In a landmark judgment,
Upholding the rights of individuals, a 5-judge bench led by India’s Chief Justice
The court has observed:
Bodily autonomy is individualistic. Expression of intimacy is part of right to privacy.- Judgment of CJI Misra & J Khanwilkar #Section377 #LGBT
— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) September 6, 2018 ]]>Majoritarianism in constitutionally untenable. Constitution is a dynamic document, having the primary objective of establishing a dynamic and inclusive society- Judgment of CJI Misra and J Khanwilkar #Section377 #LGBT
— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) September 6, 2018 ]]>#Section377 in Supreme Court: LGBT Community has same rights as of any ordinary citizen. Respect for each others rights, and others are supreme humanity. Criminalising gay sex is irrational and indefensible, observes CJI Dipak Misra. https://t.co/05ADSuh5cv
— ANI (@ANI) September 6, 2018 ]]>The
A five-person bench headed by India’s Chief Justice Dipak Misra pronounced its judgment following a hearing in July on a string of petitions that had challenged the law as unconstitutional that violated the fundamental rights of citizens including the right to equality and right to freedom and expression. The right to privacy verdict of the Supreme Court earlier this year is also likely to be a significant factor that will influence the court’s decision.
In 2013, India’s Supreme Court had overturned an earlier ruling by the
The Indian government which had been given the option of enacting legislation that would have scrapped this law, had left the decision to the “wisdom” of India’s Supreme Court.
The decision marks a key moment for both India’s Supreme Court as well as its outgoing Chief Justice Misra who will pass on reigns to Justice Ranjan Gogoi next month.
In 2001, Netherlands became the first country to recognise same sex marriages. Same sex marriages are now legally permitted in over 20 countries including Australia, the US, New Zealand, Germany, and Malta, among others.
Section 377
The section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is a colonial era law that criminalised sexual activities that are "against the order of nature” and was punishable with life imprisonment.
Specifically, the language of the 377 states that “Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.”
While the law has rarely been enforced, gay and civil right activists have long argued the law was used to harass members of India’s queer community.
The 377 itself traces its root to the Buggery Act of 1533, enacted during the reign of King Henry VIII that criminalised and sodomy and bestality.
Moment Of Pride
The decision has been hailed as a historic win for the LGBTQ rights in India and Twitter as abuzz with celebratory tweets from celebrities and politicians alike:
Historical judgment!!!! So proud today! Decriminalising homosexuality and abolishing #Section377 is a huge thumbs up for humanity and equal rights! The country gets its oxygen back! 👍👍👍💪💪💪🙏🙏🙏 pic.twitter.com/ZOXwKmKDp5
— Karan Johar (@karanjohar) September 6, 2018 ]]>So pleased to learn that the SupremeCourt has ruled against criminalising sexual acts in private. This decision vindicates my stand on Section 377& on exactly the same grounds of privacy, dignity &constitutional freedoms. It shames those BJP MPs who vociferously opposed me in LS.
— Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) September 6, 2018 ]]>RIP #Section377
The new sunshine of this day is that of a progressive India. Love all!
So pleased to learn that the SupremeCourt has ruled against criminalising sexual acts in private. This decision vindicates my stand on Section 377& on exactly the same grounds of privacy, dignity &constitutional freedoms. It shames those BJP MPs who vociferously opposed me in LS.
— Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) September 6, 2018 ]]>