+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

House Republican who abandoned re-election over his support for an assault weapons ban says party 'orthodoxy' is not 'good for the functioning of our democracy'

Jun 18, 2022, 01:22 IST
Business Insider
Republican Rep. Chris Jacobs of New York at the Capitol Hill Club in Washington on Wednesday, April 27, 2022.Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images
  • Rep. Chris Jacobs abandoned re-election after facing backlash for changing his mind about gun control.
  • Following the Buffalo mass shooting, he said he would support an assault weapons ban if it came to the floor.
Advertisement

Republican Rep. Chris Jacobs of New York — who abandoned an otherwise safe re-election campaign after he came out in support of greater restrictions on guns — is warning about the effects of political polarization on American democracy.

"I think we have a real problem in the party – both parties – right now," Jacobs told Politico. "If you're not stuck to that orthodoxy in either party, you can't do it. And I just don't think that's good for the functioning of our democracy."

In the wake of a mass shooting at a grocery store in Buffalo motivated by white supremacy, Jacobs said at a press conference that he would vote for an assault weapons ban.

"I want to be completely transparent on where I am in Congress," he said. "If an assault weapons ban bill came to the floor that would ban something like an AR-15, I would vote for it."

Following both the Buffalo shooting and a mass shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas that left 19 children and two teachers dead, House Democrats introduced a slew of new gun control measures, though they did not include an assault weapons ban. Most House Republicans voted against the measures after party leadership sent a memo to rank-and-file members that included talking points from the National Rifle Association opposing the reforms.

Advertisement

But Jacobs was one of five House Republicans who voted for a so-called "red flag" law that would allows courts to withhold gun purchases for individuals who pose a threat to themselves or others, and he was among ten Republicans who voted to raise the purchasing age for semi-automatic weapons from 18 to 21.

"I wanted to be honest. I could have walked through the primary, which I was going to win and not say anything, and then just said, 'Oh, by the way, I've changed my position on this,'" Jacobs also told Politico.

But Jacobs instead opted not to run for re-election, saying he didn't want to see a "negative" campaign over the issue.

"It would be an incredibly divisive election for both the Republican Party and the people of the 23rd District," he said at a press conference announcing his decision. "The last thing we need is an incredibly negative half-truth filled media attack funded by millions of dollars of special interest money coming into our community around this issue of guns and gun violence and gun control."

That came after backlash from local Republicans over his comments on an assault weapons ban.

Advertisement

Donald Trump Jr. said that Jacobs "already caved to the gun-grabbers" by announcing his support for the measure. "He can't resist getting a few glowing headlines from the mainstream media," he said.

And Erie County Conservative Party Chair Ralph Lorigo told the New York Times that Jacobs "understood that this was potentially political suicide."

"His heart is in a good place, but he's wrong in his thinking as far as we are concerned," said Lorigo. "This quick jump that all of the sudden it's the gun that kills people as opposed to the person is certainly not 100 percent true."

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article