+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

'A cloud of doubt hangs over the FBI's objectivity': Senate grills FBI Director James Comey on Clinton and Russia probes

Aug 25, 2024, 16:02 IST
Kevin Lamarque/ReutersFBI Director James Comey prepares to testify before a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on "Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation" on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 3, 2017.The Senate Judiciary Committee grilled FBI Director James Comey on Wednesday about his handling of the investigations into Hillary Clinton's email server and Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, the committee's chairman, used his opening statement to assert that there is still no proof that any collusion occurred between President Donald Trump's campaign team and Russian officials, and that "all this speculation about collusion" is coming from the explosive but unverified Trump-Russia dossier that is "spinning wild conspiracy theories."

"The public needs to know what role the dossier has played, and where it came from," Grassley said. "And whether there was anything improper going on between the Trump campaign and the Russians, or whether these allegations are just a partisan smear campaign that manipulated our government into chasing a conspiracy theory."

Grassley then pivoted to Comey's handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server, questioning why he did not recommend that criminal charges be brought against her and alleging that "a cloud of doubt hangs over the FBI's objectivity."

Advertisement

Leaks and 'unmasking'

Later, Grassley grilled Comey on leaks from the intelligence community to the press about the FBI's probe into Trump's Russia ties. The chairman asked Comey if he had ever been an "anonymous source," or authorized anyone at the bureau to be an anonymous source, to news outlets relating to stories about Trump and Russia. Comey replied that he had not.

"Is there any investigation into the leaks of classified information related to Mr. Trump and his associates?" Grassley asked.

Comey replied that "where there is a leak of classified information, the FBI makes a referral to the Justice Department" regarding whether to open an investigation. But he said he would not confirm whether such an investigation has been opened because he has not been authorized to do so.

Later, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham pivoted back to the FBI's investigation into Russia's election interference, asking Comey whether he ever spoke with former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates about her concerns that former national security adviser Michael Flynn could be suspectible to Russian blackmail.

Comey replied that he had spoken with Yates about her concerns about Michael Flynn but would not elaborate further on the content of their conversation.

Advertisement

Yates, then the acting attorney general, reportedly traveled to the White House in late January to warn administration officials that Flynn had been misleading Vice President Mike Pence about his conversations with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, which she said made him vulnerable to being blackmailed by Russia.

Graham then asked whether Comey was "aware of any request" by the Obama administration to "unmask" the identities of American citizens who had been caught up in the incidental surveillance of monitored foreign agents operating on US soil. Comey replied that he was "not aware" of any such requests, but that those requests are not uncommon.

"I did it just this week," Comey said.

'It makes me mildly nauseous to think that we had some kind of impact on the election'

Democrats, meanwhile, argued that questions about the FBI's objectivity came not from its conclusion that she should not be charged with a crime, but from Comey's decision to publicly revisit the email investigation 11 days before the election. The bureau did not disclose, however, the investigation that it had opened into Trump and his associates' ties to Russia three months earlier.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the committee's ranking Democrat, said that "before voters went to the polls, they had been inundated" with press coverage and statements from Comey about the Clinton email investigation. Comey announced he would revisit the probe on October 28, "unprompted, and without knowing whether a single email" found by the FBI on former Rep. Anthony Weiner's laptop "warranted a new investigation."

Advertisement

(On October 28, Comey wrote a letter to Congress saying that the FBI had learned of "the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent" to the investigation into Clinton's email server, which had originally been closed in July. The emails were discovered as the FBI was examining former Rep. Anthony Weiner's laptop, which he shared with his wife, Huma Abedin, a top Clinton aide. Weiner had been accused of exchanging sexually explicit texts with a 15-year-old girl. Comey's letter was promptly released by Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the chair of the House Oversight Committee, and dominated the headlines of major media outlets in the days leading up to the election.)

Amid the flurry of Clinton news, Feinstein said, the FBI "was noticeably silent about the investigation into the Trump campaign and Russian interference in the US election," and "summarily refused to even acknowledge the existence of any investigation."

"It's still very unclear why the FBI's treatment of these two investigations was so dramatically different," Feinstein said. "With the Clinton email investigation, its' been said that 'exceptional circumstances' ... required public comment from the FBI. However, I can't imagine how an unprecedented, big, bold, hacking interference in our election by the Russian government did not also present exceptional circumstances."

Comey then gave a lengthy explanation for his decision, which he said was a choice between a "really bad" option to disclose the re-opened investigation, and a "catastrophic" option to conceal it from Congress:

This is a developing post.

Advertisement

NOW WATCH: 'OJ had me shook': A Georgetown professor reveals what it was like to talk to OJ Simpson after bashing him on national television

Please enable Javascript to watch this video
You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article