Dozens of manufacturing companies testified about how Trump's trade war with China could affect them - here's what they said

Alta Forest Products

Chehalis, Washington

"American companies and workers in our industry are thus competing on an uneven playing field. By imposing a tariff you will preserve family-wage jobs in our communities." -Mike Pedersen

Star Pipe Products

Houston, Texas

"It has the potential to affect our ability to maintain to our current employment levels in our U.S. operations and, also, our capacity to continue to invest in our foundry in Oklahoma, which would impair our efforts to create new jobs. And while we understand and appreciate the government's intent to protect U.S. industries from truly unfair trade practices, this action is using a sledgehammer where a scalpel is needed." -Rishi Bhutada

Skyline Steel

Parsippany, New Jersey

"Skyline is pleased that the U.S. Government will impose an additional duty on certain Chinese-origin products to help address these unfair and illegal practices." -Robert Braden

Kenroy Home

Jacksonville, Florida

"I am not sure how Kenroy is going to handle the immediate $1.75 million in tariff costs ... But so far, Kenroy Home has already suspended new product development as new products with less certain sales potential will be overburdened by these tariffs. This has resulted in curtailed hiring and has already forced selected employee cuts." -John Mandelker

Element Electronics

Eden Prairie, Minnesota

"Quite frankly, I can't find any way to interpret what the administration is proposing other than it's a mistake or unintended result and will promptly be fixed through this hearing process, because the alternative is that the government has targeted Element's factory for closure, and that makes no sense at all." -David Baer

Huntingdon Fiberglass Products

Huntingdon, Pennsylvania

"Unfortunately, no U.S. suppliers have shown interest in manufacturing these materials for us as doing so would require a significant allocation of time and expense. As a result of our dependence on Chinese supply, the financial consequences of the proposed tariffs would be grave for Huntingdon." -Jason Takac

BTIC-America Corporation

Houston, Texas

"These tariffs will not create additional jobs nor they make the U.S. more competitive in this market. They will not spur additional domestic growth nor will it improve competition. These tariffs would merely punish a single foreign supplier all at the expense of U.S. businesses and consumers." -Jon Tilley

Commercial Metals Company

Irving, Texas

"We cannot continue to allow Chinese industrial plans, technology transfer policies, and cyber enabled theft, and illegal government subsidies cause further injury to US manufacturers." -Billy Milligand

The Wooster Brush Company

Wooster, Ohio

"In other words, the tariffs will punish American brush manufacturers like Wooster that are trying to achieve the administration's goal of investing in US manufacturing and jobs, but will encourage the foreign production of finished brushes." -Bill Fagert

Sea Eagle Boats

Jefferson, New York

"The proposed tariffs will not create a US manufacturing industry because domestic production is simply too expensive for a recreational product intended for the middle class family. … Moving production out of China is difficult and time consuming." -John Hoge

Silberline

Tamaqua, Pennsylvania

"Any additional tariff would result in significant financial strain on our US-based business, threaten jobs and call into question future investment." -Lisa Scheller

Niche Chem Industries

Fair Lawn, New Jersey

"The additional tariffs, if imposed, would result in severe economic harm to our company and our customers, potentially creating supply shortages and raising the costs on consumer products purchased by Americans." -Deborah Hardesty

Ball Chain Manufacturing Company

Mt Vernon, New York

"Under these current conditions we're in jeopardy of having to cease US manufacturing operations. In a perfect world, there would be no need for tariffs, every player would compete fairly. Unfortunately, this is not the case, particularly with respect to China and South Korea." -Valentine Taubner, Jr.

Nation Ford Chemical

Fort Mill, South Carolina

"The rising ... cost of these materials by the initially proposed 10 percent will cause a severe hardship to our company. A tariff of 25 percent will likely create a situation where we would not be cost competitive on a global basis." -Phillip McCarter

Royce Associates

East Rutherford, New Jersey

"...in the late '70s, I was here to testify to maintain certain tariffs on certain chemicals that we felt there was unfair trade going on at that point in time. Today though, I am here, and I feel that I'm not testifying just for Royce but more on behalf of the thousands of US textile workers, the US military, and the blue collar professionals who the administration has pledged support for. We believe that the proposed tariffs on vat dyes will cause the unintended consequence of causing harm to these groups of people, rather than helping them." -Wylie Royce

Daikin America

Orangeburg, New York

"Let me be very direct. Daikin America's parent has made investments in the United States based on the fact that the US is a country that is generally friendly to business and allows the market to determine cost. Current investments and additional investments will be affected by government actions that undermine our ability to obtain sufficient inputs at world market prices." -Ritchie Straff

Synplus

Pomona, California

"We have already seen a decrease in the demand for 2019 just based on the suggestion of a tariff." -Cynthia Gardenhire

Tencom

Holland, Ohio

"I understand you want to beat China over the head with these tariffs to get them to trade more fairly. But in our case, you're putting at risk the jobs, efforts and future of people that have spent 20 years building a small American manufacturing company." -Robert DiSanza

Leather Specialty Company

Naples, Florida

"These additional duties will help our USA manufacturing and encourage other companies to expand, startup again, and start hiring Americans." -Michael Korchmar

Diamond Innovations

Worthington, Ohio

"If a tariff is imposed on industrial diamonds, my company will be at a significant commercial disadvantage to our offshore competitors who would not have to bear the burden of the tariff. I may have to reduce our US workforce by nearly 100 jobs in order to stay competitive." -Michael Korchmar

