+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

The Trump administration is almost certainly going to get off the hook despite making the White House a COVID hotspot and an unsafe workplace

Oct 8, 2020, 20:50 IST
Business Insider
U.S. President Donald Trump removes his mask upon return to the White House from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on October 05, 2020 in Washington, DC.Win McNamee/Getty
  • Following the lead of the boss — President Trump — basic safety COVID-19 protocols were not only ignored by the staff of the White House, they were ridiculed.
  • Now the White House is a COVID hotspot and an unsafe workplace.
  • There was speculation that the White House could be held criminally or civilly liable, but both are unlikely.
  • The government holds itself to a lower standard for workplace safety standards than it does for private companies. And the Trump administration has gutted the agency that holds employers accountable.
  • Trump is back in the Oval Office despite still being infected with COVID, putting everyone in that building at risk.
  • This is an opinion column. The thoughts expressed are those of the author.
Advertisement

The White House is an unsafe work environment.

Over the past few months, following the lead of the boss — President Trump — basic safety COVID-19 protocols were not only ignored by the staff of the White House, they were ridiculed.

Masks were rarely worn, and often mocked or discouraged. Consistent social distancing among senior staffers didn't happen, either. Crowded meetings in close quarters continued.

Once COVID ran rampant through the building, accurate and up-to-date information from the administration was nowhere to be found, but press secretary Kayleigh McEnany did manage to give some briefings to the assembled press corps, including a short one last Thursday where she didn't wear a mask.

McEnany tested positive for the virus three days later.

Advertisement

McEnany tweeted that she "definitively had no knowledge" that Hope Hicks had tested positive for COVID earlier that day, but the conflicting and confusing timelines given from the White House through the debacle made some reporters question the statement.

And those reporters who McEnany spoke to are justifiably livid. But they've recognized that the Trump White House is a place that even seven months into the pandemic doesn't take it seriously.

"No masks on planes. Inconsistent testing. Every life reliant on a rapid testing system that doesn't really work. And they have mocked and attacked us for pointing that out repeatedly," one White House reporter told CNN.

"Because of this recklessness we are more worried than ever about our health," another reporter said.

White House staffers are also talking about how terrified they are of working in an embarrassingly reckless environment.

Advertisement

These reporters and staffers would have a number of options if they were compelled to work in a corporate environment with such haphazard safety protocols. But because it's the White House, there's little they can do to stand up for themselves and hold the Trump administration accountable. And because Trump is president, the watchdogs in charge of protecting workers' safety are nowhere to be found.

A dangerous workplace, limited recourse

Some hot legal takes popped up online speculating on whether the White House, or particular senior staffers, could be declared criminally negligent for putting other White House staffers and reporters in a dangerous workplace.

Deborah Berkowitz, a former senior policy adviser for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) during the Obama administration, doesn't think that scenario is likely to play out.

"Sadly, workers have few rights here to hold employers accountable in this administration," Berkowitz said. "The White House, like other employers who flagrantly violate CDC guidelines, have truly nothing to fear."

Berkowitz — currently the Worker Health and Safety Program Director at the National Employment Law Project — added: "White House employees could file a complaint with OSHA to request an onsite inspection. However, during the pandemic OSHA has refused to issue any specific requirements that employers must comply with to protect workers."

Advertisement

During the Trump administration, Berkowitz said, "the federal agency in charge of protecting workers in this Administration is missing in action" and conducting very few onsite workplace inspections.

Alan Lescht, a DC-based attorney who specializes in employment and labor law, said reporters might be able to claim the White House was negligent, though the bar to prove negligence is quite high. As far as filing a claim for an unsafe work environment, Lescht said because reporters are "guests" of the White House, their only recourse is to file a workers' compensation claim against the news outlets that assigned them to an unsafe environment. In this case, the workplace is the White House.

Scott Oswald, an attorney who represents employees and whistleblowers at the Washington, DC-based firm The Employment Law Group, said that criminal negligence is pretty much off the table because it doesn't apply to federal workplaces.

"The government has seen fit to hold private employers to a different standard than it holds itself. At least at least from a criminal standpoint," Oswald said.

Because the White House is a federal building, the labor guidelines and worker protections of the District of Columbia don't apply. And in an ironic twist, the current administration may have made it harder for their employees to seek recourse as it has been rolling back workers protections and gutted OSHA for almost the past four years.

Advertisement

However, there's a small window available for a civil course of action, but only for some.

White House staffers, but not reporters, might be able to hold the White House liable in civil court "if it could be shown that the president was intentionally placing reporters and others in an unsafe environment that he knew what he was doing was a violation of safety practices," Oswald said.

As for the White House reporters, there's not much they can do. In what could be a sign of things to come, BuzzFeed News on Wednesday pulled its White House reporter Kadia Goba, citing concerns for her safety in a COVID hot zone. BuzzFeed News' editor in chief Mark Schoofs tweeted: "We will not put our reporters at needless risk of getting a deadly disease — and neither should anyone else."

The White House and Capitol Hill have flouted the DC government's COVID guidelines, and have since become the source points of a surge in DC-area COVID infections.

Trump is back in the Oval Office despite still being infected with COVID, putting everyone in that building at risk.

Advertisement

But don't expect the federal government to hold itself to basic workplace safety standards. And good luck to anyone in whose description includes "must work inside the White House."

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article