Twitter 2.0 is an empty promise unless it exterminates the bots

• Twitter still has a massive bot problem.
• That threatens new CEO Linda Yaccarino's plan to turn the site into an accurate, real-time source of information.

As part of her vision for Twitter's future, CEO Linda Yaccarino wants you to use the platform to find accurate and timely information on hot topics with minimum effort.

Good luck with that.

If you were to use the search function today to see what AI experts are saying about ChatGPT you would need heaps of patience and ample tolerance of bots.

Instead of getting sharp insights on the generative AI tool, a cursory glance at the search results for "ChatGPT" thrown up by Twitter in recent days offers a stream of tweets from bots who have hijacked the term to dominate the "top" results.

Scroll long enough and you may eventually come across something useful, but at the time of writing, multiple tweets from bots appear each minute. Bots also spam people's replies and DMs on everything from bitcoin to stock trading.

This is a big problem for Yaccarino.

On Monday, she said Twitter was "on a mission to become the world's most accurate real-time information source and a global town square for communication" as it evolved into Twitter 2.0.

"That's not an empty promise," she said. Isn't it? The company has, under its owner Elon Musk, fired most of the staff trying to keep users safe from spam and misinformation.

Bots aren't just appearing in search results for ChatGPT. Noise from spam accounts includes everything from tweets about a West Virginia state trooper being shot, to bot armies promoting a specific Forex trader account. Adam Feldman, a theater critic at Time Out, noted a "disturbing" occurrence this week as he highlighted how bots were making seemingly specific, tailored responses to his tweets on the Tony Awards.

Though Elon Musk has previously said the company had removed 90% of its bots, recent research shows just how persistent this problem continues to be. It's also a difficult problem to measure objectively.

Bot activity remains as consistent as it was before Musk took over, The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday, citing findings from several researchers. Analysis carried out by cybersecurity firm Cheq noted that paid advertising traffic driven by bots to its clients accounted for about 12% of traffic — the same level as a year ago.

This all gets in the way of Yaccarino's ambition of making Twitter a real-time information source.

Insider contacted Twitter for comment, but the company responded with an automated message that didn't address the inquiry.

Musk has long singled out removing bots as a top priority — something he was willing to "die trying" to accomplish. Part of his strategy involved getting people to pay for Twitter Blue, a monthly fee for verification that, in theory, would signal to other users that an account is run by a real person who is who they claim to be.

The idea has fallen flat. Not only has Twitter Blue struggled to attract paying users — Musk has personally paid for some celebrity users to have verified accounts — but the system has proven easy to exploit. In April, Twitter falsely verified a troll account impersonating Disney (and then suspended it).

If Twitter's future is to be a global town square that trades in accurate, real-time information between real-world people, the bots need to go for good — and fast.