compliments her way about the value she was delivering to Exxon — her employer and the largest oil company in the US.
Earlier this summer, she was told she was in good standing, quelling fears that she'd be axed as part of Exxon's performance-based cuts, which were ramping up in the wake of the worst oil downturn in a generation. Then everything changed.
Days ago, Katie was told she was among the company's worst performers during Exxon's annual review process. Her options were to resign or enroll in a performance-improvement plan that she understood employees rarely passed.
Benji reported that Exxon is disguising layoffs as performance-based job cuts, citing current and former employees. Several employees said they received no negative feedback before being told that they were ranked as poor performers and forced out of the company, he reported.
You can read the story in full here:
Inside the Young Living empire
Young Living, a multi-level marketing company that boasts celebrity endorsements from the likes of Ellen Pompeo, Jenna Dewan, and Kristin Cavallari, claims revenues of $1.5 billion a year from its network of 6 million members, Nicole Einbinder reports.
From her story:
- 89% of all its members sit on the company's bottom rung of sellers, earning, on average, only $4 — that's four dollars — annually.
- While Young Living members worked to keep their businesses afloat, the founders of the company earned a lavish lifestyle in a $1.3 million 10,000-square-foot mansion, trips to far-flung countries, and private planes.
- The company is being sued by plaintiffs who allege it's "an illegal pyramid scheme." The company denies the claims.
- "Young Living disputes many of these claims as outdated, misleading, or exaggerated," the company told Business Insider. "The company has instituted robust compliance practices and complies with applicable laws."
You can read the story in full here:
Separately, Nicole reported that while Young Living founder Gary Young's official life story is sunlit and ruggedly all-American, the evidence paints a less flattering portrait. From her story:
Young's early career included enrolling at a school dedicated to the teachings of a man who was convicted of practicing medicine without a license after a patient died. Young himself was convicted of illegally posing as a health practitioner. He did time in Spokane County Jail in Washington.
You can read that story in full here:
I'll be out next week, so you'll be hearing from Olivia Oran. As a reminder, you can:
- Sign up here to get the top stories in healthcare delivered to your inbox every day
- Sign up here to get the top stories in advertising delivered to your inbox every day
- Sign up here to get Insider Today, a daily newsletter that offers exclusive insights on the big stories.
Below are headlines on some of the stories you might have missed from the past week.
— Matt
The 31 top power players helping CEO Evan Spiegel run Snap