+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Sci-fi legend Neal Stephenson says it's getting harder and harder to predict the future

Sep 28, 2015, 18:58 IST

Madeleine Ball / flickr

Earlier this year, the science fiction legend Neal Stephenson published his fourteenth (!) novel, "Seveneves."

Advertisement

In it, the moon splits into seven pieces. Global destruction ensues, as does an adventure with the fate of the human species at stake.

Stephenson's previous titles include "Cryptonomicon," "Anathem," and "Snow Crash," all of which are beloved by nerds the world over.

As one of those nerds, I was stoked to talk to Stephenson, one the best sci-fi writers alive.

One question I was looking forward to asking, given the forward-facing nature of his writing: What do you think is going to happen to human society in the near future?

Advertisement

Stephenson wasn't having it. He explained that he doesn't wake up in the morning looking forward to a day of trying to predict the future. While working in the future is a formal con strait of the genre, he explained, it's not the focus of the writing; the point is simply to tell good stories.

Nonetheless, Stephen's work as been alarmingly predictive of what's come to pass. The most obvious case is "Snow Crash," his notable 1992 novel. A 2013 Wall Street Journal story detailed how big data, virtual worlds, wearable tech, and even the world wide web itself were all forecasted by Stephenson's "eerily prophetic" classic. His 2011 thriller "Reamde" suggests a privacy-free future uncomfortably close to Edward Snowden's assertion that "A child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all?."

"We are living in Neal Stephenson's story," venture capitalist Bijan Sabet told the Journal.

But that's not what he's after.

"I didn't predict the Internet or ubiquitous mobile devices, I didn't predict cloud computing," he tells Tech Insider, "and I think that things are less predictable now."

Advertisement

Yuri Samoilov / Flickr

How so?

"The instruments of change are more widely distributed among a larger number of people," he explains.

"When the process of innovation is centralized and the tools that are used in innovation are concentrated in the hands of General Electric, Princeton University, and a few other big players," he says, "then it's inherently a little bit easier to figure out what they're working on and what might emerge from it."

But today, innovation is far from centralized. It's distributed all over the place.

The Economist reports that today about half of the adults on the planet have smartphones. By 2020, it'll be 80%. And the cost of transferring a megabyte of data was about $8 back in 2005, but now it's a few cents.

Advertisement

That means data - and the ability to process it - is more mobile, and shared between more people, than ever before. The tools of transformation aren't held by a few privileged hands; they're all over the world, and increasingly so.

"In a situation where vast numbers of people in a lot of different countries have got access to very powerful and flexible tools, then trying to predict or anticipate what those people are going to come up with doesn't seem like a productive undertaking," Stephenson says.

Nonetheless, Stephenson has been one of the foremost sci-fi futurists. He inspired the "Hieroglyph Project," which encourages sci-fi writers to explore hopeful scenarios. In a 2011 essay, Stephen wrote that such imagination can inspire people to work toward shared - though still hypothetical - goals, like the robots imagined by Isaac Asimov, the rockets imagined by Robert Heinlein, or the cyberspace imagined by Wiliam Gibson.

Good science fiction "supplies a plausible, fully thought-out picture of an alternate reality in which some sort of compelling innovation has taken place," Stephenson wrote. "A good [science-fiction] universe has a coherence and internal logic that makes sense to scientists and engineers ... such icons serve as hieroglyphs - simple, recognizable symbols on whose significance everyone agrees."

NOW WATCH: 4 ways to stay awake without caffeine

Please enable Javascript to watch this video
You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article