+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Texas sued by group of Big Tech giants over censorship bill they say would protect 'pro-Nazi speech' and 'terrorist propaganda'

Sep 23, 2021, 23:09 IST
Business Insider
Left to right: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, and Google CEO Sundar Pichai. Andrew Harnik/Rolf Vennenbernd/picture alliance/Pool via REUTERS
  • Groups representing Facebook, Youtube, and Twitter are suing Texas over a "social media censorship" law.
  • Proponents say the law prevents users from being booted of platforms for their political views.
  • Multiple courts have ruled against similar laws, citing private companies' rights to editorial discretion.
Advertisement

Two major trade groups representing social media platforms Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter are suing the Attorney General of Texas over a new state law that supporters say would limit the "censorship" of conservative users.

HB20, which passed in Texas earlier this month, bans social-media companies with more than 50 million monthly active users from censoring people because of "the viewpoint of the user or another person," the law states. It also allows users "banned from social media for their political beliefs" to sue the platform that banned them.

Tech companies say the law "would unconstitutionally require platforms like YouTube and Facebook to disseminate, for example, pro-Nazi speech, terrorist propaganda, foreign government disinformation, and medical misinformation," according to the suit.

The plaintiffs cite multiple court decisions defending a private company's right to editorial discretion under the first amendment. This includes a Florida law similarly targeting social media companies that was blocked by a federal judge in June.

"Forcing those companies to give equal treatment to all viewpoints puts Nazi party political speech and extremist messages from Taliban sympathizers on equal footing with God bless America," Matt Schruers, president of the Computer & Communications Industry Association, told USA Today.

Advertisement

On the other side of the lawsuit is Attorney General Ken Paxton, a fervent Trump loyalist who spoke at the rally preceding the Jan 6. attack on the US capitol.

Texas GOP leaders initially raised Big Tech censorship concerns following the US capitol insurrection that killed five people and injured more than 100 officers.

In response, several major social-media networks banned former president Donald Trump from their platforms citing a violation of their terms and services, in addition to blocking accounts linked to election misinformation.

"The seemingly coordinated de-platforming of the President of the United States and several leading voices not only chills free speech, it wholly silences those whose speech and political beliefs do not align with leaders of Big Tech companies," Paxton said in a news release one week after the riot.

"I will defend the First Amendment and ensure that conservative voices have the right to be heard," Paxton said in a statement. "Big Tech does not have the authority to police the expressions of people whose political viewpoint they simply disagree with."

Advertisement

Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article