+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Solar is the world's fastest growing source of renewable energy. Here's why one of Europe's largest hedge funds is betting on wind instead.

Jan 15, 2020, 23:34 IST
VestasPer Lekander, a partner at the hedge fund Lansdowne Partners, says he's betting on wind, even though he should be "more bullish on solar."
  • Lansdowne Partners is one of Europe's largest investment firms, with $1.2 billion allocated towards energy alone.
  • While solar is the fastest growing source of renewable energy, Per Lekander, who manages Lansdowne's energy fund, says he's betting on wind instead.
  • "I should probably be more bullish on solar, but I'm not," he told Business Insider. "I'm way more bullish on wind."
  • There's a good reason to trust him: His clean energy portfolio surged 37% last year, besting the broader stock market, according to an HSBC hedge fund report.
  • Click here to subscribe to Power Line, Business Insider's weekly clean-energy newsletter.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Over the next five years, global renewable power capacity is expected to double, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). Solar energy alone accounts for 60% of that projected growth.

That's why it's surprising to hear that Per Lekander, a partner at Lansdowne Partners - one of Europe's largest hedge funds - is placing big bets on wind energy over solar.

"I should probably be more bullish on solar, but I'm not," said Lekander, who's been with the firm since 2014. "I'm way more bullish on wind. I think it's my highest conviction."

Advertisement

Lekander declined to share detail about the firm's investments on the record, but he indicated that it has positions in wind companies overseas.

There might be a reason to trust his judgment: His $221 million long-only clean energy fund he manages surged 37% in 2019, besting the broader stock market, according to an HSBC hedge fund report.

So, why wind over solar?

Solar is a fragmented industry dominated by companies in China

Reuters/Kimberly WhiteSolar panels on a roof at Google headquarters in Mountain View, California

Solar is the fastest-growing renewable energy in the world, according to the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. In the US, it's projected to supply nearly half of all renewable energy by 2050, up from 11% in 2017.

Lekander doesn't deny the impending explosion of solar.

"I believe that solar is going to grow quicker than wind, at least for the next few years," he said.

It's easier to develop solar projects, relative to wind farms, he says. There's not as much NIMBYism - short for "Not in my backyard." Plus, solar is far cheaper than offshore wind, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency.

But Lekander says there are a few major drawbacks. For one, he says, Chinese companies have a huge share of the market in solar manufacturing. Solar energy is also a "fragmented" industry, he says.

Advertisement

"There are many, many players," he said. "I struggled to find companies which have really differentiated business models. I'm not saying I'm negative on solar - because the demand is just too strong - but it's a commodity business for now."

Then, there's wind.

The wind industry is older and more consolidated

VestasWind turbines in Macarthur, Australia

The first electricity-generating wind turbine was built in the late 1800s. Sure, it probably looked nothing like the mammoth turbines of today, but it supports Lekander's point: The wind industry is old, and that's given it more time to consolidate.

Advertisement

"You're getting into industry consolidation, with a few leading players, and you're really starting to have differentiated business models," Lekander said.

In 2018, just four manufacturers deployed nearly 60% of the turbines: Vestas, Goldwind, GE, and Siemens Gamesa, according to Bloomberg NEF.

Plus, wind energy is better positioned for recurring profits, Lekander says, because unlike solar panels, wind turbines need to be regularly serviced.

"There is recurring business, which is not that easy to accomplish," he said.

Between onshore vs. offshore wind, Lekander's bets are on offshore, with a five-year outlook, because wind at sea often avoids the NIMBY problem, he says, and "you can have monstrously big turbines."

Advertisement

No matter the type of energy, however, Lekander says renewables are bound to explode.

"Our view is that this is going to go way further than people think," he said. "The speed is just massively accelerating."

This story is part of Business Insider's expanding coverage of clean energy. Do you have a tip about startups or investment firms in the industry? Please contact this reporter at bjones@businessinsider.com or through the confidential messaging app Signal at 646-768-1657.

Featured Digital Health Articles:
- Telehealth Industry: Benefits, Services & Examples
- Value-Based Care Model: Pay-for-Performance Healthcare
- Senior Care & Assisted Living Market Trends
- Smart Medical Devices: Wearable Tech in Healthcare
- AI in Healthcare
- Remote Patient Monitoring Industry: Devices & Market Trends

Advertisement

NOW WATCH: The extreme life of a sloth

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article