25 US cities where housing is affordable, people work less, and there's plenty to do
25. Seattle, Washington
23 (TIE). Minneapolis, Minnesota
Percent of income spent on housing: 26.7%
Average weeks worked per year: 38.6
Entertainment density: 1.8%
23 (TIE). Austin, Texas
Percent of income spent on housing: 31.5%
Average weeks worked per year: 38.4
Entertainment density: 2%
21 (TIE). Raleigh, North Carolina
Percent of income spent on housing: 29.5%
Average weeks worked per year: 37.8
Entertainment density: 1.6%
21 (TIE). Louisville, Kentucky
Percent of income spent on housing: 24.2%
Average weeks worked per year: 36.2
Entertainment density: 1.7%
20. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Percent of income spent on housing: 22.9%
Average weeks worked per year: 35
Entertainment density: 1.7%
19. Scottsdale, Arizona
Percent of income spent on housing: 25.6%
Average weeks worked per year: 37.6
Entertainment density: 1.3%
18. Richmond, Virginia
Percent of income spent on housing: 27.8%
Average weeks worked per year: 33.4
Entertainment density: 1.8%
17. Durham, North Carolina
Percent of income spent on housing: 25.9%
Average weeks worked per year: 36.1
Entertainment density: 1.7%
16. St. Paul, Minnesota
Percent of income spent on housing: 29.3%
Average weeks worked per year: 36.5
Entertainment density: 1.8%
15. Honolulu, Hawaii
Percent of income spent on housing: 37.4%
Average weeks worked per year: 37.5
Entertainment density: 1.2%
14. Wichita, Kansas
Percent of income spent on housing: 24.6%
Average weeks worked per year: 35.5
Entertainment density: 1.4%
13. Corpus Christi, Texas
Percent of income spent on housing: 27.9%
Average weeks worked per year: 34.7
Entertainment density: 1.3%
12. Cincinnati, Ohio
Percent of income spent on housing: 22.4%
Average weeks worked per year: 36
Entertainment density: 1.5%
11. Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Percent of income spent on housing: 24.4%
Average weeks worked per year: 32.3
Entertainment density: 1.6%
10. Nashville, Tennessee
Percent of income spent on housing: 31.1%
Average weeks worked per year: 38
Entertainment density: 4.4%
9. Reno, Nevada
Percent of income spent on housing: 27.9%
Average weeks worked per year: 37.8
Entertainment density: 2%
8. Columbus, Ohio
Percent of income spent on housing: 27.6%
Average weeks worked per year: 36.6
Entertainment density: 1.3%
7. Lubbock, Texas
Percent of income spent on housing: 30.3%
Average weeks worked per year: 34.3
Entertainment density: 1.2%
6. Lexington, Kentucky
Percent of income spent on housing: 25.8%
Average weeks worked per year: 36.4
Entertainment density: 1.9%
5. Boise, Idaho
Percent of income spent on housing: 26.6%
Average weeks worked per year: 37.6
Entertainment density: 1.5%
4. Henderson, Nevada
Percent of income spent on housing: 29.1%
Average weeks worked per year: 35.4
Entertainment density: 2.4%
3. Omaha, Nebraska
Percent of income spent on housing: 26.6%
Average weeks worked per year: 38.1
Entertainment density: 1.7%
2. Lincoln, Nebraska
Percent of income spent on housing: 25.1%
Average weeks worked per year: 39.5
Entertainment density: 1.5%
1. Madison, Wisconsin
Percent of income spent on housing: 27.7%
Average weeks worked per year: 37.1
Entertainment density: 2.2%
Popular Right Now
Popular Keywords
Advertisement