AP
The limited strike would seemingly be a response to allegations that the Syrian government used chemical weapons on its own people before dawn on August 21. Hundreds were killed and thousands suffered "neurotoxic symptoms."
The design of the potential attack implies sending a message to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad without becoming entrenched in the 29-month conflict.
On Monday U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said: "There is a reason why President Obama has made clear to the Assad regime that this international norm [of chemical weapons use] cannot be violated without consequences."
Reuters reports that the West has told the opposition to expect a strike "within days." The opposition has denied the report.
The Post notes that the targets would not be directly related to
(On May 5 Israeli jets targeted the Syrian military's fortress on Qasioun Mountain, which overlooks the capital, in a strike that was seen as a message to Iran.)
The decision for the strikes is reportedly contingent on an intelligence assessment of Syrian government culpability in last week’s alleged chemical attack, consultation with allies and Congress, and a consideration of justification under international law.
Fox News confirmed that four U.S. Navy destroyers are being pre-positioned in the nearby Mediterranean Sea, and on Monday evening CNN reported that a strike could take place "within hours" were Obama to give the order.
Reuters claims Western states have warned #Syria opposition to expect strikes within days - would aim to prevent further CW use. #Damascus
— Charles Lister (@Charles_Lister) August 27, 2013
Here's a look, courtesy of the Institute of The Study of War, at the likely weapons that would be used in a cruise missile strike, namely Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles (TLAM):
Institute of the Study of War
Institute of the Study of War