Alta Forest Products

Chehalis, Washington

"American companies and workers in our industry are thus competing on an uneven playing field. By imposing a tariff you will preserve family-wage jobs in our communities." -Mike Pedersen

Star Pipe Products

Houston, Texas

"It has the potential to affect our ability to maintain to our current employment levels in our U.S. operations and, also, our capacity to continue to invest in our foundry in Oklahoma, which would impair our efforts to create new jobs. And while we understand and appreciate the government's intent to protect U.S. industries from truly unfair trade practices, this action is using a sledgehammer where a scalpel is needed." -Rishi Bhutada

Skyline Steel

Parsippany, New Jersey

"Skyline is pleased that the U.S. Government will impose an additional duty on certain Chinese-origin products to help address these unfair and illegal practices." -Robert Braden

Kenroy Home

Jacksonville, Florida

"I am not sure how Kenroy is going to handle the immediate $1.75 million in tariff costs ... But so far, Kenroy Home has already suspended new product development as new products with less certain sales potential will be overburdened by these tariffs. This has resulted in curtailed hiring and has already forced selected employee cuts." -John Mandelker

Element Electronics

Eden Prairie, Minnesota

"Quite frankly, I can't find any way to interpret what the administration is proposing other than it's a mistake or unintended result and will promptly be fixed through this hearing process, because the alternative is that the government has targeted Element's factory for closure, and that makes no sense at all." -David Baer

Huntingdon Fiberglass Products

Huntingdon, Pennsylvania

"Unfortunately, no U.S. suppliers have shown interest in manufacturing these materials for us as doing so would require a significant allocation of time and expense. As a result of our dependence on Chinese supply, the financial consequences of the proposed tariffs would be grave for Huntingdon." -Jason Takac

BTIC-America Corporation

Houston, Texas

"These tariffs will not create additional jobs nor they make the U.S. more competitive in this market. They will not spur additional domestic growth nor will it improve competition. These tariffs would merely punish a single foreign supplier all at the expense of U.S. businesses and consumers." -Jon Tilley

Commercial Metals Company

Irving, Texas

"We cannot continue to allow Chinese industrial plans, technology transfer policies, and cyber enabled theft, and illegal government subsidies cause further injury to U.S. manufacturers." -Billy Milligan

The Wooster Brush Company

Wooster, Ohio

"In other words, the tariffs will punish American brush manufacturers like Wooster that are trying to achieve the administration's goal of investing in U.S. manufacturing and jobs, but will encourage the foreign production of finished brushes." -Bill Fagert

Sea Eagle Boats

Jefferson, New York

"The proposed tariffs will not create a U.S. manufacturing industry because domestic production is simply too expensive for a recreational product intended for the middle class family. … Moving production out of China is difficult and time consuming." -John Hoge

GlobiTech

Sherman, Texas

"This tariff would jeopardize the employment of approximately 225 employees in high-tech manufacturing Sherman, Texas. Also, definitive plans are now at risk involving the construction of a $58 million expansion, which is part of a $114 million expansion, which would add 93 additional employees in North Texas." -S. George Alfonso

Duncan Textile

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

"The tariffs will have a snowball effect. As the prices increase, fewer mattresses will be made and sold, mattress manufacturing and distributing will decrease, stores will close and jobs will be lost. In the end these proposed tariffs are truly attacks on Americans." -Linda Duncan

MinkeeBlue

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

"A proposed 25 percent increase in tariffs would be devastating to my business. The added tariffs would increase my import cost approximately 42 to 47 percent. I'm not in a position to financially absorb the cost. This leaves me with one of two choices: pass the cost onto the consumer or close my business. Passing the cost onto the consumer is risky and doomed to fail over a period of time." -Sherrill Mosee

Ultra Wheel Company

Fullerton, California

"The 25 percent would put us out of business. We can't absorb that type of cost with our current profitability." -Friedrich Dobler

Arrowhead Engineered Products

Blaine, Minnesota

"In particular, additional duties would have a significant negative impact on our U.S. operations and result in a potential need to terminate U.S. employees and move those positions outside the U.S. operations to offset our product cost increases of these proposed additional tariffs." -James Wisnoski

BrightLine Bags

San Rafael, California

"The claim that these tariffs are necessary in the name of national security — that's the claim — in this category that premise is false. Gear bags are not a threat to national security. This is a political game being played with my company as the game piece." -Ross Bishop

Demdaco

Leawood, Kansas

"...many of our customers are brick and mortar mom-and-pop gift shops trying to navigate rapidly evolving retail changes. Any tariff pass-through costs from Demdaco could hurt them and our many other business partners up and down the supply chain, eventually affecting consumers directly." -Dave Kiersznowski

Leather Miracles

Hickory, North Carolina

"I appreciate the opportunity to be here and I would like to think that these are not punitive or just arbitrary. But our category seems to be like it was swept up into this crisis for no explicable reason." -David Mathison

Albaugh

Ankeny, Iowa

"According to our analysis, in general, we would have to raise prices anywhere from 17 to 72 percent to recover the impact of these tariffs. In some cases, even doubling prices would not mitigate the impact. … As a company that sells its products to hard-working farm families with limited budgets, Albaugh cannot raise its prices without hurting many of those farmers." -Stuart Feldstein

Ledvance

Wilmington, Massechussetts

"With the tariffs as proposed, purchasing components would be more expensive than buying finished light bulbs straight from China. The proposed tariffs would put our U.S. production at a significant disadvantage." -Jennifer Dolin