+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Elon Musk reportedly threatened to give JPMorgan a 'one star review on Yelp' if it doesn't withdraw its lawsuit

Nov 23, 2021, 21:13 IST
Business Insider
Elon MuskPool
  • An ongoing legal dispute between JPMorgan and Tesla led Elon Musk to fire back at the bank in a recent WSJ article.
  • "If JPM doesn't withdraw their lawsuit, I will give them a one star review on Yelp," Musk said.
  • JPMorgan says Tesla owes the bank $162 million from a warrant trade dating back to 2014.
Advertisement

An ongoing legal dispute between JPMorgan and Tesla has elicited a memorable response from Elon Musk, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal.

"If JPM doesn't withdraw their lawsuit, I will give them a one star review on Yelp. This is my final warning!" Musk told The Wall Street Journal. On Twitter, Musk also said regarding the matter, "serious allegations deserve serious responses," and "I will talk to their [JPMorgan's] manager!"

The dispute revolves around Tesla warrants JPMorgan received in 2014 for helping the EV maker set up a trade. The warrants, which were incredibly profitable given Tesla's recent ascent to a $1 trillion valuation, gave the bank the right to buy shares of Tesla at a pre-determined strike price.

According to the contract related to the warrants, JPMorgan had the right to change the strike price if Tesla announced it was exploring a sale, as that would impact the value of the warrants. JPMorgan went ahead and lowered the strike price of its warrants in 2018 after Musk tweeted "funding secured" at $420 per share, according to the lawsuit.

Once the deal announced by Musk didn't materialize, JPMorgan raised its strike price higher, but not all the way back to the original strike price. When the warrants expired in June of this year, Tesla paid JPMorgan based on the original strike price rather than the adjusted strike price made by the bank.

Advertisement

Tesla would owe JPMorgan an additional $162 million if it paid the bank based on the adjusted strike price.

The strike price changes were "unreasonably swift" and "opportunistic," Tesla said in the lawsuit, adding that it was the only bank to make such an adjustment. JPMorgan responded that other banks might have declined to adjust their warrant strike prices "for business reasons having nothing to do with the contractual terms."

JPMorgan's relationship with Tesla seems to have always been on edge. While the bank helped the company go public in 2010, it was ranked behind other banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Tesla has paid JPMorgan about $15 million for advice and capital markets work over the past decade, well behind the $90 million it has paid to Goldman Sachs, according to Dealogic.

And JPMorgan's consumer bank was initially hesitant to finance electric vehicles from Tesla due to concerns about the long-term value of electric vehicle batteries, The Wall Street Journal reported. How Tesla and JPMorgan can settle their ongoing dispute remains to be seen, though tweets from Musk may provide some insight.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article