Despite the grueling work environment, high turnover rate, and growing concerns about leadership, White House staffers would still recommend the job to a friend

A White House gig isn't necessarily a ticket to a high salary. Reviewers gave the compensation and benefits a score of 2.9 out of five.

Writing on April 19, 2017, one anonymous employee wrote that, not only do White House employees receive "low pay," but there's also "little focus on professional development and personal growth."

And another earlier reviewer, a senior analyst and project manager, bemoaned bringing home "government pay in a pricey city" on July 20, 2016.

Then again, these Glassdoor reviews and ratings include those of both part-time staffers and interns; the latter group has historically been unpaid.

Meanwhile, other reviewers have praised "the full suite of standard employee benefits" that come with federal positions, as a former marketing communications worker wrote on April 13, 2015.

Overall, the White House's culture and values category obtained a 3.6 rating out of five. The value of service, in particular, is a common theme in these Glassdoor reviews.

"I was surrounded by professionals whose service-oriented values systems mirrored the one in which I had grown up," wrote an anonymous employee on July 3, 2014, during the Obama administration.

And, on February 16, 2018, an anonymous employee expressed appreciation for having "the opportunity to make a real difference in people's lives."

But the outlook for the White House seemed to sour a bit after January 20, 2017.

One reviewer referred to Trump as "a dumpster fire" on July 20, 2017, while another wrote on April 19, 2017 that they disapproved of the current president and that the workplace experience is "completely dependent" on the administration.

These negative reviews come from a small sample, but Trump has claimed to promote "conflict" and turnover in the past, Business Insider reported. What's more, the Trump administration has attracted controversy for reportedly having West Wing employees sign un-enforceable NDAs.

White House senior management earned a score of 3.9 out of 5 from Glassdoor reviews.

When it came to management, some reviewers spoke glowingly, like one communications special assistant who wrote that "management is an extraordinary group who watch out as much for subordinates and peers as they do executive leadership and POTUS" on November 11, 2016.

Many reviews, however, called for more respect and consideration to be shown to interns and lower level staffers.

"The entire management structure seemed inept at times," a former employee wrote on October 5, 2009. "Favoritism in promotion/hiring decisions without critical reflection on the overall performance of employees."

None of the Trump-era reviews have weighed in on how management at the White House has changed or stayed the same.

And when it comes to measuring the commander-in-chief's performance, it might be too early to call. Obama earned a perfect 100% approval rating, based on reviews from 40 staffers.

"The White House under the Obama administration has been a fantastic place to work," an anonymous employee wrote on November 12, 2016. "If your primary goals are impact, inspiration, and career opportunities, it's unparalleled."

So far, there's been less praise for his predecessor, but the sample of Trump-era reviewers is also far smaller. Trump currently has a 37% approval rating, based on feedback from 10 reviewers.

Additionally, five of the six reviewers who noted they had a "negative outlook" about the White House's future did so after the 2016 election.

The White House's top-rated Glassdoor category was career opportunities, coming in at 4.4 out of 5. And the White House's career opportunity rating has been on the rise since early 2017.

"You have tremendous work experience — it is the fulcrum of the global political stage — and opportunities to learn about how politics operates at the highest level, not to mention the prestige," wrote an anonymous employee on June 9, 2010.

Other reviewers wrote of gaining access to "powerful individuals" and "celebrities" and having "the opportunity to shape the future of the country."

And that sense of prestige was also reflected in a Trump-era review from December 6, 2017, in which a current employee described as "getting to know and being mentored by the most powerful people in the world early in my career" in order to become "a leader in my field."

So Trump may have been onto something when he said that "everyone wants to work at the White House."

If the reviews are any indication, people will continue to want to work at the White House regardless of the stress, high turnover rate at the top, and any perceived issues with leadership — or the sitting president of the United States.

"A friend described it best when she said working at the White House is like being in high school," an anonymous employee wrote on June 15, 2009. "It's great while it lasts, but you don't miss it (much) when its over. The pay is terrible, the stress is incredible, but the memories of working for the leader of the free world and helping support and defend the Constitution of the United States last a lifetime."

Do you have a story about your time working at the White House? Email acain@businessinsider.com.