Samsung's $1,380 Galaxy Z Flip is without a doubt a better foldable smartphone than Motorola's $1,500 Razr for 8 big reasons

The Galaxy Z Flip's 6.7-inch screen makes the new Razr's 6.2-inch screen less impressive, especially when you consider that the Galaxy Z Flip is a smaller phone overall, both when it's folded and unfolded.

To top it off, the Galaxy Z Flip's screen has a higher resolution that should make for sharper visuals than the Razr's screen.

It's truly perplexing that Motorola is shipping the new Razr with Android 9 (Pie), which was released in 2018, rather than the current version of Android 10.

In many respects, it doesn't really matter. Android 9 should work just fine, as long as Google and Motorola support the Razr with security updates during the device's lifetime. Still, Android 10 brought some significant privacy and security control settings, new gesture controls, and the highly requested system-wide dark-mode.

Again, it's not the worst thing in the world, but it's something that raises eyebrows.

You can prop the Galaxy Z Flip's screen at different angles, which gives you more options on how to use phone. One good example is resting the Galaxy Z Flip on a table and propping up the screen to take a video call without holding it. Or you can prop the Galaxy Z Flip to take time-lapse photos or regular photos without any risk of shaking from your hands.

It's not a massive game-changer, but it's a nice feature that the new Razr doesn't have.

The Galaxy Z Flip has a regular 12-megapixel camera and a 12-megapixel ultra-wide, whereas the new Razr has a 16-megapixel regular camera. The other lens on the new Razr is simply a depth sensor that doesn't take photos, but is designed to deliver better portrait mode shots.

At the end of the day, whether someone prefers ultra-wide photos or better portrait mode photos is up to the user. Subjectively, I'd prefer to have the option to take ultra-wide photos over better portrait mode photos. Portrait mode is something that can be decently faked with software, whereas ultra-wide photos can't be faked with software.

It was somewhat shocking to see that the new Motorola Razr has a mere 5-megapixel selfie camera, especially compared to the Galaxy Z Flip's 8-megapixel selfie camera.

In today's smartphone environment, 5 megapixels is pretty darn low, and not something anyone would expect on a $1,500 smartphone. I'd also expect more than 8 megapixels for the Galaxy Z Flip's $1,380 price tag, but at least it's better than what you get on the Motorola Razr.

At only 2,510mAh, the Motorola Razr's battery is small by modern Android smartphone standards. The Galaxy Z Flip has a much larger 3,300mAh battery that's more in-line with battery expectations for a smartphone released in 2020.

The only major thing going for the Motorola Razr is its classic nostalgic design. Apart from that, there's little reason for anyone to look at the Razr when the Galaxy Z Flip offers so much more for over $100 less.

Both the Galaxy Z Flip and Motorola Razr are mired in controversy over the fragility of their screens.

Samsung touted that the Galaxy Z Flip has an "ultra-thin glass" screen that initially suggested better durability against scratches. Yet, a recent test by gadget-destroyer Zack Nelson of the JerryRigEverything YouTube channel showed that the Galaxy Z Flip's screen is no more durable than the fragile plastic screen on the Samsung Galaxy Fold. In a sentence, the Galaxy Z Flip's screen scratches very easily:

Also recently, the protective plastic coating on one reviewer's Motorola Razr started to peel off the screen at the fold in the middle. It's only one indication that the Motorola Razr's foldable screen might be prone to issues, but foldable smartphone screens have a very poor record so far.